Item | Assessment 1:Pitch your pedagogy |
Due | FRIDAY 28th of MARCH 2025, 11:5G pm AEST (end of Week 3) |
Length | 8 minutes with 1 minute +/- leeway |
Weight | 50% |
Submissions |
submitted to Turnitin
|
Unit Learning Outcomes | You will demonstrate the following Unit Learning Outcomes on the successful completion of this task: ULO1: identify and analyse the role of play in learning and examine the challenges pertaining to play and pedagogies. ULO2: discuss the diversity of approaches to pedagogies utilised in early childhood education and care, and how they position children, teachers, and parents/carers. ULO3: analyse the relationships between philosophy, theory, and pedagogyto the learning environment for all young children (birth – 5 years). ULO4: critically reflect on personal philosophy to play and pedagogies for learning and teaching as an earlychildhood professional. |
Assessment Rationale
The foundation of your teaching and learning will be centered around play-based pedagogy. As an early childhood teacher, you have a key role in enabling children’s learning, development and wellbeing through intentionality, planning and extensions and enrichment of children’s play (Australia Government Department of Education, 2022). Teachers also need to have a thorough understanding of diverse theoretical and philosophical foundations of play-based pedagogy to be able to critically consider the possibilities and challenges associated with incorporating play into practice. Teachers must advocate for the recognition and significance of play as a fundamental right for all children. We must strive to create learning environments that welcome diverse perspectives and allow for the development of a shared understanding of what 'play' entails and what it looks like. This assessment task requires you to critically engage with Modules 1-3 and the theoretical underpinnings and create a digital presentation.
Task Instructions
Imagine you are working in an early childhood education and care setting and have been asked to present at the family information night. The information night is for parents/guardians who have had their child newly start in the kindergarten program. Some families of children aged 4-5 years voice their concerns about the play-based approach used in your setting. They believe their children should be engaged in more formal, academic approaches to prepare them for school. Other families are interested in the play-based approach but would like to know more about the potential value and benefits of play.
For Assessment One, your task is to prepare a ‘pitch’ to explain and justify the importance of a play-based pedagogical approach for children now and in their future at kindergarten. You will need to follow two steps in order to successfully complete your ‘pitch’.
Step One: Develop your Pitch
The task is to create a digital presentation that visually supports and enhances your Pitch. You may use Microsoft PowerPoint, Prezi or Canva to create your presentation. Resources on how to prepare the digital presentation are provided in the Assessment 1 Folder on Blackboard.
Your presentation slides need to:
To ensure your pitch is well-organised and addresses all necessary elements, you need to identify and justify the following elements:
Please note: the approximate timing for presenting each element is ONLY indicative to help you better plan the presentation. The time allocated may look slightly different for each student, depending on the presentation organisation.
Your pitch needs to be supported and informed by:
Step Two: Record your Presentation
Record yourself delivering your 8-minute presentation. You may use Zoom or Microsoft PowerPoint to capture your presentation delivery and slides.
Save the transcript of the video recording and paste it into the Template Microsoft Word document provided in the Assessment 1 folder on Blackboard.
Save your recording as an MP4 file and submit the MP4 file to VoiceThread.
Referencing
APA 7th referencing is required for this assignment. Sources should include relevant and current academic sources, professional sources, early childhood policy, and unit material. A minimum of 8 references must be included. Please refer to the APA 7th edition. See the SCU Library Guides for detailed instructions on APA formatting.
Submissions
You are required to submit the following items for grading:
Submission portal can be accessed from the ‘Assessment Tasks and Submission’ section of the unit learning site (Blackboard).
Please label the Template and Video Presentation by including: the unit code, the assessment item, your first name and surname and ID.
For example: TCHR5001_A1 Presentation_StudentSURNAME_ID123456.pdf
Academic Integrity
Adherence to SCU's academic integrity policies is mandatory. Breaches may result in severe penalties, including failing the assessment or the unit. Examples of academic misconduct include plagiarism, collusion, and the use of unauthorised tools or materials. Refer to SCU’s academic integrity policies and guides for detailed information on what constitutes a breach, and the consequences involved.
You are permitted to use Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools responsibly and ethically. Please do not post confidential, private, personal, or otherwise sensitive information into Gen AI tools. If you use these tools, you must be aware of their limitations, biases, and propensity for fabrication.
If you use of GenAI, you must adhere to the SCU Academic Integrity Framework, which includes upholding honesty, ethics, professionalism, and academic integrity. All use of Gen AI must be explicitly documented and acknowledged in your submission. If you use generative AI tools without acknowledgment, it may result in an academic integrity breach against you, as described in the Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3. To find out how to reference generative AI in your work, consult the referencing style for your unit via the library referencing guides.
All students must declare if they have or have not used GenAI to assist with assessment completion (for example, brainstorming, understanding concepts, generating examples, summarising readings, proofreading text).
Permitted use of GenAI
Students are permitted to use GenAI to:
Prohibited use of GenAI
Students are not permitted to use GenAI to:
Any of these actions will constitute and be treated as a breach of academic integrity.
Special Considerations
Students wishing to request special consideration must submit a Request for Special Consideration form via their ‘MyEnrolment’ page as early as possible and prior to the due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
Late Submissions G Penalties
Except when special consideration is awarded, late submission of assessment tasks will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be incurred as soon as the deadline is reached.
Grades G Feedback
Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU Grade and written feedback from the marker. Grades and feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades C Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow up to 7-10 days for marks to be posted. Works submitted by the due date will be evaluated against the marking criteria outlined below in the ‘Assessment Rubric’. For more information regarding SCU grades and standards, visit Final Grades.
Description of SCU Grades
High Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Credit:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Pass:
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Fail: The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
Assessment Rubric
Marking Criteria and % allocation | High Distinction+ 100% | High Distinction 85%-99% | Distinction 75%-84% | Credit 65%-74% | Pass 50%-64% |
Marginal Fail 35%-49% | Fail 1%-34% | Not Addressed 0% |
Applies theoretical knowledge and literature to discuss the role of play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing 30% | Exemplar | Highly distinctive demonstration of understanding on role of play in learning, development and wellbeing within ECEC including ALL or MOST of the following: Outstanding breadth of knowledge on theoretical two perspectives of play. Exceptionalsynthesis of academic and professional sources toexplain the role of play in the ECEC context. Appropriate and insightful example/s of play-based experiences. | Distinctive demonstration of understanding on role of play in learning, development and wellbeing withinECEC including MOST of the following: Very good breadth of knowledge on two theoretical perspectives of play. Distinctive synthesis of academic and professional sources to explain the role of play in the ECEC context. Appropriate and comprehensive example/s of play-based experiences. | Credible demonstration of understanding on role of play in learning, development and wellbeing within ECEC including MOSTor SOME of the following: Good breadth of knowledge ontwo theoretical perspectives of play. A good synthesis of academic and professional sources to explain the role of play in the ECEC context. Appropriate and clear example/s of play-based experiences. | Sound demonstration of understanding on roleof play in learning, development and wellbeing withinECEC including SOME of the following: Sound breadth of knowledge on two theoretical perspectives of play. A passable synthesis of academic and/or professional sources to explain the role of play in the ECEC context. Appropriate and basic example/s of play-based experiences. | Limited explanation of the roleof play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing within ECEC including FEW or NONE of the following: Unclearbreadth of knowledge on theoretical perspectives of play. Limited use of academic or professional sources to explain the role of play in ECEC. Example of play-based pedagogy not relevant. | Fails to meetthe criteria – No explanation of the role of play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing. No links to theory or literature. No play-based learning examples provided. | N/A |
Discusses challenges and solutions in relating to implementing a play-based pedagogy in the ECEC setting 20% | Exemplar | Highly distinctive and well- articulated examination of potential challenges and solutions relating to implementing play- based pedagogy in ECEC. Outstanding use of examples. Extensive use of relevant academic and professional sources. | Distinctive and detailed articulation of potential challenges and solutions relating to implementing play-based pedagogy in ECEC. Distinctive use of example/s. Comprehensive use of relevant academic and professional sources. | Credible examination of potential challenges and solutions relating to implementing play-based pedagogy in ECEC. Good use of example/s. Good use of relevant academic and professional sources. | Sound examination of potential challenges and solutions relating to implementing play- based pedagogy in ECEC. Basic example/s provided. Some use of relevant academic and/or professional sources. |
Limited understanding of potential challenges and solutions relatedto play-based pedagogy. No example/s provided. Limited use of relevant sources. | Fails to meetthe criteria – Very limited to No discussion of challenges to play- basedpedagogy. No useof relevant sources. | N/A |
Demonstrates knowledge of an ECEC learning environment that facilitates play-based learning 20% | Exemplar | Insightful discussion of what contributes to a successful play- based learning environment including ALL or MOST of the following: Outstanding examples of physical, social, and temporal elements and links to relevant academic and professional sources. | Detailed discussion of what contributes to a successful play- based learning environment including MOST or SOME of the following: Distinctive examples of physical, social, and temporal elements and links to relevant academic and/or professional sources. | Clear discussion of what contributes to a successful play- based learning environment including MOSTor SOME of the following: Credible examples of physical, social, and temporal elements and links to relevant academic and/or professional sources. | Basic discussion of what contributes to a successful play- based learning environment including SOME of the following: Sound examples of physical, social, and temporal elements and links to relevant academic and/or professional sources. |
Limited and unclear discussion of what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment. Limited use of relevant sources. | Fails to meetthe criteria – Very limited to No discussion of what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment. No use of relevant sources. | N/A |
Discusses personal philosophy on play as an early childhood teacher and how it influences teaching and learning 20% | Exemplar |
Insightfuland well-articulated philosophy on play. Discussion provides comprehensive and reflective explanations of its influence on teaching and learning, including detailed examples of translating philosophy to practice. |
Detailed articulation of philosophy on play. Discussion provides explanations of its influence on teaching and learning, including specific examples of translating philosophy to practice. |
Clear articulation of philosophy on play. Discussion provides explanations of its influence on teaching and learning. |
Basic discussion of philosophy on play. Discussion provides some explanation of its influence on teaching and learning. |
Limited articulation of philosophy on play. Limiteddiscussion on itsinfluence on teaching and learning. | Fails to meetthe criteria – Very limited to No discussion of what personal playphilosophy is and its influence on teaching and learning. | N/A |
Demonstrates presentation skills with application of academic and professional literacy 10% | Exemplar | Outstanding presentation skills are demonstrated, including ALL or MOST of the following: appropriate pace, tone, articulation, and volume. The student has included a video of themselves presenting, showcasing excellent physical presentation skills and body language and overall providing an exceptional digital presentation with the use of images. Fully accessible and working videopresentation. Correct presentation length(+/- 1 min) Correctly formatted reference list using APA7. | Very good presentation skills evident including MOST or SOMEof the following: pace, tone, articulation, volume. The student may or may not have included a video of themselves presenting, showcasing very good physical presentation skills and body language and overall providing a distinctive digital presentation. Fully accessible and working videopresentation. Correct presentation length(+/- 1 min) Correctlyformatted reference listusing APA 7. | Good presentation skillsevident including MOST or SOME of the following: pace, tone, articulation, volumeand overall credible digital presentation. Accessible and working video presentation. The student may or may not have included a video of themselves presenting, showcasing good physical presentation skills and body language and overall providing a credible digital presentation. Correct presentation length (+/- 1 min) Correctly formatted reference list using APA 7. | Passable presentation skills evident including SOME of the following: pace, tone, articulation, volume and overall sound digital presentation. The student may or may not have included a video of themselves presenting, showcasing physical presentation skills and body language and overall providing a passable digital presentation. Accessible and working video presentation. Correct presentation length (+/- 1 min) Correctly formatted reference list using APA 7. |
Presentation skills are limited including pace, tone, articulation, volume and overall limited digital presentation. Accessible and working videopresentation. Insufficient presentation length. Limited use of APA 7 for referencing. | Fails to meet thecriteria – Incomplete working videopresentation that shows very limited skills including pace, tone,articulation, volume and overall limited digital presentation. Insufficient presentation length. Very limited use of APA 7 for referencing. | N/A |
“Achieve academic success with Punjab Assignment Help – your trusted partner for high-quality, plagiarism-free assignments, expert guidance, and timely submissions. Get professional support for your coursework today!”
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.