MIS770 Foundation Skills in Data Analysis Assignment Help

MIS770 Foundation Skills in Data Analysis – Trimester 2, 2024 Assessment Task 2 –Individual Assignment

DUE DATE: Thursday, 12th September 2024, by 8:00pm (Melbourne time) PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:30%

WORD COUNT: 2000 Maximum number of words or equivalent

Description

Purpose

This assignment task is aligned to the learning outcomes and skills GLO4 & ULO2, ULO3 required in applying the ideas and concepts introduced in Modules 1 and 2 to undertake Descriptive Measures, Probability Theory, and Inferences to transform raw data into information and knowledge using appropriate data analysis techniques. You will require to prepare a business report that analyses a given dataset and interprets the results to demonstrate understanding of the specific business problems posed, and that offers conclusions and recommendations that address these problems. You will use plain language to report pertinent findings in a fair, neutral and transparent manner, and present compelling evidence to support their findings. By completing this task, you will encounter with some examples of the application of data analysis within an organisation, test your understanding of the material presented in the relevant topics, and your ability to analyse data, and effectively communicate your results in a language best suited to target audience/business professionals.

Context/Scenario

TechnoPulse Electronics (TPE) is an online store (fictitious) that sells electronic appliances all over the world. The annual board meeting is on the horizon, and you have been asked to provide summary information and estimates. Although TPE has no “bricks and mortar” storefront, some purchases are made directly from the different warehouse locations. The data set contains thirteen variables with information about 150 randomly selected TPE warehouses throughout the world.

You play the role of the senior analyst that will be responsible for modelling the data. The questions you need to answer are contained in the following memorandum. Assume that your readers do not have an analytics background, so it’s important that you utilise “plain, easy to understand language” in your answers. If you believe you need to include any technical terms, then you must explain these in a clear and succinct manner using layman’s terms.

Memorandum

Date: 10th August 2024 To: You, Data Analyst

From: Jordan Mitchell, CEO Subject: Analysis of Data

Dear YourName,

Can you please carry out an analysis of the TechnoPulse Electronics data (contained in the file

MIS770A2_TPE_Data.xlsx) and prepare a report containing answers to the following questions.

 

Q1. Summaries of key variables of interest

Can you please provide me with separate summaries of the following variables, just by themselves? In other words, please investigate each variable individually without reference to any other variable in the dataset.

 

  1. “Sales” – Annual Sales in $'000.
  2. “Cus_Rating” – The typical Customer review rating.

 

Q2. Exploring relationships between two variables

  1. I would like to know if there is a link between the typical customer review rating (“Cus_Rating”) and Managers gender (“Mgr_Gender”). I suspect that the customer review rating may differ based on the location managers gender, but I’d like to know if this is actually the case. Therefore, I’d like you to establish from your sample data if there is any relationship between these two variables.
  2. I’m also interested to establish if there is a relationship between the number of items sent from warehouses (“Items_Sent”) and the number of team members operating at that warehouse location (“T_Members”).
  3. Further, it would be helpful if we knew if the annual sales of the warehouse (“Sales”) has any relationship with the length of time this store has been operating with a web presence (“Length”).

Q3. Estimating warehouse measures

  1. I would like you to estimate the average annual sales of all warehouses managed by Males.
  2. I’m also interested to know if you can estimate the proportion of all of our stores that have a customer review rating of “High”.

Q4. Claims about warehouses

  1. I read somewhere that industry average wage for warehouse staff is $65,000. I think that the average wage is higher than this figure for TPE warehouse staff. Is there any evidence to suggest that this is the case? 
  2. Another claim based on industry observations was that fewer than 22% of warehouse managers were male. Can you also check this claim against your survey data?

Q5. Appropriate sample size

Finally, I am concerned that the sample of 150 is too small to provide accurate results as this seems hardly enough data. If we ever decide to repeat the analysis, I would like to be able to calculate approximately the true proportion of warehouses that have a high customer review rating (“Cus_Rating”) to within 5%.

Therefore, what sample size would we need to include in the next analysis to satisfy this requirement?

I look forward to your response, Jordan

Specific Requirements

Before attempting the assignment, make sure you have prepared yourself well. At a minimum, please read the relevant sections of the prescribed textbook and review the materials provided in Modules 1 and 2.

Report Requirements

  • Your report must have a cover sheet containing your personal particulars and the Unit details, an executive summary, introduction and conclusion.
  • Your report should be no longer than 4 pages excluding cover sheet, and there is no need to, any visualisations (i.e., Charts and Tables), or Appendices in the Report.
  • The Charts/Graphics and Tables you create are only to be placed in the Data Analysis file (i.e. the Excel spreadsheet) and not reproduced in the report.
  • Your report is meant to be a stand-alone document. That is, it should be able to be read without looking at the data analysis. To this end, do not refer to the visualisations as “as you can see from Figure 1 etc”. You need to interpret your data analysis visualisations for Jordan in the report.
  • Suggested Microsoft Word formatting for the report: Single-line spacing; no smaller that 10- point font; page margins approx. 25mm, and good use of white space.
  • Set out the report in the same order as in the originating Memorandum from Jordan, with each section(question) clearly marked.
  • Use plain language and keep your explanations succinct. Avoid the use of technical or statistical jargon. As a guide to the meaning of “Plain Language”, imagine you are explaining your findings to a person without any statistical training (e.g., someone who has not studied this unit). What type of language would you use in that case?
  • Marks will be lost if you use unexplained technical terms, irrelevant material, or have poor presentation/organisation.
  • All Microsoft Excel output associated with each question in the Memorandum is to be placed in the corresponding tab in the file MIS770A2_TPE_Data.xlsx.

Data Analysis Instructions/Guidelines

 

In order to prepare a reply to Jordan’s memorandum, you will need to examine and analyse the dataset

MIS770A2_TPE_Data.xlsx thoroughly.

 

Jordan has asked a number of questions and your data analysis output (i.e., your charts/tables/graphs) should be structured such that you answer each question on the separate tab/worksheet provided in your Excel document. There are also five extra tabs in MIS770A2_TPE_Data.xlsx and you should use the various templates contained in these tabs in your “CI”, “HT” and “Sample Size” answers.

 

In order to effectively answer the questions, your data analysis output needs to be appropriate. Accordingly, you’ll need to establish which of the following techniques are applicable for any given question:

 

  • Summary Measures (e.g., descriptive statistics, Inc. outlier detection, percentiles).
  • Comparative Summary Measures (i.e., descriptive statistics, outlier detection and percentiles for multiple values of a variable).
  • Suitable tables (such as a frequency distribution) and charts or graphics (such as histograms, box plots, pie charts, bar/column charts, polygons) that will illustrate more clearly, other important features of a variable.
  • Scatter Diagrams (used to visually establish if there is a relationship between two numeric variables).
  • Cross Tabulations (sometimes called contingency tables), used to establish the relationships(dependencies) between two variables (see Additional Materials under Topic 2 – Creating Cross Tabulations in Excel using Pivot Tables).
  • Confidence Intervals. You can assume that a 95% confidence level is appropriate. We use confidence intervals when we have no idea about the population parameter we are investigating. Additionally, we would use confidence intervals if we were asked for an estimate. You should use the relevant Excel templates provided in the dataset and copy them to the applicable question tab.
  • Hypothesis Tests. You can assume that a 5% level of significance is appropriate. We use hypothesis tests when we are testing a claim, a theory or a standard. You should use the relevant Excel templates provided in the dataset and copy them to the applicable question tab.
  • Sample size calculation: You can assume that a 95% confidence level is appropriate. You should include comparisons for 90% and 99% and a recommendation for the appropriate sample size.
  • To answer some questions, you may need to make certain assumptions about the data set we are using. Mention these in your data analysis, where relevant. There is no need to mention this in the report.

Note: There is an appendix at the end of each chapter of the prescribed textbook which describes the basic Excel steps associated with that topic. Chapters 1 to 9 are applicable for this assessment.

Learning Outcomes

This task allows you to demonstrate your achievement towards the Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs) which have been aligned to the Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes (GLOs). Deakin GLOs describe the knowledge and capabilities graduates acquire and can demonstrate on completion of their course. This assessment task is an important tool in determining your achievement of the ULOs. If you do not demonstrate achievement of the ULOs you will not be successful in this unit. You are advised to familiarise yourself with these ULOs and GLOs as they will inform you on what you are expected to demonstrate for successful completion of this unit.

 

The learning outcomes that are aligned to this assessment task are:

Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs)Graduate Learning Outcomes (GLOs)
ULO 2Manipulate and summarise data that accurately represents real world problems

 

 

 

GLO 4: Critical thinking: evaluating information using critical and analytical thinking and judgment

ULO 3Interpret and appraise statistical output to assist in real-world decision making

Submission

You must submit your assignment in the Assignment 2 Dropbox in the unit CloudDeakin site on or before the due date. Your completed assignment should be submitted in two separate files:

  • Report (Part A): A Microsoft Word document of no more than 4 pages (excluding title/cover page) that must not contain any charts/tables/graphs. (Note: Do not submit a pdf or a Pages file in lieu). Please name your word document MIS770A2_yourstudentid.docx
  • Data Analysis (Part B): An Excel document containing separate tabs/worksheets with charts/tables/graphs for each question. Please note that all interpretations should be presented in your “Report” and the Excel document should only contain your intermediate analysis and final output. Please name your Excel document MIS770A2_yourstudentid.xlsx

 

Submitting a hard copy of this assignment is not required. You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced you will need to submit your backup copy.

Any work you submit may be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of detecting collusion and/or plagiarism and for authenticating work.

When you submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment Dropbox folder after upload and check for, and keep, the email receipt for the submission.

Marking and feedback

The marking rubric indicates the assessment criteria for this task. It is available in the CloudDeakin unit site in the Assessment folder, under Assessment Resources. Criteria act as a boundary around the task and help specify what assessors are looking for in your submission. The criteria are drawn from the ULOs and align with the GLOs. You should familiarise yourself with the assessment criteria before completing and submitting this task.

Students who submit their work by the due date will receive their marks and feedback on CloudDeakin 15 working days after the submission date.

Extensions

Extensions can only be granted for exceptional and/or unavoidable circumstances outside of your control. Requests for extensions must be made by 12 noon on the submission data using the online Extension Request form under the Assessment tab on the unit CloudDeakin site. All requests for extensions should be supported by appropriate evidence (e.g., a medical certificate in the case of ill health).

 

Applications for extensions after 12 noon on the submission date require University level special considerationand these applications must be must be submitted via StudentConnect in your DeakinSync site.

Late submission penalties

If you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension or special consideration, 5% will be deducted from the available marks for each day after the due date up to seven days*. Work
 

submitted more than seven days after the due date will not be marked and will receive 0% for the task. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date. *'Day' means calendar day for electronic submissions and working day for paper submissions.

An example of how the calculation of the late penalty based on an assignment being due on a Thursday at 8:00pm is as follows:

  • 1 day late: submitted after Thursday 11:59pm and before Friday 11:59pm– 5% penalty.
    • 2 days late: submitted after Friday 11:59pm and before Saturday 11:59pm – 10% penalty.
    • 3 days late: submitted after Saturday 11:59pm and before Sunday 11:59pm – 15% penalty.
    • 4 days late: submitted after Sunday 11:59pm and before Monday 11:59pm – 20% penalty.
    • 5 days late: submitted after Monday 11:59pm and before Tuesday 11:59pm – 25% penalty.
    • 6 days late: submitted after Tuesday 11:59pm and before Wednesday 11:59pm – 30% penalty.
    • 7 days late: submitted after Wednesday 11:59pm and before Thursday 11:59pm – 35% penalty. The Dropbox closes the Thursday after 11:59pm AEST/AEDT time.

Support

The Division of Student Life provides a range of Study Support resources and services, available throughout the academic year, including Writing Mentor and Maths Mentor online drop ins and the SmartThinking 24 hour writing feedback service at this link. If you would prefer some more in depth and tailored support, make an appointment online with a Language and Learning Adviser.

Referencing and Academic Integrity

Deakin takes academic integrity very seriously. It is important that you (and if a group task, your group) complete your own work in every assessment task Any material used in this assignment that is not your original work must be acknowledged as such and appropriately referenced. You can find information about referencing (and avoiding breaching academic integrity) and other study support resources at the following website: http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support

Your rights and responsibilities as a student

As a student you have both rights and responsibilities. Please refer to the document Your rights and responsibilities as a student in the Unit Guide & Information section in the Content area in the CloudDeakin unit site.

Marking Rubric

 

 PoorNeeds ImprovementSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodExcellent

Executive summary

(Marks: 10)

0 points

Does not communicate anyof the main findings of the analysis in an accurate or useful way, or the findings are basic.

 

 

0 – 2.9 Marks

3 points

Explains somemain findings of the analysis accurately and enables reader to draw a few conclusions.

 

 

 

3 – 4.9 Marks

5 points

Explains most of the main findings of the analysis accurately and enables reader to draw some reasonable conclusions.

 

 

 

5 – 5.9 Marks

6 points

Explains nearly all main findings of the analysis accurately and enables reader to draw mostly reasonable conclusions.

 

 

 

6 – 6.9 Marks

7 points

Provides detailed and accurate descriptions of themost important features of the analysis along with appropriately qualified conclusions.

 

7 – 7.9 Marks

10 points

Provides outstanding descriptions and reaches conclusions that are carefully considered and insightful.

 

 

8 – 10 Marks

Data Analysis

(Marks: 40)

 

This part relates to the various visualisations in the form of charts, tables & graphs, templates, etc. created which formed the basis of response to the question posed.

 

Excel document

0 points

Uses irrelevant or inappropriate techniques to analyse the data, or the Data Analysis and visualisation tools were used to analyse the data but in an incomplete or inaccurate manner.

 

A very poor presentation of the analysis, or the analysisdoes not followprinciples of goodgraphical display.

16 points

Uses some appropriate data analysis and visualisation tools to analyse the data but there are many errorsin the analysis.

 

The presentation of the analysis needs improvement.

20 points

Uses appropriate data analysis and visualisation tools to analyse the data but there are several errorsin the analysis.

 

The presentation of the analysis is satisfactory.

24 points

Uses appropriate data analysis and visualisation tools to analyse the data but there are some errors in the analysis.

 

The presentation of the analysis is of a respectable standard.

28 points

Comprehensive analysis of thedata using appropriate techniques, but there aresome minor errors in the analysis.

 

Uses data visualisations to understand patterns in data.The analysis is well organised and follows principles ofgood graphical display.

40 points

Skilful and comprehensive analysis of data using manydifferent techniques.

 

Uses data visualisations to produce novelinsights.

An excellent presentation ofthe analysis.

 0 – 15.9 Marks16 – 19.9 Marks20 – 23.9 Marks24 – 27.9 Marks28 – 31.9 Marks32 – 40 Marks

Report

(Marks: 40)

 

This partis the written response to the questions posed.

 

Word document

0 points

Does not communicate any of the main findings of the analysis in an accurate and/or useful way, or the interpretation and communication of findings is at a basiclevel.

 

The written communication is unprofessional or difficult to follow and contains numerous errors.

16 points

Explains some of the main findings of the analysis accurately which only enablesthe reader to draw a few reasonable conclusions.

 

The written communication is not very easy to follow and/or it contains too many errors.

20 points

Explains most of the main findings of the analysis accurately and enables the reader to draw several reasonable conclusions.

 

The written communication is clear and easy to follow but it contains minor errors.

24 points

Explains nearly all of the main findings of the analysis accurately and enables the reader to draw mostly reasonable conclusions.

 

The written communication is clear and easy to follow and generally free of errors.

28 points

Provides detailed and accurate descriptions of themost important features of the analysis along with appropriately qualified conclusions.

 

The written communication is professional, easy to follow and has a good structure.

40 points

Provides outstanding descriptions and conclusions that are carefully considered and insightful.

 

The written communication is very professional, logical and easyto follow.

 0 – 15.9Marks16 – 19.9 Marks20 – 23.9 Marks24 – 27.9 Marks28 – 31.9 Marks32 – 40 Marks

Overall Assignment

Presentation

(Marks: 10)

0 points

No attempt has been made to follow the assignment Requirements/  Instructions/ Guidelines.

3 points

Little attempt has been made to follow the assignment Requirements/ Instructions/ Guidelines.

5 points

Majority of the assignment Requirements/ Instructions/ Guidelines have been followed.

6 points

Nearly all of the assignment Requirements/ Instructions/ Guidelines havebeen followed.

7 points

All of the assignment Requirements/ Instructions/ Guidelines have been followed.

10 points

All of the assignment Requirements/ Instructions/ Guidelines have been dealt with meticulously.

   Satisfactorily presentedGood presentation  
 Poorly presentedUnsatisfactorily presented  Very good presentation 
      Faultless assignment
      presentation
 0 – 2.9Marks3 – 4.9Marks5 – 5.9Marks6 – 6.9Marks7 – 7.9Marks8 – 10 Marks

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.