TCHR5009 THEORY TO PRACTICE EDUCATION  AND CARE FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS

TCHR5009 THEORY TO PRACTICE EDUCATION  AND CARE FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS

Summary

TitleAssessmentTask1:ProfessionalPhilosophyandCriticalReflection
TypeReport
DueDateMonday21stJuly2025@11:59pmAEST(Week 3)
Length1500words
Weighting50%
Academic Integrity

Inthisassessmenttask,theuseofGenAIisallowedbutlimited.

YoumayonlyuseGenAItohelpguideyouintheprocessofcompletingyourassessmentwork. Think of it as a tool. A quick way to access information or an AI tutor to help answer your questions. So, you can use GenAI to help guide your research, ask questions to help to clarify your understanding, brainstorm preliminary ideas, get feedback on your ideas and clarify concepts. Remember, just as if you Googled something, you still need to evaluate the information to determine its accuracy and relevance. GenAI can produce biased and false information. You must find scholarly sources to support any of the ideas generated. This is a requirement for this assessment.

 

You cannot include content generated by AI in your assessment (even if you have paraphrased, summarised or quoted the output). You are only permitted to use Grammarly Premium to help edit and improve the quality ofyour written work. If you choose to use this, youmustprovideadraftofyourtaskbeforeitwas enteredintoGrammarly.Attachyourdraft as an appendix.

IfyouopttouseGenAIasdefinedasacceptableforthisassessment,youmustkeepevidence of how it was used and acknowledge how you used it in the process of completing your assessment appropriately. To help understand what to do, consult the Learning Zone’s resources.

If you use GenAI tools in your assessment task beyond the acceptable limits, it may result in an academicintegritybreachagainstyouasdescribedinthe StudentAcademicandNon-Academic

MisconductRules,Section3.

Submission

Submission of your assessment is via TURNITIN. The submission link can be found in the AssessmentTasksandSubmission  TabintheBlackboardsite.OnlyWorddocumentswill be accepted.

 

Pleasenote:

  • ItisYOURresponsibilitytoensurethatyouhavesubmittedthecorrectfileand the FINAL version of your assessment for marking BEFORE the due date/time. The document that is submitted to the final submission link, is the documentthat will be marked. Do not upload any drafts to the final submission link.
  • AfteryouhavefollowedtheTurnitinsubmissionitisessentialyoudownload the

    DigitalReceipt.


 

  
 


 

 

 
  • If you have any difficulty submitting your assignment, please contact TechnologyServicesandmakesurethatyoulogajobwiththemsoyouhaveevidenceofyour attemptedsubmission.Toavoidanylast-minuteproblems,makesureyousubmit well before 11:59pm on the due date.

 

Rationale

This task allows students to reflect on theoretical perspectives and practice to develop a professional philosophy for teaching infants and toddlers. By engaging with topics such as attachment, routines, and responsive environments, students will connect research and theory to their beliefs about quality early childhoodlearning.Throughcriticalreflection,studentswill explorehowtheirphilosophymaybe translatedto practice, identify potential challenges and propose strategies for overcoming them.

 

TaskDescription

ThisreportiscomprisedoftwotasksandshouldbepresentedinONE Worddocument.PDFdocumentswill not be accepted.

Part1-ProfessionalPhilosophyStatement(750words)

 

Writeaprofessionalphilosophystatement outliningyourbeliefs,valuesandapproachtoworkingwithinfants and toddlers in an early childhood education and care setting.

Yourstatementshould focusonatleastthree(3)keyaspectsofinfantandtoddlerlearning,developmentand health and safety such as:

  • Relationshipsandattachment
  • Qualityinearlychildhoodsettings
  • Braindevelopment
  • Routines
  • Physicalandhumanenvironments

(Youmayalsoincludeothertopicsthatareimportanttoyou.)

Youmustsupportyourphilosophywithreferenceto:

  • Theunittext:Programplanningforinfantsandtoddlers(3rded)
  • TheEarlyYearsLearningFramework(V2.0)
  • TheNationalQualityStandard
  • Relevantearlychildhoodacademicliterature

 

Part2-CriticalReflection(750words)

 

Criticallyreflectonyourprofessionalphilosophyandidentifythree(3)potentialchallengesyoumayfacewhen puttingitintopractice. Foreachchallenge,youmust1)Explainwhyitmayarise,and2)Describehowyouplan to overcome it, using strategies informed by theory, policy/frameworks and your professional values.

 

Youmustsupportyourcriticalreflectionwithreferenceto:

  • Theunittext:Programplanningforinfantsandtoddlers(3rded)
  • TheEarlyYearsLearningFramework(V2.0)
  • TheNationalQualityStandard
  • Relevantearlychildhoodacademicliterature Follow the steps to complete the task:


 

  • CreateanewWordDocumentandsaveitwithyoursurnameandinitialsandtheassessmenttask’s

name.E.g:MillsA_assessment1_report_finalcopy

  • Downloadthecoverpagefromtheunitsite,fillinthedetails,andcopyittothefirstpageofyour assessment. Ensure you complete the GenAI acknowledgement.
  • Completeprofessionalphilosophy(750words)andcriticalreflection(750words)
  • CompleteonereferencelistattheendoftheWorddocument.
  • Checkthedraftwiththedraftcheckerontheunitsite.Makeanychangesasneeded.
  • Oncecomplete,submitthefinaltaskviatheTurnitinlinkintheAssessmentandSubmissionsectionof the unit site.
  • Downloadthedigitalreceiptforproofofsubmission.

 

Get Plagiarism free Assignment help from Punjab Assignment Help

 

Referencing

APA7threferencingformatisrequiredwithaminimumof8references.Therequiredsourcesarelistedabove.

Online  Assignment help in Australia

HelpfulResources

  • AustralianChildren’sEducation&CareQualityAuthority(n.d.). Developmentalmilestonesandthe Early Years Learning Framework and the National Quality Standards.
  • AustralianChildren’sEducation&CareQualityAuthority.(2022).Thenationalqualitystandard.

    https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard

  • AustralianGovernmentDepartmentofEducation.(2022) Belonging,beingandbecoming:Theearly years learning framework for Australia (V2.0).
  • Sims,M.,&Hutchins,T.(2020).Programplanningforinfantsandtoddlers(3rded).PademelonPress.

 

TaskSubmission

Assessments should be submitted using the Turnitin link on the Assessments Tasks & Submission section on the Blackboard site. Only Microsoft Word documents submitted via the Turnitin portal on Blackboard will be accepted. Assessment tasks emailed to unit staff will not be accepted. The Word document that is submitted tothefinalsubmissionlinkwillbemarked. Youmustlabelyoursubmissionwithyoursurnameandinitialsand the assessment task's name.

 

AcademicIntegrity

AtSouthernCrossUniversityacademicintegritymeansbehavingwiththevaluesofhonesty,fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility, and respect in relation to academic work.

The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic, and consistentapproachtoaddressingacademicintegrityacrosstheentire University.Formoreinformation,see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework

NOTE:AcademicIntegritybreachesinclude poorreferencing,notidentifyingdirectquotationscorrectly,close paraphrasing, plagiarism, recycling, misrepresentation, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and fabricating information.

 

SpecialConsideration

Studentswishingtorequestspecialconsiderationtoextendtheduedateofanassessmenttaskmustsubmita Request for Special Consideration form via their MyEnrolment page as early as possible and prior to the original due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.

PleaserefertotheSpecialConsiderationsectionofPolicy https://policies.scu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=140


 

LateSubmissions&Penalties

Exceptwhenspecialconsiderationisawarded,latesubmissionofassessmenttaskswillautomatically leadto the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be incurred as soon as the deadline is reached.

  • apenaltyof5%oftheavailablemarkswillbedeductedfromtheactualmarkatoneminuteafter the time listed in the due date
  • afurtherpenaltyof5%oftheavailablemarkwillbedeductedfromtheactualmarkachievedon

eachsubsequentcalendardayuntilthemarkreacheszero.” Please refer to the Late Submission & Penalties section of Policy https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255

Grades&Feedback

AssessmentsthathavebeensubmittedbytheduedatewillreceiveanSCUgrade.Gradesandfeedbackwillbe posted to the ‘Grades and Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow 7-10 days for marks to be posted.


 

 Assessment1:ReportMARKINGRUBRIC
CriteriaHighDistinctionDistinctionCreditPassMarginalFailFail

Task1: Professional

Philosophy(35%)Articulation of professionalphilosophyforworkingwithinfants and toddlers thatincludes key ideas aboutlearning,development,andhealth and safety.

Professionalphilosophyis

exceptionally clear, insightfuland personalised, and clearlydemonstratesbeliefsandvaluesrelated to working with infantsand toddlers. It shows a deepunderstanding of infant andtoddlerslearning,development,and health and safety.

Professionalphilosophyiswell-

developed and clearly writtenand demonstrates beliefs andvalues related to working withinfants and toddlers. Itdemonstrates a strongunderstanding of infant andtoddlerlearning,development,and health and safety.

Professionalphilosophyis

clearly expressed and includesrelevant content about infantand toddler learning,development, and health andsafety. Some aspects of thephilosophy may beunderdevelopedortoogeneral.

Professionalphilosophyis

adequately written but isgeneral or descriptive. Includessome relevant content aboutinfant and toddler learning,developing, and health andsafetybutlacksdepthorclarity.

Professionalphilosophyis

unclear, or overly vague. Itshowslittleunderstandingofinfant and toddler learning,development, or health andsafety.

Professionalphilosophyis

unclear,inappropriateorvague.It shows no understanding ofinfant and toddler learning,development, or health andsafety.

Task2:Criticalreflection

(35%)

Critical reflection onphilosophyandimplementationchallenges,with informed strategies.

Providesahighlyinsightful,

well-structured, and criticallyreflective response. Eachchallenge is clearly identifiedand deeply analysed, showingsophisticatedunderstandingofinfant and toddler practice.

Strategies to overcomechallenges are highly relevantand clearly justified.Thereflection shows strongalignmentbetweenphilosophy

andpractice.

Providesathoughtfuland well-

organised reflection. Eachchallenge is clearly identified.Strategies are relevant andjustified.Thereflectionshowsastronglinkbetweenphilosophyandpractice.

Providesaclearandgenerally

well-structuredreflection.Challenges are identified andexplained with some depth,and strategies are mostlyappropriate.Reflectionmaybemore descriptive thananalytical but still shows agood understanding of thephilosophy-to-practicelink.

Provides a basic reflectionwithlimitedcriticalanalysis.Challenges may besuperficially explained orgeneralised. Strategies areincluded but may be vague,underdeveloped or lackjustification. Limited linkbetween philosophy andpractice.

Reflectionispoorlystructured

orlacksclarity.Challengesareunderdeveloped,incomplete,or only partly relevant.

Strategiesareunclearorminimallyjustified.

Demonstratesminimalcriticalthinking and lacks clarity inlinkingphilosophytopractice.

Reflectionisunclear,

disorganised or missing keyelements. Challenges are notidentified or are irrelevant.Strategies are absent,inappropriate or unjustified.No understanding of howphilosophyrelatestopractice.

Useofsettext,theEYLFV2.0, NQS, academicliterature(20%)

Demonstratesoutstanding

integrationofthe settext, EYLFV2.0, NQS, and a wide range ofhigh-quality, current andrelevant academic literature.Sources are seamlesslyembedded to strengthen boththeprofessionalphilosophyandcriticalreflection.

Demonstratesstronguseofthe

set text, EYLF V2.0, NQS, andrelevant academic literature.Some integration may lackdepthorclarity,butoverall,theuse of sources enhances theprofessional philosophy andcriticalreflection.

Demonstratesadequateuseof

set text, EYLF V2.0, NQS andrelevant academic literature.Support for ideas is generallyrelevant but may bedescriptive or inconsistentlyapplied.Theremaybelimitedevidence of wider reading.

Demonstratesbasicuseoftheset text, EYLF V2.0, NQS andacademic literature but maybe limited in relevance ordepth.

Limiteduseofsettext,the

EYLFV2.0,NQS.Integrationofliterature is minimal orinappropriate.

Noorminimaluseofthe

requiredsettext,EYLF,NQS,or academic literature.

AcademicLiteracy

(10%)

DisplayedoutstandingAcademicLiteracy, including all of thefollowing: Correct word count(+/- 10%), correct writingconventions,correctlyformatted APA7th in-textcitations and reference list.DisplayedcomprehensiveAcademicLiteracy,includingallor most of the following:Correct word count (+/- 10%),correct writing conventions,correctly formatted APA7th in-textcitationsandreferencelist.Displayed solid AcademicLiteracy,includingsomeormostof the following: Correct wordcount (+/- 10%), correct writingconventions,correctlyformatted APA7th in-textcitations reference list.DisplayedsatisfactoryAcademicLiteracy, including some of thefollowing: Correct word count(+/- 10%), correct writingconventions,correctlyformatted APA7th in-textcitations and reference list.Limited Academic Literacy.Mostly incorrect word count,writingconventionsandAPA7thin-text citations and referencelist.Failed to display satisfactoryAcademic Literacy. Incorrectwordcount,incorrectwritingconventions,incorrectlyformatted APA7th in-textcitations and reference list.



 

  
 


 

  
 


 

DescriptionofSCUGrades

High Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctiveinsightandabilityinresearching,analysingandapplyingrelevantskillsandconcepts,andshows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctiveinsightandabilityinresearching,analysingandapplyingrelevantskillsandconcepts,andshowsa well-developedabilitytosynthesise,integrateandevaluateknowledge.Thestudent’sperformancecouldbe described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Credit:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student’sperformancecouldbedescribedascompetentinrelationtothelearningrequirementsspecified.

Pass:

Thestudent’sperformancesatisfiesallofthebasiclearningrequirementsspecifiedandprovidesasoundbasis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Fail:

Thestudent’sperformancefailstosatisfythelearningrequirementsspecified

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.