Title | Assessment 1 - Critical Review |
Type | Reflective Analysis on a Contemporary Issue |
Due Date | March 28, at 11:59 pm AEST (endof Week 3) |
Length | 1500 – 2000words |
Weighting | 50% |
Academic Integrity | GenAI may be usedin this task You may use Grammarly Premium to provide feedback and suggestions on your writing for academic tone, written expression, grammar, Australian English spelling, andpunctuation. You must not use GenAI to generate ideas for thisassessment task. |
Submission | Word document submitted to Turnitin (Do not submitPDF documents) |
Unit Learning Outcomes | This assessment task maps to the following ULOs:
|
Rationale
As an early childhood teacher, your understandings of issues that affect the early childhood profession will influence your professional philosophy. This is why it is fundamental for pre- service teachers to be able to articulate a personal teaching philosophy, linking it to established educational theories and current research and effective pedagogy. This assessment requires you to demonstrate critical reflection skills and promote the integration of theory and practice.
Task Description
Students will consider three of the contemporary issues explored in the unit in modules 1-3 and write a short summary of each issue. These issues will help inform your personal philosophy statement that will be supported by current research and relevant to professional practice.
Task Instructions
Title | Assessment 1 - CriticalReview |
Type | Reflective Analysis on a Contemporary Issue |
Due Date | March 28, at 11:59 pm AEST (endof Week 3) |
Length | 1500 – 2000words |
Weighting | 50% |
Academic Integrity | GenAI may be usedin this task You may use Grammarly Premium to provide feedback and suggestions on your writing for academic tone, written expression, grammar, Australian English spelling, andpunctuation. You must not use GenAI to generate ideas for thisassessment task. |
Submission | Word document submitted to Turnitin (Do not submitPDF documents) |
Unit Learning Outcomes | This assessment task maps to the following ULOs:
|
Rationale
As an early childhood teacher, your understandings of issues that affect the early childhood profession will influence your professional philosophy. This is why it is fundamental for pre- service teachers to be able to articulate a personal teaching philosophy, linking it to established educational theories and current research and effective pedagogy. This assessment requires you to demonstrate critical reflection skills and promote the integration of theory and practice.
Task Description
Students will consider three of the contemporary issues explored in the unit in modules 1-3 and write a short summary of each issue. These issues will help inform your personal philosophy statement that will be supported by current research and relevant to professional practice.
Task Instructions
Questions:
Question 1: Module 1
Scenario: Jack, a 4-year-old boy attends kindergarten for three days per week and likes to play outside with his friends. Jack’s mother spends some time in the room when she comes to pick him up and constantly asks him to be inside and read some books to developing his reading skills. One day, his mother shared her concern with you by saying that she is very worried about Jack’s reading and writing skills as most of the time Jack is playing outside with friends and there is no teaching and learning sessions in this room. She thinks Jack will have lower academic results in primary school as most of the time, he is busy to play with friends.
Drawing on literature:
Question 2: Module 2
Read through the very recent data outlined in the ACECQA snapshots for 2024. Highlighted in module 2. From this data, identify one (1) issue that relates to the quality of early childhood education and care.
Question 3: Module 3
Fatima, a 4-year-old child has recently moved from her country to Australia with her parents. The family informed the service that Fatima has been diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and as they are new in the area, do not know about getting the support from the community. They ask the educator of the room to provide some information about the available services in the community. The educator was in a rush to finish her shift and replied, “Sorry there is no service in the community for migrated people. You can ask your GP”.
Drawing on literature:
Please note:
Formatting and style
Referencing
Resources
Referencing Style Resource:
Please refer to the APA 7th Referencing Guide for this task - https://libguides.scu.edu.au/ap
Writing and Analysing Resources:
Task Submission
Please note:
Resubmission
As per SCU Rules Relating to Awards - Rule 3 - Coursework Awards - Student Assessment and Examinations: Section 6 - Assessment Resubmission, there are NO resubmissions available for either of the tasks in this unit. Requests for resubmission of either task will be declined in line with the SCU Assessment, Teaching and Learning Procedure - https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255
Special Consideration
Please refer to the Special Consideration section of Policy https://policies.scu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=140
Late Submissions & Penalties
Please refer to the Late Submission & Penalties section of Policy https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255
Academic Integrity
At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility, and respect in relation to academic work. Please check the first page of this booklet for what types of GenAi may be used.
The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic, and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework
Note: Academic Integrity breaches include poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations correctly, close paraphrasing, plagiarism, recycling, misrepresentation, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, fabricating information.
Grades & Feedback
Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades and Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow 7 days for marks to be posted.
Assessment Criteria
See the marking rubric for the marking criteria and grading standards.
Description of SCUGrades
High Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The stu dent’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Credit:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying
relevant skills andconcepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent inrelation to the learning requirements specified.
Pass:
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area.
Thestudent’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learningrequirements specified.
Fail:
The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
Assessment Rubric
Marking Criteria and % allocation | High Distinction 100% + | High Distinction (85-99%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (59-64%) | Fail 1-49% | Absent Fail 0% |
Criterion 1: Identification of why theseare "issues" in early childhood education and care. 10% | Achieves all the criteria for a high distinction to an exemplary standard with outstanding integration of the unitcontent and references. | Insightful, in- depth and logical discussion is evident in relation to identifying why the three contemporary issues are important in early childhood education and care. | A well- developed, clear and concise discussion is evident in relation to identifying why the three contemporary issues are important in early childhood education and care. | A developing discussion is evident in identifying why the three issues are important in early childhood education and care but require further thought. | Satisfactory identification of why the three issues are important in earlychildhood education and care | Little identification of why the three issues are important in early childhood education and care | Not attempted. |
Criterion 2: Analysis of a range of positions on each of the three issues that has been highlighted in the literature. 10% | Achievesall the criteriafor a high distinction to an exemplary standard, with outstanding integration of the literature. | Excellent analysis of a range of positions on each of the three issues and validated witha wide range of literature sourced from the unit and | A well- developed analysis of a range of positions on each of the three issueswith links that have been highlighted with a wide rangeof | A developing analysis of a range of positions on each of the three issueswith links that have been highlighted in literature but required a more | Satisfactory analysis of a range of positions on each of the three issues with links that have been highlighted in literature but required greater detail and an in- | Poor analysisof a range of positions on each of the three issues with links that have been highlighted in the literature. | Not attempted. |
independent research. | literature sourced from the unit and independent research. | in-depth connection with a wide range of literature sourced from the unit and independent research. | depth connection with a widerange of literature sourced from the unit and independent research. | ||||
Criterion 3: Position on each issue presented and justified. 10% | Achieves all the criteria for a high distinction to an exemplary standard, with outstanding integration of theunit materials and a deep knowledge of the issues. | Demonstrates a clear, insightful and critical positionon each issue with excellent justifications of the impact on early childhood education and care. | Demonstrates a clear and insightful position on each issue with well justifications of the impact on early childhood education and care. | Demonstrates a clear position on each issue with some developing justifications of the impact on early childhood education and care. | The student’s position on each issuehas been presented and is satisfactorily justified with reference to the impacton early childhood education and care. | The student’s position on each issuehas not been presented and there is no justification with reference to the impact on early childhood education and care. | Not attempted. |
Criterion 4: The critical review/s of the three issues reflects deep engagement with the unit materials, current literature and publications. 10% | Achievesall the criteriafor a high distinction to an exemplary standard, with outstanding engagement with the unit materials and current literature. |
The critical review/s of the three issues reflects very deep and insightful engagement with the unit materials, current literature and publications. | The critical review/s of the three issues reflects deep engagement with the unit materials, current literature and publications. | The critical review/s of the three issues reflects satisfactory engagement with the unit materials, current literature and publications. | The critical review/s of the three issues reflects limited engagement with the unit materials, current literature and publications. | The critical review/s of the three issues reflects littleor no engagement with the unit materials, current literature and publications. | Not attempted. |
Criterion 5: Standard of writing and presentation - spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraph structure, APA 7th referencing. 10% | Achievesall the criteriafor a high distinction to an exemplary standard, without any errors. | Writing is clear, insightful and cohesive and flows seamlessly throughout so that clear connections between sections are evident. Flawless use of APA referencing style is evident and there are no errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar. | In-depth and clear writing with minor errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraph structure, and APA 7th referencing | Good standard of writing and presentation with some errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraph structure, APA 7th referencing | Satisfactory standard of writing and presentation with many errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraph structure, APA 7th referencing | Poor standard of writing and presentation with many errors in spelling, punctuation, grammar, paragraph structure, APA 7th referencing | Not attempted. |
![]() |
![]() | |||
![]() |
Punjab Assignment Help offers expert-written, plagiarism-free assignments with timely delivery and affordable pricing, ensuring academic success for students. Contact us now.
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.