BUS6201 Strategic Leadership Assignment Help

Assessment Overview

No	Assessment Name	Weight	Date Open	Date for Submission
1	Assessment 1 Online discussion and peer review (approx. 1500words)	20%	Week1	Week 4, 6, 8 and 10
2	Assignment 3 : GroupCase Study analysis of an Organisation and Presentation	40%	Week 5	Week 7
3	Individual Assignment Case Studyanalysis of a Leader.	40%	Week 9	Week 11

Learning Outcomes

ULO

Learning Outcome

AQF Mapping*

CLOs

mapping

MBA

Understand concepts and frameworks of strategic leadership in comparison to other types of leadership theories and models in different Organisational contexts.

1, 2

Appraise the role and importance of strategic intent and its link to strategic decision-making in a range of contexts and challenges.

2, 3, 4

Adapt a robust analysis of specific Organisationalsituations to recommend and introduce strategic initiatives using practical applications of theoretical concepts and principles.

4, 5, 6

Evaluate strategic business practices and Organisational performance considering ethical considerations in real world situations.

3, 6, 7, 8

Apply a range of relevant theories and constructs to analyse Organisational dynamics when responding to competitive challenges and experiences to develop creative solutions to these challenges to improving Organisational performance.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

6, 7, 8

The following instructions are strictly applied throughout our MBA program:

The assessments are an important part of unit progression and are to be attended to diligently. Hence, no attempt at an assessment means no marks.
Assessment tasks must be submitted within the timeframe given. Late submission will attract a 5% deduction in the mark for each day the submission is late.
Assessment guidelines must be followed, for example, if the assessment involves a written report of 2,000 words, the word count is important. If the word count is more than 10% outside the guideline, there will be a deduction of 5% off the final mark.
All assessments must be submitted to VIT, Australia and will be checked, marked and the student provided with feedback. Assessments can be submitted on LMS and by email.
Students are required to achieve at least 40% in each assessment component and an overall mark of 50% to achieve a pass grade in the unit. If a student does not achieve 40% in an assessment and the overall mark for the unit is more than 50%, then a mark of 49% will be recorded for the unit.
The authorised agent/local tutor can help students understand the various parts of the assessment and also will be appointed as “Invigilator” (supervision only) for the assessment.

Note - For all assignments, the preferred layout is in 12-point Calibri, with 1.5 line spacing, 5 centimetres left- hand margins and bold headings. Whenever you use the ideas and arguments of other writers, you must make reference to the writers and their work. By acknowledging the work of others, you avoid

plagiarism. The APA style requires a reference list at the end of your assignment. It is to be arranged in alphabetical order by author surname.

For further clarification you can contact your tutor via the VIT email.

Assessments in More Detail

Assessment 1		Weight	Hurdle	CLOs	ULOs
	Students select, readand analyse	20%	No	1,2, 5,6,7,8	1, 3
	a currentand detailed press
	article aboutan internationally
Online	well knowncorporate leader,
discussion and	then discussit in classor in an
peer review (approximately	online forum andwrite a 200 words critical analysis of the
1,200 words)	topic. Students must then
	critically review peers’ forum
	posts (x min 10) and write
	approximately 100 words on
	each.
Due at 23:59pm on the Sundayat the beginning of Week 5.

Your search for a suitable press articles about notable industry and business leaders should focus on the business pages in newspapers such as The New York Times, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age (Melbourne), The Australian, The Australian Financial Review, The Times (London), the China Daily, The Times of India, and The Straits Times (Singapore).

Your commentary should demonstrate the leader’s contribution to their industry, the economy, and or society. Look for their strengths and weaknesses, and the opportunities and threats that might exist for them. Examples could be philanthropic activities, mergers and acquisitions, corporate failures, successions and terminations etc.

Post your 200 word review in the Assessment #1 section in the LMS. Try to complete this by the end of Week #2. Then over the next two weeks post your contributions to the posts by ten of your peers- approximately 100 words per post. Be constructive and creative in your comments.

The practice in management discussions is to conduct yourself in a polite and respectful manner. Derogatory remarks and rudeness are unacceptable.

Assessment 2		Weight	Hurdle	CLOs	ULOs
Group	Critically analyse a specific organizational case study in relation to strategic diagnosis, identification of gaps,strategic plans and strategies, and implementing them. Apply theories, toolsand frameworks covered in the unit.	40%	No	1,2,3,4 ,5,6,8	2,3,4
Case Study (1,500 words)
Presentation. (15 Slides)
Due at 23:59pmon the Sunday at the beginning of Week 9.

Teamwork, or group work are core practices in business. Activities and actions always involve more than one person, regardless of the size of the business.

Consequently in management programs, students are required to participate in group assignments, and breakout discussions in lectures and tutorials.

In this assignment your group must find a suitable business case study in relation to strategic diagnosis, identification of gaps, strategic plans and strategies, and implementing them. Apply theories, tools and frameworks

covered in the unit. Your group must conduct research about the enterprise beyond what is revealed in the case study.

An example might be a case study about a major event that effected the business, such as the Samarco tailings dam disaster in Brazil, 2015. To analyse this case research would need to examine the various parties involved in the

event, be they the owners of the mine, the communities effected, the Brazilian government, and the markets effected by the event.

Critically analyse the specific organizational case study in relation to strategic diagnosis, identification of gaps, strategic plans and strategies, and implementing them. Apply theories, tools and frameworks covered in the unit.

The presentation of the case study (15 minutes and 15 slides Maximum) must be conducted in a manner as if being presented to an executive board. Note that within PowerPoint is a feature for recording commentary. It is recommended that your team uses this.

The names and student numbers of each member of the group must be on title page of the report, and in the first PPT slide. The report and the group presentation must be submitted by only one member of the group.

Assessment 3

Weight

Hurdle

CLOs

ULOs

Individual Major essay

(2,000 words)

Critically evaluate an organizational strategic leadership situation, analysing the paradigms and other factors influencing leadership strategic effectiveness and organizational performance and recommend solutions for future successful outcomes.

40%

Yes

1,2,5,6

,7,8

2, 3,

4, 5

Students are to select an industry leader other than one who has been profiled

in any of the lectures. It could be the individual dealt with in Assignment #1.

You are required to critically evaluate an organizational strategic leadership situation of this individual, analysing the paradigms and other factors

influencing leadership strategic effectiveness and organizational performance and recommend solutions for future successful outcomes.

In the mandatory tutorials conducted early in each week, opportunities will prevail for discussing assignments with your tutor.

Assessment #1 Rubric

Online discussion and peer review

(approx. 1,200words)

Students select, read and analyze a current and detailed press article about an internationally well known corporate leader, then discuss it in class or in an online forum and write a 200 words critical analysis of the topic. Students must then critically reviewpeers’ forum posts(x min 10)

and writeapproximately 100 wordson each.

20%

Criteria

HD(Excellent)

D(Very Good)

C(Good)

P(Pass)

F(Fail)

Missing Content

Comment

ULO 1:

Understandconcepts and frameworks of strategic leadership in comparison to other types of leadership theories and models in different Organizational contexts.

Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of concepts and frameworks of strategic leadership, comparing them effectively to other types of leadership theories and models in various organizational contexts.

6 points

Displays a very good understanding of conceptsand frameworks of strategic leadership, with a clear comparison to other types of leadership theories and models in different organizational contexts.

5 points

Shows a good understan ding of concepts and framewor ks of strategic leadershi p, with adequate comparis on to other types of leadershi p theories and models in various organizati onal contexts.

4 points

Demonstrat es a satisfactory understandi ng of concepts and frameworks of strategic leadership, with basic comparison to other types of leadership theories and models in different organization al contexts.

3 points

Displays limited understand ing of concepts and framework s of strategic leadership, with minimal compariso n to other types of leadership theories and models in various organizatio nal contexts.

<3 points

ULO 2:

Appraise the role and

Offers an

exceptional

Provides a very

good appraisal

Shows a

good

Demonstrat

es a

Displays

limited

importance of strategic intent and its link to strategic decision-making in a range of contexts and challenges

appraisal of the role and importance of strategic intent, linking it effectively to strategic decision-making across various contexts and challenges discussed in the corporate leader's press article.

6 points

of the role and importance of strategic intent, with clear connections to strategic decision- making in various contexts and challenges presented in the corporate leader's press article.

5 points

appraisal of the role and importanc e of strategic intent, with adequate connectio ns to strategic decision- making in different contexts and challenge s discussed in the corporate leader's press article.

4 points

satisfactory appraisal of the role and importance of strategic intent, with basic connections to strategic decision- making in various contexts and challenges highlighted in the corporate leader's press article.

3 points

appraisalof the role and importance of strategic intent, with minimal connection s to strategic decision- making in different contexts and challenges covered in the corporate leader's press article.

<3 points

ULO 5:

Disciplinary Knowledge

Demonstrates a deep understanding of

the disciplinary knowledge

Displays a solid understanding of disciplinary

knowledge related to

Shows a satisfactor y

understan ding of

Demonstrat es a basic understandi

ng of disciplinary

Displays a minimal understand

ing of disciplinary

related to strategic leadership, applying relevant theories and frameworks effectively in the analysis of the chosen corporate leader's press article.

4 points

strategic leadership, incorporating relevant theories and frameworks appropriately in the analysis of the selected corporate leader's press article.

3 points

disciplinar y knowledg e related to strategic leadershi p, applying relevant theories and framewor ks adequatel y in the analysis of the chosen corporate leader's press article.

2.5 points

knowledge related to strategic leadership, with limited application of relevant theoriesand frameworks in the analysis of the selected corporate leader's press article.

2 points

knowledge related to strategic leadership, with weak application of relevant theories and framework s in the analysis of the chosen corporate leader's press article.

<2 points

Peer Review		Provides insightful and constructive reviews of at least 10 peers' forum posts, offering valuable feedback and contributing to meaningful discussions.	Offers thoughtful reviews of at least10 peers' forum posts, providing constructive feedback and engaging in meaningful discussions.	Provides satisfactor y reviews of at least 10 peers' forum posts, offering feedback and contributi ng to discussion s.	Offers basic reviews of at least 10 peers' forum posts, with limited feedback and minimal contribution to discussions.	Provides minimal or inadequate reviews of peers' forum posts, lacking constructiv e feedback and meaningful engageme nt in discussions .
Peer Review		4 points	3 points	2.5 points	2 points	<2 points
	Total

Assessment #2 Rubric

Case Study (2,500 words)

Critically analyzea specific organizational case study in relation to strategic

diagnosis, identification of gaps, strategic plans and strategies, and

implementing them.Apply theories, toolsand frameworks covered in the unit.

40%

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Pass

Fail

Missing

Content

Comment

ULO 2:

Appraise the role and importance of strategic intent and its link to strategic decision-making in a range of contexts and challenges

Demonstrate s an exceptional appraisal of the role and importance of strategic intent, linking it effectively to strategic decision- making across various contexts and challenges in the case study.

9Points

Displays a very good appraisal of the role and importance of strategic intent, with clear connections to strategic decision- making in various contexts and challenges in the case study.

7.5 Points

Shows a good appraisal of the role and importance of strategic intent, with adequate connections to strategic decision- making in different contexts and challenges in the case study.

6 Points

Demonstratesa satisfactory appraisal of the role and importance of strategic intent, with basic connections to strategic decision- making in various contexts and challenges in the case study.

4.5 Points

Displayslimited appraisal of the role and importance of strategic intent, with minimal connections to strategic decision- making in different contexts and challenges in the case study.

<4.5 Points

ULO 3:

Adapt a robust analysis of specific Organizational situations to recommend and introduce strategic initiatives usingpractical applications of theoretical concepts and principles2

Offers an exceptional analysis of specific organization al situations in the case study, recommendi ng and introducing strategic initiatives with a high level of practical application of theoretical concepts and principles.

9 Points

Provides a very good analysis of specific organization al situations in the case study, recommendi ng and introducing strategic initiatives with practical applications of theoretical concepts and principles.

7.5 Points

Offers a good analysis of specific organizational situations in the case study, recommendin g and introducing strategic initiatives with satisfactory applications of theoretical concepts and principles.

6 Points

Providesabasic analysis of specific organizational situations in the case study, recommending and introducing strategic initiatives with limited applications of theoretical concepts and principles.

4.5 Points

Offers a minimal analysis of specific organizational situations in the case study,with weak recommendatio ns and implementation s of strategic initiatives and limited application of theoretical concepts and principles.

<4.5 Points

ULO 4: Evaluate strategic business practice and Organisational performance considering ethicalconsiderations in real- world situations.		Exhibits an excellent evaluation of strategic business practice and	Shows a very good evaluation of strategic business practice and organization al performance in the case study,with a clear consideratio n of ethical consideratio ns in real- world situations.	Displays a good evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance in the case study, considering ethical consideration sin real-world situations.	Providesabasic evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance in the case study, with limited consideration of ethical considerations in real-world situations.	Shows a minimal evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance in thecase study, lacking consideration of ethical considerations in real-world situations.
		organization
		al
		performance
		in the case
		study,
		demonstrati
		ng a
		comprehensi
		ve
		consideratio
		n of ethical
		consideratio
		ns in real-
		world
		situations.
	ULO5:	Demonstrate s a deep and comprehensi ve understandi ng of the theories, tools, and frameworks covered in	Displays a solid understandi ng of the theories, tools, and frameworks covered in the unit, incorporatin	Shows a satisfactory understandin g of the theories, tools, and frameworks covered in the unit, applying them	Demonstratesa basic understanding of the theories, tools, and frameworks covered in the unit, with limited applicationto	Displays a minimal understanding of the theories, tools, and frameworks covered in the unit, with weak application to the analysis of
	Disciplinary Knowledge

	the unit, effectively applying them to the analysis of the case study. 5 Points	g them appropriatel y into the analysis of the case study. 4 Points	adequately to the analysis of the case study. 3.5 Points	the analysis of the case study. 2.5 Points	the case study. <2.5 Points
Spelling and Grammar	Exceptional command of spelling and grammar with no errors present.	Very good command of spelling and grammar with minor errors that do not detractfrom overall clarity.	Good command of spelling and grammarwith noticeable errors that minimally impact clarity.	Satisfactory command of spelling and grammar with several errors that may impact clarity.	Limited command of spelling and grammar with frequent errors that hinder clarity.
Spelling and Grammar	3 Points	2.5 Points	2 Points	1.5 Points	<1.5 Points
Referencing	Accurateand consistent use of referencing style with a comprehensi ve list of sources.	Mostly accurate and consistent use of referencing style with a completelist of sources.	Adequateuse of referencing style with occasional errors and a sufficiently complete list of sources.	Limited use of referencing style with frequent errors and an incomplete list of sources.	Minimal use of referencing style with significant errors and an incomplete or missing list of sources.
Referencing	5 Points	4 Points	3 Points	2.5 Points	<2.5 Points

Total

Assessment #3 Rubric

Major essay (2,500 words)	Critically evaluate an organizational strategic leadership situation, analyzing the paradigms and otherfactors influencing leadership strategic effectiveness and organizational performance and recommend solutions for future successful outcomes.						40%
	HD Excellent	D Very Good	C Good	P Pass	F Fail	Missing Content	Comment
ULO 2: Appraise the role and importance of strategic intent and its link to strategic decision- making in a range of contexts and challenges.	Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the role and significance of strategic intent, providing insightful analysis across various contexts and challenges.	Displaysavery good graspof the role and significance of strategic intent, with clear analysis in multiple contexts and challenges.	Shows a good understanding of the role and importance of strategic intent, with adequate analysis in different contexts and challenges.	Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the role and importance of strategic intent, with basic analysis in various contexts and challenges.	Displays limited understanding of the role and importance of strategic intent, with minimal analysis in different contexts and challenges.	-
	8 Points	6.5 Points	5.5 Points	4 Points	/<4	-
ULO 3:	Offers an	Provides a very	Offers a good	Provides a	Offers a minimal	-
Adapt a robustanalysis	exceptional	good analysis	analysis of	basic analysis	analysis of
of specific Organizational	analysis of	of specific	specific	of specific	specific
situations to recommend	specific	organizational	organizational	organizational	organizational
and introduce strategic	organizational	situations,	situations,	situations,	situations, with
initiatives using practical	situations,	recommending	recommending	recommending	weak
applications of	recommending	and	and	and	recommendations
theoretical concepts and	and	implementing	implementing	implementing	and

principles.	implementing strategic initiatives with a high levelof practical application of theoretical concepts and principles.	strategic initiatives with practical applications of theoretical concepts and principles.	strategic initiatives with satisfactory applications of theoretical concepts and principles.	strategic initiatives with limited applications of theoretical concepts and principles.	implementations of strategic initiatives and limited application of theoretical concepts and principles.
principles.	8 Points	6.5 Points	5.5 Points	4Points	<4 Points
ULO 4: Evaluate strategic business practice and Organizational performance considering ethical considerations in real-world situations	Exhibits an excellent evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance, demonstrating a comprehensive consideration of ethical considerations in real-world situations.	Shows a very good evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance, with a clear consideration of ethical considerations in real-world situations.	Displays a good evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance, considering ethical considerations in real-world situations.	Provides a basic evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance, with limited consideration of ethical considerations in real-world situations.	Shows a minimal evaluation of strategic business practice and organizational performance, lacking consideration of ethical considerations in real-world situations.	-
	8 Points	6.5 Points	5.5 Points	4 Points	<4 Points	-
ULO5: Relevant theories and constructs applied to	Applies an extensive range of relevant	Applies a wide range of relevant	Applies a sufficient range of	Applies a basic range of relevant	Applies a minimal range of relevant theories and	-

analyze Organizational dynamics when responding to competitive challenges and experiences to develop creative solutions to these challenges to improve Organizational performance	theories and constructs to analyze organizational dynamics, demonstrating creativity in developing solutions to competitive challenges and experiences.	theories and constructs to analyze organizational dynamics, with creativity in developing solutions to competitive challenges and experiences.	relevant theories and constructs to analyze organizational dynamics, developing solutions to competitive challenges and experiences.	theories and constructs to analyze organizational dynamics, with limited creativity in developing solutions to competitive challenges and experiences.	constructs to analyze organizational dynamics, lacking creativity in developing solutions to competitive challenges and experiences.
	8 Points	6.5 Points	5.5 Points	4 Points	<4 Points
Spelling and Grammar	Exceptional command of spelling and grammar with no errors present.	Very good command of spelling and grammar with minor errors that do not detract from overall clarity.	Good command of spelling and grammarwith noticeable errors that minimally impact clarity.	Satisfactory command of spelling and grammar with several errors that may impact clarity.	Limited command of spelling and grammar with frequent errors that hinder clarity.	-
Spelling and Grammar	3 Points	2.5 Points	2 Points	1.5 Points	<1.5 Points	-
Referencing			Adequate use
	Accurate and consistent use	Mostly accurate and	of referencing style with	Limited use of referencing	Minimal use of referencing style
	of referencing	consistent use	occasional	style with	with significant
	style witha	of referencing	errors and a	frequent errors	errors and an
	comprehensive	style with a	sufficiently	and an	incomplete or
	list of sources.	complete list of sources.	complete list of sources.	incomplete list of sources.	missing list of sources.

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

2.5 Points

<2.5 Points

Total

"Unlock top grades with expert guidance from Punjab Assignment Help – your trusted partner for all ICT500 Emerging Technologies assignments. Get started today and experience academic success!"

Related categories

Topics Assignment Research Thesis Assignment Guideline Dissertation Case Study Homework Essay help

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.

Blogs

BUS6201 Strategic Leadership Assignment Help