Assessment 3
Information and Rubric
| Subject Code | NTW202 |
|---|---|
| Subject Name | Mobile and Wireless Technologies |
| Assessment Number and Title | Assessment 3: Wireless Network Implementation and Configuration |
| Assessment Type | Individual report |
| Length / Duration | 1000 words ± 10% |
| Weighting % | 30% |
| Total Marks | 30 |
| Purpose of the assessment (with the learning outcomes Mapping) | Purpose of this assessment is to enable students to apply their theoretical knowledge by implementing a functional wireless network design in Cisco Packet Tracer. Through hands-on practice, students will gain skills in configuring wireless devices, managing connections, troubleshoot issues, and validate network performance, ensuring they develop confidence and expertise for real-world wireless network deployment. |
| Due Date | Week 10 – Sunday at 23:59 |
| Submission Guidelines | • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assessment Cover Page<br>• Your report must include clear headings and subheadings for all requirements mentioned below in the assessment description and instructions<br>• The assignment must be in MS Word format/AE 1.5 spacing, 12-pt. Times New Roman (Body) font, and should be no more than 5 to 6 pages with appropriate section headings<br>• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using APA referencing style. |
| Mode | Individual Assessment |
|---|---|
| Format | Microsoft Word, Pdf |
| Late submission | • Late report submission penalty may be applied (10% per late day)<br>• Extensions will be considered in serious manner. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a |
| Academic Misconduct | - |
Note: with similarity index > 25% and AI detection > 40% will be reported.
Assessment 3 builds directly upon the theoretical design developed in Assessment 2 and focuses on the practical implementation using Cisco Packet Tracer. Building upon the theoretical design previously developed in Project in scalable Architecture and Configuration of IPv4 network in Assessment 2, students will complete the setup, device implement, configure, and test their practical network using Cisco Packet Tracer.
Primary goal is to translate the conceptual design into a fully functional, scalable IP network that demonstrates correct subnetting, routing, connectivity, and reliability across all campuses. Students will configure routers, switches, and workstations using various protocols discussed earlier in this course. The final network protocol to ensure efficient inter-campus communication.
Sydney Campus is included as the core site hosting shared resources, with Melbourne, Cairns, and Gold Coast operating as client campuses linked via WAN links. Each campus must include the three departments—Administration, IT Support, and Labs—with properly assigned subnets based on the host requirements defined in Assessment 2.
After configuration, students must verify and document network connectivity using commands such as ping, show ip route, and show ip ospf neighbor. Troubleshooting steps and screenshots must be provided to demonstrate functional performance. Students are encouraged to optimize their design by minimizing IP wastage, ensuring redundancy, and performance considerations, reflecting on how the implementation aligns with the design proposal earlier.
Assessment Structure
Summary
• Provide a concise overview of the assessment and its objectives.
Table of Contents
• List all sections and subsections with corresponding page numbers.
1. Introduction
Introduce the purpose of implementing a practical IPv4 network using the theoretical design from Assessment 2. Explain the importance of subnetting, VLSM, and OSPF in building scalable networks.
2. Network Scenario
This section describes the practical scenario of connecting RA's three campuses—Sydney, Melbourne, and Geelong—using OSPF. Each campus includes multiple departments that require reliable inter-campus connectivity. Students are expected to use VLSM according to IP address allocation and configure routers and switches to ensure efficient routing and communication.
Network Requirements:
• Configure routers, switches, and PCs based on the theoretical design from Assessment 2. • Use a Class C IP address range (e.g., 192.168.10.0/24) with VLSM. • Implement OSPF routing across all campuses to enable dynamic communication. • Label all devices properly on the Packet Tracer diagram. • Verify connectivity using ping and traceroute commands. • Document routing table accuracy and OSPF neighbor relationships. • Provide screenshots of configurations, test results, and troubleshooting processes.
3. Network Topology Design
Include a clearly labelled topology diagram created in Cisco Packet Tracer. Explain the layout and rationale for the chosen network architecture. Include screenshots, addressing plan, and description of routers, switches, and links. Justify their placement and their function in the network design.
4. IPv4 Addressing and Subnetting
Demonstrate the application of VLSM for subnet allocation. Show the subnetting calculations, IP address assignments, and subnet masks used for each department and inter-campus links. This section should be detailed to minimize IP wastage and ensure efficient address allocation and subnetting.
5. OSPF Configuration
Explain the OSPF configuration process applied across all routers that connect the campuses. Include command documentation (router ospf, network, and area assignments). Verify that OSPF adjacencies and routing tables are correctly formed using show ip route and show ip ospf neighbor.
6. Practical Implementation in Cisco Packet Tracer
Detail the implementation process in Cisco Packet Tracer. Configure each router, switch, and PC according to the planned topology. Include relevant configuration screenshots, interface settings, and verification outputs to demonstrate successful implementation.
7. Testing and Validation
Conduct network connectivity tests between all departments and campuses using ping and traceroute commands. Show evidence of successful communication and correct data propagation. Document troubleshooting steps using show running-config and show ip route. Describe troubleshooting steps to resolve any issues during testing.
8. Challenges and Reflection
Briefly describe any challenges faced during the network implementation and how they were resolved. Reflect on the effectiveness of OSPF as a dynamic routing protocol and evaluate how subnetting and hierarchical design contributed to network scalability.
9. Conclusion
Summarize key learnings from the implementation process. Highlight the importance of VLSM, OSPF, and Cisco Packet Tracer in building scalable and efficient inter-campus networks. Present how the practical implementation validates the theoretical framework developed in Assessment 2.
10. References
Provide at least 6 to 10 relevant references, listed appropriately using APA referencing style. Reference sources must be cited at the appropriate place in the text of the report.
Assessment 3 Report Marking Rubric: Wireless Network Implementation and Configuration. 30%
| Marking Criteria | Fail (0-49%) | Pass (50-64%) | Credit (65-74%) | Distinction (75-84%) | High Distinction (85-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction and Clarity of Objectives<br>5% | Unclear or incomplete introduction with no clear objectives | Basic introduction with some objectives stated | Clear introduction with well-defined objectives | Detailed introduction with objectives clearly explained | Exceptionally clear, concise introduction with well-articulated objectives and context |
| Network Configuration and Security<br>10% | Network devices incorrectly configured with no or major errors. No wireless security settings implemented | Basic device configuration with some security settings or major errors | Most network devices correctly configured with basic security settings in place (e.g., WPA2) | All network devices correctly configured with adequate security and best practices applied | Comprehensive network configuration with optimal settings, advanced security protocols, and detailed justification |
| Device Connectivity and Testing<br>5% | Devices fail to connect properly. No connectivity test results | Devices partially connected with basic connectivity test results | Devices connected successfully with some connectivity test results | All devices properly connected with comprehensive connectivity tests | All devices seamlessly connected with thorough, well-documented connectivity tests and analysis |
| Performance Analysis and Troubleshooting<br>5% | No or minimal performance analysis; No troubleshooting steps | Basic performance analysis with few troubleshooting steps | Good performance with some troubleshooting | Comprehensive performance analysis with effective troubleshooting methods | Exceptional performance analysis with advanced troubleshooting, detailed evaluation, and innovative solutions |
| Report Quality and Explanation<br>15% | Weak structure with minimal technical details, poor grammar | Basic structure and some technical explanation | Well-structured report with clear and relevant technical explanations | Clear, detailed, professional report with strong technical depth | Exceptionally clear, highly detailed, professionally structured report with in-depth technical explanations |
| Submission of Packet Tracer (.pkt) File PKt<br>10% | Packet Tracer file missing or not submitted with evidence or screenshots | Packet Tracer file submitted but has implementation issues, limited screenshots, lacks annotations | Packet Tracer file submitted with some configurations, relevant screenshots provided with proper annotations | Packet Tracer file submitted with well-configured network, annotated screenshots providing detailed evidence | Packet Tracer file submitted and fully optimized with a comprehensive configuration, highly detailed and well-annotated screenshots, exceptional evidence |
Assessment 3 Report Marking Rubric: Wireless Network Implementation and Configuration. 30%
| Marking Criteria | Fail (0-49%) | Pass (50-64%) | Credit (65-74%) | Distinction (75-84%) | High Distinction (85-100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction and Clarity of Objectives<br>5% | Unclear or incomplete introduction with no clear objectives | Basic introduction with some objectives stated | Clear introduction with well-defined objectives | Detailed introduction with objectives clearly explained | Exceptionally clear, concise introduction with well-articulated objectives and context |
| Network Topology Design<br>10% | Network topology missing or incorrect. No clear design shown | Basic topology with missing or unlabelled elements | Topology includes most elements but lacks some detail or clarity | Clear, well-labelled topology with all required elements and logical structure | Comprehensive, professional topology with detailed labels, optimal design, and clear justification |
| IPv4 Addressing and Subnetting VLSM<br>10% | Incorrect or missing subnetting. No VLSM applied | Basic subnetting with major errors or inefficient IP allocation | VLSM applied with minor errors. Subnetting mostly accurate | Correct VLSM implementation with efficient IP allocation. Clear subnetting calculations | Exceptional VLSM with optimal IP usage. Detailed calculations and justifications provided |
| OSPF Configuration and Verification<br>10% | No OSPF configuration or major errors. No verification shown | Basic OSPF setup with errors or incomplete verification | OSPF configured with minor issues. Some verification provided | OSPF correctly configured and verified. Routing tables and neighbor relationships shown | Comprehensive OSPF configuration with detailed verification, troubleshooting steps, and advanced settings |
| Practical Implementation and Screenshots<br>10% | No implementation shown or screenshots missing | Basic implementation with few screenshots. Limited configuration details | Implementation complete with relevant screenshots. Most configurations shown | Complete implementation with clear, annotated screenshots. All configurations documented | Exceptional implementation with highly detailed, well-annotated screenshots. Comprehensive configuration evidence |
| Testing, Troubleshooting, and Validation<br>10% | No testing or validation shown. No troubleshooting steps | Basic connectivity tests with limited results. Minimal troubleshooting | Tests conducted with some validation. Basic troubleshooting documented | Comprehensive testing with clear validation results. Effective troubleshooting methods | Thorough testing and validation with advanced troubleshooting. Detailed analysis of results |
| Report Quality, Structure, and Explanation<br>10% | Weak structure with minimal technical details, poor grammar | Basic structure and some technical explanation | Well-structured report with clear and relevant technical explanations | Clear, detailed, professional report with strong technical depth | Exceptionally clear, highly detailed, professionally structured report with in-depth technical explanations |
| References and APA Style<br>5% | No references or incorrect citation format | Few references with inconsistent APA formatting | Adequate references with mostly correct APA style | All references properly cited in APA format. Good source quality | Excellent references from high-quality sources. Perfect APA formatting throughout |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
