ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF | |
Subject Codeand Title | BANASD603 Applied Optimisation in Business |
Assessment | Data pre-processing and business proposal |
Individual/Group | Individual |
Length | 1,000 words(+/- 10%) |
Learning Outcomes | The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
|
Submission | Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 4.2(Week 8). |
Weighting | 30% |
Total Marks | 100 marks |
You are required to complete three interrelated assessments for this subject with each to be assessed independently on their own merits. Assessment 2 requires you to produce a 1,000-word business proposal that: (1) demonstrates that data has been obtained and prepared; and (2) critiques the selection of analytical techniques to solve a business problem. The submission will include evidence of the data pre-processing steps taken and a business proposal critiquing how analytical techniques will be selected.
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task. To be successful in this assessment, you are required to read the resources provided in Modules 2 to 4.
Assessment 2 will prepare you to solve a business problem using your dataset for analysis. Translating a business problem into an optimisation and analytics solution is a process that requires significant preparation. Firstly, you must understand the business problem. Secondly, you must obtain and prepare the data to solve that problem. Thirdly, you must identify optimisation and analytical goals and techniques. Only after this preparation can you effectively perform the analysis and map the problem and goals to one or more business patterns. Therefore, preparation work is essential for a professional data analyst to perform before solutions to business problems can be discovered. In completing Assessment 2, you will gain the skills to identify an appropriate business
problem, obtain and prepare data to solve that problem, and utilise the tools and methods to confidently provide quality analysis.
Obtain and prepare data for an in-depth analysis of a business problem and produce a business proposal of 1,000 words (+/- 10%) that critiques your selection of analytical techniques. To be successful in this assessment, you are required to read the resources provided in Modules 2 to 4. Please complete the following three key tasks:
Assessment 2 is the second of three interrelated assessments in this subject with each to be independently assessed. Therefore, in Assessment 2, you can modify or even change the business problem and/or the selected dataset originally proposed in Assessment 1, based on the feedback you have received. Refining the problem and dataset will ensure that it aligns with the requirements for Assessment 2.
If you select a public dataset, a valid link to the dataset must be provided. If selecting a private dataset, a separate file must be uploaded when submitting your business proposal for this assessment. The best approach is to download and compress the dataset as a .zip file and submit this file together with the research report, using the following naming convention: BANASD603_LastnameFirstname_Assessment2Dataset.zip
Full instructions for how to do so will be provided by your Learning Facilitator. Any alternative approach to submitting your dataset file (such as providing a link to a shared drive), must be negotiated with your Learning Facilitator.
Since completing Assessment 1, if you decide to switch to a private dataset, remember that it is your responsibility to obtain permission from the data owner to use that data (e.g., from your employer). Usually, access to public datasets does not involve such privacy concerns.
An optimisation tool called SAS Viya will be used as the basis for Assessment 2.
SAS Viya is a powerful data mining tool used to provide valuable analytical insights (introduced in Module 1). To access SAS Viya, you will be given instructions for enrolling in SAS AcademicsOnDemand, an online platform through which the software is freely available for use in this assessment. For detailed instructions, refer to the Essential Resources provided in Module 2.
Your 1,000-word (+/- 10%) business proposal should be structured using the following headings (each section is not given equal weighting):
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submit this assessment via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu BANASD603: Applied Optimisation in Business.
If you select a private dataset, your submission will consist of the following two documents:
BANASD603_LastnameFirstname_Assessment2Dataset.zip
The business proposal as a Word .doc format using the following naming convention: BANASD603_LastnameFirstname_Assessment2BusinessProposal. doc
Note: To include a second file in your submission, once your first item has been uploaded, click
‘Browse Your Computer’ to attach the extra documents. Then, click Final Submit button.
Your Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policies, Procedures and Forms and the subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attribute | Fail (Yet to achieve minimumstandard) 0-49% | Pass (Functional) 50-64% | Credit (Proficient) 65-74% | Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% | High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Data and preparation
Total Percentage for this Assessment Attribute = 35% | 10% Dataset available and working | ||||
Dataset is unavailable and not fit-for-purpose. | Dataset is available and somewhat relevant. Limited details of appropriateness are provided. | Dataset has the basics required to solve the identified business problem with explanations of data appropriateness provided. | Dataset properly represents big data andsource provided (with at least 500 rows). The appropriateness of the dataset is explained. | Dataset properly represents big data andsource provided (with at least 500 rows). The appropriateness of the dataset is comprehensively explained. | |
5% Screenshot supplied | |||||
No SAS Viya screenshot is | Screenshot is included in | Screenshot is included in the report and can prove successful registration of SAS | |||
included in the business | the business proposal but | Viya. | |||
proposal. | does not prove | ||||
registration of SAS Viya. | |||||
10% Data Preparation | |||||
Headings are inappropriate or missing. AND | Headings are inappropriate or missing. OR | Headings are appropriate but lacks clarity. OR | Headings are appropriate and clear. Data preparation is explained with only | Headings are essentially self-explanatory. Data preparation is well- explained with no discernible errors |
Data preparation is very poorly done and unexplained. | Data preparation is insufficiently explained with numerous errors identified in the preparation. | Data preparation is explained but there are errors identified in the preparation. | minor errors identified in the preparation. | identified in the preparation. | |
10% Dataset Audit | |||||
Dataset audit is not undertaken and no outputs or graphsare identified. | Dataset audit is poorly undertaken with issues weakly identified. No or very limited outputs or graphs are provided. | Dataset audit is undertaken with basic issues identified. Limited or no outputs and graphs are provided. | Dataset audit is satisfactorily undertaken. Outputs and graphs are provided to demonstrate identification of the issues. | Dataset audit is expertly handled with clear outputs and graphs providedto demonstrate comprehensive work undertaken to identify the issues. | |
Identifies analytical techniques Total Percentage for this Assessment Attribute = 20% | 10% Identify Analysis Technique and application of Software | ||||
Inappropriate or missing identification and explanation of analytical techniques and their appropriateness. | Limited identification and explanation of analytical techniques and their appropriateness. Limited or no explanation of how software will be applied. | Satisfactory identification and explanation of analytical techniques and their appropriateness. Some attempt is made to understand how software will be applied. | Appropriate identification and explanation of analytical techniques and their appropriateness. Demonstrates proper understanding and application of the software tools. | Outstanding identification and explanation of analytical techniques and their appropriateness. Demonstrates expert understanding and application of the software tools. | |
10% Description of the Analysis Technique |
Misunderstanding of analytical technique as evidenced by the description. | A basic explanation of analytical technique is provided with numerous errors and missinglogic. | An adequate explanation of analytical technique is provided with some errors and missing logic. | A thorough explanation of analytical technique and its relevance to the data and problem is provided. | A clear and excellent explanation of analytical technique with strong support for its relevance to the data and problem is provided. | |
Alignment of dataset, business problem and analytical technique Total Percentage for this Assessment Attribute = 20% | 20% | ||||
Oversimplified or inconsistent explanation of alignment. | Limited understanding or weak explanation of alignment. | Basic explanation but showing some understandings of the alignment with analytical technique. | Clear explanation but missing technical elements while explaining alignment. | Exceptional work explaining alignment and how it relates to the analytical technique. | |
Ethical, legal, global or cultural factors Total Percentage for this Assessment Attribute = 15% | 15% | ||||
Ethical, legal, global or cultural factors are missing or not relevant to the given context. | Ethical, legal, global or cultural factors are partially relevant to the given context. | Ethical, legal,global or cultural factors are mostly relevant to the given context. | A good discussion of ethical, legal, global or cultural factors which are relevant to the given context. | A high-quality discussion of ethical, legal, global or cultural factors which are relevant to the given context. | |
3% Academic Referencing | |||||
Does not applyAPA referencing style. Citations are not | Applies basic APA referencing style with numerous | Applies adequate APA referencing style withonly minor | Applies APA referencing style with no errors. | Applies APA referencing style with no errors. |
Referencing, resources and communication Total Percentage for this Assessment Attribute = 10% | present in the business proposal. | errors. Citations are present in the business proposal. | errors. Citations are present in the business proposal. | Citations are present in the businessproposal. | Citations are present in the businessproposal. |
3% Relevance of References | |||||
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good-quality, credible and relevantresources to support and develop ideas. | Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas,but these are not always explicit or well-developed. | Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. | Demonstrates use of good-quality, credible and relevantresources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. | Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within andwithout the organisation for sourcingevidence. | |
4% Communication | |||||
Writing is done with limited focus on the topic and without proper logic flow. Numerous paragraphs are written with littleor no attention to transitions within and between paragraphs. | Writing is done with some focus and conciseness while some ideas are expressed without proper logic flow. Some paragraphs are written without proper attention to transitions within and between paragraphs. | Most writing is donewith focus and conciseness while some ideas are expressed without proper logic flow. Most paragraphs are written with proper attention to transitions within and between paragraphs. | Most writingis done with focus, conciseness and proper logic flow. Most paragraphs are written with proper attention to transitions within and between paragraphs. | Writing is highly coherent and concise with logic flow and smooth transition within and between paragraphs. |
The following SubjectLearning Outcomes areaddressed in thisassessment | |
SLO b) | Appraise how optimisation techniques improve data-driven and model-driven performance in solving business problems. |
SLO c) | Critique the selection of optimisation techniques to solve a business problem. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.