| Subject Code: | MBA502 | ||
| Subject Name: | Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity | ||
| Assessment Title: | Emotional Intelligence Self-Reflective Essay | ||
| Assessment Type: | Reflective Essay | ||
| Assessment Length: | 1500 | Words | (+/-10%) |
| Weighting: | 30% | ||
| Total Marks: | 30 | ||
| Submission: | MyKBS (Turnitin) | ||
| Due Date: | Tuesday 11.55pm Week 4 |
Your Task
Using both: Golman’s Model and the two of six Genos (2018) Emotional Intelligence (EI) domains of selfawareness and self-management, students are to write an EI Self-Reflective Essay. To enrich their selfreflection, students should use 1 of the 5 EI tools discussed in week 2.
Assessment Description
In Weeks 1-5, students have familiarised themselves with two models of EI: Goleman and Genos.
In this Self-Reflective essay, students need to analyse their results of the EI Genos test by relating it to the theories discussed in weeks 1 to 5 by focusing on Self-Awareness and Self-Management in both Models (Goleman and Genos). In addition, students need to demonstrate how the practice of 1 of the 5 EI tools from week 2 (either mindfulness or journaling or gratitude or strength spotting or meditation app) have increased their self-awareness and self-management. Finally, students are to reflect on any implications of their increased EI in their future career as professionals.
The link to the Genos EI Workplace Behaviour Self Report Assessment will be sent out in Week 2 via Announcements.
Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline 2024 v4
Assessment Instructions
Students should follow the essay format as identified below:
➢ Introduction (150 words)
➢ Evidence of the growth of Self-Awareness and engagement with Genos and Goleman’s models (400 words)
➢ Evidence of the growth of Self-Management and engagement with Genos and Goleman’s models (400 words)
➢ Implications for your future career (400 words) ➢ Conclusion (150 words)
➢ Reference List (using the Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style throughout your essay and the reference list at the end)
➢ References:
• Your Genos and Goleman references
• 1 more academic reference in addition to Genos and Goleman
• 1 or more business references, such as business articles, news items, and/or comparison websites.
| LO1: | Analyse the key features of emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence, as well as one’s own strengths and weaknesses in relation to EI / CI. |
| LO2: | Apply the concepts of emotional and cultural intelligence to the modern workplace, and the implications for leadership, teams and for transforming organisational cultures. |
Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline 2024 v4
Important Study Information Important Study Information
Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
Please read the policy to learn the answers to these questions:
• What is academic integrity and misconduct?
• What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
• How can I appeal my grade?
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
Length Limits for Assessments
Penalties may be applied for assessment submissions that exceed prescribed limits.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Further details can be accessed at https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Page 4 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline 2024 v4
Related Article: MBA621 Healthcare Systems Assigment Help
Generative AI Traffic Lights
Please see the level of Generative AI that this assessment has been designed to accept:
Page 5 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline 2024 v4
| Traffic Light | Amount of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenerativeAI) usage | Evidence Required | This assessment (✓) |
| Level 1 | Prohibited:No GenerativeAI allowedThis assessment showcases your individual knowledge, skills and/or personal experiences in the absence of Generative AI support. | The use of generative AI is prohibited for this assessment and may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. | This assessment is Level 1 |
| Level 2 | Optional:You may use GenerativeAI for research and content generation that is appropriately referenced.See assessment instructions for detailsThis assessment allows you to engage with Generative AI as a means of expanding your understanding, creativity, and idea generation in the research phase of your assessment and to produce content that enhances your assessment. I.e., images. You do not have to use it. | The use of GenAI is optional for this assessment.Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference GenerativeAI.https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing -other-sources/referencing-othersources-generative-aiIn addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment.Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. | |
| Level 3 | Compulsory:You must use GenerativeAI to complete your assessmentSee assessment instruction for detailsThis assessment fully integrates Generative AI, allowing you to harness the technology's full potential in collaboration with your own expertise.Always check your assessment instructions carefully as there may still be limitations on what constitutes acceptable use, and these may be specific to each assessment. | You will be taught how to use generative AI and assessed on its use.Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference GenerativeAI.https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing -other-sources/referencing-othersources-generative-aiIn addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment.Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
