Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Trimester | T2 2024 |
Unit Code | HI6026 |
Unit Title | Audit, compliance and assurance |
Assessment Type | Group Assignment |
Due Date+ time: | Wednesday, 25 Sep 2024 11.59 PM |
Purpose of the assessment (withULO Mapping) | Students are enrolled in a Group of up to 4 members. The group will study, analyse and conduct academic work on the topics of Audit, compliance and assures week 2 toweek 12 (ULO 1, 2, 3 and 4). A groupof 4 students will study,analyse, and perform academic assignments related to Auditing, Assurance and Compliance. This activity will cover ULO 1, 2, 3, and 4.
|
Weight | 40 % |
Total Marks | Assignment (40 marks) |
Word limit | 3,000 words ± 500 |
Submission Guidelines |
|
Academic Integrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with anyquestions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties thatrange from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, orcancellation of course enrolment. |
Penalties |
|
|
Adapted Harvard Referencing
Adapted Harvard Referencing approach example and guidelines:
author surname and each referenced numbered (1 to 10 etc). In addition, each reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source.
For example;
Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. and Stein, A. 2004. Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall,
For example; “The company decided to implement an enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligence strategy (Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).”
Where students do not follow the above guidelines:
Each group has been allocated a subject company for completing this assignment. In the excel file """Find Your Company""" """"""under "Assessments" on Blackboard, you will find the listed company you have been allocated for completing this assignment.
Requirements - Questions
As a group, assume that you have been appointed as the external auditor for your allocated company for the financial year ending June 2022 or 2023. Prepare a report to adequately address the following:
The assignment structure must be as follows:
To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students are responsible for the academic integrity of all components of the assignment. You need to complete the following Group Assignment Task Allocation table, relevant evidence (authenticity of your assignment) which identifies which student/students are responsible for the various sections of the assignment.
This table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory component requiredbefore any grading is undertaken. Students that are registered in a solo group are not required to fill this table.
Both assessment items must be submitted on Blackboard. The written assignment must be in a report format and submitted through safe-assign prior to final submission. The originality percentage should be as low as possible. The written submission must be double-checked, edited and rephrased if the originality percentage and plagiarism risk is noted as high, as per safe-assign.
Group Assignment Marking Criteria | Weighting |
| 2% |
| 30% |
| 8% |
Total Weightof the Report | 40% |
Academic Integrity
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on Blackboard.
Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or Unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.
Plagiarism | Reproducing the work of someone elsewithout attribution. Whena student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self- plagiarism. |
Collusion | Working with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, in a waythat is not authorised. |
Copying | Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied, this may also be considered an offence. |
Impersonation | Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself, in an in-person examination. |
Contractcheating | Contracting a third partyto complete an assessment task,generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment. |
Data fabrication and falsification | Manipulating or inventing datawith the intent of supporting false conclusions, including manipulating images. |
Source: INQAAHE, 2020
Marking Rubric
Excellent HD | Very Good D | Good C | Satisfactory P | Unsatisfa ctory F | |
Executive Summary
(2 marks) | Very effectively written synopsis with clear communication ofthe main points ina concise paragraph. | Competently composed a strong synopsis. The mainpoints are communicated well. | Synopsis is professionally written with all the expected points raised. | Synopsis is clearlywritten, but it is brief or has some errors. | Synopsi s is deficien t and poorlywritten. Too brief. |
Main Body | Excellent. Well | There are valid | There are valid | Some | Poorly organized; |
Including | organized. Main | points raised with | points raised, | organization; | no logical |
Introduction | points arelogically | a good argument | paragraphing is | main points | progression; |
(30 marks) | ordered; sharp | / Thesis | noted, and the | are there but | beginning and |
sense of | statement, | points in the | they are | ending is vague. | |
structuring and | paragraphingis | introductionis | disjointed; | No structure. | |
arrangement of key | noted, and the | explained in | Minor | Lacks substance. | |
information. | points in the | more detail | structuring | No research | |
Supporting details | introduction is | with supporting | issues. | noted. | |
are specific to the | explained in more | evidence. | |||
main points and | detail with | ||||
adequate facts and | supporting | ||||
other evidence is | evidence. |
provided and well- | |||||
articulated. | |||||
Overall Presentation, Evidence of research and use of appropriate refencing in the assignment (8 marks)
Total (40) | References are consistently correct using Adapted Harvard style. No missing citations.A strongreference list with relevant andcredible sources used.Evidence of extensive research. And excellent presentation | References are consistently correct using Harvard style. No missing citations. References used are good, but not extensive. However, a very good prestation report | Generally correctreferencing using Harvard style. More references required. However, a goodprestation report | Some References are used, but not used consistently. Not enough research done. | Referenc es aremissing or do not complywith correct referenci ng style. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.