ASSESSMENT 2: Report
Summary
Title | Assessment 2: Report | |
Due Date | Friday 12th April 11:59pm AEDT (Week 6) | |
Length | 2000 words | |
Weighting | 50% | |
Submission | 1 word document submitted to Turnitin | |
Academic Integrity (See below for limits of use where GenAI is permitted) | Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, may not be used for this Assessment Task. You are required to demonstrate if you have developed the unit’s skills and knowledge without the support of GenAI. If you use GenAI tools in your assessment task, it may result in an academic integrity breach against you as described in the Student Academic and Non- Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.
Under the Rules - Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules (Section 3) students have the right to Appeal against the Academic Integrity Officers academic misconduct Determination, to the Executive Dean, with that determination being final and conclusive, and not subject to further Appeal within the University. Students are not able to appeal against | |
academic misconduct via the Unit Assessor or unit staff. | ||
Unit Learning Outcomes | You will demonstrate the following Unit Learning Outcomes on the successful completion of this task:
|
Task Description
This task requires you to reflect upon the Early Years Learning Framework [EYLF] (AGDE, 2022) principles and practices and write a report demonstrating your ability to identify and critique high- quality early childhood pedagogy.
Early childhood educators are required to understand the importance of high-quality practice and be able to identify what high-quality practice looks like. In this assessment, you will be asked to identify high-quality practice and determine the principles, theory and research that underpins such practice. This assessment aims to develop your understanding of how to align practice, principles, theory and research.
The Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) is a crucial document for early childhood education and care. You are to write a report that demonstrates your knowledge and understanding of how the EYLF principles and practices support high-quality pedagogy.
Your critical reflection should be written in an essay that critically analyses three EYLF Principles (two of which are Respect for diversity AND Sustainability; and one is your choice), and three EYLF Practices (two of which are Responsiveness to children AND Learning environments; and one is your choice). As part of your critical analysis, you will include your personal reflections on how you anticipate implementing these three principles and three practices, in high-quality early childhood education and care settings, to support best practice.
Your report should include an introduction that explains how the EYLF guides high-quality pedagogy, body paragraphs and a conclusion, with in-text citations and references to academic literature to support your perspectives.
The EYLF Principles and Practices that you can choose from are listed below (the compulsory principles and practices are in bold):
PRINCIPLES:
PRACTICES:
Follow the steps below to complete this task:
task’s name. E.g: MillsA_TCHR5003_assessment2_report
APA7th referencing format is required with a minimum of 10 references. Sources should include relevant early childhood policy and peer-reviewed literature. Link to SCU Libguide here: APA 7 Referencing.
Assessments should be submitted using the Turnitin activity titled “Assessment 2: Report” in the Assessments Tasks & Submission section on the Blackboard site. Only Microsoft Word documents submitted via the Turnitin portal on Blackboard will be accepted.
Students wishing to request special consideration to extend the due date of an assessment task must submit a Request for Special Consideration form via their MyEnrolment page as early as possible and prior to the original due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
Except when special consideration is awarded, late submission of assessment tasks will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be incurred as soon as the deadline is reached.
achieved on each subsequent calendar day until the mark reaches zero.”
Assignments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade and written feedback. Grades and feedback will be posted to “Grades & Feedback” section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow 7-10 days for marks to be posted.
At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility and respect in relation to academic work. The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework
GenAI May Not be Used
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, may not be used for this
Assessment Task. You are required to demonstrate if you have developed the unit’s skills and
knowledge without the support of GenAI. If you use GenAI tools in your assessment task, it may
result in an academic integrity breach against you as described in the Student Academic and Non- Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.