ICT 653 Emerging Technologies in IT Assignment Help

ICT 653 Emerging Technologies in IT

Assessment 2 Individual Assessment Weightage 40%

  1. Assignment

Write a Literature Review Report on any topic related to the following.

 

  • Cloud Computing
    • Edge Computing
    • Cyber Security
    • Internet of Things (IoT)
    • Blockchain
    • Data Analytics
    • Machine Learning

You must discuss the topic with the instructor before you start the assignment.

  1. Learning Outcomes
    • Investigate and analyze advanced principles of Cloud Computing, Edge Computing, Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning exploring their applications and implications in depth.
    • Critically review and synthesize contemporary literature on any emerging technology in IT including Cloud Computing, Edge Computing, Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.
  2. Submission Details

This is an individual assignment. Donot start working on the assignment before getting approval from your instructor. The report is to be submitted in a word or pdf format. The assessment carries 40% weightage. 30% marks are for the report and 10% marks are for the 15-minute recorded presentation. The report length should be not less than 2500 words and not more than 3000 words. The word count does not include the title page, table of contents, list of references and figures. Ensure all pages are numbered. The similarity index of your report should be less than 20%. The deadline for submission of both the report and the recorded 15-minute presentation is midnight on Sunday, 25 August 2024Do not use AI tools for this assignment. Late submissions will incur a 10% deduction in marks for each day beyond the due date. A delay of more than 5 days will result in a grade of 0.

  1. Structure of the report Title Page

    The title page of your report must contain:

 

  • The title of the report (make the title as informative as possible)
    • Who the report is prepared for.
    • Who it is prepared by.
    • The date the report is submitted.


 

 

Abstract

 

It should be between 200 – 300 words long (tip: write the abstract last)

 

 

Introduction

This section should include;

  • Define the specific area or issue within IT that the research will address.
    • Provide context and background information relevant to the topic, including key developments or trends.
      • Clearly state at least two research questions that your study will seek to answer.
      • Discuss the significance of the research and its relevance to current IT research and practice.

 

Summary of Articles

Write summaries of the research articles that you have read for the literature review. You should write summaries for at least 8 articles. The summary of each article should include the following.

  • Critical evaluation of each article to mention their strengths and weaknesses.

Discussion

In this section, you should state your research questions and how the articles that you have read relate to that question. You should

  • Discuss similar papers together. Papers with same themes/concepts.

Literature Map

Draw a literature map related to your topic.

 

Concept Matrix

 

Draw a concept matrix related to your topic.

 

Conclusions

 

This section should summarize your key findings. Conclusions are the results of your own critical thinking, they should be justified through analysis of your findings and written in your


 

own words with no citations.

 

References

 

You must use correct APA (7th edition) for referencing various academic resources that you have used to write this report. Your references should enable someone reading your report to easily identify and refer to any works you have used. At least 08 recent and relevant academic resources (i.e. peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers etc.) are needed in the report.


 

Marking Rubric for the Report

 

 

 

Total Marks = 100

 Clear, concise, and comprehensive summarydemonstrating advanced understanding.Clear summary with minor omissions or errors, conveying good understanding.Adequate summary with some clarity issues,demonstrating basic understanding.Summary lacking clarity and detail, showing limited understandingUnclear or missing summary, indicating significant misunderstanding.
Abstract     
(5 marks)High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFail
 (85- 100%)(75-84%)(65-74%)(50-64%)(0-49%)
      

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

Clear topic, thorough background, strong rationale, and evident relevance to IT research.Defined       topic, adequate background, developed rationale, relevant to IT research.Introduced topic, basicbackground, articulated rationale, somewhat relevant to IT research.Brief topic, limitedbackground, unclear rationale, vaguelyrelevant to IT research.Unclear topic, no background,    no rationale, irrelevant to IT research.
     
(10 marks)High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFail
 (85- 100%)(75-84%)(65-74%)

 

(50-64%)

 

(0-49%)

      
 Concise     summariesEffectiveBasic       summariesBrief       summariesIncomplete
 with thorough critique,summaries   withwith limitedcritique,lacking detail    andsummaries without
 demonstrating    deepcritique, showingindicating   a    basiccritique,     showingcritique,
 understanding.goodunderstanding.some understanding.demonstrating   a
Summaries of understanding.  

lack                  of

understanding.

8 Articles

 

(30 marks)

     
High Distinction (85-100%)Distinction (75-84%)Credit (65-74%)Pass (50-64%)Fail (0-49%)
      


 

 

 

 

 

Discussion (20marks)

Clear research question(s), comprehensive discussion of article relevance, effective grouping of similar papers.Clear research question(s), adequate discussion of article relevance, some grouping of similar papers.Research question(s) stated, basic discussion of article relevance, limited grouping of similar papers.Vague research question(s), minimal discussion of article relevance, little grouping of similar papers.Unclear research question(s), no discussion of article relevance, no grouping of similarpapers.
High Distinction (85-100%)Distinction (75-84%)Credit (65-74%)Pass (50-64%)

Fail

(0-49%)

     

 

 

 

 

Literature Map (10 marks)

Clear,             informative map    with  detailed annotations showcasing connections between concepts, theories, and

studies.

Well-organized map            illustrating connections between concepts, theories,        and studies, with some

annotations.

Basic map showingconnections, with limitedannotations.Vague map with unclear connections and                 minimalannotations.No map provided or a disorganized map with no clear connections or annotations.

 

High Distinction (85-100%)

 

Distinction (75-84%)

 

Credit (65-74%)

 

Pass (50-64%)

 

Fail (0-49%)

     

 

 

 

 

 

Concept Matrix (10 marks)

Clear                        matrix showing relationships between                concepts, theories, and studies.Organized matrix illustrating relationships between concepts, theories,        and studies.Basic matrix showing relationships.Vague matrixwith unclear relationships.No matrixor disorganized matrix.
High Distinction (85-100%)Distinction (75-84%)Credit (65-74%)Pass (50-64%)

Fail

(0- 49%)

     

 

 

 

Report Readability (5 marks)

Clear           structure,

concise                     writing, engaging language, andproper grammar.

Organized     with

mostly      concise

writing,        someengagement, and acceptable grammar.

Basic structure withattempts at concisewriting, but grammar may be inconsistent.Lacks                       clearorganization, verbose writing,and grammar issues.Disorganized, verbose   writing, and       numerous grammar errors.
High Distinction (85-100%)Distinction (75-84%)Credit (65-74%)Pass (50-64%)Fail (0-49%)
     

 

 

 

 

 

 

References (5 marks)

At least 8 peer reviewed academic resources are used with all of them in proper APA format.At least 8 peer reviewed academic resources are used but few are not in proper                    APA format.At least 8 academic resources are used. Fewof themare not peer reviewed andare not in proper APAformat.Less than 8 academic resources are used. Most of them are not peerreviewed and/or are not in proper APA format.Less     than      8 academic resources areused. They are not peer reviewed and are notin proper APAformat.
High Distinction (85-100%)Distinction (75-84%)Credit (65-74%)Pass (50-64%)Fail (0-49%)
     

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusions (5 marks)

Clearly summarizes keyresults of thereportSummarizes key results of the reportwith minor errors         and/or minormissionsSummarizes                         keyresults of the report withone major errorand/or one major omissionSummarizes key results of the report with more than one majorerror and/or more than one major omissionSummarization has major errorsand omissions

 

High Distinction (85-100%)

 

Distinction (75-84%)

 

Credit (65-74%)

 

Pass (50-64%)

 

Fail (0-49%)

     

 

Marking Rubric for Recorded Presentation

 

 

Total Marks =10

 

 

 

 

 

Content

Exceptional clarity, depth, and relevance demonstrated with insightful analysis.

Clear              and

thorough analysis, demonstrating                         a solidunderstanding of the topic.

Adequate analysis covering keypoints adequately.

Limited       analysis

addressing                         keypoints superficially.

Inadequate analysis, missing key points entirely.
(4 marks)High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFail
 (85-100%)(75-84%)(65-74%)(50-64%)(0-49%)
      
 Highly organized structure                       with seamless transitions.

Well-organized structure facilitates

comprehension.

Adequate structure with some room for

improvement.

Structure                           is somewhat unclear or disjointed.

Chaotic               or

nonexistent

structure, making it difficult to follow.

Organization     
(3 marks)

High Distinction

 

(85-100%)

DistinctionCreditPassFail
 (75-84%)(65-74%)(50-64%)(0-49%)
      

 

 

 

Delivery

 

(3 marks)

Engaging and confident, captivating the audience.Engaging deliverymaintains audience interest.Somewhat engagesbut lacks consistency                        in maintaining audience interest.Lacks engagement andconfidence, impacting audience interest.

Lacks engagement, coherence,                        and confidence, making it challenging for the audience to stay

focused.

High DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFail
 (85-100%)(75-84%)(65-74%)(50-64%)(0-49%)
      

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.