TCHR3004: Leadership and Advocacy in Early Childhood
Title | Assessment 1 |
Type | Report |
Due Date | Sunday, 27 July at 11:59 pm AEST(end of Week 3) |
Length | 1500 words |
Weighting | 50% |
Submission | Word document (not PDF)submitted to Turn it in |
Unit Learning Outcomes | This assessment task maps to the following ULOs:
|
Academic Integrity | Purpose-Specific Gen AI Use GenAItoolsmaybeusedforspecificassessmenttasksorpurposesasidentified below:
Note that:
|
Task Description
This task requires students to draw on learning from Modules 1 to 3 to write are port focus sed on a leadership style of your choice that you aspire to implement as a professional early childhood teacher in an early childhood education and care service in Australia.
In developing and explaining the seplans, students will:
As an early childhood teacher, it is important that you:
service in relation to children, families, staff, and the community – here you need to critically consider and explain how a leader implementing your chosen leadership style would manage the service and how this would impact upon children, families, staff, and the community in a variety of ways
Please refer to the APA 7th Referencing Guide for this task-https://libguides.scu.edu.au/apa
At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility, and respect in relation to academic work.
The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Frame work aims to develop a holistic,systematic, and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the Punjab assignment Help.
Academic Integrity breaches include poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations correctly, close paraphrasing,plagiarism,recycling,misrepresentation,collusion,cheating,contract cheating, fabricating information.
Per Level 2 of the SCU Gen AI Tool Descriptors, the task allows for Purpose-Specific Gen AI Use. Gen AI tools can be used for specific assessment tasks or purposes as identified and scaffolded by the Unit Assessor. The purpose-specific uses of Gen AI in this task are detailed on the first page of this task outline.
the right to Appeal against the Academic Integrity Officers academic misconduct Determination, to the Executive Dean, with that determination being final and conclusive, and not subject to further
Appeal with in the University. Students are not able to appeal against academic misconduct a the Unit Assessor or unit staff.
Please refer to the Special Consideration section of Policy https://policies.scu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=140
Please refer to the Late Submission & Penalties section of Policy https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255
Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades and Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Dates for grades release of on-time assessment submissions for each task are provided with in the assessment folders for this unit.
There are NO resubmissions available for either of the tasks in this unit. Requests for resubmission of either task will be declined in line with the SCU Assessment, Teaching and Learning Procedure - https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255
See the marking rubric for the marking criteria and grading standards.
…continue don next page….
Marking Criteria and %allocation | High Distinctio n 100%+ | HighDistinction (85-99%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (59-64%) | MarginalFail 35-49% | Fail 1-34% | Absent Fail 0% |
Criterion 1: Identification and explanation of one leadership style from the unit and the key principlesand theoretical underpinning softhisstyle ofleadership with support from valid, required literaturethat includes the EYLF V2.0, NQS and at least three unit | Achieves all the criteriafor a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without anyerrors. | Outstanding identification and explanationofone relevantleadership style fromthisunit.The key principles and theoretical underpinnings of this style of leadership are clearly and meaningfully discussed at an outstanding level. Requiredliterature is integrated to support and build the discussion,andinsightfullinks are drawn between the pointsmadeand the literature. | Very good identification and explanationofone relevantleadership style fromthisunit.The key principles and theoretical underpinnings of this style of leadership are clearly and accurately discussedatavery good level. Required literature is integrated to supportandbuild the discussion, andaccuratelinks are drawn between the points made and the literature. | Solididentification andexplanationof one relevant leadership style fromthisunit.The key principles and theoretical underpinnings of this style of leadership are mostly clearly and accurately discussed atsound level. Required literature is somewhat integrated to supportthe discussion, and accurate links are drawn between the points made andtheliterature. | Satisfactory identification and basic explanation of one relevant leadership style from this unit. The key principles and theoretical underpinnings of this styleofleadershipare somewhatclearlyand accurately discussed atabasiclevelthough depth was needed. Requiredliteratureis cited to support the discussion, and accurate links are drawn between the pointsmadeandthe literature. | Response meetssomeor all of the requirements at the passing levelinlimited ways, OR only meetssomeof the requirements at the passing level AND/OR minimum literature requirements have not been met but some validliterature hasbeenused | Response meets some of the requirements at the passing level in very limited ways, OR response does notprovide relevant or accurate responses to the requirementsata passing level AND/OR invalid citations to literature or invalid literature used AND/OR no supportfrom literature | Did not attempt OR did not providea response based on the leadershi p styles and learning relatedto these in this unit of study |
reading sources 40% | ||||||||
Criterion 2: Critical consideration of chosen leadership style fromthe unit and its influence on ECEC service management in relation to children, families,staff, and community. Practical examples in ECT practice are outlined with reference to thesegroups, and with supportfrom valid, literaturethat includes the EYLFV2.0, NQS and at least three unit | Achieves all the criteriafor a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without anyerrors. | Outstandingcritical consideration of the influence of one leadership style from thisunit on the management ofan ECEC service in relation to each required group. Insightfulexamples of very relevant ECT practices are outlined clearly and in detail at an outstanding level. Requiredliterature is integrated to support and build the discussion,andinsightfullinks are drawn between the points made and the literature. | Very good critical consideration of the influence of one leadership style from this unit on the management of anECECservicein relation to each required group. Detailed and relevantexamples of very appropriate ECT practices are outlinedclearlyat a very good level. Required literature is integrated to support and build the discussion, andaccuratelinks are drawn between the points made and the literature. | Solid critical consideration of the influence of one leadership style from thisunit on the management ofan ECEC service in relation to each required group. Mostly detailed and mostly relevantexamples ofappropriateECT practices are outlinedat agood level. Required literature is somewhat integrated to supportthe discussion, and accurate links are drawn between the points made and the literature | Satisfactory critical consideration of the influence of one leadershipstylefrom this unit on the management of an ECEC service in relation to each required group. Somewhat detailed and relevant examples of appropriate ECT practicesareoutlined at a basic level. Requiredliteratureis cited to support the discussion, and accurate links are drawn between the pointsmadeandthe literature. | Responseisnot critical/provide s a discussion rather than critical consideration AND/OR meets some or all the requirementsat the passing level in limited ways, OR only meets some of the requirementsat the passing level AND/OR minimum literature requirements have not been met but some valid literature has been used | Response meets some of the requirements at the passing level in very limited ways, OR response does notprovide relevant or accurate responses to the requirementsata passing level AND/OR invalid citations to literature or invalid literature used AND/OR no supportfrom literature | Did not attempt OR did not providea response based on the leadershi p styles and learning relatedto these in this unit of study |
reading sources 40% | ||||||||
Criterion 3: Writing is professional , succinct, and appropriate for a leader in an ECEC service setting to share with staff and families. 20% | Achieves all the criteriafor a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without anyerrors. | Writing over all taskresponsesis highly professional, within the set word count, and highly appropriate for a work place leader in an ECEC service setting to share with staff and families. No feedback given on improvements needed over any of these areas. | Writing over all task responses is very professional, within the set word count,and very appropriate for a workplace leader in an ECEC service setting to share with staff and families. Very minimal feedback given on minor improvements that could be made to one or two of these areas. | Writing over all task responses is professional, within the set word count, and appropriate for a work place leader in an ECEC service setting to share with staff and families.Some feedback given on improvements that could or need to be made over some of these areas. | Writing over all task responses shows developing professional language, is within the set word count, and is mostly appropriate for a workplace leader in an ECEC service setting to share with staff and families. Feedback is given on improvements that need to be made over these areas to improve leader communication. | Writing over some or all task responses requires improvement to be appropriate for a leader in an ECEC service workplace AND/OR the task is not within +/-10% of the set word count/the writing is not succinct AND/OR all or some of the responses are not suitable for sharing with staff and families in an ECEC service | Writing in the task response lacks professionalism AND/OR is inappropriate for a professional ECEC setting AND/OR is overly verbose/lacks conciseness AND/OR greater than+/- 10% of the set word limit AND/OR significant feedback is given on needed development of professionalism and/or appropriateness | Did not attempt |
Online Assignment Help In Australia
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts ,and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could bedescribed as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise,integrateandevaluateknowledge.Thestudent’sperformancecouldbedescribed as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Get Plagiarism free Assignment help from Punjab Assignment Help
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified ,demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying
relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation.
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area.
Thestudent’sperformancecouldbedescribedassatisfactoryinrelationtothelearningrequirements specified.
The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.