Assessment 2 Details and Submission GuidelinesIndividual Task | |
| School | School of Business |
| Course Name | Master of Business Research |
| Unit Code | MBR525 |
| Unit Title | Entrepreneurship Issuesfor Research Projects |
| Trimester | T2- 2024 |
| Lecturer | Dr Melphon Mayaka |
| Assessment Type | Individual Report |
| Assessment Title | Brief review of literature |
| UnitLearning Outcomes Addressed: |
|
| Weight | 20% |
| Total Marks | 20 |
| Particulars | 2000 Words (Max.) |
| Release Date | Week 4 |
| Due Date | Week 7 |
| Submission Guidelines |
|
| Extension | If an extension of time to submit work is required, an Application for Special Consideration and supporting documentation must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer via your MIT AMS login: https://online.mit.edu.au/ams. You must submit this application no later than three working days after the due date of the specific piece of assessment or the examination for which you are seekingSpecial Consideration. |
| Academic Misconduct | Academic misconduct, including the use of GenAI/ChatGPT, is a serious offence.Depending on the seriousness of the case,penalties can vary from a written warningor zero marksto exclusion fromthe course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiarwith the full policy and procedure available at http://www.mit.edu.au/about- mit/institute- publications/policies-procedures-and- guidelines/Plagiarism- Academic-Misconduct- Policy-Procedure. For furtherinformation, please referto theAcademic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. |
Assessment Cover Sheet
| Student ID Number/s: | Student Surname/s: | Given name/s: |
| Course: | School: | |
| Unit code: | Unit title: | |
| Due date: | Date submitted: | Campus: |
| Lecturer: | Tutor: | |
Student Declaration I/We declare that:
I/we have notplagiarised the work of othersor participated in unauthorised collaboration (collusion) or Contract Cheating when preparing this assignment. | ||
| MIT ID | Signature | Date |
Assessment Task Instructions
This report includes your last few weeks’ (week 2 to week 6) review of the contemporary studies in entrepreneurship literature. In assessment task 1, you have followed the annotated bibliography style. However, you will follow the literature review style for assessment task 2. In this regard, a few exemplary documents are uploaded on Moodle for your assistance.
Besides, you have been reviewing relevant literature between weeks 2 and 6, presenting those, and receiving feedback from your lecturer during your weekly classes. This in-class practice would enhance your capacity to write the assessment task 2.
The assessment task 2 (i.e., the brief literature review document) ideally should be less than 2000 words, and you should include the following:
Using Technology for Assessment
| Rationale | Activities | Technological toolsselected |
|
|
|
Assessment Instructions
ASESSMENT MARKING RUBRIC – LITERATURE REVIEW (LR)
| Marki ng Criteria | Excellent HD: 80%-- 100% | AdvancedD: 70%-- 79% | Proficient C: 60%-- 69% | Functional P: 50%-- 59% | Unsatisfactor y F: 0%-- 49% |
Overall Structure (10%) | Outstanding and structured LR, and include
| Advanced and structured LR, needminor improvements in
etc. | Proficient LR, need somemajor improvements in
| Functional LR with somemissing aspects in
| Inadequate and unstructured LR, showinga lack in
|
| Introduction or Background (20%) | Presented and explained thefollowing at an outstanding level
| Presented and explained the following at an advanced level
| Presented and explained the following at a proficient level
| Presented and explained the following at a functional level
| Presented and explained thefollowing inadequately
|
Marking Criteri a | Excellent HD: 80%-- 100% | AdvancedD: 70%-- 79% | Proficient C: 60%-- 69% | Functional P: 50%-- 59% | Unsatisfactor y F: 0%-- 49% |
Literature Review (50%) | Demonstrated an excellent level of interpretive, analytical, and intellectual abilities in the following areas
| Demonstrated an advanced level of interpretive, analytical, and intellectual abilities in the following areas
| Demonstrated a proficient level of interpretive, analytical, and intellectual abilities in the following areas
| Demonstrated a functional level of interpretive, analytical, and intellectual abilities in the following areas
| Demonstrated an unsatisfactory level of interpretive, analytical, and intellectual abilities in the following areas
|
Academic Practice (20%) | An excellent level of academic practice is followed inthe areas of
| An advanced level of academic practice is followed in the areasof
| A proficient level of academic practice is followed in the areas of
| A functional level of academic practice is followed in the areas of
| An unsatisfactory level of academic practice is followed in the areas of
|
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
