Unit code | MME501A | ||
Unit name | Design and Failure Analysis of Materials | ||
Assessment # | 4 | ||
Paper # | A | ||
Version # | 1 | ||
Created by | Rumana Sultana | Date | 14 Aug 2024 |
Reviewed by | Milind Siddhpura | Date | 19 Aug 2024 |
Assessment Instructions:
UNIT#_ASSESSMENT#_YOURNAME_DATE
E.g. ME501_Assessment2_SteveMackay_01Aug2019
Important note: Failure to adhere to the above may result in academic penalties. Please refer to the unit outline or EIT Policies and Procedures for further information.
Unit code and name: | MME501A: Design and Failure Analysis of Materials |
Assessment #: | 4A |
Assessment type: | Research Report and Presentation |
Weighting: | 35% |
Total marks: | 100 marks |
Please complete your answers on the assessment cover page document available on Moodle.
Clearly label your question numbers (there is no need to copy the full question over). Include all working out.
Word count:
3,000 words excluding diagrams and references.
Task 1 (80 marks)
Today, fracture mechanics are continuously used in designs from joints on airplane wings, metal joists in buildings, car tire rims, the glass covering our smartphones, and the windshield protecting you from incoming projectiles. In conjunction with fatigue testing, understanding how an object or design will initially crack and eventually fail allows engineers to directly improve designs for both longevity of the product and system safety.
New nanoscale materials that are less likely to crack and fail, such hexagonal boron nitride, are expanding fracture mechanics beyond the macro. Developing crack-resistant materials from the atom up calls for the discovery of completely novel and world-changing materials.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep learning models continue to improve our understanding of the core concerts of fracture mechanics while simulating how unproven materials will fracture, considerably speeding up the search for stronger materials.
Overall, fracture mechanics focuses on how cracks form and propagate. Since many mechanical failures derive from fatigue and eventually fracturing, fracture mechanics will continue to make the systems and products we use stronger and safer.
Fracture mechanics may not seem common, but it’s in everything, from safety mechanisms to large metal structures. Due to its vast use, fracture mechanics can have major consequences, like the SS Schenectady failure.
Source: https://control.com/technical-articles/an-overview-of-fracture-mechanics-in-industrial-applications/
Question 1: (15 marks)
Select a real-life fracture problem in any industry either from your own industry that you are working in or from literature/history, i.e. mining, automobile, aerospace, construction etc. Give the background information and details of the fracture problem. Provide a diagram.
Question 2: (15 marks)
State the details of the findings of the fractured surface. Provide figures of the fractured surface.
Question 3: (10 marks)
Investigate and provide the metallographic details of the fractured surface.
Question 3: (25 marks)
Identify and analyse all possible root causes of the fracture problem. Demonstrate knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. Your report should contain all the required parameter data and calculations (if needed).
Question 4: (10 marks)
Recommend solutions in a logical and clear fashion to prevent or mitigate the identified damage of materials. Consider the environmental responsibilities and the need for sustainable development when searching for the solutions. Show the proof of literature search.
Format and presentation: (5 marks)
Task 2: (10 marks)
Deliver a 5-minute presentation
Important: This presentation is one of the mandatory requirements and if you don’t submit this video, your assessment marks will be zero.
The requirements are as follows:
fracture problem that you have discussed in the report.”
Task 3: (10 marks)
What specific skills did I use during this project/task, and how did they contribute to the outcome? What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?
END OF ASSESSMENT
Marking rubric overleaf
Marking Rubric for Task 1
Assessment Criteria | High Distinction (HD) (85 to 100%) | Distinction (D) (75--‐84%) | Credit (C) (65--‐74%) | Pass (P) (50--‐64%) | Fail (N) (0--‐49%) |
Quality of selection, suggestion, and description (15%) | Excellent selection and description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry. | Good selection, and description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry. | Good selection but less description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry. | Good selection with poor description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry. | Poor selection of the fracture problem with poor description of the background information and details of the fracture problem of a particular industry. |
State the details of the of the findings of the fractured surface (15%) | Excellent details of the findings on the fractured surface with figures of the fractured surface. |
Good details of the findings on the fractured surface with figures of the fractured surface. | Relatively adequate description of the fractured surface with figures of the fractured surface. | Some description of the fractured surface without figures of the fractured surface. | Limited description of the fractured surface without figures of the fractured surface. |
Investigate and provide the metallographic details of the fractured surface (10%) |
Complete investigation and identification of the metallographic details is provided. |
Comprehensive investigation and identification of the metallographic details is provided. | Less comprehensive investigation and identification of the metallographic details is provided. |
Limited investigation of the metallographic details is provided. |
Poor investigation of the metallographic details is provided. |
Identify and Analysis of the fractured surface. Demonstrate knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding |
Complete identification and analysis of all possible root causes of the fracture problem. All the detailed information and calculations for the selected problem are provided. | Comprehensive identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem.
All the detailed information and calculations for the selected problem are provided. Very good Knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. |
Less comprehensive identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem. Most of the detailed information and calculations for the selected problem are provided. | Limited identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem. Some of the information and calculations for the selected problem are provided. Fair knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. | Poor identification and analysis of possible root causes of the fracture problem. Limited of the information and calculations for the selected problem are provided. Poor knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. |
Excellent knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. | Good knowledge of the fundamentals and fracture mechanics understanding. | ||||
Recommend solutions to prevent or mitigate the identified damage of materials. Consider sustainability when searching for solution. Show proof of literature search. (10%) |
Provide all logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem. Provide evidence of literature search. |
Provide a range of logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem Provide evidence of literature search. |
Provide some logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem. But did not provide the evidence of literature search. |
Provide a few solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem but did not mention anything about sustainable solution. But did not provide the evidence of literature search. |
Provide none of logical, clear and sustainable solutions to prevent or mitigate the fracture problem. No evidence of literature search. |
General Report Presentation and format (5%) |
Report is very well organized, containing an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, page number, table and figure title and number. Clear, concise sentences. No grammatical errors. Citations are included in the correct format. |
Report is very well organized, containing an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, page number, table and figure title and number. May have some minor grammatical errors. Citations are included in the correct format; may have minor errors. | Report has separate introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, but connections among these could be improved. Adequate sentence structure but may require editing for clarity/wordiness. Some grammatical errors, but these do not impede understanding. Citations are included with some issues in formatting |
Distinction between introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion is unclear. Poor sentence structure. Writing may be wordy or difficult to follow in places. Many grammatical errors. Citations are included but not in the correct format. |
General structure of the report is difficult to follow. Paragraphs are unfocused, incoherent or require restructuring. Topic sentences are absent or unconnected to the paragraphs that follow. Transitions are absent or used incorrectly. Paper is unreasonably too long or too short. |
Marking Rubric for Task 2
Assessment Criteria | Out of: | Score: |
Contents/Objectives | 1 | |
Bullet points - not sentences | 1 | |
Diagrams and tables (Visible size, Labelling) | 1 | |
Slide Quality (slide numbering, visible font size) | 1 | |
No spelling/grammar mistakes | 1 | |
Clear information and explanation | 2 | |
Voice modulation - not monotone | 2 | |
Time management – completes within given timeframe | 1 | |
Total: | 10 |
Marking Rubric for Task 3
Assessment Criteria | High Distinction (HD) (85 to 100%) | Distinction (D) (75--‐84%) | Credit (C) (65--‐74%) | Pass (P) (50--‐64%) | Fail (N) (0--‐49%) |
What specific skills did I use during this project/task, and how did they contribute to the outcome? What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them? |
Extensive discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods |
Very good discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods |
Good discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods |
Fair discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods |
Poor discussion of the required skills and challenges and overcoming methods |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.