BUS6204 Organisational Change management Assignment Help

BUS6204 ASSESSMENT GUIDE

Organisational Change Management

 

Assessment Overview

For the assessment of BUS UNIT 6204, There are three assessment tasks you must fulfil in order to complete in BUS6204 Unit.Detail saregiveninUnitdescriptorandalsoon“Studyboard@VIT”.

Assessment will be done with the following timetable:

 

No.Assessment NameDate OpenDate of Submission

 

 

1

 

Discussion Participation  20% weight age

 

Start at week2

 

 

Week2,3,4,5

Sundayby11.55pm

 

 

2

 

Case    Study    Report:  GroupProject40%

weightage      (25%-

Report,             15%  presentation)

 

 

Week3

 

Week4

Sundayby11.55pm

 

 

3

 

Individual Report 40% weightage

 

 

Week5

 

 

Week6

Sundayby11.55pm

 

Each week, you will be guided by our LMS on all the course requirements of our MBA unit including what to do in that week, and how to fulfill task requirements. For each assessment, the “Studyboard@VIT” will provide details on the assessment task and guidelines including how you will be assessed on each assessment task, marking criteria and so on.

 

 

Some clarification on each assessment:

 

  1. Assessment1: Discussion Participation

Discussion Participation: You will be assesses based on your accessible login on LMS, using the CHAT on the LMS. Also, your interaction through email etc. with faculty and coordinators here in Australia. No assessment can be done by any other facilitator.

 

  1. Assessment2:Case Study Report:Group Project and Presentation(2000words)

Studentsinagroupof3-4 will analyze the provided case study, identifying the theoretical models and concepts to describe and explain the questions mentioned below the case and recommend possible interventions taking into consideration ethical and practical factors in their determinations. This is a Group Assessment, and students will present their work done. Students will normally work in a group of 3 to 4 students.

 

  1. Assessment3: Individual Report(2000words)

Individual Report on Organization Development and Continuous Change: Students will develop a theoretical model to analyze aspecificmanagerialproblemwithrespectivetochangemanagement.Studentswillneedto demonstratetheirknowledgeandabilitytocriticallydevelopthemodelobjectives,thedecisionvariablesandthe organizational constraints. The studentsmustprepare abrief reportto demonstrate theirabilityusingsolver functiontogenerateanoptimalsolutionandassisttheirmanagementindecisionmaking.


 

The following instructions are strictly applied throughout our MBA programme:

1.The assessments are an importantpartofunitprogressionandaretobeattendedtodiligently.Hence,noattempt at an assessment task means no marks.

2.Noassessmentisallowedbeyondatimelimitasgivenandannouncedandtherefore,tobesubmittedintime.

Latesubmissionwouldattract10%-markdeductionsforeachdaylatesubmission.

3.Assessmentguidelinesmustbe followed as per the guidelinesprovided.For example, ifthe assessment is onwritingreportwith2000words,itmustbelikethat,pagesarenotimportant,butwordcountarenecessary Incase, word count exceedsmorethan10%or10%lessofthespecified word count,itwill consider with10% mark deductions.

4.All assessmenttobesubmittedtoVIT,Australiaandwillbechecked,markedand providedwithfeedback.No assessment can be done anywhere other than VIT, Australia.

›5.AssessmentcanbesubmittedonLMSoremailtoVITortolocalinvigilatorwhowillbescanningthe

assignments/answerpapersandwillsubmitonthesamedaytoVIT,Australia.

›6.Total weight ofassessmentandmarkingwillbedoneasoverall.

7.Studentsarerequiredtoachieveatleast40%marksinthefinalassessmentcomponentandanoverall markof 50% to achieve a pass grade in the unit.

›8.The authorized agent/local facilitator can help student understand theassessment parts andwillbeappointedas

“Invigilator”(supervisiononly)for theassessment.

 

Note:For all assignments,thepreferredlayoutisin12-pointCalibri,with1.5linespacing,5centimetersleft-hand margins and bold headings. Whenever you use the ideas and arguments of other writers, you must refer to the writers and their work. By acknowledging the work of others, you avoid plagiarism. The APA style requires a reference list at the end of your assignment. It is arranged in alphabetical order by author surname.

 

For further clarification you can contact the coordinator via email.

 

 

FurtherdetailsoneachassessmentforBUS6204canbefoundonthefollowingpages.


 

Assessment 1

Discussion Participation•Weightage20%

Student Guidelines

›1.In this class, online discussions will count towards your assignments grade in the course. The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important for lecture to see, but also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and positions on various topics.

› 2. You are expected to participate on at least 3 different forums. You should begin at least one thread and provide at least three posts in response to other participants’ threads. Posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of two paragraphs. Word totals for each post should be in the 100-200 words range.

› 3. While on discussion: you agree or disagree explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience.Include a reference,link,or citation when appropriate.

› 4. While on discussion: Be organized in your thoughts and ideas.In corporate correlations with the assigned readings or topics. Stay on topic. Provide evidence of critical and thoughtfulness in your responses or interactions. Avoid summarizing.

›5.During the discussion:Contribute to the learning community by being creative in your approaches to topics, being relevant in the presented viewpoints, and attempting to motivate the discussion.

›6.In discussion:Be aware of grammar and sentence

mechanics.Use proper etiquette.

›7.Remember that being respectful is always critical in the classroom, online and during forum chat discussions.


 The Assess or will assess you on the following: Discussion and Participation:

  • Are made in at imely fashion,giving others an opportunity to respond.
  • Are thoughtful and analyze the content or question asked.
  • Pose new possibilities or opinions not previously voiced.
  • Are Ideas expressed clearly and concisely. Uses appropriate vocabulary. Is attentive to spelling and grammar.
  • Spend the time to construct creative, challenging and engaging discussion assignments, which promote participation.


 

 

BUS6204-Assessment1•Forum Discussion Rubric

 


 

FOR FACULTY MEMBER ONLY

Name of the Student:


 

 

 

Student No:


 

Assessment Task:Forum Discussion•Weightage: 20%

Lecturer’s Observation on Student Participation:


 

 

 

 

 


 

CriteriaExcellent (A80-100%)VeryGood (B70-79%)

Good

(C60-69%)

Pass

(D50-59%)

Fail

(N0-49%)

Marks
Context and critical thinking
  • Comments always insightful & constructive.
  • Uses appropriate terminology.
  • Comments           balanced

    between                general impressions, opinions &specific,          thoughtful criticisms,orcontributions.

  • Comments mostlyinsightful & constructive.
  • Mostlyusesappropriate terminology.
  • Comments     are     mostly relevantwiththediscussion.
  • Commentsareoccasionally insightful & constructive.
  • Occasionallyuseappropriate terminology.
  • Comments are occasionally toogeneralornotrelevantto  the discussion.
  • Comments are sometimes constructive,withoccasional signs of insight.
  • Studentdoesnotuse appropriateterminology.
  • Commentsnotalways relevanttothediscussion.
  • Commentsareuninformative.
  • Lackinginappropriate terminology.
  • Heavyrelianceonopinion& personal taste.
40%
Disciplinary Knowledge
  • Disciplinary knowledge is clearly presented and uses disciplinary         language  authoritatively.
  • Shows critical understanding of the issue presented and demonstrates depth and accuracy of understanding.
  • Disciplinary knowledge is clearlypresentedanduses disciplinary         language  competently.
  • Shows a proficient awareness of the issue presentedanddemonstrates accuracy of understanding.
  • Disciplinaryknowledgeis presented and uses disciplinary language approachingcompetency.
  • Shows an awareness of the issue presented and demonstrateslimited content understanding.
  • Disciplinaryknowledgelacks clarity and uses disciplinary language tentatively.
  • Showsanawarenessofthe issue presented and some evidence of gaining new understanding.
  • Disciplinary knowledge is unclearanddoesnotusethe languageofthedisciplineina sustained fashion.
  • Demonstratesnoevidenceof gaining new understanding.
40%
Grammar              and Vocabulary
  • Employs             excellent discipline-based vocabulary relevant to the context and adheres to grammatical convention.
  • Employs a competent discipline-based vocabulary relevantto the context and adheres to grammatical convention.
  • Employs a developing disciplinary               based vocabularythatadheresto thebasicrulesofgrammar.
  • Demonstrates           limited  disciplinary based vocabulary that adheres to the basic rules of grammar, with a number of errors.
  • Thetasklargelyrevertsto the use of non-discipline specific vocabulary with grammatical errors that interfere with meaning.
20%
Timely participationIt is important to check how student has been manage timing and promptness 
Total marks100%
Comments 

 

 


 

Assessment2

  
  


 

Strategic Report: Group ProjectandPresentation•Weightage40% (25%: Report, 15%: Presentation)

 


 

Student Guidelines

Studentsinagroupof3-4willanalyzethecasestudy onanytopicamongstalotofthemuploadedon Moodle as a part of Assessment 2. This assignment requires that you write a 2000- 2500-word group report. This will involve critically assessing the issues presented in the case alongside theory/literature and making recommendations for improvements. The group is then required to present your work in the form of a presentation.

Questions that you are required to answer from the case are listedattheendofeach case.

Note: All the groups can pick any one case study.

Inyourreportyouneedtoaddressalltheissuesin the case study.

  • Your discussion should be supported by citations from the current Organizational Change literature.
    • You are required touse 12-15 peer-review academic journal articles.
    • Your report should include the sections outlined in the exact order:

ExecutiveSummary: isanoverall summary of the entire report. It should:

Introducethetopicofyourreport

Indicate the main subjects (major findings) examined in the discussion section of your report,

Stateyourconclusions

Stateyourrecommendations (No page number)

Table of contents: This is an ordered list of the different sections and subsections of your report. It must include numbered section headings and subheadings, with their relevant pages. This indicates to your reader where various sections of your discussion can be found.

Note: Table of contents should also be on a separate page. (No page number)

  • Introduction:(Thenumberingofthepagesstarts here)Theintroductionshouldgenerallyinclude three key types of information.

    Background: This section sets the context for the report and provides the (brief) background information required for the reader to understand the report. For example, it may briefly outline the issue faced by the organization.Tellthereadersomethingabout


 

the history / origin of the report. When was it requested? Why is it important? Who was involved and how?

Aims/objectives:Thistellsthereaderwhattheaims

/objectives of thereport are.It indicates what key questionsthereportistryingtoanswerandwhat it is trying to achieve. Why was it written?

Scope:Tellthereaderexactlywhatareas/ideasare covered in the report. This also helps to explain how the report is organized. Look at your plan and consider your headings and sub-headings.

Discussion and analysis: This section is where informationrelevanttothetopicispresented.It must be fully referenced throughout, using various resources to support ideas. It should be organized logically, using topic headings, subheadings and minor subheadings to break it intosectionsandsub-sectionsbasedontheideas being discussed. All headings must be numbered sequentially. The length of a discussion is approximately 60% of the total word count.

  • Conclusion: The purpose of the conclusion is to provide a summary of the major findings. It effectivelyattemptstoanswerthekeyquestions posed in the introduction. When writing a conclusion, it may be useful to consider the following:

Nonewinformationshouldbeintroduced,

What has been learnt or proved from doing this research?

Based on the research, what conclusions can be drawn?

Consider the key questions and objectives set out in the introduction - what are the answers / conclusions you came to?

Consider each of the key sections of your report - what was the main point made in each section?

 

Recommendations: Often when writing a report specific recommendations for future actions are requested. These can be included as a separate section after the conclusion or even as a part of the conclusion (using a sub-heading).

Recommendations should state what actions should beimplementedbasedoncasestudy.Youmaylist these in bullet points or small paragraphs.

  • ReferenceList:Thislistincludesthefullpublication detailsofallbooks,articles,Websitesandother sources referred to in the report. Only cited articlesshouldbe includedin yourreference list and should be in alphabetical order.

ThereferencingstylesatVIT:APA styles


 

Your report needs to take into consideration the following aspects:

Background and Context: Provide an overview of the organization or scenario being analyzed.

ProblemorIssueIdentification:Clearlyoutlinethe primaryproblemorchallengebeingaddressed. Discuss why this issue is significant and its impact on the organization or stakeholders.

Analysis of the Situation: Use appropriate frameworks or tools (e.g., SWOT, PESTLE, or Porter's Five Forces) to evaluate the case.

Change Management in Chaotic Environments: Describe how the organization responded to unpredictable or dynamic conditions.

Competitive and Collaborative Strategies: Discuss howtheorganizationmanagedcompetitionand collaboration within its industry.

Recommendations and Solutions: Offer practical recommendations to address the identified challenges.

Lessons Learned: Reflect on key takeaways from the case study.

The Report should be written in appropriate business language so that your analysis and discussion have an objective tone.

Your writingshouldbe clear andconcise andbein your own words.

Useheadingsandsubheadingtoguidethereader.

Use visual data representations to support your discussion.

ReportConclusion.

 

TheConsultativeReport(perteam)mustbeinthe range of 2,000 words in length excluding references. You must reference using the APA referencing style.

Reflective Piece: A further 400–500 words reflection

papershouldbesubmittedperstudent.


 

Reflectionsbasedonyourexperienceandlearningin thisexerciseandhowthismaybeappliedinyour own organization.

Yoursubmissionwill include twosubmissions: GroupReport+IndividualReflectiveReport+

PowerPointPresentation(pre-recordedorin

class)

 

Youwillbeassessedon thefollowing:

Research information: Appropriate sources are consulted, Sufficient sources are consulted, Sources are referenced.

Organize information: Appropriate headings, write clearly and concisely using an integrated structure, arguments and conclusions match purpose.

Develop and Explain: Case issues in depth and provideimplementationplanfortheorganization for improved decision making.

Write clearly and concisely: Arguments are easy to understand and succinct.

Presentation skills: Each group member will be assessed on the way of presentation and the quality of work.

 

Submission formattingstyleguide:

For all major assignments, both formative and summative, the preferred layout is in 12-point Calibri,with1.5 linespacing,2.5 centimeters left- handmargins andBoldheadings. Allassignments must be submitted with a completed and signed cover sheet. Whenever you use the ideas and argumentsofotherwriters,youmustrefertothe writers and their work. By acknowledging the work of others, you avoid plagiarism. The APA style requires a reference list at the end of your assignment.Itisarrangedinalphabeticalorderby author surname.


 

 


 

 


 

BUS6204-Assessment2•Case Study Analysis Rubric

FORFACULTYMEMBERONLY                                                                                                                                                                                                                Assessment Task: Strategic Report-GroupProject•Weightage:40%

NameoftheStudent:                                                                              StudentNo:                                                                                                                Lecturer’sObservationonStudentParticipation:

 

 

 

 

Criteria

Excellent(A80-

100%)

Very Good (B70-

79%)

Good

(C60-69%)

Pass

(D50-59%)

Fail

(N0-49%)

Marks

Understandingof Concepts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analysis               and Evaluation

Demonstrates exceptional understandin gofchange management theories, models,               and principles, applied critically                  to the case.

 

Provides

insightful,in- depth analysis, identifying criticalissues andproposing innovative

solutions.

Shows              strong understanding ofkeychange management conceptswith good  application.

 

 

 

 

Offers                solid analysis                     and evaluationwith relevant                    and practical recommendati ons.

Demonstratesadequate understandingwith basicapplicationto the case study.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Providesbasicanalysis with           some     valid recommendations  but lacks depth.

Limitedunderstanding of                  change

management concepts                      with partialapplication.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Offerslimitedanalysis; recommendations are     generic         or  unsupported.

Lacks      understanding  of         change

management principles;littleto no application.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Failstoanalyseor evaluate effectively;                       no valid recommendations provided.

15%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15%

Writing, Argument &Report Structure

Excellent,

logically developed structure matched                 to the task.

Generates                   a highly developed, focused,and

sustained argument(s)

Uses           logically  developed structure matchedtothe task.

Generates

developedand focused argument(s) relatedtothe report.

Uses somewhat logical structure              of paragraphsbutwith errors.

Generates               few developed          and  focusedargument(s)related to the report.

Poorlogicinstructure of paragraphs.

Poordevelopmentand focus                         of

argument(s) related     to               the report.

Paragraphstructureis not clear, well ordered,                     or logical.

Generates a series of statements or claims without connecting these to form a clear, logical argument.

10%

 

 

 

10%


 

 relatedtothe report.     
Application                  to Case Study

Theories         and  frameworksof         Change Management Theoriesare applied flawlessly and creativelyto address     the

case      study

scenario.

Theories           and  frameworksof Change Management are             applied accurately     to

address        the

case         study scenario.

Some      theories               of  ChangeManagement                   are applied,         though inconsistently          or  superficiallyMinimalorincorrect application                    of Change Management theories;                  limited relevancetothe case.No application of theories                       or frameworks; fails to address the case.10%
Presentationand referencing

Professional

presentation with           no

errors         in  grammar, spelling,     or formatting;

referencingis flawless.

Presentation     is polished     with minor    errors; referencing    is mostly accurate.

Presentation               is

adequate                      but contains errors in grammar, spelling, or referencing.

Poorlypresentedwith frequent errors in grammar,spelling, or referencing

Presentation                        is unacceptablewith  numerous errors; referencingis

missing                       or inaccurate

10%
PresentationSkills: Content, structure                  and Engagement

Highlyengaging, well- organized, clear,     and comprehens  ive content.

Confident,

professional, engaging,and         natural delivery.

Activelyengages audience; encourages questions and interaction.

Highly     engaging, well- organized, clear,        and comprehensiv  e content.

Confident        but

slightly      less

engaging or polished.

Engages audience but with less interaction.

Highlyengaging,well- organized,                    clear, andcomprehensive content.

Some           confidence, occasional hesitations           or monotone.

Minimal               audience engagement; limitedinteraction.

Highlyengaging,well- organized,clear, and comprehensive content.

Lacks confidence; frequent pauses or distractions.

Little to no audience engagement or interaction.

Highly            engaging, well-organized, clear,                and comprehensive content.

Unclear,monotone, or unprepared.

Noengagementor audience interaction.

15%


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Reflective

Learning: Reporting, Responding, Relating, Reasoning& Reconstruc ting Thoughts

Excellently

demonstrat edtheissues involved, explained why           it

happened, made    clear observation sand posed questionsto addressthe issues.

Explained     the relevant theory     and literature support.

Explained how the changes could be more

beneficial.

Significantly

demonstrated the issues involved, explained why it happened, made clear observations and                 posed

questions                       to address the issues.

 

 

 

 

Explained the relevant theory                     and literature support.

 

Explained how the changes could be more beneficial.

Demonstrates the issues involved, explainedandfairly explains why it happened, made clear observations and                 posed

questions                       to address the issues.

 

 

 

 

Good attempt to explaintherelevant theory                    and literature support.

Good attempt to explain how the changes could be more beneficial.

Demonstrates the issues involved, explained.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fairly explained the relevant theory and literature support.

Fairly explained how the changes could bemore beneficial.

Demonstrated the issues involved, but              vaguely explained why it happened.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demonstrated weak attempttoexplain the relevant theory                   and literaturesupport.

Not                        much

explanation as to how the changes could be more beneficial.

5%

 

 

 

 

5%

 

 

 

 

5%

Totalmarks100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weightage40%=

Lecturer’sSignature:                                                                                                            Date://                                                                                                                                                Name:


 

 


 

Assessment3

 


 

Individual Report•Weightage40%

 

Student Guidelines

This is an individual assessment, and you must choose one of the managerial problems related to change management as listed below that relate to your organization or another organization of your choice. You need to research all the data that will support management in such a way that they will have sufficient data andinformation that theyare able to make the decisions appropriately.

The change management theories you suggest in relation to this assessment mustbe made with regards to any one of the following:

Identify areal-worldexample where an organization successfullyadaptedtoachaoticenvironment? What were the key success factors? What lessons can belearnedfromorganizations that failedtoadapttosignificantchanges?

How can competitive and collaborative strategies help organizations navigate chaotic and unpredictable environments? How do changing environments influence the balance between competition and collaboration?

 

Further, you should be able to collect relevant information on the following parameters:

Consider situation characterized by high uncertainty, rapid changes, and complexity, often requiring organizations to be highly adaptable and innovative.

Analyse the Key Success Factors (KSFs) or conditions that contributed to the organization's successful adaptation.

Choose a Relevant Real-World scenario: Select an organization that faced significant disruption (e.g., technological changes, economic crises, pandemics, or competitive challenges) and successfullyadapted.Examplesinclude Netflix transitioning from DVD rentals to streaming or Apple reimagining itself with the iPhone.

Highlightwhatenabledtheorganizationtoadapt.

Thesecould include:

Innovation: Development of new products, services, or business models.

Leadership: Visionary leadership that guided the organization through change.


 

 

Agility:Theabilitytopivotquicklyinresponseto challenges.

Culture:Aculturethatsupportschangeandencourages creativity.

Technology:Leveragingadvancedtechnologytostay ahead.

CustomerFocus:Maintainingadeepunderstandingof customer needs and preferences.

Extractkeylessonsfrombothsuccessesandfailures: Embrace change as an opportunity.

Continuouslyinnovateandinvestin R&D. Structure Your Answer:

Introduction:     Briefly    explain    what     a    chaotic environment is and its relevance.

MainBody:

ExampleofSuccess:Describetheorganization,the challenge faced, its response, and KSFs.

ExampleofFailure:Explainwhatwentwrongand why.

Lessons Learned: Summarize the insights from both cases.

Conclusion:Reflectontheimportanceofadaptability

intoday’sbusinessenvironment.

CiteSources:Referencereputablesources,case studies, or articles to support your examples.

Your submission will include an Individual Report of 2000 words

 

Youwillbeassessedasfollows:

Structure of the written report: Background information is relevant, issues are logically ordered, recommendations clearly relate to the managerial problem.

Identify critical managerial problem: Consider the situationandanalyzeitusingvariables,objectives and constraints.

Usethechangemanagementtheoriesandstrategies to solve the question

Implement the solution: Justify by providing alternatives that the solution generated is the optimal.

Write clearly and concisely: Arguments are explicit and succinct, appropriate headings are used, grammar and spelling are accurate.


 

Submission     formatting     style guide

 

For all major assignments, both formative and summative,thepreferredlayoutisin12-pointCalibri, with1.5linespacing,2.5centimetersleft-handmargins andBoldheadings.Allassignmentsmustbesubmitted with a completed and signed cover sheet. Whenever youusetheideasandargumentsofotherwriters,you must refer to the writers and their work. By acknowledging the work of others, you avoid plagiarism. The APA style requires a reference list at the end of your assignment. It is arranged in alphabetical order by author surname.


 

 

 

BUS6204-Assessment3•IndividualReportRubric

 


 

FORFACULTYMEMBER ONLY

NameoftheStudent:


 

 

 

StudentNo:


 

AssessmentTask:IndividualReport•Weightage:40%

Lecturer’sObservationonStudentParticipation:


 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Criteria

Excellent(A80-

100%)

VeryGood(B70- 79%)

Good

(C60-69%)

Pass

(D50-59%)

Fail

(N0-49%)

Marks

 

 

 

 

Identification              of the Managerial Problem

 

 

 

 

Understanding of Change Management Theories

Clearlyidentifiesa complex managerial problemrelated to              change management, with comprehensive background context provided.

 

Demonstrates         an  exceptional understandingof relevantchange management theories,linking themdirectly to the         managerial problem.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identifies arelevant managerial problem with sufficient context and understanding.

 

 

 

 

Shows                          strong  understandingoftheories withclearconnectionsto the managerial problem.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identifies a managerial problem, but context ordepthof

understandingis limited.

 

 

 

Demonstrates                            basic understandingoftheories but links to the problem are general.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Problem is vaguely identified, with minimal context or relevancetochange management.

 

Limited understanding of theories;connections to the problem are weak or unclear.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Failstoidentifya managerial problem                or provides irrelevant                or unclear context.

 

Showslittletono understandingof  change management theories;                no relevant connections.

15%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15%


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CriticalThinking and Creativity

 

Demonstrates exceptional criticalthinking andcreativityin evaluating                  the

problem                  and proposing solutions.

Integrates

perspectivesto develop                clear model formulationfor optimal solution.

 

 

Showsstrongcritical thinking                     and

creativity           in

analysis                     and solutions.

 

Integrates contrasting perspectives              to develop              model formulationforoptimal solution.

 

 

 

Demonstrates some criticalthinkingbut lacks creativity or depthinsolutions.

 

Formulatesaresponse that               integrates perspectives               for model development.

 

 

 

 

Limited critical thinking or creativity;solutions areconventionalor shallow.

Response     does             not  integrate contrasting perspectives                 for modelformulation.

 

 

 

Lacks critical thinking or creativity; responsesare

simplistic or irrelevant.

Response does not integrate contrasting perspectiveson the issues.

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

Disciplinary

Knowledge

Disciplinary

knowledge                     is clearly presentedand uses disciplinary language authoritatively.

Shows          critical understanding of    the         issue  presentedand demonstrates depth               and

accuracy       of

understanding.

Disciplinary

knowledge is clearlypresented  and              uses

disciplinary language competently.

Showsaproficient awarenessofthe issuepresented and demonstrates accuracy          of understanding.

Disciplinaryknowledge is    presented      and uses      disciplinary  language approaching competency.

Shows an awareness of theissuepresented and demonstrates limited content understanding.

Disciplinary knowledge lacks clarity and uses disciplinary languagetentatively.

Shows an awareness of theissuepresented and some evidence of gaining new understanding.

Disciplinary

knowledgeis

unclear and does not use thelanguageof thedisciplinein  a sustained fashion.

Demonstrates no evidenceof

gaining new understanding.

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%


 

 

 

Use             of

Evidence and Examples

Integratesdiverse, credible evidence(e.g., case            studies, academic references, industry examples)               to strengthen analysis             and recommendati

ons.

Uses                         relevant  evidence              and examples  effectively,with minor    gaps              in  integrationIncludes              some evidence,butitmay be limited in variety, relevance,                        or integrationMinimal use of evidence;examples areweakorloosely connected to the problem.

Fails       to        use

evidence                    or examples effectively; argumentsare unsupported.

10%
Grammar                &Vocabulary

Employsexcellent discipline- based vocabulary relevanttothe context                  and

adheres                    to grammatical convention.

Employs                  a

competent discipline-based vocabulary relevanttothe context                    and

adheres                      to grammatical convention.

Employs a developing disciplinary based vocabulary that adherestothebasic rules of grammar.Demonstrates limited disciplinary based vocabulary that adherestothebasic rules of grammar, withseveralerrors.

The         task    largely revertstothe use     of     non- discipline specific vocabularywith

grammaticalerrors that          interfere

withmeaning.

10%


 

Text Box: 8Text Box: BUS6204Text Box: OrganisationalChangeManagement

 

 

 


 

Referencing

Employs      an accurate academic referencin g conventio  n       citing

multiple sources.

Employs          an          accurate  academic referencing convention                    citing multiple          sources,  with some errors.Employs a basic academic referencing convention appropriate to the discipline, with an adequate number of sources.

Employs    a    basic academic referencing conventionap propriate       to the     discipline

with       limited sources.

Shows         unfamiliarity

with,                 and

inconsistent applicationofthe conventions                               of academic referencing                        with inadequatesources.

10%
Totalmarks100%
Comments 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weightage40%=

Lecturer’sSignature:                                                                                                            Date://                                                                                                                                                Name:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.