Assessment  Attributes

Fail

(Yet to achieve

minimum standard) 0-49%

High Distinction (Exceptional)

85-100%

Composition

10%

The document lacked overall organisation. Limited underlying logic and flow of ideas overall

Grammatical and spelling  errors throughout document.

The document was organised and clearly written for most part. Limited logic and/or flow  of ideas in some parts of the document.

Grammatical and spelling errors werepresent in some parts of the document.

The document was organised and clearly written. The logicand/or flow of ideasin the entire document were easy to follow in most parts.

Vocabulary was well chosen  with some minor improvement needed.

Sentences were mostly grammatically correct and/or only a few spelling errors were present

The document was well organised and clearly written. The underlying logic  and/or flow of ideas were easy to follow throughout the document

Vocabulary was well chosen  and supported reader comprehension.

Sentences were grammatically correct and free from spelling errors.

The document was well organised and clearly written. The underlying logic was clearlyarticulated and easy to follow throughout the document

Vocabulary was chosen that precisely expressed the intended meaning and supported reader comprehension.

Sentences were grammatically correct and free from spelling errors.

High -level Problem  Description and Detailed Problem Description

30%

High -level context description of the problem  domain is missing or is unclear.

Demonstrated little to no ability to define a manageable                       and achievable topic.

High -level context description  of the problem domain is missing or is unclear.

Defines a problem that is manageable and achievable, however too narrowly focused and leaves out

relevant aspects of the problem; or theproblem is so

High - level context description of the problem  domain is clear.

Defined a focused and manageable/achievable problemthat appropriately addresses most of the

relevant aspectsof the problem.

High - level context description of the problem domain is clear and describes the exact purpose of the project.

Defined a focused and manageable/achievable

problem that appropriately  addresses relevant aspects

High - level context description of the problem domain is clear,concise and describes the exact purpose  of the project.

Identified a creative, focused, and manageable problem that addresses

potentially significant yet previously less-explored

Key issues and/or problems were not identified; or key issues  and/or problems were identified inaccurately. Meaning is unclear.

broad that it cannot be adequately addressed.

Identified some key issues and/or problems. Descriptions  have some inaccuracies or omissions that interfere with the interpretation of the meaning being conveyed.

Identified mostkey issues and/or problems. Some minor inaccuracies or omissions may be present,  but do not interfere with meaning.

of the problem.

Identified all possible key issues and/or problems.

aspects of the problem.

Identified all possible key issuesand/or problems and described them clearly, accurately, and appropriately.

Proposed Solution

30%

Identified only a single approach for solving the problem that does not apply within a specific context in the problem.

Proposed one solution that is “generic” (off the shelf) rather  than individually designed to address the specific contextual factors of the problem.

Identified multiple approaches for solving the problem, only some of which apply within a specific context in the problem.

Proposed one or more solutions that indicatesome understanding of the problem.

Identified multiple approaches for solving the problem that applywithin a specific context of the problem.

Proposed one or more solutions that indicate comprehension of the problem.

Identified multiple and creative approaches for solving the problem that  apply within a specific context of the problem.

Proposed one or more solutions that indicate a deep comprehension of problem.

Business Value of the proposed solution

20%

Did not present the business value (significance) of the proposed solution.

Significance of the

proposed solution failed to present analysis and/or

Presented someappropriate business value (significance) of the proposed solution.

Some relevant information was missing.

Significance of the proposed solution showed limited

Presented appropriate businessvalue (significance) of the proposed solution.

Generally showed analysis

of significance of the proposed solution. Minor

Presented sufficient and appropriate business value  (significance) of the proposed solution.

Showed analysis of

significance of the proposed solution.

Presented appropriate, sufficient and credible business value (significance)  of the proposed solution.

Significance of the proposed

solution showed clear analysis, relevance, and

Project Plan

10%

Software process were identified and described.

Stages of the software process have some description and timeline presented.

Provides justification of the use of the software process.

Identifies appropriate software processfor the project.

Describes the stages of the software process correctly and timeline presented is achievable.

Justification of the identified  software process is described clearly and demonstrateunderstanding of the software process.

Competently identifies appropriate software process for the project.

Stages of the software processare presented in detail.

Timeline shows careful planning.

Justification were clearly described and demonstrate clear understanding of the software process.

Proficiently identifies appropriate software processfor the project.

Exceptional description of the stages of the software process.

Timeline is thorough and shows that carefulplanning was applied.

Justification identifies all relevant aspects of the project and demonstrates  higher level of understanding of the

software process.