Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Trimester | T3 2025 |
| Unit Code | HT5001 |
| Unit Title | Foundations of Education Development |
| Assessment Type | Individual Pedagogical Inquiry |
| Weight | 50% |
| Word limit (if applicable) | 1,500 words |
| Submission Guidelines | - All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.<br>- The assignment must be in MS Word format unless otherwise specified. |
| Academic Integrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment. |
| Penalties | - All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time, along with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.<br>- Your answers must be based on Holmes Institute syllabus of this unit. Outside sources may not amount to more than 10% of any answer and must be correctly referenced in full. Over-reliance on outside sources will be penalised<br>- Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and referencing. |
Individual Assignment Guidelines and Specifications
Your task:
Individual Pedagogical Inquiry
Overview:
This task has two parts. You will observe a video of a play event and write a reflection and analysis based on what you saw.
Part A - Observed Practice (Completed in Week 7 class)
Part B - Reflection and Analysis
Based on your chosen video and notes, write a 1500-word reflection addressing the following:
Instructions:
Weighting 50% Word Count 1,500 Due Week 8
END OF FINAL INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT
Rubric
Linking Observation to EYLF Learning Outcomes (20%)
| Not Satisfactory (0-49%) | Pass (50-59%) | Credit (60-69%) | Distinction (70-79%) | High Distinction (80-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does not link the observation to the EYLF or Learning Outcomes, or explanation is inaccurate. | Provides a basic link between the observation and the EYLF, with minimal examples. | Provides an adequate explanation linking the observation to the EYLF and Learning Outcomes, though links may lack depth. | Provides a clear explanation linking the observation to the EYLF and Learning Outcomes, with relevant examples. | Provides a comprehensive explanation of how the observation links to the EYLF and its Learning Outcomes, connecting multiple relevant Outcomes with detailed examples. |
Analysis Using Relevant Theory (20%)
| Not Satisfactory (0-49%) | Pass (50-59%) | Credit (60-69%) | Distinction (70-79%) | High Distinction (80-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No relevant theory applied, or application is inaccurate. | Provides a basic analysis using a relevant theory, but application is limited or unclear. | Provides an adequate analysis using a relevant theory, but connections to the observation are general or lack depth. | Provides a clear analysis using at least one relevant theory, applied appropriately to the observation. | Provides an insightful, well-structured analysis using at least one relevant theory (e.g., Piaget, Vygotsky) that is thoroughly applied to the observation. |
Identity, Socialisation, and Sense of Belonging (20%)
| Not Satisfactory (0-49%) | Pass (50-59%) | Credit (60-69%) | Distinction (70-79%) | High Distinction (80-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does not address identity, socialisation, and belonging, or discussion is inaccurate. | Provides a basic discussion with minimal examples. | Provides an adequate discussion but may lack depth or clear examples. | Provides a clear discussion with relevant examples of identity, socialisation, and belonging. | Provides a comprehensive discussion showing how the observation demonstrates children's identity, socialisation, and sense of belonging, with clear, relevant examples. |
Educator's Role and Intentional Teaching (20%)
| Not Satisfactory (0-49%) | Pass (50-59%) | Credit (60-69%) | Distinction (70-79%) | High Distinction (80-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does not address the educator's role or intentional teaching, or explanation is inaccurate. | Provides a basic discussion with minimal examples. | Provides an adequate discussion but may lack detail or depth. | Provides a clear analysis of the educator's role and intentional teaching strategies, with relevant examples. | Provides a detailed and reflective analysis of the educator's role, clearly explaining intentional teaching strategies with strong examples. |
Referencing and writing skills (20%)
| Not Satisfactory (0-49%) | Pass (50-59%) | Credit (60-69%) | Distinction (70-79%) | High Distinction (80-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Writing is unclear, poorly structured, and contains frequent errors. Referencing is missing, incorrect, or does not follow Harvard style. | Writing is understandable but may contain multiple grammar or structure issues. Referencing attempts made but with frequent errors in Harvard format. | Writing is generally clear but may have occasional grammar or structure issues. Harvard referencing is mostly correct but with some inconsistencies. | Writing is mostly clear and well-structured, with very few errors. Sources are referenced accurately in Harvard style with minor formatting errors. | Writing is clear, well-structured, and free from errors. All sources are accurately referenced using Harvard style, with correct in-text citations and reference list formatting. |
Total (100%)
Note: This report is provided as a sample for reference purposes only. For further guidance, detailed solutions, or personalized assignment support, please contact us directly.

Unit Code: HT5001
Unit Title: Foundations of Education Development
Assessment Type: Individual Assignment
Word Count: Approx. 1,500 words
Play is a central element of early childhood education, providing children with meaningful opportunities to explore, interact, and construct knowledge. The Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) recognises play as a vital context for learning, where children develop socially, emotionally, cognitively, and physically (Department of Education, 2022). Observing children’s play allows educators to understand how learning occurs and how pedagogy can be intentionally designed to support development.
This pedagogical inquiry is based on the observation of a video showing a group of preschool-aged children engaging in cooperative block play within an early learning setting. The reflection analyses how the observed learning aligns with the EYLF Learning Outcomes, applies Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory to interpret children’s learning, examines how identity, socialisation, and belonging are demonstrated, and reflects on the role of the educator and intentional teaching strategies used to support learning.
The selected video features four children aged approximately four to five years engaged in block play during an indoor free-play session. The play takes place in a designated learning area with a variety of wooden blocks available. The children collaboratively construct a large structure, referring to it as a “city,” which includes houses, roads, and a bridge.
Throughout the observation, children communicate their ideas verbally, negotiate roles, and solve problems together. When parts of the structure collapse, children persist, adjust their strategies, and rebuild. An educator is positioned nearby, observing attentively and occasionally interacting by asking open-ended questions rather than directing the activity. The play environment is calm, inclusive, and supportive, allowing children to take ownership of their learning.
The observed play strongly aligns with multiple EYLF Learning Outcomes, demonstrating holistic learning and development.
Children demonstrate autonomy, confidence, and agency throughout the play. They independently choose materials, make decisions, and express their ideas. For example, one child confidently suggests adding a bridge, while another leads the construction of the base. These actions reflect children’s developing sense of identity, as they see themselves as capable learners whose ideas are valued (Department of Education, 2022).
The collaborative nature of the play highlights children’s ability to work respectfully with others. Children negotiate turn-taking, listen to peers’ suggestions, and resolve minor conflicts independently. This demonstrates their growing understanding of social relationships, cooperation, and shared responsibility, aligning closely with Outcome 2.
Problem-solving and persistence are evident when the structure becomes unstable. Instead of abandoning the task, children experiment with wider blocks and discuss ways to strengthen the base. This shows curiosity, creativity, resilience, and sustained concentration, all of which are key indicators of Outcome 4.
Children use language to plan, explain, negotiate, and reflect on their construction. They describe their ideas, ask questions, and respond to peers. Non-verbal communication, such as pointing and gestures, is also used to support meaning-making. This demonstrates Outcome 5, as children communicate effectively for social and learning purposes.
Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory emphasises that learning occurs through social interaction and is shaped by cultural and social contexts (Vygotsky, 1978). According to this theory, children construct knowledge through collaboration with peers and guidance from more knowledgeable others.
In the observed play, learning is clearly socially mediated. Children learn from each other by sharing ideas, modelling strategies, and providing feedback. For example, when one child demonstrates how to stabilise the structure, others adopt the same strategy. This reflects the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), where children extend their learning through social interaction.
The educator’s involvement further supports Vygotsky’s theory. By asking open-ended questions such as, “What could you try next?” the educator scaffolds learning without taking control. This intentional support encourages critical thinking while allowing children to remain active participants in their learning process.
The observation provides strong evidence of children’s developing identity, socialisation skills, and sense of belonging. Identity is demonstrated through children’s confidence in expressing ideas, taking initiative, and identifying themselves as contributors to the group task.
Socialisation is evident in the cooperative interactions, shared problem-solving, and respectful communication among children. They learn to negotiate, compromise, and collaborate, which are essential social skills in early childhood development.
A sense of belonging is fostered through inclusive play, where all children are welcomed and valued. The supportive environment and positive peer relationships enable children to feel safe and connected, reinforcing emotional wellbeing and engagement in learning (Department of Education, 2022).
The educator plays a critical role in supporting learning through intentional teaching practices. Rather than directing the play, the educator observes, listens, and responds strategically. This approach respects children’s autonomy while ensuring learning opportunities are maximised.
Intentional teaching is evident in the educator’s use of open-ended questions, which prompt reflection and problem-solving. The educator also intentionally provides open-ended resources that encourage creativity and exploration. By creating a supportive environment and engaging thoughtfully with children, the educator enhances learning outcomes without disrupting the flow of play.
This pedagogical inquiry highlights the importance of play as a powerful context for learning in early childhood education. The observed block play demonstrates strong alignment with the EYLF Learning Outcomes, supporting children’s identity, social relationships, problem-solving skills, and communication. Through the lens of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, the significance of social interaction and scaffolding in learning is clearly evident. The educator’s intentional teaching practices further enrich children’s learning experiences by fostering independence, collaboration, and critical thinking. Overall, the observation reinforces the value of play-based pedagogy in supporting holistic child development.
Department of Education (2022). Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia. Canberra: Australian Government.
Edwards, S. (2017). Play-based learning and intentional teaching. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(2), 4–11.
Fleer, M. (2018). Conceptual play and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2009). Conceptualising progression in the pedagogy of play and sustained shared thinking. Educational and Child Psychology, 26(2), 77–89.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.