| Subject Code: | TECH1200 | ||
| Subject Name: | Fundamentals of Programming | ||
| Assessment Title: | Online TasksAnalysis | ||
| Assessment Type: | Individual | ||
| Word Count: | 1000 | Words | (+/-10%) |
| Weighting: | 40 % | ||
| Total Marks: | 40 | ||
| Submission: | Via MyKBS | ||
| Due Date: | Week 9 | ||
This assessment is to be completed individually. In this assessment, you will develop a Python 3 program that uses ChatGPT (https://chat.openai.com/) to generate at least 20 records and five fields. Your program should incorporate all the topics covered in Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7.
The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate your ability to apply the programming concepts and techniques covered in the course to develop a practical application in Python. You will be required to use the ChatGPT to generate a minimum of 20 records with at least five fields (see example below) and process the data in your program using the concepts covered in Weeks 1-7. The outcomes that you will demonstrate in this assessment include:
To submit your assessment, you should create a single Python file and upload it to the LMS. Your Python file should be well-documented and include comments to explain the functionality of your code. You should also include a report with explanation of how you utilised ChatGPT in your program.
This assessment aims to achieve the following subject learning outcomes:
| LO1 | Interpret simple program specifications. |
| LO4 | Use an integrated development environment to develop, debug and testa solution written in a programming language. |
Example to generate ChatGPT Python code:
 |
Input to ChatGPT (https://chat.openai.com/):
This dataset contains five fields: id (integer), name (string), gender (string), age (integer), and
salary (integer). Each record is represented as a sublist within the main list.
Assessment instructions for this assessment:
Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
Please read the policy to learn the answers to these questions:
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
Penalties may be applied for assessment submissions that exceed prescribed limits.
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Further details can be accessed at https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Please see the level of Generative AI that this assessment is Level 2 has been designed to accept:
Traffic Light | Amount of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenerativeAI) usage |
Evidence Required | This assessment (✓) |
Level 1 |
Prohibited:
No GenerativeAI allowed
This assessment showcases your individual knowledge, skills and/or personal experiences in the absence of Generative AI support. |
The use of generative AI is prohibited for this assessment and may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. | |
Level 2 |
Optional:
You may use GenerativeAI for research and content generation that is appropriately referenced.
See assessment instructions for details
This assessment allows you to engage with Generative AI as a means of expanding your understanding, creativity, and idea generation in the research phase of your assessment and to produce content that enhances your assessment. I.e., images. You do not have to use it. |
The use of GenAI is optional for thisassessment.
Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference GenerativeAI.
https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing- other-sources/referencing-other-sources- generative-ai
In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment.
Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially resultin penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
✓ |
Level 3 |
Compulsory:
You must use GenerativeAI to complete your assessment
See assessment instruction for details
This assessment fully integrates Generative AI, allowing you to harness the technology's full potential in collaboration withyour own expertise.
Always check your assessment instructions carefully as there may still be limitations on what constitutes acceptable use, and these may be specific to each assessment. |
You will be taught how to use generative AI and assessed on itsuse.
Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learnhow to reference GenerativeAI.
https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing- other-sources/referencing-other-sources- generative-ai
In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment.
Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially resultin penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zerofor the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
Marking Criteria | 40 marks | F (Fail) 0 – 49% | P (Pass) 50 – 64% | C (Credit) 65 –74% | D (Distinction) 75 –84% | HD (High Distinction) 85 – 100% |
Program Functionality
| 6 marks | Program does notgenerate at least 20 records and 5 fields using ChatGPT. | Program generates at least 20 records and 5 fields using ChatGPT but is not well- structured or does not utilise best programming practices. | Program generates at least 20 records and 5 fields using ChatGPT, is well-structured and utilises best programming practices, but lacks comments or explanations of code. | Program generates at least 20 records and 5 fields using ChatGPT, is well-structured and utilises best programming practices, and includes detailed comments and explanations of code. | Program generates at least 20 records and 5 fields using ChatGPT, is exceptionally well- structured and utilises best programming practices, includes detailed comments and explanations of code, and utilises resources to expand functionality ofthe program. |
Demonstration of Knowledge
| 12 marks | Program demonstrates a lack of understanding of the concepts covered in weeks 1-7 of the course. | Program demonstrates understanding of the concepts covered in weeks 1-7 of the course but lacks application of knowledge to the program. | Program demonstrates understanding of the concepts covered in weeks 1-7 of the course and applies knowledge to the program. | Program demonstrates a strong understanding of the concepts covered in weeks 1-7 of the course and applies knowledge to the program in creative and effective ways. | Program demonstrates exceptional understanding of the concepts covered in weeks 1-7 of the course and applies knowledge to theprogram in innovative and sophisticated ways. |
Use of Required Topics
| 6 marks | Less than half of required topics are used. | At least halfof required topics are used. | Most required topics are used. | Almost all required topics are used. | All required topics are used in a creative and sophisticated way. |
Functionality
| 2 marks | Program does notcompile or run properly. | Program runs, but with limited functionality and errors. | Program runs withacceptable functionality. | Program runs withadvanced functionality and minimal errors. | Program runs withexceptional functionality andno errors. |
Code Quality
| 2 marks | Code is disorganised, difficult to read,and not well-documented | Code is organised, readable, and moderately documented | Code is well-organised, readable, and well- documented | Code is very well- organised, highly readable, and extensively documented | Code is exceptionally well-organised, extremely readable, and meticulously documented |
Creativity
| 2 marks | Program is unoriginal and lacks creativity. | Program is somewhat original and shows some creativity. | Program is fairlyoriginal and shows creativity. | Program is very original and shows significant creativity. | Program is exceptionally original and shows exceptional creativity. |
Report
| 10 marks | Poorly presented with little or no attention toformatting, style, and design. | Acceptable report with some attention to formatting, style, and design. . | Good report with appropriate formatting, style, and design. | Very good report with excellent formatting, style,and design. | Exceptional report with outstanding formatting, style, and design. |
| Feedback and gradeswill be released via MyKBS | |||||
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
