| Subject Code: | MBA621 |
| Subject Name: | HealthcareSystems |
| Assessment Title: AssessmentType: Length: | CaseStudy Individualcasestudyanalysisandrecommendations 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) |
| Weighting: | 40% |
| TotalMarks: Submission: | 100 Online |
| Due Date: | Week9 |
Your task
Individually,developa2000-wordreportandrecommendationsontheworkforcechallengesfacing the aged care OR disability health care sector in Australia today.
The purpose of this individual assessment is to use a systems-thinking approach to analyse the workforce shortage facing the Australian aged care OR disability health care sector, and what it means to the various stakeholders.
In the 2023 Australian Government’s Intergenerational report, both the aged care and disability sectors are predicted to be two of Australia’s fastest growing markets over the next 40 years. While this creates many opportunities, it adds more challenges to an already strained health care industry. You are to write a report that critically articulates the workforce challenges for your chosen sector, and outline your recommendations to address this challenge.
Areascoveredinyourreport should include:
Youarerequiredtouseatleast12sourcesofinformation(atleast5oftheseshouldbeacademic journals) and reference these in accordance with the Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. These may include websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles.
The cover page,Table of Contents,Reference List,tables,images,and graph sare excluded from the word count.
This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. MyKBS will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your MyKBS error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well before the deadline to avoid any possible delay involving the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties.
PenaltieswillbeimposedonlateassignmentsubmissionsinaccordancewithKaplanBusinessSchool “late assignment submission penalties” policy.
| Numberof days | Penalty |
| 1*-9 days | 5%perdayforeachcalendardaylatedeductedfromthetotalmarks available |
| 10- 14 days | 50%deductedfromthetotalmarks available. |
| After14days | Assignmentsthataresubmittedmorethan14calendardaysafter the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). |
| Note | Notwithstandingtheabovepenaltyrules,assignmentswillalsobe givenamarkofzeroiftheyaresubmittedafterassignmentshave been returned to students |
*Assignments submitted at any stage with in the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty
Formoreinformation,pleasereadthefullpolicyviahttps://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences ofcheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties?
HowcanIappealmygrade?
Click here for answers to these questions: https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than10%will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisororrefertothe resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click herefor this information.
Please see the level of Generative AIthatthisassessmenthasbeendesignedto accept:
| TrafficLight | Amount of Generative ArtificialIntelligence (GenerativeAI) usage | EvidenceRequired | Thisassessment (✓) |
Level1 | Prohibited: No Generative AIallowed This assessment showcases your individual knowledge,skillsand/orpersonalexperiencesin the absence of Generative AI support. |
TheuseofgenerativeAIisprohibitedforthis assessment and may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. | |
Level2 |
Optional:
You may use Generative AIforresearchand content generation that is appropriately referenced.
Seeassessment instructions for details This assessment allows you to engage with Generative AI as a means of expanding your understanding,creativity,andideagenerationin the research phase of your assessment and to produce content that enhances your assessment. I.e., images. You do not have to use it. | TheuseofGenAIisoptionalforthis assessment. YourcollaborationwithGenerativeAImust be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used.Clickonthelinkbelowtolearnhow to reference GenAI. https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai Inaddition,youmustincludeanappendixtha documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment. Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct,includingbutnotlimitedtoamark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
(✓) |
Level3 |
Compulsory:
You must use Generative AIto complete your assessment
Seeassessment instruction for details
ThisassessmentfullyintegratesGenerativeAI, allowing you to harness the technology's full potential in collaboration with your own expertise.
Always check your assessment instructions carefullyastheremaystillbelimitationsonwhat constitutes acceptable use, and these may be specific to each assessment. | YouwillbetaughthowtousegenerativeAI and assessed on its use. YourcollaborationwithGenerativeAImust be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference GenAI. https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing-other-sources/referencing-other-sources-generative-ai Inaddition,youmustincludeanappendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment. Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct,includingbutnotlimitedtoamark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
MBA621 Assessment 2 Marking Rubric–Case Study Analysis and Recommendations40%
| Marking Criteria(_/100) | F (Fail) | P (Pass) 50–64% | C(Credit) 65–74% | D(Distinction) 75 – 84% | HD(HighDistinction) 85 -100% | |
| 0–34% | 35–49% | |||||
Executive Summary
/10marks | You wrote a summary that is limitedtocoverthesignificant findings of your report. | Youwroteadeveloping summary that partially covers the significant findings of your report. | You wrote a basic summarythatpartially covers the significant findingsofyourreport. | You wrote an enhanced ExecutiveSummarythat covers all of the significant findings of your report. | You wrote a detailed Executive Summary that coversallofthesignificant findings of your report. | You wrote a comprehensive Executive Summarythatcoversallof the significant findings of your report. |
Currentoverview ofchosen sector
/20marks | Youprovidedalimitedoverview of your chosen sectorsupported by outdated in-text citations. | You provided a developingoverviewof your chosen sector supported with limited currentin-textcitations. | You provided an acceptableoverviewthat discusses your chosen sectorwithanattemptto provide current in-text citations. | You provided an adequate overview of your chosen sector, supportedwithsufficient current in-text citations. | You provided a comprehensiveoverview of your chosen sector, supported with insightful current in-text citations | You provided an expert overview of your chosen sector, supported with sophisticatedcurrentin-text citations. |
SystemsThinking Approach
/25marks | You described the workforce issue using a limited systems perspectiveandpoorlyjustified it with limited supporting evidence and in-text citations. | You reviewed the workforce issue using a developing systems perspectiveandjustifiedit with limited supporting evidence and in-text citations. | Youcriticallyreviewedthe workforce issue using a systems perspective and justified it with supporting evidence and in-text citations. | You critically reviewed the workforce issue by appropriately applying a systemsperspectiveand justifieditwithsupporting evidence and in-text citations. | Youcriticallyreviewedthe workforce issue by comprehensivelyapplying a systems perspective and justified it with excellent supporting evidence and in-text citations. | You critically reviewed the workforceissuebyexpertly applying a systems perspective and justified it with excellent supporting evidence and in-text citations. |
Recommendations
/25marks | You listed recommendations thathavenofeasibilityforthe next 5 years. | You described recommendations that havelimitedfeasibilityfor the next 5 years. | You provided recommendations that maybeusefulforthenext 5 years. | Youprovidedreasonable recommendations that are somewhat useful for the next 5 years. | You provided strong recommendationsthatare feasible for the next 5 years. | You provided excellent recommendationsforthe next 5 years. |
Conclusion /5 marks | You wrote a conclusion that highlights the salient points of yourreportinalimitedcapacity. | You wrote a conclusion that demonstrates developing highlights of thesalientpointsofyour report. | You wrote an adequate conclusion that captures someofthesalientpoints of your report. | You wrote an adequate conclusion that captures mostofthesalientpoints of your report. | You wrote a strong conclusionthatdescribes all salient points of your report. | You wrote an excellent conclusionthatdescribes all salient points of your report in a convincing narrative. |
Format,in-text citations and reference list /15marks | Your writing is disjointed and demonstrateslimitedstructure, thought and consideration for the intended audience, including only a few in-text citations and a reference list, citingsources(inclusiveGenAI generated answers if applicable) used for the assessment. | Your writing is often disjointed but demonstrates some structure, thought and consideration for the intended audience, includingonlyafewin-text citations and a reference list, citing sources used fortheassessment. | Your writing is fluent but not always connected, demonstrating an adequate structure, thoughtandconsideration fortheintendedaudience, including many in-text citations and a reference list, citing sources used fortheassessment. | Your writing is fluent, demonstrating sufficient structure, thought and consideration for the intended audience, including many in-text citationsandareference list, citing sources used for the assessment. | Your writing is fluent, demonstrating a comprehensive structure, thoughtandconsideration fortheintendedaudience, including thorough in-text citations and a reference list, citing sources usedfor the assessment. | Your writing is excellent, demonstrating a comprehensive structure, thought and consideration for theintendedaudience, including thorough in-text citations and a reference list,citingsourcesusedfor the assessment. |
| Feed back and grades will be released via My KBS | ||||||
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
