| Subject Code: | TECH4100 |
| Subject Name: | UX and Design Thinking |
| Assessment Title: | Report evaluation |
| Assessment Type: | Individual |
| Word Count: | 2000 Words (+/-10%) |
| Weighting: | 30% |
| Total Marks: | 30 |
| Submission: | Via My KBS |
| Due Date: | Week10 |
Your Task
This assessment is to be completed individually. In this assessment, you will apply design thinking models to real-world UX design projects. Additionally, you will evaluate UX design principles and practices in the development of web and mobile software applications.
The assessment will be an advanced-level report that will require students to show case their ability to apply design thinking models, analyse the UX development life cycle, and evaluate UX design principles and practices in the development of web and mobile software applications.
Assessment Task: In this assessment, you are required to create a comprehensive UX Design Report for a web or mobile software application of your choice. The report should demonstrate your advanced knowledge and skills in applying design thinking models, analysing the UX development life cycle, and evaluating UX design principles and practices.
Assessment deliverables:
This assessment aims to achieve the following subject learning outcomes:
| LO1 | Apply design thinking models to real-world UX design projects. |
| LO2 | Analyse the UX development lifecycle and the purpose of each phase. |
| LO3 | Evaluate UX design principles and practices in the development of web and mobile software applications. |
Students must conduct research externally and included references in order to produce a well referenced assessment. You should use at least ten (10) sources of information and reference these in accordance with the Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. These may include websites, social media sites, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. These references should be presented as in-text citations and a referencing list at the end of your assessment (not included in the word limit).Wikipedia and other popular sites are not to be used.
Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
Please read the policy to learn the answers to these questions:
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
 |
Penalties may be applied for assessment submissions that exceed prescribed limits.
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Further details can be accessed at https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
All assessments including draft copies must be written and submitted in English. The use of translation tools are not permitted.
PleaseseethelevelofGenerativeAIthatthisassessmentisLevel2hasbeendesignedtoaccept:
Traffic Light | Amount of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) usage |
Evidence Required | This assessment (✓) |
Level1 |
Prohibited:
No Generative AI allowed This assessment showcases your individual knowledge, skills and/or personal experiences in the absence of Generative AI support. |
The use of generative AI is prohibited for this assessment and may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. | |
Level2 |
Optional: You may use Generative AI for research and content generation that is appropriately referenced.
See assessment instructions for details This assessment allows you to engage with Generative AI as a means of expanding your understanding, creativity, and idea generation in the research phase of your assessment and to produce content that enhances your assessment. I.e., images. You do not have to use it. |
The use of Gen AI is optional for this assessment.
Your collaboration with Generative AI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference Generative AI. https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your Generative AI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment.
Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
✓ |
Level3 |
Compulsory: You must use Generative AI to complete your assessment
See assessment instruction for details
This assessment fully integrates Generative AI, allowing you to harness the technology's full potential in collaboration with your own expertise. Always check your assessment instructions carefully as there may still be limitations on what constitutes acceptable use, and these may be specific to each assessment. |
You will be taught how to use generative AI and assessed on its use.
Your collaboration with Generative AI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference Generative AI.
https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai
In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your Generative AI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment. Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
