ASSESSMENT GUIDE
ICT709
Enterprise Resource Planning Semester 2, 2025
Assessment Overview
Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When Due | Weighting | ULO# |
Assessment ID 1 Case Study of an organisation with a focus on ERP implementation (Individual) (1500 Words) | Assignment 1 This is an individual assessment. You will be given a case study where you will show your knowledge and understanding of ERP systemsby applying themto a complex business case. You should recommend ERP and associated solutions that are supported by business strategies, modern infrastructures and technologies. You should also demonstrate that you can provide professional advice in systems consulting. You will further need to showthat you are able to conduct research at postgraduate level. |
Session 4 |
40% |
1,2,3 |
Assessment ID 2 Proposal of ERP system customisation project (Group) (1000 Words) | Assignment 2 In this groupassessment, you willdeliver a project proposal to customise an ERP system for improving critical information functions in an organisation. You will collaborate with team members in business analysis, in assessing ERP systems and related technologies, and in recommending expected operational and informational outcomes. Both functional and non-functional system components (of two or three interrelated business functions), performances and evaluations must be addressed in a professionally developed proposal that is suitable for both IT and non-ITaudiences. |
Session 8 |
30% |
1,2,5 |
Assessment ID 3
*Final report of ERP system customisation project (Group) (1500 Words) | Assignment 3 In this group assessment, you will deliver a final report on your ERP system customisation project in Assessment Item 2. You will showhow to integrate and automate two or three business functions in the system to provide a comprehensive suite of useful information for business decision making. With approval from the lecturer, some teams may choose to undertake the project involving databases and facilities on cloud. Some teams may also choose to deploy their ERP applications on web or mobile platforms. All projects should address issues and concerns such as ethics, security and big data capability enabling in the wider context of ERP system implementations and provide a scalable system that is adaptive to any changes in the future. Each group member is also required to complete (i) a peer review report and (ii) a self- reflective reportas individual submission. |
Session 12 |
30% |
1,2,3,4,5 |
Note: * denotes ‘Hurdle Assessment Item’ that students must achieve at least 40% in this item to pass the unit.
You must reference all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use the IEEE referencing style when
referencing in your assessments in this unit. Refer to the library’s referencing guides for more information.
%2007042020.pdf
VIT enforces that the integrity of its students’ academic studies follows an acceptable level of excellence. VIT will adhere to its VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms where it explains the importance of staff and student honesty in relation to academic work. It outlines the kinds of behaviours that are"academic misconduct", including plagiarism.
In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms, late submission of assessments will lead automatically to the imposition of apenalty. Penalties will be applied as soon as the deadline is reached.
Special Consideration is a request for:
For more information, visit VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms.
Reasonable adjustment in assessment methods will be made to accommodate students with a documented disability or impairment.
Contact the unit teaching team for more information.
Contract cheating usually involves purchasing an assignment or piece of research from anotherparty. This may be facilitated by a fellow student or friend or purchased on a website. The unauthorized use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is also considered cheating. Other forms of contract cheating include paying another person to sit an exam in the student's place.
Contract cheating warning:
Many of for pay-contract cheating companies recycle assignments despite guarantees of “original, plagiarism-free work”, so the
similarity is easily detected by Turnitin.
We determine your grades to the following Grading Scheme:
Grade | Percentage |
A | 80%– 100% |
B | 70% – 79% |
C | 60%– 69% |
D | 50%– 59% |
F | 0%– 49% |
Assessment tasks | Learning Outcome Mapping | |||
Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When due | Weighting | ULO# |
1 | Assignment 1: This is an individual assessment. Students will be given a case study where students will showtheir knowledge and understanding of ERP systemsby applying them to a complex business case. You (student) shouldrecommend ERP and associated solutions that are supported by business strategies, modern infrastructures and technologies. You should alsodemonstrate that you can provide professional advice in systems consulting.You will further need to show that you are able to conduct research at postgraduate level. |
Session 4 |
40% |
1, 2, 3 |
Introduction
Welcome to the "Enterprise Systems Analysis and Readiness Assessment" assignment. In this task, we delve into the dynamic realm of business operations and technological integration. By selecting a real-world business undergoing or having undergone Enterprise System implementation, you will explore critical aspects of its activities, processes, and overall readiness for system integration.
This assignment aims to cultivate your critical analysis skills as future business leaders. By dissecting a chosen organization, understanding the scope of Enterprise Systems, and evaluating readiness, you'll gain insights into challenges and opportunities. This exercise enhances your ability to communicate technical arguments and professional assessments, crucial skills in today's dynamic business environment. Embrace the opportunity to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world scenarios and contribute to the evolving landscape of enterprise technology.
All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be set up in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop- boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of sessions 4.
The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and
resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed before the submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due date and time have elapsed.
Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.
You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:
Assessment Criteria | Exceptional ≥80% | Admirable 70–79% | Creditable 60–69% | Acceptable 50–59% | Unsatisfactory ≤49% |
Introduction (15 marks) | Provides an excellent and well-structured introduction that clearly outlines the chosen organisation, context of ERP adoption, and scope of the report. Purpose and objectives are stated with outstanding clarity. |
Provides a strong introduction with clear organisational background and report purpose. Objectives are mostly well-defined. |
Provides an adequate introduction with basic organisational context and report purpose. Some objectives may lack clarity. |
Provides a limited introduction with vague or brief mention of organisation and purpose. Objectives are incomplete or unclear. |
No clear introduction; fails to identify the organisation, purpose, or objectives. |
Scope of ERP (15 marks) | Thoroughly explains the scope of ERP systems (e.g., SCM, CRM, HRM, Finance, MM) with detailed insights on their relevance to the chosen organisation. Shows deep understanding of ERP contributions to business operations. |
Explains scope of ERP systems with good relevance to the organisation. Coversmost ERP modules appropriately. |
Explains scope of ERP systems at a basic level; relevance to the organisation is partly demonstrated. |
Mentions ERP scope briefly with limited organisational relevance or incomplete coverage of modules. |
Does not explain ERP scope or fails to link it to the organisation. |
Evaluate Implementation Approach (20 marks) | Critically evaluates the organisation’s ERP implementation strategies with excellent analysis of infrastructures, | Provides good evaluation of ERP implementation strategies with clear analysis of infrastructures and alignment. | Provides a reasonable evaluation of ERP implementation with some analysis of | Provides a superficial evaluation of ERP implementation with minimal analysis or limited examples. | Fails to evaluate ERP implementation strategies or provides irrelevant/incorrect discussion. |
technologies, and business alignment. Provides strong technical and business reasoning. | strategies and infrastructures. | ||||
Analyse Change Management (20 marks) | Provides an in-depth and critical analysis of organisational readiness, culture, and change management strategies. Suggests excellent, logical, and convincing strategies for successful ERP adoption. |
Provides a strong analysis of change management aspects with logical and relevant strategies for ERP adoption. |
Provides some analysis of change management with a few relevant strategies, though lacking depth. |
Provides a limited discussion of change management with weak or generic strategies. |
No analysis of change management; arguments are confused or absent. |
Conclusion (15 marks) | Provides an excellent professional assessment of the organisation’s readiness and summarises key findings clearly. Offers highly relevant, evidence- based recommendations. |
Provides a strong conclusion with clear summary and relevant recommendations. |
Provides a basic conclusion with some summary and general recommendations. |
Provides a weak conclusion with minimal summaryand unclear recommendations. |
No conclusion or recommendations provided. |
Presentation, Language, and Grammar (10 marks) | Report is exceptionally well-structured, professionally presented, and writtenwith excellent academic language. Formatting andflow are of publishable standard. | Report is very well- structured and professionally written with strong academic language. | Report is generally clear and well-written with acceptable structure and formatting. |
Report is poorly structured with weak academic writing and formatting. | Report is unprofessional, disorganised, and written with significant errors. |
References (5 marks) | Uses 5+ highly relevant academic and professional references (journals, textbooks, ERP case studies). All formatted correctly in IEEE style. |
Uses 4 relevant academic/professional references, mostly formatted correctly. |
Uses 3 references of mixed quality; some errors in formatting. |
Uses only 2 references; relevance and formatting are weak. |
Provides no references or irrelevant/unreliable ones. |
Overview
Assessment tasks | Learning Outcome Mapping | |||
Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When Due | Weighting | ULO# |
2 | Assignment 2 – Enterprise SystemsAnalysis and Integration: A Case StudyApproach (Group) In this group assessment, you (student) will deliver a project proposal to customise an ERP system for improving critical information functions in an organisation. You will collaborate with team membersin business analysis, in assessing ERP systems andrelated technologies, and in recommending expected operational and informational outcomes. Both functional and non-functional system components (of two or three interrelated business functions), performances and evaluations must be addressed in a professionally developed proposal that is suitable for both IT and non-ITaudiences. |
Session 8 |
30% |
1, 2, 5 |
In this assignment, you'll explore more about Enterprise Systems by analysing a chosen business scenario and evaluating its readiness for the implementation of common Enterprise Systems. Building upon your previous examination of a selected business, you will critically analyse its activities, workflows, and processes to identify various aspects such as problems, weaknesses, strengths, threats, opportunities, stakeholders, and entities interacting with the enterprise. Furthermore, you will explore the scope of common Enterprise Systems and how they integrate various business functional areas into an enterprise-wide information system.
This assignment aims to strengthen your ability to critically analyse enterprise activities and propose an ERP customisation plan that addresses both functional and non-functional requirements. By working collaboratively, you (group) will develop a professional proposal that demonstrates integration across business functions and communicates effectively to both technical and non-technical audiences.
All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be set up in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop- boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 8. The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed before the submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due
date and time have elapsed.
Note:All workis due bythe duedate and time.Late submissionswill be penalizedat 20%of theassessment finalgrade per day,including weekends.
Your (group) report must include a Title Page with the title of the Assignment and group member names and their IDs. A contents page showing page numbers and titles of all major sections of the report. All Figures included must have captions and Figure numbers and be referenced within the document. Captions for figures placed below the figure, captions for tables placed above the table. Include a footer with the page number. Your report should use 1.5 spacing with a 12-point Times New Roman font. Include references where appropriate. Citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the IEEE style.
Only one submission is to be made per group. The group should select a member to submit the assignment by the due date and time. All members of the group will receive the same grade unless special arrangement is made due to group conflicts. Any conflict should be resolved by the group, but failing that, please contact your lecturer who will then resolve any issues which may involve specific assignment of work tasks, or removal of group member
You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:
Criteria | High Distinction (≥80%) | Distinction (70–79%) | Credit (60–69%) | Pass (50–59%) | Fail (≤49%) |
Case Study Selection and Description (15 marks) | The chosen business scenario is highly relevant to the industry, well-justified, and provides a comprehensive, insightful overview of operations. |
Business scenario is relevant and clearly described, providing good industry context. | Business scenario is somewhat relevant, offering a basic overview of operations. | Business scenario shows limited relevance and provides only a vague overview. |
Scenario is irrelevant or lacks any meaningful description of operations. |
Enterprise Activities and Processes Analysis (25 marks) | Provides thorough, critical, and insightful analysis of activities, workflows, and processes. Identifies a wide range of problems, weaknesses, strengths, threats, opportunities, stakeholders, and entities in depth. |
Provides detailed analysis, identifying several relevant aspects of processes and stakeholders. |
Provides a basic analysis, identifying some problems, strengths, and stakeholders. |
Provides a superficial analysis with few relevant aspects identified. |
Lacks depth, fails to identify significant activities, processes, or issues. |
Scope of Enterprise Systems Explanation (20 marks) | Offers a comprehensive and clear explanation of the scope of ERP systems (SCM, CRM, HRM, Finance, MM, etc.), showing deep understanding of how each system function contributes to business improvement. |
Provides a clear explanation of ERP systems with good understanding of contributions to business operations. |
Provides a basic explanation, showing limitedunderstanding of ERP functions. |
Provides a vague or inaccurate explanation with minimal relevance to business improvement. |
Scope of ERP systemsis missing, inaccurate, or demonstrates a serious lack of understanding. |
Integration of Business Functional Areas (20 marks) | Presents a well-structured and detailed explanation of how ERP integrates multiple business functions into an enterprise-wide system, supported by strong analysis and relevant process modelling. |
Provides a structured explanation of integration supported by good analysis and some process modelling. |
Provides a basic explanation of integration with limited analysis or weak process modelling. |
Provides a vague or incomplete explanation of integration with little analytical support. |
Fails to explain how ERP integrates business functional areas. |
Conclusion and Recommendations (10 marks) | Provides a concise, insightful conclusion with well- developed, evidence-based recommendations on ERP readiness and strategies to address challenges. |
Provides a clear conclusion with relevant recommendations. |
Provides a basic conclusion with some recommendations, though lacking detail. |
Provides a vague conclusion with weak or irrelevant recommendations. |
No clear conclusion or recommendations provided. |
References Quality (10 marks) | Uses 6+ high-quality academic/professional sources(journals, textbooks, ERP case studies). All are highly relevant and correctly formatted. |
Uses 5 relevant sources of good quality with mostly correct formatting. |
Uses 3–4 sources of mixed quality; some formatting errors. |
Uses only 2 sources; limited quality and poor formatting. |
Provides no references or includes unreliable/irrelevant sources. |
Assessment tasks | Learning Outcome Mapping | |||
Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When due | Weighting | ULO# |
3
*Final report of ERP system customisation project (Group) (1500 Words) | Assignment 3 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Readiness and Integration: A Practical Case Study Analysis (Group)
In this group assessment, you will deliver a final report on your ERP system customisation projectin Assessment Item2. You willshow how to integrate and automate two or three business functions in the system to provide a comprehensive suite of useful information for business decision making. With approval from the lecturer, some teams may choose to undertake the project involving databases and facilities on cloud. Some teams may also choose to deploy their ERP applications on web or mobile platforms. All projects should address issues and concerns such as ethics, security and big data capability enabling in the wider context of ERP system implementations and provide a scalable system that is adaptive to any changes in the future. Each groupmember is alsorequired to complete (i) a peerreview report and (ii) a self-reflective report as individual submission. |
Session 12 |
30% |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
*Hurdle Assignment
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems play a pivotal role in modern business operations, offering integrated solutions to streamline workflows, enhance efficiency, and drive organizational growth. In this group assignment, you will embark on a journey to analyze a practical case scenario involving a company's readiness for ERP implementation and devise strategies for seamless integration across functional areas. By applying your knowledge of business processes, enterprise systems, and implementation strategies, you will explore the complexities and challenges inherent in ERP adoption, ultimately proposing innovative solutions to propel the company towards success.
This assignment aims to develop your ability to critically evaluate an organisation’s readiness for ERP implementation and propose practical strategies for system integration. By analysing workflows, assessing ERP tools, and designing an implementation plan with supporting business process models, you will demonstrate how ERP solutions can enhance efficiency, address organisational challenges, and ensure scalable, future-ready operations.
All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be set up in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop- boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 12. The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed before the submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due date and time have elapsed.
Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.
Your (group) report must include a Title Page with the title of the Assignment and group member names and their IDs. A contents page showing page numbers and titles of all major sections of the report. All Figures included must have captions and Figure numbers and be referenced within the document. Captions for figures placed below the figure, captions for tables placed above the table. Include a footer with the page number. Your report should use 1.5 spacing with a 12-point Times New Roman font. Include references where appropriate. Citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the IEEE style.
Only one submission is to be made per group. The group should select a member to submit the assignment by the due date and time. All members of the group will receive the same grade unless special arrangement is made due to group conflicts. Any conflict should be resolved by the group, but failing that, please contact your lecturer who will then resolve any issues which may involve specific assignment of work tasks, or removal of group member
You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:
Criteria | High Distinction (≥80%) | Distinction (70–79%) | Credit (60–69%) | Pass (50–59%) | Fail (≤49%) |
Depth of Analysis & Critical Thinking (20 Marks) | Demonstrates outstanding ability to critically evaluate ERP readiness, ERP tool comparisons, and integration strategies with deepinsights and innovative perspectives. |
Shows strongcapacity for critical analysis of ERP readiness and integration with well-developed arguments. |
Provides a satisfactory levelof critical analysis with some gaps in originality or depth. |
Provides only a basic level of analysis with limited depth and few original insights. |
Lacks critical analysis, provides shallow insights, and shows minimalunderstanding of ERP readiness and integration. |
Clarity & Coherence of Communication (10 Marks) | Communicates findings with exceptional clarity, structure, and coherence, demonstrating mastery of academic and professional writing. |
Communicates ideas clearly and coherently with effective organisation and language. |
Communicates adequately, though with some lapses in clarity or structure. |
Communicates with limited clarity; frequent lapses in organisation or language. |
Fails to communicate ideas clearly, leading to confusion or ambiguity. |
Relevance & Applicability of Proposed Strategies (15 Marks) | Strategies for ERP implementation, integration, and risk mitigation are highly relevant, innovative, and strongly supported by case- specific analysis. |
Strategies are relevant and well-supported, showing good understanding of ERP context. |
Strategies are appropriate but lack originality or show some gapsin applicability. |
Strategies are basic, somewhat relevant, and lack innovation or depth. |
Strategies lack relevance or applicability and are unsupported by analysis. |
Accuracy & Completeness of Research (10 Marks) | Research is thorough, accurate, and comprehensive, integrating ERP literature, tool comparisons, and industry cases to strongly support arguments. |
Research is extensive and reliable, effectively supporting analysis and recommendations. |
Research is sufficient but shows somegaps in depth or coverage of ERP sources. |
Research is basic, limited, and somewhat lacking in depth or accuracy. |
Research is inadequate, flawed, or fails to support ERP arguments or recommendations. |
Creativity & Innovation in Solution Development (10 Marks) | Solutions for ERP adoption and integration are highly creative and innovative, offering unique, practical, and technically sound approaches. |
Solutions are innovative and demonstrate original thinking and sound problem-solving. | Solutions are adequate but lack originality or creativity in ERP integration approaches. |
Solutions are basic and show little innovation, relying on generic ideas. |
Solutions are unoriginal, impractical, or fail to address ERP integration challenges. |
Quality of Implementation Plan & Risk Management (15 Marks) | Implementation planis comprehensive, well- structured, and addresses milestones, resources, and risk mitigation effectively. | Plan is thorough and covers key aspects, with appropriate risk management. | Plan is sufficient to guide ERP implementation but shows some gaps in detail or risk assessment. | Plan is basic, lacking depth in milestones, resources, or risk management. | Plan is inadequate, poorly developed, and fails to address key implementation or risk areas. |
BusinessProcess Model Effectiveness (10 Marks) | Business process model is highly effective, clearly illustrating ERP integration and optimisation across functions with logical flow. |
Model effectively illustrates integration with good clarity and organisation. |
Model provides a basic illustration of integration with some gaps in clarity or logic. |
Model is unclear or disjointed, limiting understanding of ERP integration. |
Model lacksclarity and coherence, failing to demonstrate ERP integration. |
Professional Presentation (5 Marks) | Report and visuals are of professional quality, with polished writing, well-designed figures, and effective use of ERP modelling tools. |
Presentation is professional, with clear writing, good visuals, and appropriate use of tools. | Presentation is adequate, with some lapses in writing, visuals, or organisation. |
Presentation is basic, somewhat unpolished, or weak in visuals/organisation. |
Presentation is unprofessional, poorly written, confusing, or ineffective. |
Referencing (5 Marks) | Uses minimum 8+ high-quality ERP- related references (journals, textbooks, industry reports). All are relevant and correctly formatted. |
Uses 6 relevant academic/professional references, mostlywell formatted. |
Uses 4 references of mixed quality, with some formatting errors. |
Uses only 3 references, weak in quality and accuracy. | Provides 1 or no relevant references, or uses unreliable/incorrect sources. |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.