GDECE 102 Learning and Development birth Assignment Help

GDECE 102 Learning and Development birth Assessment

 

Assessment 2 rubric

Task description:

Based on analysis of the case study provided, design appropriate learning and teaching strategies for the child in an early childhood education setting. The needs of the child should be understood through Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. The learning and teaching strategies should also be justified through ecological systems theory. Draw upon a range of literature to support your analysis and decision making.

Criteria:

  • Explain your understanding of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (300 - 500 words)
  • Apply the theory to analyse the focus child in the case study provided. (300 - 500 words)
  • Develop a range of teaching and learning strategies to address the developmental needs of the child (800 - 1000 words) This assignment should include a brief introduction and conclusion.

 

Word count: 2000 words +/- 10%

NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.

Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.

Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)

Due Date: Week 12

Grading Scale:

 

Grade

Criteria

High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassNot Meeting Requirements

C1.

Explain your understanding of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological

systems theory  (15 marks)

1.1

Bronfen- brenner’s ecological

systems theory is explained in

detail, with some critical reflection.

1.2

Bronfen- brenner’s ecological

systems theory  is clearly explained.

1.3

Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems  theory is clearly described.

1.4

Bronfen- brenner’s ecological

systems theory is accurately outlined but may lack detail.

1.5

Bronfen- brenner’s ecological

systems theoryis outlined, may contain minor mis-

understandings.

1.6

Bronfen- brenner’s ecological

systems theoryis discussed but contains key mis- understandings and/or

inaccuracies.

1.7

Bronfen- brenner’s ecological

systems theoryis absent, or barely mentioned.

C2.

Apply the theory to analyse the focus child in the case study provided.

2.1

Child is clearly introduced, and ecological

systems theory is applied to the case with

detailed explanation and criticalreflection.

2.2

Child is clearly introduced, and ecological

systems theory isapplied to the case with

detailed explanation.

2.3

Child is clearly introduced, and

ecological systems theory is clearly applied to the case, with relevant

details included to support

understanding.

2.4

Child is clearly introduced, and ecological

systems theory  is clearly applied to the case.

2.5

Child is clearly

introduced, and a clear attempt has been made to analyse the case through

ecological

systems theory.

2.6

Discussion of the child is brief, with no reference to the theory.

2.7

Discussionof the child is either absent or mostly inaccurate.

(10 marks)       
C3.3.13.23.33.43.53.63.7
Develop a rangeTeaching andTeaching andTeaching andTeaching andTeaching andTeaching andTeaching and
of teaching andlearninglearninglearning strategieslearninglearninglearninglearning
learningstrategies arestrategies areare clearlystrategies arestrategies arestrategies arestrategies are
strategies toexplained inclearlyexplained andclearlystated but maynoted, butabsent or mostly

address the

needs of the child

detail in terms of

ecological

explained in

terms of

connected to the

analysis of thecase.

described and

not clearly

address the

unclear or

irrelevant.

inaccurate.


 

(15 marks)systems theory and connected to the analysis of the case. Critical reflection on the strategies included.

ecological

systems theory  and connected to the analysis of the case.

 meet the needs of the child.needs of the child.  

C.4

Relevant academic literature is drawn upon to support explanations and arguments

presented.

 

 

(5 marks)

4.1

A broadrange of academic

literature is drawn  upon to justify

argument

4.2

A broadrange of academic

literature is

drawn upon to clarify argument

4.3

A rangeof academic literature is drawn upon to support

argument.

4.4

A rangeof academic

literature is

drawn upon, but only superficially supports

argument.

4.5

Minimal academic literature drawn upon.

4.6

Academic

literature drawn upon, but

irrelevant to target content.

4.7

No literature

drawn upon or

literature drawn upon is not from appropriate

sources.

C5. Assignment is formatted

according to

requirements and written clearly and cohesively. APA 7 referencing is used.

Word limitis adhered to.

C4.1 The assignment is clear and free of typographical and structural features that hinder understanding. There is no confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is formatted according to stated

requirements. The assignment is formatted according to stated

requirements. Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used.

 

Word limitmet.

C4.2 The assignment is clear with minor typographical and structural features that may hinder

understanding. There is minimal confusion between authorvoice and that of sources. The assignment is mostly formatted

according to stated requirements.

Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of- text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style

C4.3 The

assignment is clear with typographical and structural

features thatmay hinder

understanding. There is minor confusion

between author voice and thatof sources. The

assignment is partlyformatted according to

stated

C4.4 The

assignment has typographical and structural features  that significantly

hinder

understanding.

There is confusion between author voice and that of sources.

The assignment is minimally formatted

according to stated requirements.

Mechanics of in-

C4.5 The assignment has typographical and structural features that prohibit understanding. There is confusion

between authorvoice and that of

sources, or author’s voice is absent. The assignment is not formatted according to stated requirements.

Mechanics of in-textand end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing stylewere not used appropriately.

 

 

Word limit not met.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5 marks)

 were used with minor inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors). Word limit met.

requirements. Mechanics of in- text and end-of- text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with inconsistencies (no more than 4 errors).

 

Word limit met.

text and end-of- text APA (7th Ed.) referencing

containseveral errors.

Word limit met.

 

 

"Choose Punjab Assignment Help for expert guidance on GDECE 102 Learning and Development Birth assignments. We deliver top-quality, plagiarism-free solutions tailored to your academic needs, ensuring your success every step of the way!"

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.