Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Trimester | T22024 |
Unit Code | HI5020 |
Unit Title | CorporateAccounting |
Assessment Type | GroupAssignment |
DueDate+ time: | 27/September/2024 11.59pm(Melb/Sydneytime) |
Purpose of the assessment(withULO Mapping) | This assignment aims to understand different classes of assets and liabilities reported by companies and the measurement basis used for each class of assets. It also seeksto develop anunderstanding ofstudentson differentitemsreported as other comprehensive and their significance (ULO 1, 3, 4, 5). Students are then required to examine the measurement, accounting treatment and disclosure of asset retirement/environmental rehabilitation obligations in detail. ThisassessmentwillcoverthefollowingUnitLearningObjectives:
|
Weight | 40% |
Total Marks | Assignment(40marks) |
Word limit | 3000words±500words |
Submission Guidelines |
|
Academic Integrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academicintegrity and consult your teacherswith anyquestions. Violating academic integrityisseriousandpunishablebypenaltiesthatrangefromdeductionofmarks, failure ofthe assessment task or unit involved, suspensionofcourseenrolment,or cancellation of course enrolment. |
Penalties |
|
Group Assignment Guidelines and Specifications
Assessment tasks (40Marks)
Select the latest annual report of an ASX-listed company. From the annual report, complete the following tasks:
Marks | |
Abstract | 1 Mark |
Table of content | 1 Mark |
1.Introduction of the company: -Briefly introduce the selected publicly listed company and providean overview of the company's industry. | 2Marks |
| 2Marks |
3.Direct and indirect method of cashflow statement? -How does the direct method of cashflow statement differ from the indirect method of cash flow statement? | 4 Marks |
| 6Marks |
| 6Marks |
| 6 Marks |
| 6Marks |
8.Comparative analysis -Compare the cash flow performance of the selected company over two years,aswellascurrentandpreviousyears,andhighlightanddiscussany differences or similarities in cash flow patterns and financial strategies. | 5 Marks |
9.Conclusion | 1 Mark |
TOTAL Weight | 40 Marks |
Student Assessment Citation and Referencing Rules
HolmeshasimplementedarevisedHarvardapproachtoreferencing.Thefollowingrulesapply:
Where students do not follow the above rules,penalties apply:
Academic Integrity
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity, as it is integral to maintainingacademicqualityandthereputationofHolmes'graduates.Accordingly,all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Sills link on Blackboard.
Academicintegritybreachesareseriousoffencespunishablebypenaltiesrangingfromdeductionof
marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.
Plagiarism | Reproducing the work of someone else withoutattribution.When a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self-plagiarism. |
Collusion | Working with one or more other individualstocompletean assignment, in a way that is not authorized. |
Copying | Reproducing and submitting the work of anotherstudent,withor without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautionstopreventtheirownoriginalworkfrombeingcopied, this may also be considered an offence. |
Impersonation | Falsely presenting oneself,orengagingsomeoneelsetopresentas oneself, in an in-person examination. |
Contract cheating | Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generallyinexchangeformoneyorothermannerofpayment. |
Data fabrication and falsification | Manipulatingorinventingdatawiththeintentofsupportingfalse conclusions, including manipulating images. |
Source:INQAAHE,2020
HI50202024T2 Group Assignment Marking Rubric | |||||
Criterion | Excellent | VeryGood | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
Introduction and Cash Flow Statement Analysis (6 marks) | Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the subject-relevanttheory, withclearandthorough explanations and applications that are entirely accurate. | Demonstrates a strongunderstanding of the subject- relevanttheory,with well-explained and correctly applied concepts. Minor issues, if any. | Demonstratesagood understanding of the subject-relevant theory,withaccurate explanations and applications, butwith some areas needing more clarity ordetail. | Demonstratesabasic understanding of the subject-relevant theory, but explanations or applications are either incomplete or lacksufficientclarity. | The subject-relevant theory is incorrectly applied or explained, or an entirely incorrect model/theoryisused, not consistent with what is taught at Holmes. |
Direct and Indirect Method of Cash Flow Statement (4 marks) | The theory is clearly explained and comprehensively applied, demonstrating deep understandingandaccurate application of both methods. | The theory is well- explained and correctly applied to both methods, with minorimprovements needed for clarity. | The theory is explained and applied accurately, thoughtheremaybe a need for more depthorprecisionin understanding both methods. | The theory is either notfullyexplainedor applied, showing gaps in understanding or clarityaboutthetwo methods. | The theory is incorrectlyappliedor explained, or an incorrect approach nottaughtatHolmes is used. |
Operating Cash Flow(6 marks) | The theory is clearly explained and comprehensively applied, demonstrating deep understandingofoperating cash flows with accurate analysis. | The theory is well- explained and correctly applied, with a solid understanding of operatingcashflows, though minor issues maybe present. | The theory is explained and appliedcorrectly,but there are areas wheretheanalysisof operating cash flows could be stronger or more detailed. | The theory is either notfullyexplainedor applied, with significant gaps in understanding or clarity regarding operatingcashflows. | The theory is incorrectlyappliedor explained, or an incorrect model/theory not taught at Holmes is used. |
Investing Activities(6 marks) | Thetheoryisclearly explained and comprehensivelyapplied, | Thetheoryiswell- explained and correctlyapplied, | The theory is explainedand appliedaccurately, | The theory is either notfullyexplainedor applied,showing | The theory is incorrectlyappliedor explained,oran |
demonstratingathorough understandingofinvesting activities and accurate application. | with a strong understanding of investing activities, thoughtheremaybe minorissues. | but the analysis of investing activities may lack depth or clarityinsomeareas. | gaps in understanding or clarity about investingactivities. | incorrect model/theory not taughtatHolmesis used. | |
Financing Activities(6 marks) | The theory is clearly explained and comprehensively applied, demonstrating a deep understandingoffinancing activities with accurate analysis. | The theory is well- explained and correctly applied, with a solid understanding of financing activities, though minor improvementscould bemade. | The theory is explained and appliedcorrectly,but there are areas wheretheanalysisof financing activities could be more detailed or clearer. | The theory is either notfullyexplainedor applied, with significant gaps in understanding or clarity regarding financing activities. | The theory is incorrectlyappliedor explained, or an incorrect model/theory not taught at Holmes is used. |
Cash Flow Ratios(6 marks) | The theory is clearly explained and comprehensively applied, demonstrating deep understandingandaccurate calculation and interpretation of cash flow ratios. | The theory is well- explained and correctly applied, with a strong understanding of cash flow ratios, thoughminorissues maybe present. | The theory is explained and appliedcorrectly,but the analysis of cash flow ratios may lack depth or clarity in some areas. | The theory is either notfullyexplainedor applied, showing gaps in understanding or clarity about cash flow ratios. | The theory is incorrectlyappliedor explained, or an incorrect model/theory not taught at Holmes is used. |
Comparative Analysis and Conclusion(6marks) | Providesacomprehensive comparativeanalysiswith clear and insightful conclusions that demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject-relevant theory. | Provides a strong comparativeanalysis with well-supported conclusions, though there may be minor areas for improvement. | Provides a good comparative analysis with generally accurateconclusions, thoughtheremay be some gaps in clarity or depth. | Provides a basic comparativeanalysis withconclusionsthat are somewhat supported, but lacks depth or clarity in places. | Theanalysisiseither incorrect or lacks depth, with unsupported or unclear conclusions, or an incorrect model/theory not taught at Holmes is used. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.