Assessment # & Type |
Assessment Type |
Weighting |
Hurdle? |
ULOs |
Submission Due |
Assessment 1 Tutorial activities and/or Onlinediscussion forums |
Discussion of key topics with critical analysis of pivotal concepts in relation to organisational behaviour. |
20% |
No |
1, 2 |
Week 2, 3, 4, 5 Sunday 11.59 pm (MEL time) |
Assessment 2 Case Study report (1500 words) | Analyse behavioural characteristics of a specific organisation. Through a case study approach, identify theoretical models and concepts to describe and explain questionable behaviours and recommend possible interventions taking into considerations ethical and practical factors in their determinations. |
40 % |
No |
2, 3, 4 |
Week 4 Sunday 11.59 pm (MEL time) |
Assessment 3 Group Theoretical Report (2000 words) | Students will form groups. After identifying any two (relevant) leadership and change management theories, the group will apply the two theories to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). The theories will inform - 1. An analysis of the business’ commitment and contribution to environment sustainability and CSR, 2. Clear recommendations on how the business could improve its sustainability and CSR practices in the immediate to long-term perspectives. |
40% |
Yes |
2, 4, 5 |
Week 6 Sunday 11.59 pm (MEL time) |
Important Note: To pass the unit, students are expected to achieve at least 40% in the Hurdle tasks and an overall mark of 50%.
Assessment 1: Tutorial activities and/or Online discussion forums
The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important from the lecturer’s point of view but is also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and position on various topics.
Students will analyse the provided case study, identify theoretical models and concepts to describe and explain questionable behaviours and recommend possible interventions taking into consideration ethical and practical factors in their determinations.
Students will form groups (3-4). After identifying any two (relevant) leadership and change management theories, the group will apply the two theories to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). The theories will inform - 1. An analysis of the business’ commitment and contribution to environment sustainability and CSR, 2. Clear recommendations on how the business could improve its sustainability and CSR practices in the immediate to long-term perspectives. using concepts and theories covered in this unit. A complete detail for each assessment is provided in the next sections.
VIT enforces that the integrity of its students’ academic studies follows an acceptable level of excellence. VIT will adhere to its VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms where it explains the importance of staff and student honesty in relation to academic work. It outlines the kinds of behaviors that are “academic misconduct”, including plagiarism.
In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms, late submission of assessments will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be applied as soon as the deadline is reached.
Special Consideration is a request for:
Extensions of the due date for an assessment, other than an examination (e.g. assignment extension).
Special Consideration (Special Consideration in relation to a Completed assessment, including an end-of-unit Examination).
Students wishing to request Special Consideration in relation to an assessment the due date of which has not yet passed must engage in written emails to the teaching team to Request for Special Consideration as early as possible and prior to start time of the assessment due date, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates. For more information, visit VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms.
Reasonable adjustment in assessment methods will be made to accommodate students with a documented disability or impairment. Contact the unit teaching team for more information.
Contract cheating usually involves the purchase of an assignment or piece of research from another party. This may be facilitated by a fellow student, friend or purchased on a website. Other forms of contract cheating include paying another person to sit an exam in the student’s place.
Contract cheating warning:
By paying someone else to complete your academic work, you don’t learn as much as you could
have if you did the work yourself.
You are not prepared for the demands of your future employment.
You could be found guilty of academic misconduct.
Many of for pay contract cheating companies recycle assignments despite guarantees of
“original, plagiarism- free work” so similarity is easily detected by Turnitin.
Penalties for academic misconduct include suspension and exclusion.
Students in some disciplines are required to disclose any findings of guilt for academic misconduct before being accepted into certain professions (e.g. law).
You might disclose your personal and financial information in an unsafe way, leaving yourself open to many risks including possible identity theft.
You also leave yourself open to blackmail - if you pay someone else to do an assignment for you, they know you have engaged in fraudulent behavior and can always blackmail you.
The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important from the lecturer’s point of view but is also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and position on various topics.
Discussion and Participation:
This assignment will be marked based on the following criteria.
Criteria | Excellent (A: 80-100%) | Very Good(B: 70-79%) | Good (C: 60-69%) | Pass (D: 50-59%) | Fail (F:< 50%) | Mark |
Context and critical thinking |
|
|
|
|
| |
Disciplinary Knowledge |
|
|
|
|
| |
Grammar andVocabulary |
|
|
|
|
| |
Timely participation | It is important to check how student has been managetiming and promptness | |||||
Total marks | ||||||
Comments |
Students will analyse the “Pride-Building at Aramark” case study, identify theoretical models and concepts to describe and explain questionable behaviours and recommend possible interventions taking into consideration ethical and practical factors in their determinations.
The Case Study: Pride-Building at Aramark
Source: Griffin, R.W., Phillips, J.M., Gully, S. M. (2020), Organisational Behavior Managing People and People. 13th Ed. Cengage Learning.
Aramark, a leader in professional services headquartered in Philadelphia, has approximately 270,000 employees serving clients in twenty-two countries.51 Aramark wanted to better motivate its employees who clean airplanes for Delta and Southwest Airlines. Turnover of the low-paid staff of largely immigrant employees once exceeded 100 percent a year. Morale was low, and wallets and other valuable items that passengers left on planes had a tendency to disappear.
To turn things around, Aramark manager Roy Pelaez believed that he had to break some rules to get employees to feel motivated. "Managers are not supposed to get involved with the personal problems of their employees, but I take the opposite view," he says. "Any problem that affects the employee will eventually affect your account. If you take care of the employees, they will take care of you and your customer." Besides the typical "Employee of the Month" recognition programs, he brought in an English-language teacher to tutor employees twice a week on their own time, added Friday citizenship classes to help employees become U.S. citizens, and arranged for certified babysitters subsidized by government programs to keep single mothers showing up for work. He even created a small computer lab with three used computers so that employees could train each other in word processing and spreadsheets. "All of these things are important, because we want employees who really feel connected to the company," says Pelaez.
Employees who had perfect attendance over a six-month period or who turned in a wallet or pocketbook filled with cash and credit cards were rewarded with a day off with pay. Workers in the "Top Crew of the Month" were rewarded with movie passes, telephone calling cards, or "burger bucks." Turnover fell to 12 percent per year—amazing for jobs that pay only minimum wage to start. And crews started to recover large amounts of money from the airplanes, returning to passengers some 250 lost wallets with more than $50,000 in cash.52
In five years, Pelaez’s efforts helped to increase Aramark’s revenue in this area from $5 million to $14 million.53 Since 1998, programs such as these have helped Aramark consistently rank as one of the top three most admired companies in its industry in Fortune magazine's list of "America’s Most Admired Companies. "54
Analyse the behavioural characteristics of Aramark, a leader in professional services headquartered in Philadelphia. Identify the theoretical models and concepts of OB related to the below Questions:
Students will Individually analyse the Pride-Building at Aramark case study. This assignment requires that you write a 1,500-word individual report. This will involve critically assessing the issues presented in the case alongside theory/literature and making recommendations for improvements.
In your report you need to address all the issues in the case study.
Your discussion should be supported by citations from the current Organisational Behaviour literature. You are required to use 12-15 peer-review academic journal articles.
Executive Summary: is an overall summary of the entire report. It should:
Table of contents: This is an ordered list of the different sections and subsections of your report. It must include numbered section headings and subheadings, with their relevant pages. This indicates to your reader where various sections of your discussion can be found. Note: Table of contents should also be on a separate page. (No page number)
Introduction: (The numbering of the pages starts here)
Discussion and analysis: This section is where information relevant to the topic is presented. It must be fully referenced throughout, using various resources to support ideas. It should be
organised logically, using topic headings, subheadings and minor subheadings to break it into sections and sub-sections based on the ideas being discussed. All headings must be numbered
sequentially. The length of a discussion is approximately 60% of the total word count.
Conclusion: The purpose of the conclusion is to provide a summary of the major findings. It effectively attempts to answer the key questions posed in the introduction. When writing a conclusion, it may be useful to consider the following:
Recommendations: Often when writing a report specific recommendations for future actions are
requested. These can be included as a separate section after the conclusion or even as a part of the conclusion (using a sub-heading).
Reference List: This list includes the full publication details of all books, articles, Web sites and other sources referred to in the report. Only cited articles should be included in your reference
list and should be in alphabetical order.
Marking Criteria: Case Study report (1500 words) (Weightage 40%)
This assignment will be marked based on the following criteria.
Criteria | Excellent (A: 80-100%) | Very Good(B: 70-79%) | Good (C: 60-69%) | Pass (D: 50-59%) | Fail (F: < 50%) | Mark |
Executive Summary and Introduction (5/40 Marks) | Provides a concise overview of the case and assignment objectives, clearlyarticulating their significance. | Provides a clearoverview of thecase and assignment objectives, indicating their importance. | Offers an overview of the caseand assignment objectives, though may lack someclarity in significance. | Presents a basic overview of the case and assignment objectives, with limited emphasis on theirsignificance. | Absent or lacks clarity in presenting the case overview and assignment objectives. | |
Analysis of theCase (6/40 Marks) | Thoroughly identifies and analyses key issues, challenges, and opportunities presented in the case, demonstrating a deep understanding. | Identifies and analyses keyissues, challenges, and opportunities in the case, showing understanding. | Identifies key issues, challenges, and opportunities, demonstrating some understanding. |
Identifies some key issues and challenges, with basic understanding. |
Absent or lacks clarity in identifying key issues andchallenges. | |
Review and literature research (10/40 Marks) | Great research with clear associations between questions or problems and main course concepts. Good use of relevant sources. | The research demonstrates well-documented connections between the questions or problems and the main concepts. It utilizes a range of relevant sources effectively. | Good research and documented associations between questions or problems and main concepts. Some use of relevant sources. | Limited research and associations between questions or problems and mainconcepts. Little use of relevant sources. |
Incomplete research and associations betweenthe issues or problems and main concepts. Relevant sources are not used. | |
Conclusion (3/40 Marks) | Provides a concise summary of findings and recommendations, highlighting expected outcomes effectively. | Summarizes findings and recommendations, mentioning expected outcomes. | Summarizes findings and recommendations, with some mention of expected outcomes. | Presents a basic summary, briefly mentioning expected outcomes. |
Absent or lacks clarity in providing a conclusion. | |
Recommendations and observations on effective solutions (3/40 Marks) | Logical, well-reasoned, relevant observations and recommendations on suitable solutions to most issuesor problems. | The observations and recommendations provided are reasonable and relevant, offering suitable solutions to mostissues or problems. | Well-thought-out, solid observations and recommendations on solutions to many of the issues or problems. | Shallow recommendations and observations on effective solutions to a few of the issues or problems. |
Superficial recommendations and observations to effective solutions or lacks clarity. | |
Grammar and Vocabulary (3/40 Marks) | Demonstrates exemplary grammar and vocabulary usage throughout the assignment. | Shows proficient grammar and vocabulary usage with minor errors. | Contains some grammatical errors and vocabulary inconsistencies. | Contains noticeable grammatical errors and vocabulary issuesaffecting clarity. | Contains pervasive grammatical errors and vocabulary problems hindering comprehension. | |
Organization (3/40 Marks) | Presents ideas logically and coherently, maintaining a clear and organized structure. | Presents ideas logically, generally maintaining a clearstructure. | Presents ideas with some logical flow, though structure may be somewhat unclear at times. | Presents ideaswith limited logical flow, with structure oftenunclear or confusing. |
Absent or lacks coherence and organization. | |
References (4/40 Marks) | Uses a wide range of high- quality sources, correctly cited and referenced throughout the assignment. |
Uses relevant sources, mostly cited andreferenced correctly. | Uses some relevant sources, with occasional citation orreferencing errors. | Relies on limited or outdated sources, withfrequent citation or referencing errors. |
Absent or lacks propercitation and referencing. | |
Total marks | ||||||
Comments |
This is a group assignment where students are required to form groups of 3-4 members.
Students are required to analyse and explain, in report format, with reference to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). how the following theories would be applied:
Based on the above concepts, you need to apply two theories to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). The theories will inform: –
An analysis of the business’ commitment and contribution to environment sustainability and
CSR,
In your report you need to address all the issues in the case study.
Your discussion should be supported by citations from the current Organisational Behaviour literature. You are required to use 12-15 peer-review academic journal articles.
Executive Summary: is an overall summary of the entire report. It should:
Table of contents: This is an ordered list of the different sections and subsections of your report. It must include numbered section headings and subheadings, with their relevant pages. This indicates to your reader where various sections of your discussion can be found. Note: Table of contents should also be on a separate page. (No page number)
Introduction: (The numbering of the pages starts here)
indicates what key questions the report is trying to answer and what it is trying to achieve. Why was it written?
helps to explain how the report is organised. Look at your plan and consider your headings and sub-headings.
Discussion and analysis: This section is where information relevant to the topic is presented. It must be fully referenced throughout, using various resources to support ideas. It should be
organised logically, using topic headings, subheadings and minor subheadings to break it into sections and sub-sections based on the ideas being discussed. All headings must be numbered sequentially. The length of a discussion is approximately 60% of the total word count.
Conclusion: The purpose of the conclusion is to provide a summary of the major findings. It
effectively attempts to answer the key questions posed in the introduction. When writing a conclusion, it may be useful to consider the following:
Recommendations: Often when writing a report specific recommendations for future actions are requested. These can be included as a separate section after the conclusion or even as a part of
the conclusion (using a sub-heading).
Reference List: This list includes the full publication details of all books, articles, Web sites and
other sources referred to in the report. Only cited articles should be included in your reference list and should be in alphabetical order.
Conduct research on leadership and organisational behaviour theories, concepts, and best practices relevant to the case.
Propose practical solutions and recommendations supported by evidence from the case and relevant leadership and organisational behaviour literature.
Ensure clarity and conciseness in your writing. Present your ideas logically and coherently.
Format your assignment professionally, following academic writing standards. Use clear headings, subheadings, and appropriate citation style.
Seek feedback from the lecturer, tutor, or peers to refine your leadership and management plan before submission.
This assignment will be marked based on the following criteria.
Criteria | Excellent (A: 80-100%) | Very Good(B: 70-79%) | Good (C: 60-69%) | Pass (D: 50-59%) | Fail (F: < 50%) | Mark |
Executive Summary and Introduction | Provides a concise overview of the assignment objectives, clearly articulating their significance. | Provides a clearoverview of theassignment objectives, indicating theirimportance. | Offers an overview of the assignment objectives, though maylack some clarityin significance. | Presents a basic overview of the assignment objectives, with limitedemphasis on their significance. | Absent or lacks clarity in presenting the assignment objectives. | |
Argument Context Relevant to OB. |
structure matched to the task.
|
structure matched to the task.
|
|
paragraphs.
|
well ordered, or logical.
| |
Critical Thinking on OB |
|
|
|
|
key perspectives.
| |
OB Management Disciplinary Knowledge |
|
|
|
|
| |
Conclusion | Provides a concise summary of findings and recommendations, highlighting expected outcomes effectively. | Summarizes findings and recommendations, mentioning expected outcomes. | Summarizes findings and recommendations, with some mention of expected outcomes. | Presents a basic summary, briefly mentioning expected outcomes. |
Absent or lacks clarity in providing a conclusion. | |
Grammar and Vocabulary | Demonstrates exemplary grammar and vocabulary usage throughout the assignment. | Shows proficient grammar and vocabulary usage with minor errors. | Contains some grammatical errors and vocabulary inconsistencies. | Contains noticeable grammatical errors and vocabulary issues affecting clarity. | Contains pervasive grammatical errors and vocabulary problems hindering comprehension. | |
Organization | Presents ideas logically and coherently, maintaining a clear and organized structure. | Presents ideas logically, generally maintaining a clearstructure. | Presents ideas with some logical flow, thoughstructure may be somewhat unclearat times. | Presents ideaswith limited logical flow, with structure oftenunclear or confusing. |
Absent or lacks coherence and organization. | |
References | Uses a wide range of high- quality sources, correctly cited and referenced throughout the assignment. |
Uses relevant sources, mostly cited andreferenced correctly. | Uses some relevant sources, with occasional citation orreferencing errors. | Relies on limited or outdated sources, withfrequent citation or referencing errors. |
Absent or lacks propercitation and referencing. |
BUS5006 Organisational Behaviour
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.