MME501A Design and Failure Analysis of Materials Assignment Help

 

       Master of Engineering

            (Mechanical)

 

Unit codeMME501A
Unit nameDesign and Failure Analysis of Materials
Assessment #4
Paper #A
Version #1
Created byRumana SultanaDate14 Aug 2024
Reviewed byMilind SiddhpuraDate19 Aug 2024

 

 

 

Assessment Instructions:

  1. Please familiarise yourself with the EIT Academic Honesty and Misconduct Policy, in order to understand your requirements and responsibilities as a student of EIT.
  2. Please refer to our Assessment, Moderation and Student Progress Procedure for information relating to extensions. Extension requests should be submitted to your LSO at least 3 days prior to the due date.
  3. Assessments submitted via email will not be accepted.
  4. Assessments must be submitted through Turn-it-in (unless otherwise stated). Your submission must:
    1. Be a single document (Word or PDF only)
    2. Include at least 20 words of machine-readable text, and
    3. Not exceed 10MB.
  5. You must use the provided assessment cover page available on your Moodle student homepage. Submissions without a cover page will not be accepted.
  6. You must correctly title your document/s. For example:

UNIT#_ASSESSMENT#_YOURNAME_DATE

E.g. ME501_Assessment2_SteveMackay_01Aug2019

 

  1. You must reference all content used from other sources including course materials, slides, diagrams, etc. Do not directly copy and paste from course materials or any other resources. Refer to the referencing section of the EIT eLibrary on Moodle for referencing guides.
  2. It is your responsibility to check that you have submitted the correct file, as revised submissions are not permitted after the due date and time.

 

 

Important note: Failure to adhere to the above may result in academic penalties. Please refer to the unit outline or EIT Policies and Procedures for further information.
 

 

 

 

Unit code and name:MME501A: Design and Failure Analysis of Materials
Assessment #:4A
Assessment type:Research Report and Presentation
Weighting:35%
Total marks:100 marks

 

Please complete your answers on the assessment cover page document available on Moodle.

Clearly label your question numbers (there is no need to copy the full question over). Include all working out.

 

Word count:

3,000 words excluding diagrams and references.

 

 

Task 1 (80 marks)

Today, fracture mechanics are continuously used in designs from joints on airplane wings, metal joists in buildings, car tire rims, the glass covering our smartphones, and the windshield protecting you from incoming projectiles. In conjunction with fatigue testing, understanding how an object or design will initially crack and eventually fail allows engineers to directly improve designs for both longevity of the product and system safety.

New nanoscale materials that are less likely to crack and fail, such hexagonal boron nitride, are expanding fracture mechanics beyond the macro. Developing crack-resistant materials from the atom up calls for the discovery of completely novel and world-changing materials.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep learning models continue to improve our understanding of the core concerts of fracture mechanics while simulating how unproven materials will fracture, considerably speeding up the search for stronger materials.

Overall, fracture mechanics focuses on how cracks form and propagate. Since many mechanical failures derive from fatigue and eventually fracturing, fracture mechanics will continue to make the systems and products we use stronger and safer.

Fracture mechanics may not seem common, but it’s in everything, from safety mechanisms to large metal structures. Due to its vast use, fracture mechanics can have major consequences, like the SS Schenectady failure.
 

 

 

Source:  https://control.com/technical-articles/an-overview-of-fracture-mechanics-in-industrial-applications/

 

 

 

Question 1: (15 marks)

Select a real-life fracture problem in any industry either from your own industry that you are working in or from literature/history, i.e. mining, automobile, aerospace, construction etc. Give the background information and details of the fracture problem. Provide a diagram.

 

 

 

Question 2: (15 marks)

State the details of the findings of the fractured surface. Provide figures of the fractured surface.

 

 

 

Question 3: (10 marks)

Investigate and provide the metallographic details of the fractured surface.

Question 3: (25 marks)

Identify and analyse all possible root causes of the fracture problem. Demonstrate knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. Your report should contain all the required parameter data and calculations (if needed).

 

 

 

Question 4: (10 marks)

Recommend solutions in a logical and clear fashion to prevent or mitigate the identified damage of materials. Consider the environmental responsibilities and the need for sustainable development when searching for the solutions. Show the proof of literature search.

 

 

Format and presentation: (5 marks)

  • Use of references and citations
  • Format and presentation (cover page, index page, numbering, page setup, page numbers, figure numbers/titles and table numbers/titles
     

 

Task 2: (10 marks)

Deliver a 5-minute presentation

Important: This presentation is one of the mandatory requirements and if you don’t submit this video, your assessment marks will be zero.

The requirements are as follows:

  • Prepare a PowerPoint presentation on the following topic. “Briefly explain and analyze the

fracture problem that you have discussed in the report.”

  • Maximum 8 slides:
    • Slide 1: Add Title/Question + Unit Number & Name + Your Name and ID + Your Lecturer Name.
    • Slide 2: Objectives/Contents
    • Slides 3-7: Insert your answers: Solutions, Calculations, Simulation screenshots, etc.
    • Slide 8: References here in IEEE format.
  • Record your 5-minutes presentation directly on PowerPoint or using Loom Video Recorder
  • Introduce yourself and explain the Title/Question and Objectives briefly (1 minute)
  • Start explaining your Answer/Solutions/Simulations (4 minutes)
  • Paste the link of your recording within your assessment report.

 

 

 

Task 3: (10 marks)

What specific skills did I use during this project/task, and how did they contribute to the outcome? What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

 

 

 

END OF ASSESSMENT

Marking rubric overleaf
 

 

 

Marking Rubric for Task 1

 

Assessment CriteriaHigh Distinction (HD) (85 to 100%)Distinction (D) (75--‐84%)Credit (C) (65--‐74%)Pass (P) (50--‐64%)Fail (N) (0--‐49%)
Quality of selection, suggestion, and description (15%)Excellent selection and description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry.Good selection, and description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry.Good selection but less description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry.Good selection with poor description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry.

Poor selection of the fracture problem with poor description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular

industry.

State the details of the of the findings of the fractured

surface (15%)

Excellent details of the findings on the fractured surface with figures of the fractured surface.

 

Good details of the findings on the fractured surface with figures of the fractured surface.

Relatively adequate description of the fractured surface with figures of the fractured surface.Some description of the fractured surface without figures of the fractured surface.

Limited description of the fractured surface without figures of the

fractured surface.

Investigate and provide the metallographic details of the fractured

surface (10%)

 

Complete investigation and identification of the metallographic details is provided.

 

Comprehensive investigation and identification of the metallographic details is provided.

Less comprehensive investigation and identification of the metallographic details is provided.

 

Limited investigation of the metallographic details is provided.

 

Poor investigation of the metallographic details is provided.

Identify and Analysis of the fractured surface.

Demonstrate knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics

understanding

 

Complete identification and analysis of all possible root causes of the fracture problem.

All the detailed information and calculations for the selected problem are provided.

Comprehensive identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem.

 

All the detailed information and calculations for the selected problem are provided.

Very good Knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture

mechanics understanding.

 

Less comprehensive identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem.

Most of the detailed information and calculations for the selected problem are provided.

Limited identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem.

Some of the information and calculations for the selected problem are provided.

Fair knowledge of the

fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding.

Poor identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem.

Limited of the information and calculations for the selected problem are provided.

Poor knowledge of the

fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding.

 

 

 

 Excellent knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. Good knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding.  

Recommend solutions to prevent or mitigate the identified damage of materials.

Consider sustainability when

searching for solution. Show proof of literature search. (10%)

 

 

Provide all logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem.

Provide evidence of literature search.

 

 

Provide a range of logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem

Provide evidence of literature search.

 

 

Provide some logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem.

But did not provide the evidence of literature search.

 

 

Provide a few solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem but did not mention anything about sustainable solution.

But did not provide the evidence of literature search.

 

 

Provide none of logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem.

No evidence of literature search.

 

 

General Report Presentation and format (5%)

 

Report is very well organized, containing an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, page number, table and figure title and number.

Clear, concise sentences. No grammatical errors. Citations are included in the correct format.

 

Report is very well organized, containing an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, page number, table and figure title and number.

May have some minor grammatical errors.

Citations are included in the correct format; may have minor errors.

Report has separate introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, but connections among these could be improved.

Adequate sentence structure but may require editing for clarity/wordiness.

Some grammatical errors, but these do not impede understanding.

Citations are included with some issues in formatting

 

 

Distinction between introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion is unclear.

Poor sentence structure. Writing may be wordy or difficult to follow in places. Many grammatical errors. Citations are included but not in the correct format.

 

General structure of the report is difficult to follow.

Paragraphs are unfocused, incoherent or require restructuring. Topic sentences are absent or unconnected to the paragraphs that follow.

Transitions are absent or used incorrectly. Paper is unreasonably too long or too short.

 

 

Marking Rubric for Task 2

 

Assessment CriteriaOut of:Score:
Contents/Objectives1 
Bullet points - not sentences1 
Diagrams and tables (Visible size, Labelling)1 
Slide Quality (slide numbering, visible font size)1 
No spelling/grammar mistakes1 
Clear information and explanation2 
Voice modulation - not monotone2 
Time management – completes within given timeframe1 
Total:10 

 

 

Marking Rubric for Task 3

 

Assessment Criteria

High Distinction (HD)

(85 to 100%)

Distinction (D)

(75--‐84%)

Credit (C)

(65--‐74%)

Pass (P)

(50--‐64%)

Fail (N)

(0--‐49%)

What specific skills did I use during this project/task, and how did they contribute to the outcome?

What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

 

 

Extensive discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods

 

 

Very good discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods

 

 

Good discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods

 

 

Fair discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods

 

 

Poor discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods

 

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.