| Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
| Trimester | T32025 |
| Unit Code | HM5003 |
| Unit Title | Economics for Business |
| Assessment Type | Group Assignment |
| Weight | 40% |
| Submission Guidelines |
|
| Academic Integrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrityisseriousandpunishablebypenaltiesthatrangefromdeductionofmarks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment. |
| Penalties |
|
Group Assignment Guidelines and Specifications
Purpose:
This assignment aims to enhance students' research and analytical ability through the application of their economics knowledge learned in the unit. The objective is to compose a company report.
Detailed requirements of the assignment
Your group is a collection of advisors to the Management Board in your company with headquarters in Australia. As advisors you are first required to conduct research on your selected sector/industry covering the previous 5-10 years. Second, you are required to present a company strategy to your Management Board and to the Federal Government of Australia covering the next five years.
Your Management Board requires that you submit a 2000-word market report containing these findings and strategies. Finally, your Management Board requires that your research should entirely be based on microeconomic and macroeconomic theory and application taken from Holmes Institute syllabus.
Company Selection Guidelines
Please note that the company you choose must be communicated to your Lecturer, and clearance obtained prior to starting work on the assessment.
Choose a company/firm which is an enterprise based in Australia. It should be either an Australian national enterprise or the Australian subsidiary of a multinational corporation (MNC).
Your report should include headings and sub-headings. It needs to be properly referenced using the Adapted Harvard style and INCLUDE at least 10 Holmes Institute references from the lectures.
Where students do not follow the above rules:
misconduct.
To be eligible to pass this unit, you must complete all forms of assessment and demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes. All assignments must be submitted electronically ONLY using a word processor, uploaded to Blackboard via the Final Check and Submission of Safe Assign.
Late Penalties: As per the Student Handbook, late penalties will apply each day after the student has been notified of the due date. Submission deadlines are strictly enforced and a late submission incurs penalties of 5% of the assessment value per calendar day unless an extension and/or special consideration has been granted by the lecturer prior to the assessment deadline. Unless an extension and/or special consideration has been granted, no assessments are accepted after 14 calendar days of the due date, or the end of the trimester for assessments due later in a trimester. Students need to allow up to 24 hours for the Final Check of their assignment submission to Safe Assign to be available.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION AND LATEPENALTIES
An effective way for students to learn economics is through participation in a Group Assessment Project. This project is designed to accomplish effective learning. During the course of the semester, each of the elements of your Group Assessment may be reviewed by your Lecturer.
All the academic papers that are used in the assignment need to be posted on Blackboard by using File Exchange tool. Students need to highlight the discussion in the academic paper which is relevant to the assignment issues. Academic papers can be found in ProQuest (instructions on page 6). Assignment will be marked ZERO if it does not include references list.
All the discussion about group assignment needs to be recorded by using Group Blog tool. The discussion must relevant to the content of the assignment and reflects the outcome of the group meeting.
Your instructor chooses which communication and collaboration tools are available to your group. If you want to use a tool but don't find on your group's page, ask your instructor to enable it.
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
| File Exchange | Group members and instructors can share files. All members can add and delete files. |
| Group Blog | All group members can create entries. All course members can read/comment. Instructors can grade. |
| Group Journal | Only group members/instructors can view. Instructors can grade. |
| Send Email | Email individual members or entire group. |
All the group members can discuss about the assignment by using Group Blog. Once you are allocated in a group, you can see this function.
Group>Group Tools>Group Blog>Create Blog Entry
Pro Quest
To login
Go to: http://www.holmes.edu.au/>Login>Proquest USERNAME: holmes2004 and; PASSWORD: holmes
Pro quest Tips
Marking Rubric
| Criteria | Excellent (>=80%) | Very good (70-79%) | Good (60-69%) | Satisfactory (50-59%) | Unsatisfactory (<50%) |
The degree of understanding and knowledge about the company and the industry which is shown in the description of the company & industry, and the analysis of market structure (25%of the total mark) |
|
|
|
| Poor understanding about the industry and completely wrong identification of the market structure with poor evidence to support. |
The degree of analysisof demand and supply determinants; and the discussion about price elasticity (25%ofthetotalmark) |
|
|
|
| Poor analysis about demand and supply determinant, with no supported discussion.
Conclusion about elasticity is not supported with discussions/argument. |
Analysis of a recent macroeconomic event that has affected the firm/ industry and, nation (25%ofthetotalmark) | Excellent description of the event.
Excellent discussion about the impact of the event on the market and nation, supported by good evidence (statistics, studies, or articles that discuss the actual or likely impacts). | Very good description of the event.
Very good discussion about the likely impact of the event on the market, supported by some good evidence (statistics, studies, or articles that discuss the actual or likely impacts). | Good description of the event.
Good discussion about the likely impact of the event on the market, supported by limited evidence (statistics, studies, or articles that discuss the actual or likely impacts). | Reasonable description of the event.
Reasonable discussion about the likely impact of the event on the market, not supported by good evidence. | -Poor description of the event.
Poor discussion about the likely impact of the event on the market, not supported by any evidence. |
| Criteria | Excellent (>=80%) | Very good(70-79%) | Good (60-69%) | Satisfactory (50-59%) | Unsatisfactory(<50%) |
The degree of research, the format, structure, presentation, and writing of the report (25%of the total mark) |
| Evidence of very good and relevant research with correct referencing.
Meet format requirements to a very good standard, including clear structure, headings, word count (close to approximation), and very good presentation. | Evidence of good and relevant research with correct referencing.
Meet format requirements to a good standard, including clear structure, headings, word count (close to approximation), and good presentation. | Evidence of reasonable research with some mistakes in referencing.
Meet format requirements to a reasonable standard, but could be improved with a clearer structure, headings, or may have better met word count approximation, and fair presentation. | -No good and relevant researchwithmanymistakes in referencing. -May not have followed key question selection guidance, or may not meet format requirements, such as clear discussions,titlesorheadings, word count, or poor presentation. |
Note: This report is provided as a sample for reference purposes only. For further guidance, detailed solutions, or personalized assignment support, please contact us directly.

Prepared for: Management Board, Woolworths Group Limited
Prepared by: Economics Advisory Team
Word Count: ~2000
This report analyzes the performance and market environment of Woolworths Group Limited over the past decade and provides a five-year strategic plan. The analysis applies microeconomic and macroeconomic theories from the Holmes Institute syllabus to assess market structure, demand and supply determinants, price elasticity, and the impact of recent macroeconomic events. The proposed strategies aim to strengthen Woolworths’ market leadership while adapting to evolving consumer trends and economic challenges.
Woolworths Group Limited is one of Australia’s leading supermarket chains, operating over 1,000 stores nationwide. Established in 1924, Woolworths’ core business includes retailing groceries, fresh produce, liquor, and general merchandise. Woolworths has consistently maintained a dominant market position in the Australian supermarket industry, alongside its main competitor, Coles.
The Australian supermarket industry is an oligopolistic market, dominated by Woolworths and Coles, which collectively account for approximately 70–75% of the market share (IBISWorld, 2024). Other players include Aldi, IGA, and Costco, which have smaller but growing market shares.
Microeconomic Theory Application:
The industry’s oligopolistic nature leads to strategic interdependence. Pricing decisions by Woolworths significantly influence competitors’ pricing strategies (Tirole, 2017, p. 54). Barriers to entry, such as high capital investment, established supply chains, and brand loyalty, limit new entrants.
The overall price elasticity of Woolworths’ products varies:
Example: A 5% increase in Woolworths’ private-label milk may lead to only a 1–2% decrease in quantity demanded, while a similar increase in premium organic cheese could reduce demand by 8–10% (ABS, 2023).
Description: The pandemic disrupted global supply chains, increased unemployment, and shifted consumer behavior toward online shopping and essential goods.
Impact on Woolworths:
Macroeconomic Theory Application:
Woolworths operates in an oligopolistic Australian supermarket industry with significant market power. Its success relies on managing demand and supply efficiently, maintaining competitive pricing, and adapting to macroeconomic events such as COVID-19. The proposed five-year strategy focuses on sustainable growth, technology adoption, product differentiation, and regulatory compliance, ensuring continued market leadership and profitability.
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.