ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF | |
Subject Code and Title | MGT502 BusinessCommunication |
Assessment | Discussion Forum Audio Report |
Individual/Group | Individual |
Length | 600 words |
Learning Outcomes | The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
|
Submission | 12 WeekDelivery: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of week 8 8 Week Delivery: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of week 7 6 Week Delivery: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of week 5 4 Week Delivery: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of week 3 |
Weighting | 30% |
Total Marks | 100 marks |
Assessment Task
You are required to submit a Discussion Forum Report that includes:
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Business communication can either be internal, within an organization, or external, between organizations. It can also be between existing and potential customers. This assessment gives you the opportunity to develop skills and knowledge in selected business communication methods, including an examination of the theoretical underpinnings of communication in an organization.
This assessment has been designed to:
Appraise your ability to academically research and evaluate characteristics of effective business communication.
You expected to demonstrate practical understanding of application of business communication skills and their importance in professional development.
NOTE
Instructions
Create a Discussion Forum Report that comprised of a review of a peer post and a reflective summary of the learnings .
Part 1 - Review of a peer post
This review of the peer post should constitute the first part of your Discussion Forum Report.
Part 2 - Reflective Summary of Learnings
This learning summary should constitute the second part of your Discussion Forum Report.
4.You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading your assignment
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submission Instructions:
Submit the Discussion Forum Report via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MGT502: Business Communication.
The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes | Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% | Pass (Functional) 50-64% | Credit (Proficient) 65-74% | Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% | High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Knowledge and understanding of the chosen form of business communication
Percentage for this criterion = 35 % |
Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. |
Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. |
Thorough knowledge or understanding of the fieldor discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. |
Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. |
A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s.
Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. |
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge
Percentage for this criterion = 35 % | Limited synthesis and analysis.
Limited application based upon analysis. | Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application.
Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. | Well-developed analysis, synthesis, and application linked to analysis/synthesis. | Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified arguments linked to analysis/synthesis. | Highly sophisticated and creativeanalysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge.
Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed models. Arguments are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. |
Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. |
Effective Communication
Percentage for this criterion = 15% | Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.
Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. | Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way thatis not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. | Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostlyclear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. | Information, arguments and evidenceare very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.
Demonstrate an understanding of the topic. | Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Engages and sustains audience’s interestin the topic. |
Correct citation of key resources and evidence
Percentage for this criterion = 15% | Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas | Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas,but these are not always explicit or well developed. | Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. | Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. | Demonstrates use of high- quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. |
Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. | Show evidence of wide scope withinand without the organisation for sourcing evidence. |
"🎓 Simplify your academic journey with Punjab Assignment Help – Your trusted partner for expert, plagiarism-free, and on-time assignment solutions!"
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.