All information in the Subject Outline is correct at the time of approval. KOI reserves the right to make changes to the Subject Outline if they become necessary. Any changes require the approval of the KOI Academic Board and will be formally advised to those students who may be affected by email and via Moodle.
Information contained within this Subject Outline applies to students enrolled in the trimester as indicated
Associated HE Award(s) | Duration | Level | Subject Coordinator |
Master of Information Technology (MIT)
Graduate Diploma of Information Technology (GDIT) | 1 trimester | Postgraduate | Dr Aroba Khan aroba.khan@koi.edu.au P: 92833583 L: Level 1-2, 17 O’Connell St. Consultation: via Moodle or by appointment. |
This subject is
an elective subject for the Graduate Diploma of Information Technology (GDIT)
Indicated below is the weighting of this subject and the total course points
Subject Credit Points | Total Course Credit Points |
4 | MIT (64 Credit Points); GDIT (32 Credit Points) |
Indicated below is the expected student workload per week for this subject
No. Timetabled Hours/Week* | No. Personal Study Hours/Week** | Total Workload Hours/Week*** |
3 hours/week plus supplementary online material | 7 hours/week | 10 hours/week |
* Total time spent per week at lectures and tutorials
** Total time students are expected to spend per week in studying, completing assignments, etc.
*** Combination of timetable hours and personal study
Software resource requirements specific to this subject: Office 365, MS Imagine, Visio, Xamarin, PowerMockup, Adobe XD.
Academic advising is available to students throughout teaching periods including the exam weeks. As well as requesting help during scheduled class times, students have the following options:
Successful technological innovations, such as the iPhone, have highlighted the importance of usability – the ease of access and/or use of a product, website, or app. In order to design for usability, this subject provides an in-depth understanding of user interaction design theories, principles and practices. It examines user- centred design methodologies, particularly in the context of the user experience. Students will apply these methodologies to develop prototypes and a functioning cross-platform mobile application. Contemporary issues related to the design of interfaces for emerging technologies will also be explored.
Graduates of postgraduate courses from King’s Own Institute will achieve the graduate attributes expected from successful completion of a postgraduate degree under the Australian Qualifications Framework (2nd edition, January 2013). Graduates at this level will be able to apply advanced body of knowledge in a range of contexts for professional practice or scholarship and as a pathway for further learning.
King’s Own Institute’s key generic graduate attributes for a postgraduate degree are summarised below:
KOI Postgraduate Degree Graduate Attributes | Detailed Description | |
Knowledge | Current, comprehensive and coherent knowledge, including recent developments and applied research methods | |
Critical Thinking | Critical thinking skills to identify and analyse current theories anddevelopments and emerging trends in professional practice | |
|
Communication | Communication and technical skillsto analyse andtheorise, contribute to professional practice or scholarship, and present ideas to a variety of audiences |
| Research and Information Literacy | Cognitiveand technical skills to access and evaluate information resources, justify research approaches and interpret theoretical propositions |
|
Creative Problem Solving Skills | Cognitive, technical and creative skills to investigate, analyse and synthesise complex information, concepts and theories, solve complex problems and applyestablished theories to situations in professional practice |
| Ethical and Cultural Sensitivity | Appreciation and accountability for ethical principles, cultural sensitivity and social responsibility, both personally and professionally |
|
Leadershipand Strategy | Initiative, leadership skills and ability to work professionally and collaboratively to achieve team objectives across a range of team roles Expertise in strategic thinking, developing and implementing business plans and decision making under uncertainty |
Professional Skills | High level personal autonomy, judgement, decision-making andaccountability required to begin professional practice |
Across the courses, these skills are developed progressively at three levels:
Generally, skills gained from subjects in the Graduate Certificate and Graduate Diploma are at levels 1 and 2 while other subjects in the Master’s degree are at level 3.
Listed below, are key knowledge and skills students are expected to attain by successfully completing this subject:
Subject Learning Outcomes | Contribution to Graduate Attributes |
a) Apply user-centred design methodologies in the development of low-fidelity and high-fidelity mobile application prototypes |
|
b) Develop and evaluate mobile interfaces thatlook professional and are usable, functional and accessible |
|
c) Develop a mobile application with reference to the major mobile application usability guidelines and standards |
|
d) Modify design iterations based on user testing results |
|
e) Evaluate current research in usability and interface design for emerging technologies |
|
Below are details of the subject content and how it is structured, including specific topics covered in lectures and tutorials. Reading refers to the text unless otherwise indicated.
Weekly Planner:
Week (beginning) |
Topic covered in each week’s lecture |
Reading(s) | Expected work as listed in Moodle |
1 01 July |
UX Design principles and general designplanning |
Book Chapter 1,2 | Comparative evaluation of sample designs
Summative graded |
2 08 July |
UX Research and User Personas |
Book Chapter 3, 5 | User behaviour research and getting to know the users
Summative graded |
3 15 July |
Visual Design Principles and Processes |
Book Chapter7 | Evaluation of mobile application designs, visual design tools
Summative graded |
4 22 July |
Wireframesand Prototyping |
Book Chapter 8 | Creating storyboards, wireframes, mockups and prototypes using Figma |
Summative graded | |||
5 29 July | Prototyping 2 | Book Chapter 8 | Create various types of prototypes using different tools, Figma |
Summative graded | |||
Assessment 2: Due | |||
6 05 Aug | Ethics and Privacy in Prototyping | Online resources | Exercising Ethics and Privacy in UX design
Summative graded |
7 12 Aug |
UI design and implementation | Book Chapter 9 | App development tools
Summativegraded |
8 19 Aug | Frontend UI Implementation using Cross platform (Flutter) | Book Chapter 10 | Implementing App using cross platform
Summativegraded Assessment 3: Due |
9 26 Aug | Frontend UI Implementation using Cross platform (Flutter) | Online resources | App development Summative graded Draft mobile application |
10 02 Sep | Post-launching UX Activities | Book Chapter 11 | User accessibility testing Draft mobile application Summative graded |
11 09 Sep | Designing for Big Data | Book Chapter 12 | Data visualization Assessment 4: Due |
12 16 Sep |
Presentation and Revision | Assessment 4: Due | |
13 23 Sep | Study review weekand Final Exam Week |
14 30 Sep | Examinations Continuing students - enrolments for T324 open | Please see exam timetable for exam date, time and location |
15 07 Oct | Student Vacation begins New students - enrolments for T324 open | |
16 / 17 14 Oct |
NOTE: More information about the dates will be provided at a later date through Moodle/KOI email. | |
T324 28 Oct 2024 | ||
28 Oct 24 | Week 1 of classes for T324. |
Please note: KOI is closed on all scheduled NSW Public Holidays. There are no public holidays during the teaching weeks of this trimester.
Review of Grade:
There may be instances when you believe that your final grade in a subject does not accurately reflect your performance against the subject criteria. Section 8 of the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy (www.koi.edu.au) describes the grounds on which you may apply for a Review of Grade.
If this happens and you are unable to resolve it with the Academic staff concerned then you can apply for a formal Review of Grade within the timeframes indicated in the following sections of this subject outline - Supplementary Assessments, 3.2 Appeals Process as well as the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy. Please ensure you read the Review of Grade information before applying.
Review of Grade Day:
Final exam scripts will not normally be returned to students. Students can obtain feedback on their exam performance and their results for the whole subject at the Review of Grade Day. KOI will hold the Review of Grade Day for all subjects studied in T224. The ROG day will be in week 16 / 17, the date will be announced at a later date and the students will be notified through Moodle/KOI email.
Only final exams will be discussed as all other assessments should have been reviewed during the trimester.
If you fail one or more subjects and you wish to consider applying for a Review of Grade you are STRONGLY ADVISED to attend the Review of Grade Day. You will have the chance to discuss your final exam with your lecturer, and will be advised if you have valid reasons for applying for a Review of Grade (see Section 3.2 below and the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy).
A formal request for a review of grade may not be considered unless you first contact the subject coordinator to discuss the result.
Deferred Exams:
If you wish to apply for a deferred exam, you should submit an Application for Assignment Extension or Deferred Exam Form before the prescribed deadline.
If you miss your mid-trimester or final exam there is no guarantee you will be offered a deferred exam.
You must apply within the stated timeframe and satisfy the conditions for approval to be offered a deferred exam (see Section 8.1 of the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy and the Application for Assignment Extension or Deferred Exam Forms). In assessing your request for a deferred exam, KOI will take into account the information you provide, the severity of the event or circumstance, your performance on other items of assessment in the subject, class attendance and your history of previous applications for special consideration.
Deferred mid-trimester exams will be held before the end of week 9. Deferred final exams will be held on two days during week 1 or 2 in the next trimester. You will not normally be granted a deferred exam on the grounds that you mistook the time, date or place of an examination, or that you have made arrangements to be elsewhere at that time; for example, have booked plane tickets.
If you are offered a deferred exam, but do not attend you will be awarded 0 marks for the exam. This may mean it becomes difficult for you to pass the subject. If you apply for a deferred exam within the required time frame and satisfy the conditions you will be advised by email (to your KOI student email address) of the time and date for the deferred exam. Please ensure that you are available to take the exam at this time.
Marks awarded for the deferred exam will be the marks awarded for that item of assessment towards your final mark in the subject.
Supplementary Assessments (Exams and Assessments):
A supplementary assessment may be offered to students to provide a final opportunity to demonstrate successful achievement of the learning outcomes of a subject. Supplementary assessments are only offered at the discretion of the Board of Examiners. In considering whether or not to offer a supplementary assessment, KOI will take into account your performance on all the major assessment items in the subject, your attendance, participation and your history of any previous special considerations.
Students are eligible for a supplementary assessment for their final subject in a course where they fail the subject but have successfully completed all other subjects in the course. You must have completed all major assessment tasks for the subject and obtained a passing mark on at least one of the major assessment tasks to be eligible for a supplementary assessment.
If you believe you meet the criteria for a supplementary assessment for the final subject in your course, but have not received an offer, complete the “Complaint, Grievance, Appeal Form” and send your form to reception@koi.edu.au. The deadline for applying for supplementary assessment is the Friday of the first week of classes in the next trimester.
If you are offered a supplementary assessment, you will be advised by email to your KOI student email address of the time and due date for the supplementary assessment – supplementary exams will normally be held at the same time as deferred final exams during week 1 or week 2 of the next trimester.
You must pass the supplementary assessment to pass the subject. The maximum grade you can achieve in a subject based on a supplementary assessment is a PASS grade.
If you:
Briefly described below are the teaching methods/strategies used in this subject:
Provided below is a schedule of formal assessment tasks and major examinations for the subject.
Assessment Type |
When Assessed |
Weighting | Learning Outcomes Assessed |
Assessment 1: Weekly Tutorials |
Week 1 – Week 10 | 20% (2% per week) |
a, b, c, d, e |
Assessment 2: Individual report on designevaluation |
Week 5 |
20% |
b, d |
Assessment 3: Initial Prototype Build |
Week 8 |
20% |
a, d |
Assessment 4: Mobile Application development andpresentation |
Report:Week 11 Presentation: Week 11 and 12 | Mobile application 30% Presentation 10% |
c, d |
Requirements to Pass the Subject:
To gain a pass or better in this subject, students must gain a minimum of 50% of the total available subject marks.
Provided below, in formal reference format, is a list of the prescribed and recommended readings.
Canziba, Elvis, J 2018, Hands-On UX Design for Developers, Packt Publishing. Available from: O'Reilly.
Staiano, Fabio, M 2022, Designing and Prototyping Interfaces with Figma: Learn essential UX/UI design principles by creating interactive prototypes for mobile, tablet, and desktop, Packt Publishing. Available from: O'Reilly.
Králusz, T.A., 2024. Mobile Application Development with React Native and Leveraging Third-Party Libraries.
Shoaib, M., Fitzpatrick, D. and Pitt, I., 2024. Accessibility features of developmental platforms: Towards developing accessible mobile applications with cross-platform, research challenges and opportunities.
Moataz Nabil, 2023. Mobile DevOps Playbook, Packt Publishing. Available from: O'Reilly.
Staiano, Fabio, M 2022, Designing and Prototyping Interfaces with Figma: Learn essential UX/UI design principles by creating interactive prototypes for mobile, tablet, and desktop, Packt Publishing. Available from: O'Reilly.
Levy, J., 2021. UX Strategy, 2nd Edition. Publisher: O'Reilly Media, Inc. E-book. O'Reilly Learning.
Sarrab, M, Al-Shihi, H, & Safia, N 2021, Handbook of Mobile Application Development: a Guide to Selecting the Right Engineering and Quality Features, Bentham Science Publishers, Singapore. Available from: ProQuest Ebook Central.
Pannafino, J., 2018, Interdisciplinary Interaction Design: A Visual Guide to Basic Theories, Models and Ideas for Thinking and Designing for Interactive Web Design and Digital Device Experiences,
2nd ed., Assiduous Publishing
The following industry websites are useful introductory sources covering a range of information pertinent to this subject.
The assessments for this subject are described below. The description includes the type of assessment, its purpose, weighting, due date and submission requirements, the topic of the assessment, details of the task and detailed marking criteria, including a marking rubric for essays, reports and presentations.
Supplementary assessment information and assistance can be found in Moodle.
KOI expects students to submit their own work in both assignments and exams, or the work of their group in the case of group assignments. Material in assignments which comes from the work of others must be appropriately acknowledged.
Assessment 1
Assessment type: Weekly Tutorial
Purpose: Weekly tutorial exercises are designed to encourage engagement and reinforce the knowledge presented in the lectures. They will help students to enhance practical skills in understanding UX, UI, designing, prototyping and developing mobile applications. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a, b, c, d and e.
Value: 20% (2% per week)
Task details: Complete the weekly tutorial exercises that encompass a range of topics such as creating UX Design review, getting familiar with using Figma, creating UX design wire frames, storyboards, prototypes, mock ups, getting familiar with using Flutter and Dart, usability testing etc. The exercises will simulate real- world scenarios to ensure practical proficiency
Submission requirements details: Submit the completed exercises every week on Moodle.
Grade | Fail (0 – 49%) | Pass (50 – 64%) | Credit (65 – 74%) | Distinction (75– 84%) | High Distinction (85– 100%) |
Tutorial Exercises
(20 marks) | Less than 50%of the tutorial exercises completed or many major errorsor omissions. | Most tutorial exercises completed, but with some major errors or omissions. | Most tutorial exercises completed, but with some minor errors and omissions. | Nearly all tutorial exercises completed, but with some minor errors and omissions. | All tutorial exercises complete and accurate or with few very minor errors. |
Total Mark: / (20marks) | COMMENTS: |
Assessment 2
Assessment type: Individual report on design evaluation– Individual Assessment
Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is to encourage students to gain a comprehensive understanding of key aspects in user experience design principles, accessibility, usability, privacy, and ethical considerations. Students will review an existing UX design, either a mobile or web application and evaluate and critique the design considerations. Also, provide recommendations for improvement. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes b, and d.
Value: 20% Due Date: Week 5
Assessment topic: Review report of an existing UX design, either a mobile or web application. Task Details:
Submission requirements details: Submit a comprehensive review report on Moodle, sequentially addressing the critical analysis of the chosen mobile or web application.
Grade | Fail (0 – 49%) | Pass (50 – 64%) | Credit (65 – 74%) | Distinction (75– 84%) | High Distinction (85– 100%) |
Literature Review (5 marks) | Demonstrates limit ed understanding of keyconcepts. References are inaccurate or irrelevant. | Demonstrates basicunderstanding of key concepts but lacks depth or critical engagement with literature. | Demonstrates grasp of relevant literature but lacks thorough analysis or application of insights. | Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of relevant literature and effectively analyzes and applies insights. | Demonstrates exceptional understanding of literature, going beyond core topics and demonstrating advanced comprehension. |
User Experience Design Analysis
(10 marks) | Insufficient analysis of the chosen UX design.Fails to address accessibility, usability, privacy, or ethical considerations adequately. | Basic analysis of accessibility, usability, privacy and ethical considerations. Suggestions are generic or impractical. May not be based on analysis or literature. | Adequate analysis of accessibility, usability, privacy and ethical considerations. Argument is developed with some supporting evidence. | Thorough analysis of accessibility, usability, privacy and ethical considerations. Argument is developed with good supporting evidence. | Comprehensive, accurate, and insightful analysis of accessibility, usability, privacy and ethical considerations. Presents a well- reasoned argument regarding the website's strengths and weaknesses with clear supporting evidence from the literature and analysis. |
Discussion and Insights
(3 marks) | Lack of depth in discussing insights. | Basic discussion with limited insights. | Adequate discussion with some insights. | Thorough discussion with notable insights. | Comprehensive, thoughtful, and insightful discussion. |
Formatting and References
(2 marks) | Poorly formatted or lacking references. | Basic formatting with some references. | Adequate formatting with proper references. | Well-formatted with consistent references. | Excellent formatting with thorough and accurate referencing. |
Total Mark: / (20 marks) | COMMENTS: |
Assessment 3
Assessment type: Initial Prototype Build– Individual Assessment
Purpose: To design and implement a mobile application prototype with complete functionality for complex processes provided for a sample use case. Professional layout and appearance, has considerable visual appeal. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes a, and d.
Value: 20% Due Date: Week 8
Assessment topic: Initial Prototype Build of a proposed mobile application. Task Details:
Submission requirements details: Submit a comprehensive design prototype of the proposed mobile application using Figma on Moodle.
Grade | Fail (0 – 49%) | Pass (50 – 64%) | Credit (65 – 74%) | Distinction (75– 84%) | High Distinction (85– 100%) |
Functionality (8marks) | No use case provided or very little functionality shown | Nearly complete functionality for basic processes provided for a sample usecase | Complete functionality for basic processes provided for a sample use case | Nearly complete functionality for complexprocesses provided for a sampleuse case. | Complete functionality for complex processes provided for a sample use case. |
Layout and visual appeal
(8 marks) | Inconsistent layout, poor choice of fonts and colors, littlevisual appeal. | Basic layout and appearance, has some visual appeal. | Good layout and appearance, has some visual appeal. | Very good layout and appearance, has considerable visual appeal. | Professional layout and appearance, has considerable visualappeal. |
Usefulness (4 marks) | Not suitable to be given to a developer. | Could be given to developer with some instructions, but would stillraise many questions. | Could be given to developer with some instructions, but would stillraise some questions. | Could be given to developer with some instructions without raising anyquestions. | Could be given to developer without further instructions. |
Total Mark: / (20 marks) | COMMENTS: |
Assessment 4
Assessment type: Mobile application - Individual assessment
Purpose: This assessment allows students to demonstrate skills in creating a cross-platform mobile application based on initial prototypes. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes c and d
Value: Mobile application 30%; Presentation 10%
Due Date: Report week 11; Presentation in weeks 11 and 12
Task Details: Students will develop a cross-platform mobile application based on the initial prototypes and the feedback from assessment 2. Students will present their application during tutorials in weeks 11 and 12
Grade | Fail (0 – 49%) | Pass (50 – 64%) | Credit (65 – 74%) | Distinction (75– 84%) | High Distinction (85– 100%) |
Functionality (12marks) | Very little functionality developed or many major errors. | Some functionality developed for basic processes, may contain a very small number of major errors. | Complete functionality developed for basic processes, may contain a small number of minor errors. | Nearly complete functionality developed for complex processes, may contain a very small number of minor errors. | Complete functionality developed for complex processes with no errors. |
Layout and visual appeal
(7 marks) | Inconsistent layout, poor choice of fonts and colors, little visual appeal, inconsistent with prototype design. | Basic layout and appearance, has some visual appeal, inconsistent with prototype design. | Good layout and appearance, has some visual appeal, some consistency with prototype design. | Very good layout and appearance, has considerable visual appeal, consistent with prototype design. | Professional layout and appearance, has considerable visual appeal, consistent with prototype design. |
Usefulness and originality
(5 marks) | Would be of little use to target audience. | Target audience would find it somewhat useful, copies existing apps. | Target audience would find it useful, copies existing apps. | Target audience would find it useful, is an improvement on existing apps. | Target audience would find it very useful, is a new concept for an app. |
Usability
(6 marks) | Confusing to use. | Could not be used without instructions. | Easy to use butwould need instructions. | Easy to use. | Intuitive and very easy to use. |
Presentation (10 marks) | No presentation given or presentation does not summarize the report. | Poor summary of the report with limited audience engagement. | Adequate summary of the report with some audience engagement, such as eye contact and humor. | Succinct summary of the report with audience engagement, such as confidence, eye contact, and humor. | Succinct summary of the report that fully engages the audience and create a sense of presence, innovative presentation. |
Total Mark: / (40 marks) | COMMENTS: |
An important part of business life and key to achieving KOI’s graduate outcome of Professional Skills is the ability to manage workloads and meet deadlines. Consequently, any assessment items such as in-class quizzes and assignments missed or submitted after the due date/time will attract a penalty (see below).
Students who miss mid-trimester tests and final exams without a valid and accepted reason (see below) may not be granted a deferred exam and will be awarded 0 marks for assessment item. These penalties are designed to encourage students to develop good time management practices, and create equity for all students.
Any penalties applied will only be up to the maximum marks available for the specific piece of assessment attracting the penalty.
Late penalties, granting of extensions and deferred exams are based on the following:
In Class Tests (excluding Mid-Trimester Tests)
Written Assessments
Presentations
Mid-Trimester Tests and Final Exams
Deferred exam
If students are unable to submit or attend an assessment when due, and extensions are possible, they must apply by completing the appropriate Application for Extension form available from the Student Information Centre in Moodle, the KOI Website (Policies and Forms) and the Reception Desk (Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St), as soon as possible but no later than three (3) working days of the assessment due date.
The completed form must be emailed with supporting documentation to academic@koi.edu.au.
Students and lecturers / tutors will be advised of the outcome of the extension request as soon as practicable.
Appropriate documentary evidence to support the request for an extension must be supplied. Please remember there is no guarantee of an extension being granted, and poor organisation is not a satisfactory reason to be granted an extension.
Please remember that all sources used in assessment tasks must be suitably referenced.
Failure to acknowledge sources is plagiarism, and as such is a very serious academic issue. Students plagiarising run the risk of severe penalties ranging from a reduction through to 0 marks for a first offence for a single assessment task, to exclusion from KOI in the most serious repeat cases. Exclusion has serious visa implications. The easiest way to avoid plagiarising is to reference all sources.
Harvard referencing is the required method – in-text referencing using Author’s Surname (family name) and year of publication. A Referencing Guide, “Harvard Referencing”, and a Referencing Tutorial can be found on the right hand menu strip in Moodle on all subject pages.
An effective way to reference correctly is to use Microsoft Word’s referencing function (please note that other versions and programs are likely to be different). To use the referencing function, click on the References Tab in the menu ribbon – students should choose Harvard.
Authorship is also an issue under plagiarism – KOI expects students to submit their own original work in both assessment and exams, or the original work of their group in the case of a group project. All students agree to a statement of authorship when submitting assessments online via Moodle, stating that the work submitted is their own original work.
The following are examples of academic misconduct and can attract severe penalties:
Where a subject coordinator considers that a student might have engaged in academic misconduct, KOI may require the student to undertake an additional oral exam as a part of the assessment for the subject, as a way of testing the student’s understanding of their work.
Further information can be found on the KOI website.
The Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (1992) makes it unlawful to treat people with a disability less fairly than people without a disability. In the context of this subject, the principle of Reasonable Adjustment is applied to ensure that participants with a disability have equitable access to all aspects of the learning situation. For assessment, this means that artificial barriers to their demonstrating competence are removed.
Examples of reasonable adjustment in assessment may include:
The focus of the adjusted assessment should be on enabling the participants to demonstrate that they have achieved the subject purpose, rather than on the method used.
Full details of the KOI Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy may be obtained in hard copy from the Library, and on the KOI website www.koi.edu.au under Policies and Forms.
Assessments and Mid-Trimester Exams:
Where students are not satisfied with the results of an assessment, including mid-trimester exams, they have the right to appeal. The process is as follows:
(10) working days of the return of the marked assessment, or within five (5) working days after the return of the assessment if the assessment is returned after the end of the trimester.
Review of Grade – whole of subject and final exams:
Where students are not satisfied with the results of the whole subject or with their final exam results, they have the right to request a Review of Grade – see the Assessment and Assessment Appeals Policy for more information
An Application for Review of Grade/Assessment Form (available from the KOI Website under Policies and Forms and from KOI Reception at Kent St, Market St and O’Connell St) should be completed clearly explaining the grounds for the application. The completed application should be submitted as explained on the form, with supporting evidence attached to academic@koi.edu.au
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.