Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Trimester | T3 2024 |
Unit Code | HI5031 |
Unit Title | Professional Issues in IS Ethics and Practice |
Assessment Type | Individual Assignment |
Due Date+ time: | 24 January 2025 11.59 pm (Melb./Sydney time) |
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) |
learning;
|
Weight | 50% |
Total Marks | Assignment(50marks) |
Word limit | 2500 words |
Submission Guidelines |
|
Academic Integrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrityisseriousandpunishablebypenaltiesthatrangefromdeductionofmarks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment. |
Penalties |
|
Using the case study: B.C. Stahl and D.Eke, "The ethics of Chat GPT– Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 74, p. 102700, 2024,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700. A copy of this case study is available on the Blackboard site.
Studentsarerequiredtoreviewthecasestudyprovidedandcriticallyanalyzetheethicalchallenges associated with ChatGPT, an emerging technology. The analysis should focus on key issues
Highlighted in the case study, including authorship attribution, misinformation risks, algorithmic bias, privacy, and transparency.
Students must also search for and review a minimum often (10) academic research papers that expand on these ethical challenges.
Additionally, students should assess Open AI's actions in addressing these concerns by applying a chosen professional code of conduct (e.g., ACS, ACM, or IEEE).
Finally, students are required to propose some recommendations to mitigate risks and promote
ethical practices in deploying ChatGPT. These recommendations should focus on transparency, bias mitigation, user privacy, and inclusive access, balancing the ethical considerations with the benefits of innovation.
Read the Case Study (Stahl and Eke, 2024), and then complete the following tasks:
Discuss the main ethical issues raised by ChatGPT as outlined in the case study. Under take additional research to expand on these concerns. Topics to address include:
Evaluate Open AI's actions in addressing these ethical concerns through a chosen professional code of conduct (ACS, ACM, or IEEE). Include the following analyses:
− Utilitarianism: Assess the balance between ChatGPT's societal benefits and harms.
− Deontology: Analyse Open AI's intentions and obligations in addressing ethical challenges.
− Virtue Ethics: Evaluate the role of responsible innovation and the character of organizations involved in ChatGPT's development.
− Contract Theory: Discuss the implicit agreements with users and stakeholders regarding transparency, safety, and fairness.
Provide actionable recommendations for Open AI to address ethical risks effectively. Focus on:
Summarize the key finding so your analysis and emphasize the importance of balancing ethical considerations with technological innovation.
Use atleast 10 academic sources to support your analysis and recommendations. All references must adhere to the Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard Referencing style.
There port format must contain the following sections:
Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:
Where students do not follow the above rules:
Your document should be a single MS Word or Open Office document containing your report. Do not use PDF as a submission format.
All submissions will be submitted through the Safe Assign facility in Black board. Submission boxes
Linked to Safe Assign will be setup in the Units Black board Shell. Assignments not submitted through these submission links will not be considered.
Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above) and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be penalized per day late (including weekend days) according to Holmes Institute policies.
The Safe Assign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of plagiarism. Safe Assign will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class members
submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Safe Assign similarity score (or match) when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to change your assignment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your assignment will be graded as late.
Submitted assignments that indicate a high level of plagiarism will be penalized according to the Holmes Academic Misconduct policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, plan early and submit early to take advantage of the re-submission feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please
Remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission.
Looking for help with your assignments and essay writing? Visit us at Punjab Assignment Help and get expert assistance today!
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.