ASSESSMENT3 BRIEF | |
Subject Code and Title | RES611 Critical Literature Review |
Assessment | Project Statement |
Individual/Group | Individual |
Length | 1500 words (+/-10%) |
Learning Outcomes | The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
|
Submission | Due By 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT end of Module 6.1(week11) |
Weighting | 40% |
Total Marks | 100 marks |
Assessment Task
Develop a Project Statement for scholarly research in your chosen field.
Context
The Project Statement should be seen as the first stage of a developed project proposal that students may develop if completing RES612 Project Proposal. This assessment is the conceptualisation phase and orientation to the literature and problem scope. You will demonstrate, via this assignment that your chosen inquiry is tenable and is based upon basic and/or applied research.
The Project Statement has the following objectives:
The project proposal, especially its problem component, should be firmly grounded on existing and recent research to evidence that the inquiry is current, do-able, meaningful and will contribute to the published body of knowledge in the area.
Instructions
A Project Statement is expected to introduce the topic, articulate the problem that is sought to be resolved, present the purpose of the research and specific the research questions that will be answered and the hypotheses/propositions that will be tested. Often, the project statement will include a brief research review (which you have already completed as Assessment2) and a tentative outline of the research design (which you will further develop in RES612 Project Proposal).
Address each of the following sections in your submission:
While in Assessment 2, you may have taken an approach of introducing the topic within the broader context of the literature, herein the introduction should be written in a manner as to lead the audience to the problem being investigated. You must conclude this section by listing the remaining sections to follow.
Something must be broken that needs to be fixed, and this may also include opportunities that are yet to be realized. Address the following aspects in your problem statement:
Documented in the literature thus far, and the outcomes of such research. This will enable you to distinguish your own inquiry from others. This will form the foundation of your research. This will contribute to your articulation of the significance of the problem and the need for advanced investigation.
Address the following aspects in your purpose statement:
Research Questions and Hypotheses/Propositions-State the question(s) that you will ask and the hypotheses or proposition you will test
Flowing seamlessly from the problem and purpose statements, the research questions will unambiguously state the questions that you will ask of the data that you will collect in the process of your research. You can have more than one research question but having more than four may make the research unwieldy. Each question will be associated with a testable hypothesis or proposition statement. This hypothesis will be presented as the null hypothesis, and its alternative should also be stated. A proposition used in qualitative research will be presented as a statement.
Use the framework below to present these. If Quantitative:
RQ1:
Null Hypothesis 1:
Alternative Hypothesis 1: If Qualitative:
RQ1:
Proposition:
Refine the direction of your assessment 1 to flow-onto the Problem Statement, Purpose Statement and Research Questions. This section will help your audience understand the context in which your Project Statement is situated.
In the conclusion section, recap the problem statement, state the purpose and indicate how answering your listed research questions will lead to a solution to the identified problem.
State how your research is distinguished from other works in the literature.
Please refer to the Assessment Rubric for details on how your submission will be assessed.
Referencing
The references list should contain the sources of information you used and cited in your paper. Only include those cited in the text (this is not a bibliography) but include every citation.
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submission Instructions
Submit your Assessment 3 Project Statement using the following naming convention: RES611_A_Jones_Assessment 3.doc (word document.) Submit your report via the Assessment link in Blackboard. Your Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes | Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) | Pass (Functional) | Credit (Proficient) | Distinction (Advanced) | High Distinction (Exceptional) |
Articulation of the | There is no | There is no distinction between symptoms and causes, and as a consequence, the statement is unable to articulate what is broken that needs a solution. The severity and magnitude of the problem is not identified or communicated clearly. There are limited references to the literature and the | The statement articulates, although not with clarity, what is broken that needs a solution. Symptoms and causes are often confused. The severity and magnitude of the problem is identified but not communicated clearly. There are adequate references to the | The statement | The statement |
problem. | problem | reasonably | precisely | ||
statement. Even | Articulates what is | Articulates what is | |||
Symptoms of the | Broken that needs | Broken that needs | |||
Marks for this | Problem are not | A solution. Causes | A solution. Causes | ||
criterion:40 | clearly reported. | And symptoms are | And symptoms | ||
The severity and magnitude of the | delineated. The severity and | are clearly delineated. | |||
Problem is not | Magnitude of the | The severity and | |||
Identified or | Problem is | Magnitude of the | |||
communicated. | Identified and | Problem is clearly | |||
There are no or irrelevant | communicated. The problem | identified and communicated. | |||
References to the | Statement is | The problem | |||
literature. | Contextualized to | Statement is | |||
The statement does not identify the potential | The existing body of knowledge. | comprehensively contextualized to the existing body |
![]() |
Outcomes of the research inquiry. | Problem statement Is not | literature, but the problem | The statement makes an attempt to distinguish the research inquiry from other works in the literature. | Of knowledge.
The statement clearly distinguishes the research inquiry from other works in the literature. | |
contextualized | Statement is not | ||||
Appropriately to the | contextualized | ||||
Existing body of | Appropriately to | ||||
knowledge. | The existing body | ||||
The statement fails to clearly express the potential outcomes of the research inquiry. | Of knowledge. The statement highlights the potential outcomes of the research inquiry but is unable to distinguish it from other works in the literature. | ||||
Formulation of the Purpose. Marks for this criterion: 20 | The project statement does not specify a clear purpose. The scope of the research: inclusions, Exclusions and | The statement is unable to communicate the research purpose. The scope of the research: inclusions, Exclusions and | The statement states what purpose the research will achieve, but this is not aligned with the rest of the project statement. | The statement articulates what purpose the research will achieve. The scope of the research: inclusions, | The statement precisely articulates what purpose the research will achieve. The scope of the research: |
Limitations are | Limitations are not | The scope of the | Exclusions and | inclusions, | |
Not clarified. | identified. | research: | Limitations are | Exclusions and | |
The research design is either missing or not sensible. There is no rationale for the chosen research design. | The research design is vague and ambiguous. The rationale for the research design is neither defended nor presented clearly. | inclusions, exclusions and limitations are not accurately identified. The research design is not clearly articulated. The rationale for the research design is not defended or presented to a good standard. | specified. The research design is articulated. The rationale for the research design is defended and presented. | limitations are unambiguously specified. The research design is clearly articulated. The rationale for the research design is well defended and presented clearly. |
Development | The research | The research questions | The research questions | The research questions | The research questions |
Of research | Questions are not | Are specified but are | Are specified and are | Are specified and are | are unambiguously |
Questions and | Specified or are data | Conflated with data | Not conflated with data | Not conflated with data | Specified and are not |
associated | Collection questions. | Collection questions. | Collection questions. | Collection questions. | Conflated with data |
hypotheses.
Marks for this criterion: 20 | The research questions do not align with the identified problem and are not coupled with associated hypotheses. The research questions are not consistent with the research design indicated in the purpose statement. | The research questions do not align well with the identified problem and are not coupled with associated hypotheses, which are presented in a testable form. These are not consistent with the research design indicated in the purpose statement. | The research questions align with the identified problem and are coupled with associated hypotheses, which are presented in a testable form. These are not always consistent with the research design indicated in the purpose statement. | The research questions align well with the identified problem and are coupled with associated hypotheses, which are presented in a testable form. These are consistent with the research design indicated in the purpose statement. | Collection questions. The research questions align seamlessly with the identified problem and are coupled with associated hypotheses, which are presented in a testable form. These are consistent with the research design indicated in the purpose statement. |
Structure and Organization of the Project Statement Marks for this criterion: 10 | The paper is not well organized and structured, and various sections of the project statement (including the introduction, brief | The paper is not consistently well organized and structured, and various sections of the project statement (including the introduction, brief | The paper is generally well organized and structured, but various sections of the project statement(including the introduction, | The paper is well organized and structured, but various sections of the project statement(including the introduction, Brief literature | The paper is well organized and structured, with various sections of the project statement(including the introduction, Brief literature |
literature review and conclusion)are inconsistent and unaligned with each other. Does not engage and sustain audience’s interest in the topic. Does not demonstrate insight and analytical skills. | Literature review and conclusion) do not fit in seamlessly and are often inconsistent. Does not consistently engages and sustain audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates only evolving insight and analytical skills. | brief literature review and conclusion)do not fit in seamlessly and are sometimes inconsistent. Some what engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates reasonable insight And analytical skills. | review and conclusion)do not fit in seamlessly. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates good insight and analytical skills. | review and conclusion)fitting in seamlessly. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of insight and analytical skills | |
Appropriate use of academic and linguistic conventions
Marks for this criterion: 10 | Demonstrates inconsistent use of academic and linguistic conventions, including language grammar, citations, formatting of in- text citations and references management. Substantial errors | Demonstrates basic use of academic and linguistic conventions, including language grammar, citations, formatting of in-text citations and references management. Significant errors in the application of Good writing and | Demonstrates good use of academic and linguistic conventions, including language grammar, citations, formatting of in-text citations and references management. Some errors in the Application of good | Demonstrates very good use of academic and linguistic conventions, including language grammar, citations, formatting of in-text citations and references management. Minor Errors in writing and | Demonstrates excellent use of academic and linguistic conventions, including language grammar, citations, formatting of in-text citations and references management. |
in the application of good writing and referencing practices. | Referencing practices. | Writing and referencing practices. | referencing observed. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.