Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Trimester | T2 2024 |
Unit Code | HI6005 |
Unit Title | Management andOrganisations in a Global Environment |
Assessment Type | Group Assignment |
Due Date + time: | 04/October/2024 11.59 pm (Melb/ Sydney time) |
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) | 1. Acquire a broad understanding of the theoretical and practical knowledge of Management and Organisations. 2. Analyse complex problems relating to Management and Organisations and their impact on the business due to globalisation. 3. Critically analyse policy toolswhich are usedby governments and how these policies impactthe global organisation. 4. Comprehend how businesses benefit from understanding the role of Management in organisations. 5. Synthesise theoretical and practical knowledge of management of global organisations, develop an in-depth understanding of the theories and practical knowledge necessary for managers to formulate appropriate strategies. |
Weight | 40 % |
Total Marks | Assignment (40 marks) |
Word limit | 2500 words |
Submission Guidelines |
|
AcademicIntegrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with anyquestions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties thatrange from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of courseenrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment. |
Penalties |
|
Group Assignment Guidelines and Specifications
This assignment aims to ensure that students have familiarised themselves with a general framework of at least one management-related topic. Students will be required to apply relevant theoretical concepts in a written research paper using practical examples in most cases.
Please choose one of the following topics from the list (see below).
Research on the broad topic is a group activity, and each student must contribute to that work. Each student in the group will then research an individual component drawn from the broad research topic in depth. There are two parts to the group assignment:
You should form a group of 4 students. Please use the self-enrolment tool in BB. Note that once you do so, your group members are fixed and cannot be changed. The group size should be four only. Every member must make a significant, valid academic contribution to the team result.
As you start to work on your group report, you are required to assimilate this Appendix, which will be submitted via a link on the UNIT blackboard site in week ten by Friday, 11:59 pm.
What should be included in the Appendix?
Topic Chosen: | ||||
Student ID | First Name | Family Name | Contact Phone Number | Allocated Task(s) |
[See Gantt chart example; feel free to choose your own style] GANTT CHART example:
Meeting Number: ………………………………………… Date: …………………………………………
Time: …………………………………………
Student | ID | Name | Points discussed | If absent, state the reason | |
1. | |||||
2. | |||||
3. | |||||
4. |
Group Tool | Description |
File Exchange | Group members and instructors canshare files in this area.All members can addand delete files,regardless of whoadded them. |
Group Blog | In the group area,all members of a groupcan create entries for |
The same blog and build on each entry. All course members can read and comment on a group blog, but they can't make posts unless they are members of the group. Instructors can choose to grade group blogs. All group members receive the same grade. | |
Group Journal | In the group area, all members of a group can view each other's entries. Only group members and instructors can view a group journal. Instructors can choose to grade group journals. All group members receive the same grade. |
Send Email | Group members can email individual members or the entire group. |
You can't create folders in file exchange. With your group, decide how you want to name files so they are easier to locate in a long list.
Add a file to the file exchange. Group Tools > File Exchange > Add File
Add a name for the file you want to upload. Browse for the file and submit.
You can also delete any file if you wish. On the File Exchange page, select Delete in the file's menu. But it would be good to keep all the files for any future reference.
All the group members can discuss the assignment by using the Group Blog. Once you are allocated to a group, you can see this function.
Group > Group Tools > Group Blog > Create Blog Entry
Marking Rubric | |||||
80% and above | 70%-79% | 60%-69% | 50%-59% | 0- 49% | |
Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Group member Details (1 mark) |
Name, ID, family name, contact number, allocated task entered |
Name, ID, family name, contact number, allocated task entered, unclear tasks. |
Name, ID, family name, contact number, allocated task entered |
Name, ID, family name, contact number, allocated task entered only for a few members |
Incomplete/inco rrect information entered |
Topic chosen (1 mark) | Clearly mentioned and described | The topic mentioned with clarity | Topic mentioned briefly | Topic mentioned vaguely |
Unclear topic |
Task allocation (1 mark) | The fullchart was completed with individual names, IDs, and well- explained taskswith clarity. | Full chart completed with individual names, IDs and tasks explained |
Individual names, IDs and tasks explained |
Unclear discussion of tasks |
Incomplete/inco rrect tasks entered |
GANNT Chart (1 mark) | All components of the chart are completed, explained with clarity | All components of the chart completed | Most of the components completed |
Some component missing | Incomplete/inco rrect components entered |
References (1 mark) | Each memberlisted five references with appropriate sources | Each member listed five references | Less thanfive references listed by each member | Less than two references listed by each member |
No references listed |
All correspondence (1 mark) |
All emails, WhatsApp messages, USB files, group discussions, text messages, telephonic conversation provided | All emails, messages, group discussions, text messages, and telephonic conversations are provided. USB files missing |
All emails and telephonic messages evidence provided |
Inadequate correspondence submitted |
No correspondence submitted |
Face-to-face meeting details (1 mark) | All five meeting details with all the information provided | Four meeting details withsome information provided | Less than four meetingdetails provide | Inadequate meeting details provided |
No meeting details |
Group Expectations (1 mark) | Clearly stated expectations from each of the members with | Stated expectations with some discussion | Expectations listed without discussion | Some expectations stated |
Unclear or no statements |
The written group research paper report – worth 40% of your final grade- must be submitted on Friday of Week 11 at 11:59 pm. The written report should begin with the broad research topic, followed by each component identified by the student who prepared it. (2500 ± 10% words)
To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students are responsible for the academic integrity of all components of the assignment. You need to complete the following table, which identifies which student/students are responsible for the various sections of the assignment.
Assignment Section | Student/Students |
This table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory component required before any grading is undertaken.
List of Topics (Choose one):
In this topic, you have to research globalisation. The business press bombards us with ideas about 'The shrinking world', 'The flat world' and 'The borderless world' – all catchphrases to describe the impact of globalisation. But are the (trade) borders really collapsing, or are we seeing, post-GFC, a resurgence in them? What is behind the extreme demonstrations against globalisation at G7 and WTC conferences?
There is little doubt that social influences significantly impact decision-making behaviour. Social pressures and influences may cause managers to make irrational decisions. Outline, in the general framework, a model of social influence on decision-making.
The individual components of this topic introduce some classic studies as illustrative of the impact of social influences on decision-making.
Outline six key elements commonly used to define the structure of an organisation, identifying the management theorist who identified each of these elements. Then, outline four factors (contingencies) that are commonly used to define the situation (the organisational environment).
Each individual should select an example organisation – a real example – and suggest what you believe to be the structure of that organisation in terms of the six key elements that are used to define organisational structure. For your example organisation, you should define their organisational environment in terms of the four contingency factors and comment on the organisation's match (or mismatch) to its organisational environment.
Discuss Performance Management in the context of identifying the relevant School of Management Theory. Identify positives and negatives in the approaches to performance management.
Provide a map of the various theories of work motivation and explain the map distinguishing the differences between content and process theories of work motivation.
Detailed rubricfor the GroupResearch paper written report | |||||
80% and above | 70%-79% | 60%-69% | 50%-59% | 0- 49% | |
Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Executive Summary (4 marks) | Clear evidence of a summary which summaries the entire report | Clear evidence of a summary which summarises the entire report | Some evidence of a summary which summarises the entire report |
Limited evidence of a summary of the entirereport |
No executive summary is included |
Discussion on the allocated general framework (10 marks) | Demonstration of outstanding knowledge of the chosen topic and has included significant research which are beyond areas covered within the lecture | Demonstration of very good knowledge of the chosen topic and has included some research beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. |
Demonstration of good knowledge of the chosen topic and has included minimal research beyond areas covered withinthe lecture notes. | Demonstration of satisfactory knowledge of the chosen topicand has included no research beyond areas covered within the lecture notes. |
Demonstration of little or no knowledge of the chosen topic and discussion has little or no relevance to the topic chosen. |
Application of theory on Individual component discussion (12 marks) | Your theory interpretation is accurate and insightful and has included significant research beyond the areascovered in the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified. | Your theory interpretation is accurate, has some insight, and includes research beyond the areas covered in the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified. | Your theory interpretation is somewhataccurate and includes minimal research beyond the areas covered in the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified. | Your theory interpretation is very general and has included no research beyond the areas covered within the lecture notes. Identification of the author has been identified. |
Your interpretation of the theory is missing or not relevant to the topic. No identification of the author had been given. |
Overall presentation and quality of report (6 marks) | The report is exceptionally structured with clarity and the use ofparagraphs and subheadings. | The report is well structured with clarity and the use of paragraphs and subheadings. | The report is somewhat structured with clarity, and paragraphs and subheadingsare used. | The report is structured with some clarity, and some paragraphs and subheadings are used. | Poorlypresented. The report is not structured with any clarity and does not use paragraphs and subheadings. |
Sub-total (32 marks) |
Your final submission is due Friday of week 11 before midnight.
The following penalties will apply:
Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:
The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z alphabetically by author's surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source.
For example:
Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. & Stein, A. 2004. Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of
Information Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf
All assignments must include in-text citations to the listed references. These must include the surname of the author/s or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page
number of the content, and paragraph where the content can be found. For example, "The company decided to implement an enterprise-wide data warehouse business intelligence strategy (Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4))."
Where students do not follow the above rules, penalties apply:
For students who submit assignments that do not comply with all aspects of the rules, a 10% penalty will
be applied.
Students who do not comply with guidelines BUT their citations are 'fake' will be reported for academic miscondu
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.