Assessment 1 Information
| Subject Code: | TECH8000 |
| Subject Name: | IT Capstone |
| Assessment Title: | Identifying research problem |
| Assessment Type: | Annotated Bibliography |
| Word Count: | 1500 Words(+/-10%) |
| Weighting: | 30% |
| Total Marks: | 30 |
| Submission: | Via My KBS |
| Due Date: | Week 4 |
This assessment is to be completed individually . In this assessment, you will compile an Introduction and an notated bibliography for the IT research problem that you have identified in the client’s business. An annotated bibliography is a document you prepare to study and analyse relevant papers. The Annotated Bibliography will include detailed citations, summaries, relevance, evaluations, and reflections for each source, helping to study and analyse relevant papers. It helps you to identify the research challenges and sub-questions you will address in the future assessments.
Please note:Case studies have been provided to you for five different domains. You need to pick one domain. You will select one case study in each domain. You will be required to use the same case study and the identified problem for all three assessments in this subject.
Online Assignment Help in Australia
In this assessment, students will develop a comprehensive annotated bibliography focused on the complex IT problem in the case study (provided in a separate document). This annotated bibliography will include detailed summaries and analysis of relevant papers to understand the current state of research and methodologies related to the problem. Additionally, you are required to identify specific research problem(s) that you will address throughout the course. These research problems will be drawn from the insights gained during the creation of the annotated bibliography, ensuring that you have a clear and well-defined research agenda. By thoroughly analysing existing literature, you will be better equipped to propose innovative solutions and contribute to the field of IT.
This assessment aims to achieve the following subject learning outcomes:
Get Plagiarism free Assignment help from Punjab Assignment Help
| LO1 | Design a plan for research that aims to identify the causes and potential solutions of a complex IT problem for a client. |
Students must conduct scholarly research and include appropriate references. You should use at least ten (10) sources of information and reference these in accordance with any acceptable referencing style.These may include websites, social media platforms, industry reports, census data, journal articles, conference proceedings and newspaper articles. These references should be presented as in-text citations and a referencing list at the end of your assessment in the form of Bibliography (not included in the word limit). Avoid using Wikipedia and other similar sites. Ensure thatyouuseonlyarticlespublishedwithinthepastsevenyears.YoumustsubmityourreportinWord document. The report should be well-structured and organised. It should include the following details:
2).ConductcomparativeresearchtounderstandhowothercompanieshaveaddressedsimilarIT challenges and formulate relevant research questions based on your findings.
Please refer to the assessment marking guide for assistance in completing all the assessment criteria.
Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
Please read the policy to learn the answers to these questions:
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
 |
Penalties may be applied for assessment submissions that exceed prescribed limits.
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the My KBS Academic Success Centre page. Further details can be accessed at https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
All assessments including draft copies must be written and submitted in English. The use of translation tools is not permitted.
Please see the level of Generative AI that this assessment has been designed to accept:
Traffic Light |
Amount of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) usage |
Evidence Required | This ass ess men t (✓) |
Level 1 | Prohibited:
No Generative AI allowed
This assessment showcases your individual knowledge,skills and/or personal experiences in the absence of Generative AI support. |
Generative AI is prohibited for this assessment and may result in penalties for academic misconduct, including a mark of zero for the assessment. | |
Level 2 |
Optional:
You may use Generative AI for research and content generation that is appropriately referenced.
See assessment instructions for details
This assessment allows you to engage with Generative AI to expand your understanding, creativity, and idea generation in the research phase of your assessment and to produce content that enhances your assessment.I.e.,images. You do not have to use it. |
The use of Gen AI is optional for this assessment.
Your collaboration with Generative AI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference Generative AI.
https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai
In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your Generative AI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment.
Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may result in penalties for academic misconduct,including a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
✓ |
Level 3 |
Compulsory:
You must use Generative AI to complete your assessment See assessment instruction for details This assessment fully integrates Generative AI, allowing you to harness the technology's full potential in collaboration with your own expertise. Always check your assessment instructions care fully as there may still be limitations on what constitutes acceptable use, and these may be specific to each assessment. |
You will be taught how to use generative AIandassessed on its use. Your collaboration with Generative AI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used.Click on the link below to learn how to reference Generative AI. https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your Generative AI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment. Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may result in penalties for academic misconduct,including a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
Assessment Marking Guide
Marking Criteria |30 marks | F (Fail) 0–49% | P (Pass) 50–64% | C(Credit) 65–74% | D(Distinction) 75 – 84% | HD (High Distinction) 85 – 100% |
Introduction and Problem Statement
|5 marks | The introduction and problem statement are either inadequate or missing, resulting in a lack of context and clarity for the reader. | The introduction and problem statement are included but lack clarity and conciseness,making it difficult for the reader to fully grasp the purpose and focus of the work. | Introduction and problem statement are clear and provide an over view of the IT problem's significance. | Introduction and problem statement are well-crafted and effectively highlight the significance of the IT problem. | Introduction and problem statement are exceptionally well- crafted, capturing the full significance and impact of the IT problem. |
Identifying Domain
|3 marks | Relevant domains are not identified or described. | Relevant do main sare identified but not fully utilized or explained. | Relevant domains are identified and described effectively. | Relevant domains are selected and integrated cohesively into the research context. | Relevant domains are expertly chosen and integrated, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of their relevance and application. |
Annotated Bibliography
|10 marks | Annotated bibliography is missing or lacks depth and relevance. Key findings and theories are not summarised or analysed. | Annotated bibliography is present but lacks thoroughness and synthesis of key findings and theories. Limited critical analysis is provided. | Annotated bibliography demonstrates a good understanding of existing research, summarising key findings and theories. Critical analysis and synthesis do not fully support the need for the proposed study. | Annotated bibliography is comprehensive and demonstrates a thorough understanding of existing research. Critical analysis and synthesis effectively justify the need for the proposed study. | Annotated bibliography is outstanding, showcasing an exceptional understanding of existing research. Critical analysis and synthesisgo beyond justification, making significant contributions to the |
| field. | |||||
Research Objectives and Research Questions
|6 marks | Research objectives and research questions are absent or poorly defined. | Research objectives and research questions are present but lack specificity and alignment with the problem statement. | Research objectives are clearly defined and measurable, aligning with the problem statement. Research questions effectively guide the investigation and address the identified problem. | Research objectives are well-defined and measurable, tightly aligned with the problem statement. Research questions are comprehensive and provide a clear direction for the investigation. | Research objectives are exceptionally well- defined and measurable, directly addressing the problem statement. Research questions are highly insightful, demon strating a deep understanding of the problem. |
Identifying research Community
|2 marks | Relevant research communities are neither recognized nor outlined. | Relevant research communities are mentioned but not fully explored or connected to the research. | Relevant research communities are identified and explained adequately. | Relevant research communities are identified and integrated effectively into the research framework. | Relevant research communities are expertly identified and seamlessly integrated, showing a deep understanding of their significance and role inthe research. |
Use of References
|2 marks | Uses inadequate or inappropriate sources of information, including Wikipedia or popular sites, with limited or no in-text citations and referencing list. | Uses a minimum of ten (10) sources of information, appropriately referenced using any acceptable referencing style,with some minor errors in in-text citations and referencing list. | Uses at least ten(10) sources of information, appropriately referenced using any standard referencing style, with consistent and accurate in-text citations and referencing list. | Uses at least ten (10) sources of information, appropriately referenced using any standard referencing style, with accurate and well-integrated in- text citations and referencing list. However,some references are quite old and are website | Uses at least ten (10) high-quality sources of information, appropriately referenced using any standard referencing style, with accurate and well-integrated in- text citations and referencing list. Most references are recent and include journal articles and |
| sources. | conference proceedings. | ||||
Grammar,Spelling, and Formatting of the Report
|2 marks | Contains frequent grammatical, spelling, and formatting errors that hinder the readability and comprehension of the report. | Contains some grammatical,spelling, and formatting errors, but overall, the report is mostly clear and comprehensible. | Contains few grammatical,spelling, and formatting errors, with a clear and readable report. | Demonstrates a high level of grammatical accuracy, spelling, and formatting, enhancing the clarity and professionalism of the report. | Exhibits exceptional grammatical accuracy, spelling, and formatting, resulting in a polished, error-free, and professional report. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
