Group Assignment
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
Trimester | T3 2024 |
Unit Code | HC1021 |
Unit Title | Interpersonal and E-Communication |
Assessment Type | Group Assignment |
Due Date + time: | January 29, 2025 11.59 pm (Melb/ Sydney time) |
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) | This assignment aims at ensuring that students are able to apply various models used in the strategic management process to relevant business cases. The following Unit Learning Outcomes apply to this assignment: Examine the key challenges faced by companies and contextualise the major approaches companies apply as they formulate strategy. Analyse complex strategy environments and develop confidence in working with others to develop and apply strategic alternatives. Critically analyse the relationship between an organisation’s strategy and its structure. Synthesis theoretical and practical knowledge of strategy in the diagnosis of strategy issues and the formulation of strategies. |
Weight | 40 % |
Total Marks | Assignment (40 marks) |
Word limit | Maximum 3000 words |
Submission Guidelines |
|
AcademicIntegrity Information | Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with anyquestions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties thatrange from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of courseenrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment. |
Penalties |
|
Analysing Business Communication Strategies in International and Domestic Contexts
Objective:
In this assignment, you will learn how companies communicate with their employees, customers, and the public, both within their own country and internationally. You will apply what you have learned about communication to analyse the strategies of two companies — one from your home country and one from another country. You will then compare these strategies to see how each company uses communication to achieve its goals.
What You Need to Do:
You will work in groups of Maximum of 4 students. Each group will analyse two companies:
Important:
Step-by-Step Instructions:
What You Will Submit:
Assessment Criteria:
Your assignment will be graded on the following:
Additional Tips:
Assignment Structure Guide Only:
Citation and Referencing Rules
Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:
2. In-text Citations
All assignments must include in-text citations to the listed references. These must include the surname of the author/s or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page
number of the content, and paragraph where the content can be found. For example, “The company decided to implement an enterprise-wide data warehouse business intelligence strategy (Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4)).”
The reference list must be located on the last page of your submission
The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z alphabetically by author surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference url.
For example:
4. Non-Adherence to Referencing Rules
If students do not follow the above rules, penalties apply:
“Unlock your academic potential with Punjab Assignment Help your trusted partner for expert guidance, timely solutions, and top-notch support in all your assignments!”
Marking criteria
Marking criteria | Weighting |
Overall Structure, formatand presentation (Business Report Style) | 5 marks |
Overview of bothcompanies’ communication strategies | 10 marks |
Comparison of bothcompanies’ communication strategies | 10 marks |
Summary of findings and Recommendations | 7.5 marks |
Evidence of quality research | 7.5 marks |
TOTAL Weight | 40% |
Marking Rubric Guide
Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
Overall | Report is excellently | Report is verywell- | Report is well- | Report is sufficiently | No or little logical |
Structure, format | structured, with sub- | structured, withsub- | structured, with | structured, with | structure of report. |
and presentation | sections and logical | sections andlogical | sub-sections and | sub-sections and | Many direct quotes |
paragraphing. Correct | paragraphing. Correct | logical paragraphing | logical paragraphing | and/or verylittle | |
layout including Arial, | layout including Arial, | Correct layout | Some elements of | paraphrasing. Some | |
font size 12, about the | font size 12, aboutthe | including Arial, font | layout or length | elements of layout | |
right length. | right length. | size 12, aboutthe | incorrect. | or length incorrect. | |
right length. | |||||
Overview of both | Very detailed | Detailed discussion on | Sufficient discussion | Barely adequate | Insufficient |
companies’ | discussion on key | key communication | on key | discussion on key | discussion on key |
communication | communication | strategies with | communication | communication | communication |
strategies | strategies with | examples | strategies with | strategies | strategies |
examples | examples | ||||
Comparison of both | Excellent comparisons | Very good comparisons | Good comparisons | Satisfactory | Little or no |
companies’ | drawn | drawn on both | drawn on both | comparisons drawn | comparisons drawn |
communication | on both companies’ | companies’ | companies’ | on both companies’ | on both companies’ |
strategies | communication | communication | communication | communication | communication |
strategies | strategies | strategies | strategies | strategies | |
Summary of Findings and Recommendation | An interesting, well written summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on thetopic, based on the information provided. | A very good summary of the main points. A good finalcomment on the topic, basedon the information | Good summary of the mainpoints. A final comment on the topic based on the information provided. | Satisfactory summary of the main points. A final comment on the topic, but introduced new material | Poor/no summary of the main points. A poor final comment on the topicand/or new material introduced |
provided. | |||||
Evidence of quality | Correctly set out | Correctly set out | Correctly set out | Some problems with | So many problems |
research | reference list and in- | reference listand in- | reference list and in- | the reference list | with the reference |
and Referencing | text citations included. | text citations included. | text citations | and/or in-text | list and/or intext |
(May | Cited sources are all | Cited sources are | included. Cited | citations. Cited | citations. Irrelevant |
result in | current and relevant | mostly currentand | sources are | sources are | or poorly-selected |
a mark | relevant | somewhat current | marginally current | sources | |
penalty) | and relevant | and relevant |
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.