Assessment 1: Report - Education Leadership
Task description:
Following a review of the literature, appraise the role of an early childhood education leader in contemporary Australia and conclude best practice.
Criteria:
NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.
Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.
Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)
Due Date: Wednesday, 31th July 2024, 11:59 PM
Extension requests must be granted in writing before the assignment due date. Contact your lecturer in writing for extensions of up to 7 calendar days. Longer extensions may be granted but require special consideration. Special consideration applications must also be submitted before the date and require documentary evidence, such as medical certificates.
Grading Scale:
GDECE105 Assessment 1: Report - Education Leadership (1500 words, 30% weight)
Grade Criteria | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | N - Does notmeet minimum standard | ||
C1. Appraise the roleof an early childhood education leader in contemporary Australia, based on review of the literature and empirical evidence (15 marks) | C1.1 The role of an early childhood education leader in contemporary Australia is appraised in detail, with critical analysis based on review of the literature and empirical evidence. | C1.12 The role of an early childhood education leader in contemporary Australia is explained in detail, with critical analysis based on review of the literature and empirical evidence. | C1.3 The role of an early childhood education leaderin contemporary Australia is explained. Critical analysis based on review of the literature and empirical evidence but lacks detail. | C1.4 The role of an early childhood education leader in contemporary Australia is described accurately. Critical analysis is evident but lacks detail. | C1.5 The role of an early childhood education leader in contemporary Australia is stated. Attempt at critical analysis present. | C1.6 The role of an early childhood education leaderis appraised but irrelevant to contemporary Australia. Attempt at critical analysis present, but irrelevant or not connected to argument. | C1.17 No identifiable role of an early childhood education is appraised. Critical analysis is absent. |
C2. Provide relevant examples of best practice of leadership in Early Childhood Education settings (10 marks) | C2.1 Relevant, specific examples provided, with critical reflection. | C2.2 Relevant, specific examples provided, critical reflection is evident, but lacks detail. | C2.3 Relevant, specific examples of practice clearly described, critical reflection is evident, but lacks detail. | C2.4 Relevantexamples of practice described, attempt at critical reflection present. | C2.5 Examples of practice stated. Connection to appraisal many be tenuous. | C2.6 Examples of practice provided but are irrelevant or contain key misunderstandings or inaccuracies. | C2.7 Examplesof practice not provided. |
C3. Assignment is formatted according to requirements and written clearly and cohesively. APA 7 referencing is used. Word limit is adhered to. (5 marks) | C3.1 The assignment is clear andfree of typographical and structural features that hinder understanding. There is no confusion between the author's voice and that of sources. The assignment is formatted according to stated requirements. Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used. Word limit met. | C3.2 The assignment is clear with minor typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. There is minimal confusion between the author's voice and that of sources. The assignment is mostly formatted according to stated requirements. Accurate mechanics of in- text and end-of- text APA (7thEd.) referencing style were used with minor inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors). Word limit met. | C3.3 The assignment is clear with typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. There is minor confusion between the author's voiceand that of sources. The assignment is partly formatted according to stated requirements. Mechanics of in- text and end-of- text APA (7thEd.) referencing style were used with inconsistencies (no more than 4 errors). Word limit met. | C3.4 The assignment has typographical and structural features that significantly hinder understanding. There is confusion between the author's voice and that of sources. The assignment is minimally formatted according to stated requirements. Mechanics of in- text and end-of- text APA (7th Ed.) referencing contain several errors. Word limit met. | C3.5 The assignment has typographical and structural features that prohibit understanding. There is confusion between the author’s voice and that of sources, or the author’s voice is absent. The assignment is not formatted according to statedrequirements. Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing stylewere not used appropriately. Word limit notmet. |
“Get top-quality, plagiarism-free GDECE105 assignment help from Punjab Assignment Help – your trusted partner for academic success in early childhood education!”
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.
