Assessment Details for Assessment Item 1:
Assessment tasks | Learning Outcome Mapping | ||||||
Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When due | Weighting | ULO# | CLO# forMITS | CLO# forGDITS | CLO# for GCITS |
1 | Case Study – PartA Entity - Relationship Diagram (Individual) |
Session 4 |
20% |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Case Study – PartB Normalisation (Individual) |
Session 6 |
20% |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Objectives
This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to improve students’ skills to analyze organization database requirements, develop a data model to reflect the organization’s business rules. This assessment covers the following LOs.
Case Study
This assignment concerns a liquor shop chain in Sydney, called the A-one liquor (AL). The objective of this assignment is to develop a database system that will be used to centrally store and manage all relevant information for the branches of AL.
The information to be stored include information on different branches of AL (e.g., Bankstown, Hornsby, etc.), types of drinks they sell (beers, wines, cedars, etc.), staff they employ (Retail Assistants, Shelving Assistants, etc.), AL Members (AL Loyalty Card holders). The basic requirements gathered from the stake holders is presented in the following four points. As typically the case, these requirements are often underspecified. Use your judgment in interpreting them when required and keep a note of the assumptions you made.
Investigate and identify data requirement for the given study by providing list of required entities, list of attributes in each of these entities, and the unique identifier for each entity.
Develop an Entity-Relationships Diagram for the given scenario (It must contain entities and unique identifiers in terms of keys, relationships between the entities including relationships constraints, and the attributes).
Derive the physical design having detail of entities, primary and foreign keys, detail of all the attributes.
MarkingGuide: | Unacceptable | Acceptable | Good | Excellent |
Task 1
(Weightage 20%) | . | |||
1.1 Entities (Weightage 10%) | Does not adequately have all required Entities in ER diagram | Partially have all required Entities in ER diagram | Most of the required Entities are there in ER diagram | All Entities are there in ER diagram |
1.2 Attributes (Weightage 5%) | Attributes not identified or incorrectly identified. | A few of the required attributes for each of the required entities are identified. | Most of the required attributes for each of the required entities are identified. | All the required attributes for each of the required entities are identified. |
1.3 Unique Identifiers (Weightage 5%) | Unique identifier not identified or incorrectly identified. | Unique identifier for a few of the required entities is identified. | Unique identifier for most of the required entities is identified | Unique identifier for all of the required entities is identified |
Task 2
(Weightage 60%) | ||||
2.1 Entities (Weightage 10%) | Does not adequately demonstrate required entities in an ER diagram. | A few of the required entities are demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. | Most of the required entities are demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. | All the required entities are demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. |
2.2 Attributes (Weightage 10%) | Does not adequately demonstrate required attributes in an ER diagram. | A few of the required attributes for each of the required entities are demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. | Most of the required attributes for each of the required entities are demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. | All the required attributes for each of the required entities are demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. |
2.3 Unique Identifier (Weightage 10%) | Does not adequately demonstrate required Unique identifier in an ER diagram. | Unique identifier for a few of the required entities is demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram | Unique identifier for most of the required entities is demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. | Unique identifier for all of the required entities is demonstrated correctly in an ER diagram. |
2.4 Relationships (Weightage 30%) | Does not adequately identify and demonstrate relationships among entities in an ER diagram. | A few of the required relationships among entities are identified and correctly demonstrated in an ER diagram. | Most of the required relationships among entities are identified and correctly demonstrated in an ER diagram. | All of the required relationships among entities are identified and correctly demonstrated in an ER diagram. |
Task 3
(Weightage 20%) |
3.1 Tables (Entities)
(Weightage 5%) | Relational schema does not adequately cover the required tables, and key and non-key attributes. | Relational schema covers a few of the required tables, and key and non-key attributes for thosetables. | Relational schema covers most of therequired tables, and key and non-keyattributes for thosetables. | Relational schema covers all required tables, and key and non-key attributes for thosetables. |
3.2 Foreign Keys (Weightage 10%) | Relational schema does not adequately cover foreign keys. | Relational schema covers required foreign keys in a few of the required tables. | Relational schema covers required foreign keys in most of the required tables. | Relational schema covers required foreign keysin all required tables. |
3.3 Column (attributes) information (Weightage 5%) | Does not adequately cover information about data columns. | Provide required detail information for all data columns of a few of the tables. | Provide required detail information for all data columns of most of the tables. | Provide required detail information for all data columns of all required tables. |
Assignment Requirements and Deliverables:
Part B - 20% (Due in Session 6)
Submit a single plain text file with filename as “studentid_studentname_AL_SQL” containing all SQL implementation. Your SQL queries must work on MS SQL Server and be able to be demonstrated. SQL code required (Use MS SQL Server):
Research and Discussion
Submitted as a MS Word or PDF Document
Abnormal_Rel ( ProductID, BranchID, campaignID, MemberID, ProductType, PackageType, YearProduced, Price, Brand,
StockLevel, CampaignStartDate, CampaignEndDate, FirstName, LastName, eMail, MembershipLevel, MemberExpDate, Discount )
Determine for UPDATE anomaly whether or not the relation Abnormal_Rel is susceptible to that anomaly. Support your determination with adequate explanation and a small example.
Marking Rubric/Criteria
Marking Guide: Case Study 1 | Unacceptable | Acceptable | Good | Excellent |
1. Create table statements
(Weightage 1 Mark) | Incorrect syntax, tables are not in line with Assignment 1 ERD. | Partially correct syntax, tables are somewhat in line with Assignment 1 ERD. | Syntactically correct and most tables are in line with Assignment 1 ERD. | Code is correct and all tables are in line with Assignment 1 ERD. |
2. Insert Into statements
(Weightage 1 Mark) | Incorrect syntax | Partially correct syntax and records are partially inserted as per the requirements | Syntactically correct and most of the records are inserted as per the requirements. | Code is correct and records are inserted as per the requirements. |
3. Select statements
(Weightage 3.5 Marks) | ||||
3.1 Select statement to list the branches (ID) of MA that have in stock at least 5 bottles of Penfold Grange 2010. (1.5 Marks) | Incorrect syntax | Partially correct syntax and gives output somewhat near to requirements. | Syntactically correct and gives output very near to requirements. | Code is correct and used JOIN, etc. and gives required output |
3.2 SELECT statement to generate a list of all email addresses of members whose card will expire in the month after the coming month. | Incorrect syntax | Partially correct syntax and gives output somewhat near to requirements. | Syntactically correct and gives output very near to requirements. | Code is correct and used JOIN, etc. and gives required output |
(2 Marks) | ||||
4. Anomalies
(Weightage 1 Mark) | ||||
Does not adequately identify anomalies. | Identify a few of the anomalies and remove thoseanomalies from the tables. | Correctly identify most of the possible anomalies and remove those anomalies from the tables. | Correctly identify all of the possible anomalies and remove those anomalies from the tables. | |
5. Normalization in relation to the case study
(Weightage 3.5 Marks) | ||||
4.2 discuss how 1NF was achieved for each entity. (0.5 Mark) | Does not adequately identify repeating group of columns and not transform unnormalised tables into 1NF tables. | Identify a few of the repeating group of columns and correctly transform a few of the unnormalised tables into 1NF tables. | Identify most of the repeating group of columns and correctly transform most of the unnormalised tables into 1NF tables. | Identify all of the repeating group of columns in each table and correctly transform all of the unnormalised tables into 1NF tables. |
4.3 discuss how 2NF was achieved for each entity. (2 Marks) | Does not adequately identify partial dependencies and not transform 1NF tables into 2NF tables. | Identify a few of the partial dependencies and correctly transform a few of the 1NF tablesinto 2NF tables. | Identify a few of the partial dependencies and correctly transform a few of the 1NF tablesinto 2NF tables. | Identify all of the partial dependencies in each table and correctly transform all of the 1NF tablesinto 2NF tables. |
4.4 discuss how 3NF was achieved for each entity. (1 Mark) | Does not adequately identify transitive dependencies and not transform 2NF tables into 3NF tables. | Identify a few of the transitive dependencies and correctly transform a few of the 2NF tablesinto 3NF tables. | Identify most of the transitive dependencies and correctly transform most of the 2NF tablesinto 3NF tables. | Identify all of the transitive dependencies and correctly transform all of the 2NF tablesinto 3NF tables. |
Submission Instructions
All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be set up in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop- boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 4 (Part A) and session 6 (Part B). The Exact dates will be communicated on LMS.
The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed before the submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due date and time have elapsed.
Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.
Referencing guides
You must reference all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use the IEEE referencing style when referencing in your assessments in this unit. Refer to the library’s referencing guides for more information.
%20IEEE%20-%2007042020.pdf
Academic misconduct
VIT enforces that the integrity of its students’ academic studies follows an acceptable level of excellence. VIT will adhere
to its VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms where it explains the importance of staff and student honesty in relation to academic work. It outlines the kinds of behaviours that are "academic misconduct", including plagiarism.
Late submissions
In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms, late submission of assessments will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be applied as soon as the deadline is reached.
Short extensions and special consideration
Special Consideration is a request for:
Students wishing to request Special Consideration in relation to an assessment the due date of whichhas not yet passed must engage in written emails to the teaching team to Request for Special Consideration as early as possible and prior to start time of the assessment due date, along with anyaccompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
For more information, visit VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms.
Inclusive and equitable assessment
Reasonable adjustment in assessment methods will be made to accommodate students with a documented disability or impairment. Contact the unit teaching team for more information.
Contract Cheating
Contract cheating usually involves the purchase of an assignment or piece of research from anotherparty. This may be facilitated by a fellow student, friend or purchased on a website. Other forms of contract cheating include paying another person to sit an exam in the student's place
Contract cheating warning:
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.