HI6036 IS Strategy and Innovation Assignment Help

Individual Assessment Cover page

Unit DetailsNameISStrategyandInnovation
CodeHI6036
Year,Trimester2024,Trimester2

 

Assessment DetailsNameIndividualAssessment
DueDateandWeekFinalversionofthepaper(50%):Week9Friday

 

Individual Student DetailsStudentNumber 
FirstName 
FamilyName 
Submission DeclarationIntegrityDeclarationI have read and understand academic integrity policies andpracticesandmyassessmentdoesnotviolatethese.
FullName 
SubmissionDate 

Instructions

Objectives

Thisassessmentitemrelatestotheunitlearningoutcomesasintheunitdescriptor. This assessment is designed to improve student learning skills andto give students experience in researching the literature on a topic relevant to the Unit of Study subjectmatter,criticallyanalysingcurrentacademicpapersthenpresentingideaor questionsandexpectedoutcomeswithclarityanddefinitioninareferenced

written report.

Instructions

Overview:

This assignment challenges you to apply the design thinking methodology to develop an Information Systems (IS) strategy that addresses a real business problemprovidedina casestudy.Your goalisto demonstrate howstrategicuseof information systems can lead to innovative solutions and support the organization's transformation and renewal.

 

Objectives:

Toenhanceyourabilitytoanalyzecomplexbusinessscenarios.

Todeveloppracticalsolutionsusingdesignthinkingandinformationsystems.

TocriticallyevaluatethestrategicimpactofISinnovationsonbusinessoperations. Assignment Details:

 

CaseStudyAnalysis:

You will be provided with a case study that describes a business problem in an organizational context. Carefully read and analyze the case to understand the underlying issues.

DesignThinkingApplication:

Empathize:Gatherinsightsabouttheorganization’sneeds,challenges, and

 

StrategicAppraisal:

Assess the potential of the proposed IS solutions to align with and propel the organization's strategic objectives. Discuss the expected impacts, benefits, and possible challenges of implementing your solutions.

 

Studentscanchoosetowriteaboutthe samecasestudy,buttheapproachandthe thrust of each paper must be different.

Herearesomeproposed topics:

  1. Netflix'sCloudMigration
  2. Walmart'sRetailTechnologyTransformation
  3. Blockbuster'sFailuretoInnovate
  4. FordMotorCompany’sDigitalTransformation
  5. Zara’sFast-FashionIT Strategy
  6. DBSBank’sDigital Transformation
  7. GeneralElectric’sPredixPlatform
  8. Healthcare.gov’sImplementationChallenges
  9. Airbnb’sDataScienceApplications
  10. Toyota’sJust-In-TimeSystem
 


 

TheKeyelementsoftheresearchproposal

Thefollowingelementsmustbeincludedinyourresearchproposal:

  1. Introductionorbackgroundtotheresearchproblemorissue,includingan identification of the gap in the current research
  2. Research question and, if possible, a thesis statement answering the question
  3. Justificationfortheproposalresearch,i.e.,whytheresearchisneeded.
  4. Preliminaryliteraturereviewcoveringwhatothershavealreadydoneinthe area.
  5. Theoreticalframeworktobeusedintheproposedresearch.
  6. Statementofthecontributionoftheresearchtothegeneralarea
  7. Proposedresearchmethodology
  8. Researchplanandoutline.
  9. Timetableofproposedresearch
 10.Listofreferencesusedinpreparingtheproposal
Guidelinesfor Writing
  1. Introduction
    • The introduction should be as brief as possible (a paragraph or two). Whateveryoudo,don’trambleonforpages;youneedtomakethispartof the proposal clear and crisp. In the introduction, you need to give a sense ofthegeneralfieldofresearchofwhichyourareaisapart.Youthenneed tonarrowtothespecificareaofyourconcern.Thisshouldleadlogicallyto thegapintheresearchthatyouintendtofill.Whenthegapisidentified,a researchquestioncanthenberaised.Theanswertothisquestioniscalled the thesis statement.
  2. Theresearchquestions.
    • The research question may not be a question as such, but rather a statement of a problem to be investigated.
  3. Justificationfortheproposedresearch
    • one page is usually sufficient for this. You need to tell the reader that the research can justified along four main criteria: (1) The size of the industry/area involved; (2) The gaps in the literature that demand attention; (3) The unusual or improved methodology being used; (4) The benefits in terms of policy and practice
  4. Preliminaryliteraturereview
    • Thisiswhereyouprovidemoredetailaboutwhatothers havedone inthe area, and what you propose to do. You need to write around 2-3 pages in which you cover the following: (1) The major issues or schools of thought

      (2) Gaps in the literature (in more detail than is provided in the introduction) (3) Research questions and/or hypotheses which are connected carefully to the literature being reviewed (4) Definitions of key terms,providedeitherwhenyouintroduceeachidea,orinadefinitionsub- section (5) Questions arising from the gaps that can be the focus of data collection or analysis.

  5. Theoreticalframework
    • The theoretical framework usually forms the final part of the literature review section. It describes the concept/theory/model that you are using in the thesis to demonstrate your point.
  6. Contributionoftheresearch
    • Inthissection,yououtlinehowyourresearchwillmakeachangetoanarea of study. This is different from the justification of your research. The justification explains why the research should be done. The contribution section explains how what you will do will lead to certain outcomes. You need to outline: (1) The importance of the research outcome(s); (2) The practical or theoretical nature of the outcome(s).
  7. Proposedresearchmethodology
    • Youdonothavetodescribethemethodologytobeusedingreatdetail,but youshouldjustifyitsuseoverothermethodologies.Forexample,youcould explain the reasons for using: (1) a certain paradigm or theory (2) qualitative or quantitative research (3) a case study of a specific kind (4) surveys, correlational experiments, field studies, specific statistical measurements, etc. (5) certain dependent or independent or moderating variables (6) a particular sampling frame and the size of a sample.
  8. Researchplan

 

 
  • The research plan or outline can be discussed in conjunction with a researchtimetable.However,beawarethattheyhaveadifferentfunction. A research plan helps you as well as the reader as: (1) it gives you a frameworkforthedirectionyourresearchwilltake(2)itshowsthereader the project is well-organized and achievable in the time available (3) it shows your detailed research activities.
  1. Researchtimetable
    • The timetable should indicate the weighting of each part of the proposed thesisinpercentageterms,thetopicscovered,approximatewordlimitand,  importantly,theapproximatelengthoftimeitwilltaketocompletethem. You might consider providing a graph for convenience.
  2. Listofreferences
    • This must be provided in the usual scholarly fashion. It helps to convince your reader that your proposal is worth pursuing if you can identify literature in the field and demonstrate that you understand it. It makes a very strong impact if you can identify where there is a research gap in the literature that your proposal hopes to fill. This is your contribution to the scholarlyconversation.Youshoulduseacademicreferences(peerreviewed

      articles),ratherthanwebarticles.

Submissions

 

The final version of your paper is the polished version. You should not use a lot of small sections and bullet points in the final version. Your research proposal should present the state of current knowledge in a specific area and as such, should have a narrative that flows from one paragraph to another. You cannot achieve thiswith bullet points and small disjoint sections. All references included with your paper must be cited within the paper and be appropriate to the context of the citation.

  • YouarerequiredtoaddressElements1-10inyourfinalproposal.
  • Youarerequiredtoprovideatleast10references.
  • Wordlimit: 2500
Academic Integrity Information

Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessmentmustcomplywithacademicintegrityguidelines.Importantacademic integritybreachesincludeplagiarism,collusion,copying,impersonation,contract cheating,datafabricationandfalsification.Pleaselearnaboutacademicintegrity

and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is seriousandpunishablebypenaltiesthatrangefromdeductionofmarks,failureof

 


 

theassessmenttaskorunitinvolved,suspensionofcourseenrolment,or cancellation of course enrolment.

Format Instructions
  • MostassessmentsmustbeinMSWordformatwithnospacing,11-ptCalibri font and at least 2cm margins on all four sides with appropriate section headings and page numbers.
  • YoumustnameyourfilewiththeUnitCodeandStudentID(e.g.“HI5003- GWA1995”).
  • Checkthatyousubmitthecorrectdocumentasspecialconsiderationisnot granted if you make a mistake.
  • StudentIDneedstobeindicatedonthecoverpage.
Penalties
  • AllworkmustbesubmittedonBlackboardbytheduedateandtimealong with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.
  • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriatelyattheendinareferencelistusingHolmesInstituteAdapted Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and

    referencing.

ResearchProposalMarkingScheme-Outline

 

CriterionMissingorUnacceptable(0-39)Developing(40-49)Accomplished(50-74)Exemplary(75-100)
Introduction: Research question,andbackground (25%)Research question(s), definitions, assumptionsandlimitationswereomitted or inappropriate given the context, purpose or methods of the study.Elements are poorly formed, ambiguous, or not logically connected to the description of theproblem,purposeorresearch methods.Research questions are stated clearlyandareconnectedtothe researchtopic.Articulatesclear,reasonable,andsuccinctresearch questions,andquestionsarefresh,interestingand significant.
Literaturereview(25%)Little or no evidence of a systematic approach,incompletereview;Littleorno evidence of having read completely paperscited.Incomplete and not systematic, but adequate to identify part of theliterature,verylittleevidence of critical evaluation of papers citedEvidence of reviewing, possibly incompletebutusingappropriate approaches, Some evidence of criticalappraisalorpartialcritical appraisalThe literature review addresses a relevant question.Theplannedmethodandprocedurefor the structured/systematic literature review is clearly presented, in sufficient detail, and appropriate for the question to be addressed.
Organizationandneatnessof the proposal (25%)The length of the narrative exceeds the suggested limit as indicated in the solicitation.Theideasarepresentedina random manner with no focus.The content and length of the proposalareinadequate(i.e.there is some logic inthe narrative part, but the ideas lack of clear focus and structural argumentation).Proposal format has been followedmostly.Thenarrative presentstheideasinanalmost structural and logical manner.Thenarrativehastheappropriatelengthandthe ideasarepresentedinaclearstructuralandlogic manner identifying reasonable well the reasons and means to achieve the goal of the proposal.

Harvard

Referencestyle(25%)

Clearstyleswithexcellentsourceof references.Generallygoodreferencingstyle

Sometimes

clearreferencingstyle

Lacksconsistencywithmanyerrors

ResearchProposalMarkingScheme-FinalVersion

CriterionMissingorUnacceptable(0-39)Developing(40-49)Accomplished(50-74)Exemplary(75-100)
Introduction: Research question,andbackground (20%)Research question(s), definitions, assumptionsandlimitationswereomitted or inappropriate given the context, purpose or methods of the study.Elements are poorly formed, ambiguous, or not logically connected to the description of theproblem,purposeorresearch methods.Research questions are stated clearlyandareconnectedtothe researchtopic.Articulatesclear,reasonable,andsuccinctresearch questions,andquestionsarefresh,interestingand significant.
Literaturereviewand references(40%)Little or no evidence of a systematic approach,incompletereview;Littleorno evidence of having read completely paperscited.Incomplete and not systematic, but adequate to identify part of theliterature,verylittleevidence of critical evaluation of papers citedEvidence of reviewing, possibly incompletebutusingappropriate approaches, Some evidence of criticalappraisalorpartialcritical appraisalThe literature review addresses a relevant question.Theplannedmethodandprocedurefor the structured/systematic literature review is clearly presented, in sufficient detail, and appropriate for the question to be addressed.
Researchdesign:theoretical framework, contribution, researchmethodology (20%)The research design is erroneous for the hypothesis states or has not been identifiedandordescribedusingstandard terminology.Limitationsandassumptions areomitted.Theresearchdesignisconfusing orincompletegiventheresearch questions.Importantlimitations and assumptions have not been identified.The research design has been identified and described in sufficientlydetailedterms.Some limitationsandassumptionshave been identified.The purpose, questions, and design are mutually supportive and coherent.Appropriate and importantlimitationsandassumptionshavebeen clearly stated.
Organizationandneatnessof the proposal (10%)The length of the narrative exceeds the suggested limit as indicated in the solicitation.Theideasarepresentedina random manner with no focus.The content and length of the proposalareinadequate(i.e.there is some logic inthe narrative part, but the ideas lack of clear focus and structural argumentation).Proposal format has been followedmostly.Thenarrative presentstheideasinanalmost structural and logical manner.Thenarrativehastheappropriatelengthandthe ideasarepresentedinaclearstructuralandlogic manner identifying reasonable well the reasons and means to achieve the goal of the proposal.
Researchplanandtimeline(10%)Planand/ortimelinearemissingorthe timelineisbeyondoursuggestedtime.

Planand/ortimelinearepresent

butnotadequatetosupportthe project.

Planand/ortimelinearepresent

butnotverywelldefined,not easy to understand.

Planandtimelineareadequatetosupportthe

projectactivities,costsarereasonableinrelation tothe

 

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.