GDECE106 ASSESSMENT 3 Rubric Curriculum Design Assignment Help

GDECE106 ASSESSMENT 3 Rubric Curriculum Design Task Description:

Design a one-week curriculum that incorporates inquiry-based approaches to human culture. Base your curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion. Use theoretical concepts from different perspectives discussed in the class and critically reflect on the relationship between theories and pedagogy.

Criteria

  • A design of one-week curriculum that incorporates inquiry-based approaches to human culture.
  • Clear basis of curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion.
  • Critical reflection of the relationship between theories and pedagogy.

Due Date: 11th September, 2024, 11.59 PM

Word count: 2000 words equivalent +/- 10% (excluding references)

NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.

Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.

Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)

Extension requests must be granted in writing before the assignment due date. Contact your lecturer in writing for extensions of up to 7 calendar days. Longer extensions may be granted but require special consideration. Special consideration applications must also be submitted before the date and require documentary evidence, such as medical certificates.

Grading Scale

CriteriaHigh Distinction (HD)Distinction (D)Credit (C)Pass (P)Not meeting minimum requirement (N)

C1. A design of one- week curriculum that incorporates inquiry- based approaches to humanculture.

(10 marks)

C1.1 A relevant curriculum design is clearly explained, how to incorporates inquiry-based approaches to human culture is explained, including critical reflection.C1.2 A relevant curriculum design is clearly explained, how to incorporates inquiry-based approaches to human culture is explained.C1.3 A relevant curriculum design is described, how to incorporates inquiry- based approaches to human culture is outlined.C1.4 curriculum design is relevant, how to incorporates inquiry-based approaches to human culture is mentioned.C1.5 the curriculum design is incomplete, orirrelevant.

C2. Clear basis of curriculum on themes from humanculture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion.

 

(10 marks)

C2.1 Basis of curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion is clearly explained in detail and in depth, with critical reflection.C2.2 Basis of curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion is clearly explained.C2.3 Basis of curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion is clearly described.C2.4 Basis of curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion is outlined.C2.5 Basis of curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion is barely mentioned or absent.

 

C3. Critical reflection of the relationship between theories and pedagogy.

(10 marks)

C3.1 The relationship between theories and pedagogy is explained in detail and in depth, with critical reflection.C3.2 The relationship between theories and pedagogy is clearly explained with relevant details.C3.3 The relationship between theories and pedagogy is clearly explained.

C3.4 The relationship between theories and pedagogy is discussed, a clear attempt has been madeto analyse

through the theories.

C3.5 The relationship between theories and pedagogy is absent or inaccurate, with no reference to the theory.

C4. Drawon relevant academic literature to support your explanation.

(5 marks)

C4.1 A broad range of relevant academic sources cited.

Sources effectively support claims / argument.

C4.2 A range of relevant academic sources cited.

Sources effectively support claims / argument.

C4.3 Relevant academic sources cited. Sources effectively supportclaims / argument.C4.4 Minimal academic sources cited. Sources do not effectively support claims/ argument.

C4.5 No academic sources cited

/irrelevant academic sources cited.

C5. Assignment is formatted according to requirements and written clearly and cohesively. APA 7 referencing is used. Word limitis adhered to.

 

 

(5 marks)

C5.1 The assignment is clear and free of typographical and structural features that hinder understanding. There is no confusion between authorvoice and that of sources. The assignment is formatted according to stated requirements.

Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-

C5.2 The assignment is clear with minor typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. There is minimal confusion between authorvoice and that of sources. The assignment is mostly formatted according to stated requirements.

Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-

C5.3 The assignment is clear with typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. There is minor confusion between authorvoice and that of sources. The assignment is partly formatted according to stated requirements.

Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA

C5.4 The assignment has typographical and structural features that significantly hinder understanding. There is confusion between author voice and thatof sources.

The assignment is minimally formatted according to stated requirements.

Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA

(7th Ed.) referencing

C5.5 The assignment has

typographical and structural features that prohibit understanding. There is confusion between author voiceand that of sources, or

author’s voice is absent. The assignment is not formatted according to stated requirements.

 text APA (7th Ed.)referencing style were used. Word limit met.

text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with minor inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors).

Word limit met.

(7th Ed.) referencing style wereused with inconsistencies (no more than 4 errors).

Word limit met.

contain several errors.

Word limit met.

Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7thEd.) referencing style were not used appropriately.

Word limit not met.

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.