Assessment 2 rubric
Task description:
Based on analysis of the case study provided, design appropriate learning and teaching strategies for the child in an early childhood education setting. The needs of the child should be understood through Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. The learning and teaching strategies should also be justified through ecological systems theory. Draw upon a range of literature to support your analysis and decision making.
Criteria:
Word count: 2000 words +/- 10%
NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.
Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.
Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)
Due Date: Week 12
Grading Scale:
Grade Criteria | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Not Meeting Requirements | ||
C1. Explain your understanding of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (15 marks) | 1.1 Bronfen- brenner’s ecological systems theory is explained in detail, with some critical reflection. | 1.2 Bronfen- brenner’s ecological systems theory is clearly explained. | 1.3 Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory is clearly described. | 1.4 Bronfen- brenner’s ecological systems theory is accurately outlined but may lack detail. | 1.5 Bronfen- brenner’s ecological systems theoryis outlined, may contain minor mis- understandings. | 1.6 Bronfen- brenner’s ecological systems theoryis discussed but contains key mis- understandings and/or inaccuracies. | 1.7 Bronfen- brenner’s ecological systems theoryis absent, or barely mentioned. |
C2. Apply the theory to analyse the focus child in the case study provided. | 2.1 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is applied to the case with detailed explanation and criticalreflection. | 2.2 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory isapplied to the case with detailed explanation. | 2.3 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is clearly applied to the case, with relevant details included to support understanding. | 2.4 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is clearly applied to the case. | 2.5 Child is clearly introduced, and a clear attempt has been made to analyse the case through ecological systems theory. | 2.6 Discussion of the child is brief, with no reference to the theory. | 2.7 Discussionof the child is either absent or mostly inaccurate. |
| (10 marks) | |||||||
| C3. | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 |
| Develop a range | Teaching and | Teaching and | Teaching and | Teaching and | Teaching and | Teaching and | Teaching and |
| of teaching and | learning | learning | learning strategies | learning | learning | learning | learning |
| learning | strategies are | strategies are | are clearly | strategies are | strategies are | strategies are | strategies are |
| strategies to | explained in | clearly | explained and | clearly | stated but may | noted, but | absent or mostly |
address the needs of the child | detail in terms of ecological | explained in terms of | connected to the analysis of thecase. | described and | not clearly address the | unclear or irrelevant. | inaccurate. |
| (15 marks) | systems theory and connected to the analysis of the case. Critical reflection on the strategies included. | ecological systems theory and connected to the analysis of the case. | meet the needs of the child. | needs of the child. | |||
C.4 Relevant academic literature is drawn upon to support explanations and arguments presented.
(5 marks) | 4.1 A broadrange of academic literature is drawn upon to justify argument | 4.2 A broadrange of academic literature is drawn upon to clarify argument | 4.3 A rangeof academic literature is drawn upon to support argument. | 4.4 A rangeof academic literature is drawn upon, but only superficially supports argument. | 4.5 Minimal academic literature drawn upon. | 4.6 Academic literature drawn upon, but irrelevant to target content. | 4.7 No literature drawn upon or literature drawn upon is not from appropriate sources. |
C5. Assignment is formatted according to requirements and written clearly and cohesively. APA 7 referencing is used. Word limitis adhered to. | C4.1 The assignment is clear and free of typographical and structural features that hinder understanding. There is no confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is formatted according to stated requirements. The assignment is formatted according to stated requirements. Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used.
Word limitmet. | C4.2 The assignment is clear with minor typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. There is minimal confusion between authorvoice and that of sources. The assignment is mostly formatted according to stated requirements. Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of- text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style | C4.3 The assignment is clear with typographical and structural features thatmay hinder understanding. There is minor confusion between author voice and thatof sources. The assignment is partlyformatted according to stated | C4.4 The assignment has typographical and structural features that significantly hinder understanding. There is confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is minimally formatted according to stated requirements. Mechanics of in- | C4.5 The assignment has typographical and structural features that prohibit understanding. There is confusion between authorvoice and that of sources, or author’s voice is absent. The assignment is not formatted according to stated requirements. Mechanics of in-textand end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing stylewere not used appropriately.
Word limit not met. | ||
(5 marks) | were used with minor inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors). Word limit met. | requirements. Mechanics of in- text and end-of- text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with inconsistencies (no more than 4 errors).
Word limit met. | text and end-of- text APA (7th Ed.) referencing containseveral errors. Word limit met. |
"Choose Punjab Assignment Help for expert guidance on GDECE 102 Learning and Development Birth assignments. We deliver top-quality, plagiarism-free solutions tailored to your academic needs, ensuring your success every step of the way!"
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
