1. Integrate understanding, analysis and the significance of management concepts in an ethical manner and their applications to real practice situations.
2. Research, and discuss management frameworks, then compare with real practice to demonstrate mastery of management principles in this era utilising innovative means.
3. Demonstrate comprehension and apprehension of e-marketing

products/services through reflection on the impact of technology in management

• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date (as above) along with a completed Assessment Cover Sheet.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the Assessment Task, and listed appropriately at the end in a Reference List using APA 6th edition for the School of Business. See the following resources for Reference Style Guides:
  • Business Students: https://library.mit.edu.au/referencing/APA

If an extension of time to submit work is required, an Application for Special Consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted online via your Academic Management System (AMS) login: https://online.mit.edu.au/ams.

The Application for Special consideration must be submitted no later than three (3) working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination for which you are seeking Special Consideration. In the case of serious illness, loss or bereavement, hardship or

trauma students may be granted special consideration.

Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available

at: https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-

Student Declaration

I/We declare and certify that:

1. the work contained in this assessment is my/our own work/group work, except where acknowledgement of sources is made;
2. this assessment has not been submitted previously for academic credit in this or any other course;
3. I/we have read MIT’s Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct Policy and Procedure, and I/we understand the consequences of engaging in plagiarism, collusion and contract cheating;
4. a copy of the original assignment is retained by me/us and that I/we may be required to submit the original assignment to the Lecturer and/or Unit Co-ordinator upon request;

I/we have not plagiarised the work of others or participated in unauthorised collaboration or contract cheating when preparing this assessment.

Criteri

a

Excellent (80-

100%)

Good (70-

79%)

Satisfactory (60-

69%)

Needs Improveme nt

(50-59%)

Unsatisfactory (<50%)

Content Depth

Thoroughly explores all relevant aspects of the topic with comprehensive detail and

exceptional insight.

Explores most relevant aspects with adequate detail and good insight.

Covers basic necessary content with some relevant details and insights.

Content is somewhat relevant but lacks depth and clarity.

Content misses critical elements and is overly superficial.

Research and Analysis

Demonstrates exceptional research with a wide range of credible sources. Analysis is insightful and thoroughly supports the

thesis.

Good research scope with credible sources, and analysis mostly

supports the thesis.

Adequate research and some analysis that supports the thesis with a few

logical gaps.

Limited research with insufficient analysis that weakly supports

the thesis.

Lacks evidence of research.

Analysis is minimal or absent.

Structure and Organizat ion

Logically organised in a manner that enhances clarity and impact.

Transitions are smooth, guiding the reader effortlessly through

the text.

Well- organised, but transitions could be smoother.

Structure is mostly logical.

Organisation is apparent but lacks consistency.

Some sections are

disjointed.

Poorly organised, making comprehension difficult.

Transitions are abrupt or confusing.

Lacks logical structure, making it hard to follow.

Writing and Style

Writing is eloquent and error-free. Style is appropriate to the academic

level and subject matter.

Writing is clear with minor errors. Style is generally appropriate.

Writing is riddled with errors and is inappropriate for academic standards.

Use of Evidence

Uses a diverse range of evidence effectively integrated into the argument.

Citation is flawless.

Uses appropriate evidence with good integration into the text.

Few

citation errors.

Uses basic evidence, and generally integrates it into the text.

Some

citation errors.

Insufficient or poorly integrated evidence.

Multiple citation errors.

Lacks sufficient evidence, or evidence is inappropriately used. Incorrect or

no citation.

Critical Thinking

Demonstrates exceptional critical thinking with complex argumentation and

deep insights.

Demonstrates good critical thinking with clear argumentation.

Shows some critical thinking but lacks depth or

complexity in argumentation.

Shows limited critical thinking

and simplistic

argumentation.

Lacks critical thinking.

Arguments are unsubstantiate d or illogical.

Conclus

ion

Conclusion powerfully synthesizes findings, reaffirms the thesis,

and suggests

areas for further research.

Conclusion is generic and does not effectively summarize findings.

Conclusion is missing, incorrect, or fails to summarize findings.