Write a Literature Review Report on any topic related to the following.
You must discuss the topic with the instructor before you start the assignment.
This is an individual assignment. Donot start working on the assignment before getting approval from your instructor. The report is to be submitted in a word or pdf format. The assessment carries 40% weightage. 30% marks are for the report and 10% marks are for the 15-minute recorded presentation. The report length should be not less than 2500 words and not more than 3000 words. The word count does not include the title page, table of contents, list of references and figures. Ensure all pages are numbered. The similarity index of your report should be less than 20%. The deadline for submission of both the report and the recorded 15-minute presentation is midnight on Sunday, 25 August 2024. Do not use AI tools for this assignment. Late submissions will incur a 10% deduction in marks for each day beyond the due date. A delay of more than 5 days will result in a grade of 0.
Structure of the report Title Page
The title page of your report must contain:
Abstract
It should be between 200 – 300 words long (tip: write the abstract last)
Introduction
This section should include;
Summary of Articles
Write summaries of the research articles that you have read for the literature review. You should write summaries for at least 8 articles. The summary of each article should include the following.
Discussion
In this section, you should state your research questions and how the articles that you have read relate to that question. You should
Literature Map
Draw a literature map related to your topic.
Concept Matrix
Draw a concept matrix related to your topic.
Conclusions
This section should summarize your key findings. Conclusions are the results of your own critical thinking, they should be justified through analysis of your findings and written in your
own words with no citations.
References
You must use correct APA (7th edition) for referencing various academic resources that you have used to write this report. Your references should enable someone reading your report to easily identify and refer to any works you have used. At least 08 recent and relevant academic resources (i.e. peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers etc.) are needed in the report.
Marking Rubric for the Report
Total Marks = 100 | |||||
Clear, concise, and comprehensive summarydemonstrating advanced understanding. | Clear summary with minor omissions or errors, conveying good understanding. | Adequate summary with some clarity issues,demonstrating basic understanding. | Summary lacking clarity and detail, showing limited understanding | Unclear or missing summary, indicating significant misunderstanding. | |
Abstract | |||||
(5 marks) | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
(85- 100%) | (75-84%) | (65-74%) | (50-64%) | (0-49%) | |
Introduction | Clear topic, thorough background, strong rationale, and evident relevance to IT research. | Defined topic, adequate background, developed rationale, relevant to IT research. | Introduced topic, basicbackground, articulated rationale, somewhat relevant to IT research. | Brief topic, limitedbackground, unclear rationale, vaguelyrelevant to IT research. | Unclear topic, no background, no rationale, irrelevant to IT research. |
(10 marks) | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
(85- 100%) | (75-84%) | (65-74%) |
(50-64%) |
(0-49%) | |
Concise summaries | Effective | Basic summaries | Brief summaries | Incomplete | |
with thorough critique, | summaries with | with limitedcritique, | lacking detail and | summaries without | |
demonstrating deep | critique, showing | indicating a basic | critique, showing | critique, | |
understanding. | good | understanding. | some understanding. | demonstrating a | |
Summaries of | understanding. | lack of understanding. | |||
8 Articles
(30 marks) | |||||
High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (50-64%) | Fail (0-49%) | |
Discussion (20marks) | Clear research question(s), comprehensive discussion of article relevance, effective grouping of similar papers. | Clear research question(s), adequate discussion of article relevance, some grouping of similar papers. | Research question(s) stated, basic discussion of article relevance, limited grouping of similar papers. | Vague research question(s), minimal discussion of article relevance, little grouping of similar papers. | Unclear research question(s), no discussion of article relevance, no grouping of similarpapers. |
High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (50-64%) | Fail (0-49%) | |
Literature Map (10 marks) | Clear, informative map with detailed annotations showcasing connections between concepts, theories, and studies. | Well-organized map illustrating connections between concepts, theories, and studies, with some annotations. | Basic map showingconnections, with limitedannotations. | Vague map with unclear connections and minimalannotations. | No map provided or a disorganized map with no clear connections or annotations. |
High Distinction (85-100%) |
Distinction (75-84%) |
Credit (65-74%) |
Pass (50-64%) |
Fail (0-49%) | |
Concept Matrix (10 marks) | Clear matrix showing relationships between concepts, theories, and studies. | Organized matrix illustrating relationships between concepts, theories, and studies. | Basic matrix showing relationships. | Vague matrixwith unclear relationships. | No matrixor disorganized matrix. |
High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (50-64%) | Fail (0- 49%) | |
Report Readability (5 marks) | Clear structure, concise writing, engaging language, andproper grammar. | Organized with mostly concise writing, someengagement, and acceptable grammar. | Basic structure withattempts at concisewriting, but grammar may be inconsistent. | Lacks clearorganization, verbose writing,and grammar issues. | Disorganized, verbose writing, and numerous grammar errors. |
High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (50-64%) | Fail (0-49%) | |
References (5 marks) | At least 8 peer reviewed academic resources are used with all of them in proper APA format. | At least 8 peer reviewed academic resources are used but few are not in proper APA format. | At least 8 academic resources are used. Fewof themare not peer reviewed andare not in proper APAformat. | Less than 8 academic resources are used. Most of them are not peerreviewed and/or are not in proper APA format. | Less than 8 academic resources areused. They are not peer reviewed and are notin proper APAformat. |
High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (50-64%) | Fail (0-49%) | |
Conclusions (5 marks) | Clearly summarizes keyresults of thereport | Summarizes key results of the reportwith minor errors and/or minormissions | Summarizes keyresults of the report withone major errorand/or one major omission | Summarizes key results of the report with more than one majorerror and/or more than one major omission | Summarization has major errorsand omissions |
High Distinction (85-100%) |
Distinction (75-84%) |
Credit (65-74%) |
Pass (50-64%) |
Fail (0-49%) | |
Marking Rubric for Recorded Presentation
Total Marks =10 | |||||
Content | Exceptional clarity, depth, and relevance demonstrated with insightful analysis. | Clear and thorough analysis, demonstrating a solidunderstanding of the topic. | Adequate analysis covering keypoints adequately. | Limited analysis addressing keypoints superficially. | Inadequate analysis, missing key points entirely. |
(4 marks) | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
(85-100%) | (75-84%) | (65-74%) | (50-64%) | (0-49%) | |
Highly organized structure with seamless transitions. | Well-organized structure facilitates comprehension. | Adequate structure with some room for improvement. | Structure is somewhat unclear or disjointed. | Chaotic or nonexistent structure, making it difficult to follow. | |
Organization | |||||
(3 marks) | High Distinction
(85-100%) | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
(75-84%) | (65-74%) | (50-64%) | (0-49%) | ||
Delivery
(3 marks) | Engaging and confident, captivating the audience. | Engaging deliverymaintains audience interest. | Somewhat engagesbut lacks consistency in maintaining audience interest. | Lacks engagement andconfidence, impacting audience interest. | Lacks engagement, coherence, and confidence, making it challenging for the audience to stay focused. |
High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail | |
(85-100%) | (75-84%) | (65-74%) | (50-64%) | (0-49%) | |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.