Individual Assessment Cover page
Unit Details | Name | System Analysis and Design |
Code | HI5030 | |
Year,Trimester | 2024, Trimester 3 |
Assessment Details | Name | Individual Research Paper |
Due Date and Week | 13 February, 2025 |
Individual Student Details | Student Number | |
First Name | ||
Family Name |
Submission Declaration | Integrity Declaration | I have read and understand academic integrity policies and practices and my assessment doesnot violate these. |
Full Name | ||
Submission Date |
Instructions
Academic Integrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessment must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Important academic integrity breaches include plagiarism, collusion, copying, impersonation, contract cheating, data fabrication and falsification. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties thatrange from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unitinvolved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment. |
FormatInstructions |
|
Penalties |
|
Assignment Title: Practical Application and Research on Contemporary Systems Analysis and Design Issues
Assessment Overview:
This assessment relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the Unit of Study Guide. This assessment is designed to give students skills to explore the latest system analysis and design trends, challenges, and future directions.
In this individual research paper, you will explore a contemporary issue in systems analysis and design, integrating academic research with practical application. The assignment is designed to deepen your understanding of the selected issue and its real-world impact on business information systems. You will critically analyse the issue, apply relevant methodologies to a real-world or hypothetical scenario, and propose solutions to address the challenges it presents.
1. Issue Selection:
What You’ll Do: Choose a contemporary issue from the list provided by the unit coordinator. Some examples of issues you might consider include:
2. Research and Practical Application:
What You’ll Do: Start by conducting a literature review on your chosen issue. Look for academic articles, industry reports, and case studies that discuss the issue in depth. Then, apply the insights from your research to a practical scenario. For example:
3. Impact and Solution Analysis:
What You’ll Do: Analyse how the selected issue impacts the design and implementation of business information systems in your scenario. Discuss how the issue affects system functionality, data management, and the communication of requirements to stakeholders. Then, propose practical solutions or methodologies that could address these challenges. For example:
4. Documentation and Communication:
The report submission structure is as follows:
Student Assessment Citation and Referencing Rules
Adapted Harvard Referencing Rules
Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:
The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z alphabeticallyby author surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each reference MUST
include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source. For example:
Non-Adherence to Referencing Rules
Where students do not follow the above rules:
Criteria | Marks | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
Introduction and Issue Identification | 5 | Exceptionally clear and concise introduction with excellent context; relevance and scope are well-defined. | Clear introduction with good context; relevance and scope are well-defined. | Introduction is clear but may lack some context; relevance and scope are defined but could be more precise. | Introduction is basic, with limited context; relevance and scope are defined but may be unclear or broad. | Poor or unclear introduction with little to no context; relevance and scope are poorly defined or missing. |
Literature Review | 8 | Comprehensive, well-researched literature review with critical engagement; identifies gaps and debates effectively. | Thorough literature review with good critical engagement; identifies some gaps and debates. | Adequate literature review; some critical engagement but may lack depth; few gaps or debates identified. | Basic literature review with minimal critical engagement; gaps and debates are not well identified. | Weak or minimal literature review with little to no critical engagement; fails to identify gaps or debates. |
Analysis of the Issue | 10 | Deep, insightful analysis of the issue with excellent understanding and comparison of methodologies. | Strong analysis with good understanding of the issue and comparison of methodologies. | Adequate analysis; understanding of the issue is clear, but comparison of methodologies may be limited. | Basic analysis with some understanding of the issue; comparison of methodologies is minimal or unclear. | Poor analysis with little understanding of the issue; no meaningful comparison of methodologies. |
Proposed Solutions and Implementation | 5 | Innovative, well-justified solutions with a clear and feasible implementation plan. | Well-justified solutions with a feasible implementation plan. | Adequate solutions; justification and implementation plan are present but may lack detail or feasibility. | Basic solutions with minimal justification; implementation plan may be unclear or incomplete. | Poorly justified or unfeasible solutions with little to no implementation plan. |
Conclusion and Recommendations | 5 | Clear, insightful conclusion with strong implications and actionable recommendations. | Good conclusion with clear implications and actionable recommendations. | Adequate conclusion; implications and recommendations are present but may lack depth or clarity. | Basic conclusion with minimal implications; recommendations are present but may be vague or incomplete. | Weak or unclear conclusion with little to no implications or recommendations. |
Communication and Presentation | 2 | Exceptionally well-organized, clear, and concise writing; accessible to all audiences. | Well-organized and clear writing; mostly accessible to all audiences. | Adequate organization and clarity; some technical jargon may be present but generally understandable. | Basic organization with some clarity issues; may be difficult for non-technical audiences to follow. | Poor organization and clarity; difficult to understand and follow. |
References and Academic Integrity | 5 | High-quality references, consistently and correctly cited, with a comprehensive reference list. | Good-quality references, mostly consistent and correct citations with a comprehensive reference list. | Adequate references with some citation errors; reference list is present but may have minor issues. | Basic references with multiple citation errors; reference list may be incomplete or inconsistent. | Poor references with significant citation errors or missing references; little to no academic integrity. |
"Boost your academic success with Punjab Assignment Help! Our expert team provides top-quality solutions for all your assignments, ensuring timely delivery and better grades. Contact us today for professional assistance!"
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.