BUS5006 Organisational Behaviour Assignment Help

 

Master of Business Administration (MBA) BUS5006 Organisational Behaviour - 2024S1M            

Assessment Overview

There are three assessments in this unit. This section provides a brief summary of these assessments.

Assessment # & Type

 

Assessment Type

 

Weighting

 

Hurdle?

 

ULOs

 

Submission Due

 

Assessment 1 Tutorial activities and/or Onlinediscussion forums

 

 

Discussion of key topics with critical analysis of pivotal concepts in relation to organisational behaviour.

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

No

 

 

 

1, 2

 

 

Week 2, 3, 4, 5

Sunday 11.59 pm (MEL time)

 

 

Assessment 2 Case Study report (1500

words)

Analyse behavioural characteristics of a specific organisation. Through a case study approach, identify theoretical models and concepts to describe and explain questionable behaviours and recommend possible interventions taking into considerations ethical and practical factors in their determinations.

 

 

 

40 %

 

 

 

No

 

 

 

2, 3, 4

 

 

Week 4

Sunday 11.59 pm (MEL time)

 

 

 

Assessment 3 Group Theoretical Report (2000 words)

Students will form groups. After identifying any two (relevant) leadership and change management theories, the group will apply the two theories to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). The theories will inform - 1. An analysis of the business’ commitment and contribution to environment sustainability and CSR, 2.

Clear recommendations on how the business could improve its sustainability and CSR practices in the immediate to

long-term perspectives.

 

 

 

 

 

40%

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

 

 

2, 4, 5

 

 

 

 

Week 6

Sunday 11.59 pm (MEL time)

 

Important Note: To pass the unit, students are expected to achieve at least 40% in the Hurdle tasks and an overall mark of 50%.

 

Summary of assessments

 

Assessment 1: Tutorial activities and/or Online discussion forums

The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important from the lecturer’s point of view but is also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and position on various topics.

 

Assessment 2: Case Study report (1500 words)

Students will analyse the provided case study, identify theoretical models and concepts to describe and explain questionable behaviours and recommend possible interventions taking into consideration ethical and practical factors in their determinations.

 

Assessment 3: Group Theoretical Report (2000 words)

Students will form groups (3-4). After identifying any two (relevant) leadership and change management theories, the group will apply the two theories to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). The theories will inform - 1. An analysis of the business’ commitment and contribution to environment sustainability and CSR, 2. Clear recommendations on how the business could improve its sustainability and CSR practices in the immediate to long-term perspectives. using concepts and theories covered in this unit. A complete detail for each assessment is provided in the next sections.

 

Academic misconduct

VIT enforces that the integrity of its students’ academic studies follows an acceptable level of excellence. VIT will adhere to its VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms where it explains the importance of staff and student honesty in relation to academic work. It outlines the kinds of behaviors that are “academic misconduct”, including plagiarism.

 

Late submissions

In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms, late submission of assessments will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be applied as soon as the deadline is reached.

 

Short extensions and special consideration

Special Consideration is a request for:

    Extensions of the due date for an assessment, other than an examination (e.g. assignment extension).

    Special Consideration (Special Consideration in relation to a Completed assessment, including an end-of-unit Examination).

 

Students wishing to request Special Consideration in relation to an assessment the due date of which has not yet passed must engage in written emails to the teaching team to Request for Special Consideration as early as possible and prior to start time of the assessment due date, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates. For more information, visit VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms.

 

Inclusive and equitable assessment

Reasonable adjustment in assessment methods will be made to accommodate students with a documented disability or impairment. Contact the unit teaching team for more information.

 

Contract cheating.

Contract cheating usually involves the purchase of an assignment or piece of research from another party. This may be facilitated by a fellow student, friend or purchased on a website. Other forms of contract cheating include paying another person to sit an exam in the student’s place.

 

Contract cheating warning:

    By paying someone else to complete your academic work, you don’t learn as much as you could

have if you did the work yourself.

    You are not prepared for the demands of your future employment.

    You could be found guilty of academic misconduct.

    Many of for pay contract cheating companies recycle assignments despite guarantees of

“original, plagiarism- free work” so similarity is easily detected by Turnitin.

    Penalties for academic misconduct include suspension and exclusion.

    Students in some disciplines are required to disclose any findings of guilt for academic misconduct before being accepted into certain professions (e.g. law).

    You might disclose your personal and financial information in an unsafe way, leaving yourself open to many risks including possible identity theft.

    You also leave yourself open to blackmail - if you pay someone else to do an assignment for you, they know you have engaged in fraudulent behavior and can always blackmail you.

 

Assessment 1: Tutorial activities and/or Online discussion forums 20%

 

The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important from the lecturer’s point of view but is also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and position on various topics.

 

General Guidelines

  1. In this class, online discussion will count towards your overall grade for the course. The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important from the lecturer’s point of view but is also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and position on various topics.
  2. You are expected to participate in at least 3 different forums. You should begin at least one thread and provide at least three posts in response to other participants’ threads. Posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of two paragraphs. Word totals for each post should be in the 200-300 words range.
  3. During the discussion, when you agree or disagree explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience. Include a reference, link, or citation when appropriate.
  4. During the discussion, be organised in your thoughts and ideas. Incorporate correlations with the assigned readings or topics. Stay on topic. Provide evidence of critical thinking in your responses or interactions. Avoid summarizing.
  5. During the discussion, contribute to the learning community by being creative in your approaches to topics, being relevant in the presented viewpoints, and attempting to motivate the discussion.
  6. During discussion, be aware of grammar and sentence mechanics. Use proper etiquette.
  7. Remember that being respectful is critical at all times in the classroom, online and during forum chat discussions.

 

The assessor will assess you on the following:

 

Discussion and Participation:

  1. Is made in a timely fashion, giving others an opportunity to respond.
    1. Is thoughtful with appropriate analysis of the content or question asked.
    2. Poses new possibilities or opinions not previously voiced.
    3. Ideas are expressed clearly, concisely with appropriate use of vocabulary and attention to spelling and grammar.
    4. Spends the time constructing creative, challenging and engaging discussion assignments, which promote participation.

 

Marking Criteria: Assessment 1: Tutorial activities and/or Online discussion forums (Weightage 20%)

This assignment will be marked based on the following criteria.

 

CriteriaExcellent (A: 80-100%)Very Good(B: 70-79%)Good (C: 60-69%)Pass (D: 50-59%)Fail (F:< 50%)Mark

 

 

 

 

Context and critical thinking

  • Comments always insightful & constructive.
  • Uses appropriateterminology.
  • Comments balanced betweengeneral impressions, opinions & specific, thoughtful criticisms, or contributions

 

  • Comments mostly insightful & constructive.
  • Mostly uses appropriate terminology.
  • Comments are mostly relevant with the discussion.
  • Comments are occasionally insightful & constructive.
  • Occasionally useappropriate terminology.
  • Comments are occasionally too general or not relevant to the discussion.
  • Comments are sometimes constructive, with occasional signs of insight.
  • Student does not use appropriate terminology.
  • Comments not always relevant to the

    discussion.

 

 

  • Comments are uninformative.
  • Lacking in appropriate terminology.
  • Heavy reliance on opinion & personal taste.
 

 

 

 

 

Disciplinary Knowledge

  • Disciplinary knowledge is clearly presented and uses disciplinary  language authoritatively.
  • Shows critical understanding of the issue presented and demonstrates

    depth and accuracy of understanding.

  • Disciplinary knowledge is clearly presented and uses disciplinary  language competently.
  • Shows a proficient awareness of the issue presented and demonstrates accuracy of understanding.
  • Disciplinary knowledge is presented and uses disciplinary language approaching competency.
  • Shows an awareness of the issue presented and

    demonstrates limitedcontent understanding.

  • Disciplinary knowledge lacks clarity and uses disciplinary language tentatively.
  • Shows an awareness of the issue presented and some evidence of gaining new understanding.

 

  • Disciplinary knowledge is unclear anddoes not use the language of the discipline in a sustained fashion.
  • Demonstrates no evidence of gaining new understanding
 

 

 

Grammar andVocabulary

  • Employs excellent discipline-based vocabulary relevant to the context and adheres to grammatical convention.
  • Employs a competent discipline-based vocabulary relevant to the context and adheres to grammatical convention.
  • Employs a developing disciplinary based vocabulary that adheres to the basic rules of grammar.
  • Demonstrates limited disciplinary based vocabulary that adheres to the basic rules of grammar, with a number of errors.
  • The task largely reverts to the use of non- discipline specific vocabulary with grammatical errors that interfere withmeaning.
 
Timely participationIt is important to check how student has been managetiming and promptness 

 

Total marks

  

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

 

Assessment 2: Case Study report (1500 words) 40%

Students will analyse the “Pride-Building at Aramark” case study, identify theoretical models and concepts to describe and explain questionable behaviours and recommend possible interventions taking into consideration ethical and practical factors in their determinations.

 

The Case Study: Pride-Building at Aramark

 

Source: Griffin, R.W., Phillips, J.M., Gully, S. M. (2020), Organisational Behavior Managing People and People. 13th Ed. Cengage Learning.

 

Aramark, a leader in professional services headquartered in Philadelphia, has approximately 270,000 employees serving clients in twenty-two countries.51 Aramark wanted to better motivate its employees who clean airplanes for Delta and Southwest Airlines. Turnover of the low-paid staff of largely immigrant employees once exceeded 100 percent a year. Morale was low, and wallets and other valuable items that passengers left on planes had a tendency to disappear.

To turn things around, Aramark manager Roy Pelaez believed that he had to break some rules to get employees to feel motivated. "Managers are not supposed to get involved with the personal problems of their employees, but I take the opposite view," he says. "Any problem that affects the employee will eventually affect your account. If you take care of the employees, they will take care of you and your customer." Besides the typical "Employee of the Month" recognition programs, he brought in an English-language teacher to tutor employees twice a week on their own time, added Friday citizenship classes to help employees become U.S. citizens, and arranged for certified babysitters subsidized by government programs to keep single mothers showing up for work. He even created a small computer lab with three used computers so that employees could train each other in word processing and spreadsheets. "All of these things are important, because we want employees who really feel connected to the company," says Pelaez.

Employees who had perfect attendance over a six-month period or who turned in a wallet or pocketbook filled with cash and credit cards were rewarded with a day off with pay. Workers in the "Top Crew of the Month" were rewarded with movie passes, telephone calling cards, or "burger bucks." Turnover fell to 12 percent per year—amazing for jobs that pay only minimum wage to start. And crews started to recover large amounts of money from the airplanes, returning to passengers some 250 lost wallets with more than $50,000 in cash.52

In five years, Pelaez’s efforts helped to increase Aramark’s revenue in this area from $5 million to $14 million.53 Since 1998, programs such as these have helped Aramark consistently rank as one of the top three most admired companies in its industry in Fortune magazine's list of "America’s Most Admired Companies. "54

 

YOUR TASK

Analyse the behavioural characteristics of Aramark, a leader in professional services headquartered in Philadelphia. Identify the theoretical models and concepts of OB related to the below Questions:

 

Case Questions

  1. What motivation theories apply to the workers at Aramark?
  2. If you were the manager of these employees, what would you do to motivate them? Be honest regarding your personal management style and beliefs rather than trying to be like Roy Pelaez.
  3. What are some possible barriers to the effectiveness of your motivation ideas? What could you do to overcome them?


 

Guidelines

 

Students will Individually analyse the Pride-Building at Aramark case study. This assignment requires that you write a 1,500-word individual report. This will involve critically assessing the issues presented in the case alongside theory/literature and making recommendations for improvements.

 

    In your report you need to address all the issues in the case study.

    Your discussion should be supported by citations from the current Organisational Behaviour literature. You are required to use 12-15 peer-review academic journal articles.

Your report should include the sections outlined in the exact order:

    Executive Summary: is an overall summary of the entire report. It should:

  • Introduce the topic of your report,
  • Indicate the main subjects (major findings) examined in the discussion section of your report,
  • State your conclusions,
  • State your recommendations,
  • (No page number)

    Table of contents: This is an ordered list of the different sections and subsections of your report. It must include numbered section headings and subheadings, with their relevant pages. This indicates to your reader where various sections of your discussion can be found. Note: Table of contents should also be on a separate page. (No page number)

    Introduction: (The numbering of the pages starts here)

The introduction should generally include three key types of information.

  • Background: This section sets the context for the report and provides the (brief) background information required for the reader to understand the report. For example, it may briefly outline the issue faced by the organisation. Tell the reader something about the history / origin of the report. When was it requested? Why is it important? Who was involved and how?
  • Aims / objectives: This tells the reader what the aims / objectives of the report are. It indicates what key questions the report is trying to answer and what it is trying to achieve. Why was it written?
  • Scope: Tell the reader exactly what areas / ideas are covered in the report. This also helps to explain how the report is organised. Look at your plan and consider your headings and sub-headings.

    Discussion and analysis: This section is where information relevant to the topic is presented. It must be fully referenced throughout, using various resources to support ideas. It should be

organised logically, using topic headings, subheadings and minor subheadings to break it into sections and sub-sections based on the ideas being discussed. All headings must be numbered


 

sequentially. The length of a discussion is approximately 60% of the total word count.

    Conclusion: The purpose of the conclusion is to provide a summary of the major findings. It effectively attempts to answer the key questions posed in the introduction. When writing a conclusion, it may be useful to consider the following:

  • No new information should be introduced,
  • What has been learnt or proved from doing this research?
  • On the basis of the research, what conclusions can be drawn?
  • Consider the key questions and objectives set out in the introduction - what are the answers / conclusions you came to?
  • Consider each of the key sections of your report - what was the main point made in each section?

    Recommendations: Often when writing a report specific recommendations for future actions are

requested. These can be included as a separate section after the conclusion or even as a part of the conclusion (using a sub-heading).

  • Recommendations should state what actions should be implemented based on the findings of the report. You may list these in bullet points or small paragraphs.

    Reference List: This list includes the full publication details of all books, articles, Web sites and other sources referred to in the report. Only cited articles should be included in your reference

list and should be in alphabetical order.

  • The referencing styles at VIT: APA styles.

 

Marking Criteria: Case Study report (1500 words) (Weightage 40%)

This assignment will be marked based on the following criteria.

 

 

CriteriaExcellent (A: 80-100%)Very Good(B: 70-79%)Good (C: 60-69%)Pass (D: 50-59%)Fail (F: < 50%)Mark
Executive Summary and Introduction (5/40 Marks)

Provides a concise overview of the case and assignment objectives, clearlyarticulating

their significance.

Provides a clearoverview of thecase and assignment objectives, indicating their

importance.

Offers an overview of the caseand assignment objectives, though may lack someclarity

in significance.

Presents a basic overview of the case and assignment objectives, with limited

emphasis on theirsignificance.

Absent or lacks clarity in presenting the case overview and assignment objectives. 

 

Analysis of theCase

(6/40 Marks)

Thoroughly identifies and analyses key issues, challenges, and opportunities presented in the case, demonstrating a deep understanding.Identifies and analyses keyissues, challenges, and opportunities in the case, showing understanding.Identifies key issues, challenges,  and opportunities, demonstrating some understanding.

 

Identifies some key issues and challenges, with basic understanding.

 

Absent or lacks clarity in identifying key issues andchallenges.

 

 

 

Review and literature research (10/40 Marks)

Great research with clear associations  between questions or problems and main course concepts. Good use of relevant sources.

The research demonstrates well-documented connections between the questions or problems and the main concepts. It utilizes a range of

relevant sources effectively.

Good research and documented associations between questions or problems and main concepts. Some use of relevant sources.Limited research and associations between questions or problems and mainconcepts. Little use of relevant sources.

 

Incomplete research and associations betweenthe issues or problems and main concepts. Relevant sources are not used.

 

 

Conclusion

(3/40 Marks)

Provides a concise summary of findings and recommendations, highlighting expected outcomes effectively.Summarizes findings and recommendations,  mentioning expected outcomes.Summarizes findings and recommendations,  with some mention of expected outcomes.Presents a basic summary, briefly mentioning expected outcomes.

 

Absent or lacks clarity in providing a conclusion.

 
Recommendations and observations on effective solutions (3/40 Marks)

Logical, well-reasoned, relevant observations and recommendations on suitable

solutions to most issuesor problems.

The observations and recommendations  provided are reasonable and relevant,

offering suitable solutions to mostissues or problems.

Well-thought-out, solid observations and recommendations on solutions

to many of the issues or problems.

Shallow recommendations and observations on effective solutions to a few of the issues or problems.

 

Superficial recommendations and observations to effective solutions or lacks clarity.

 
Grammar and Vocabulary (3/40 Marks)Demonstrates exemplary grammar and vocabulary usage throughout the assignment.Shows proficient grammar and vocabulary usage with minor errors.Contains some grammatical errors and vocabulary inconsistencies.

Contains noticeable grammatical errors and vocabulary issuesaffecting

clarity.

Contains  pervasive grammatical errors and vocabulary problems hindering comprehension. 

 

Organization

(3/40 Marks)

Presents ideas logically and coherently, maintaining a clear and organized structure.Presents ideas logically, generally maintaining a clearstructure.

Presents ideas with some logical flow, though structure may be somewhat unclear at

times.

Presents ideaswith limited logical flow, with structure oftenunclear or confusing.

 

Absent or lacks coherence and organization.

 

 

References

(4/40 Marks)

Uses a wide range of high- quality sources, correctly cited and referenced throughout the assignment.

 

Uses relevant sources, mostly cited andreferenced correctly.

Uses some relevant sources, with occasional citation orreferencing errors.Relies on limited or outdated sources, withfrequent citation or referencing errors.

 

Absent or lacks propercitation and referencing.

 

 

Total marks

  

 

Comments

 

 

Assessment 3: Group Theoretical Report (2000 words)

This is a group assignment where students are required to form groups of 3-4 members.

Students are required to analyse and explain, in report format, with reference to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). how the following theories would be applied:

  • Leadership and change management,
  • Decision Making

 

Your Task:

 

Based on the above concepts, you need to apply two theories to a specific business example (as chosen by the group). The theories will inform: –

  1. An analysis of the business’ commitment and contribution to environment sustainability and

    CSR,

  2. Clear recommendations on how the business could improve its sustainability and CSR practices in the immediate to long-term perspectives.

 

Structure

    In your report you need to address all the issues in the case study.

    Your discussion should be supported by citations from the current Organisational Behaviour literature. You are required to use 12-15 peer-review academic journal articles.

Your report should include the sections outlined in the exact order:

    Executive Summary: is an overall summary of the entire report. It should:

  • Introduce the topic of your report,
  • Indicate the main subjects (major findings) examined in the discussion section of your report,
  • State your conclusions,
  • State your recommendations,
  • (No page number)

    Table of contents: This is an ordered list of the different sections and subsections of your report. It must include numbered section headings and subheadings, with their relevant pages. This indicates to your reader where various sections of your discussion can be found. Note: Table of contents should also be on a separate page. (No page number)

    Introduction: (The numbering of the pages starts here)

The introduction should generally include three key types of information.

  • Background: This section sets the context for the report and provides the (brief) background information required for the reader to understand the report. For example, it may briefly outline the issue faced by the organisation. Tell the reader something about the history / origin of the report. When was it requested? Why is it important? Who was involved and how?
  • Aims / objectives: This tells the reader what the aims / objectives of the report are. It


 

indicates what key questions the report is trying to answer and what it is trying to achieve. Why was it written?

  • Scope: Tell the reader exactly what areas / ideas are covered in the report. This also

helps to explain how the report is organised. Look at your plan and consider your headings and sub-headings.

    Discussion and analysis: This section is where information relevant to the topic is presented. It must be fully referenced throughout, using various resources to support ideas. It should be

organised logically, using topic headings, subheadings and minor subheadings to break it into sections and sub-sections based on the ideas being discussed. All headings must be numbered sequentially. The length of a discussion is approximately 60% of the total word count.

    Conclusion: The purpose of the conclusion is to provide a summary of the major findings. It

effectively attempts to answer the key questions posed in the introduction. When writing a conclusion, it may be useful to consider the following:

  • No new information should be introduced,
  • What has been learnt or proved from doing this research?
  • On the basis of the research, what conclusions can be drawn?
  • Consider the key questions and objectives set out in the introduction - what are the answers / conclusions you came to?
  • Consider each of the key sections of your report - what was the main point made in each section?

    Recommendations: Often when writing a report specific recommendations for future actions are requested. These can be included as a separate section after the conclusion or even as a part of

the conclusion (using a sub-heading).

  • Recommendations should state what actions should be implemented based on the findings of the report. You may list these in bullet points or small paragraphs.

    Reference List: This list includes the full publication details of all books, articles, Web sites and

other sources referred to in the report. Only cited articles should be included in your reference list and should be in alphabetical order.

  • The referencing styles at VIT: APA styles.

Additional Guidelines

    Conduct research on leadership and organisational behaviour theories, concepts, and best practices relevant to the case.

    Propose practical solutions and recommendations supported by evidence from the case and relevant leadership and organisational behaviour literature.

    Ensure clarity and conciseness in your writing. Present your ideas logically and coherently.

    Format your assignment professionally, following academic writing standards. Use clear headings, subheadings, and appropriate citation style.

    Seek feedback from the lecturer, tutor, or peers to refine your leadership and management plan before submission.

 

Marking Criteria: Assessment 3: Group Theoretical Report (2000 words) (Weightage 40%)

This assignment will be marked based on the following criteria.

 

CriteriaExcellent (A: 80-100%)Very Good(B: 70-79%)Good (C: 60-69%)Pass (D: 50-59%)Fail (F: < 50%)Mark
Executive Summary and Introduction

Provides a concise overview of the assignment objectives, clearly articulating their

significance.

Provides a clearoverview of theassignment objectives, indicating theirimportance.

Offers an overview of the assignment objectives, though maylack some clarityin

significance.

Presents a basic overview of the assignment objectives, with limitedemphasis on their

significance.

Absent or lacks clarity in presenting the assignment objectives. 

 

 

Argument Context Relevant to OB.

  • Excellent, logically developed

structure matched to the task.

  • Generates a highly developed, focused, and sustained argument(s) related to the reporttopic.
  • Uses logically developed

structure matched to the task.

  • Generates developed and focused argument(s) related to thereport topic.
  • Uses somewhat logical structure of paragraphs but with errors.
  • Generates few developed

    and focused argument(s) related to the reporttopic.

  • Poor logic in structure of

paragraphs.

  • Poor development and focus of argument(s) related to the reporttopic.
  • Paragraph structure is not clear,

well ordered, or logical.

  • Generates a series of statements or claims without connecting these to forma clear, logical argument.
 

 

 

 

Critical Thinking on OB

 

  • Classifies multiple perspectives employing and integrating theoryvery well.
  • Explores relationships between

    component elements/ variables.

  • Integrates perspectives to

    develop insights.

  • Classifies perspectives employing and integrating sometheory.
  • Explores relationships between component elements/ variables.
  • Integrates contrasting

    perspectives  to develop insights.

  • Identifies, compares, and contrasts perspectives in a wider context with limited theoretical application.
  • Organises component elements/variables in a givenframework.
  • Formulates a response that

    integrates perspectives

  • Poor comparison and contrast of key perspectives with limited theoretical application.
  • Poor organisation of elements/variables in a givenframework.
  • Response does not integrate

    contra.

  • Does not compare and contrast

key perspectives.

  • Unable to organiseelements/variables in a given framework.
  • Response does not integrate contrasting perspectives on theissues.
 

 

 

OB Management Disciplinary Knowledge

  • Disciplinary knowledge is clearly presented and uses disciplinary language authoritatively.
  • Shows critical understanding of the issue presented and demonstrates depthand

    accuracy of understanding.

  • Disciplinary knowledge is clearly presented and uses disciplinary language competently.
  • Shows a proficient awareness of the issue presented and demonstrates accuracy of

    understanding.

  • Disciplinary knowledge is presented and uses disciplinary language approaching competency.
  • Shows an awareness of the issue presented and demonstrates limited content

    understanding.

  • Disciplinary knowledge lacks clarity and uses disciplinary language tentatively.
  • Shows an awareness of the issue presented and some evidence of gaining new understanding.

 

  • Disciplinary knowledge is unclear and does not use the language of the discipline in a sustained fashion.
  • Demonstrates no evidence of

    gaining new understanding.

 

 

Conclusion

Provides a concise summary of findings and recommendations, highlighting  expected outcomes effectively.Summarizes findings and recommendations,  mentioning expected outcomes.Summarizes findings and recommendations, with some mention of expected outcomes.Presents a basic summary, briefly mentioning expected outcomes.

 

Absent or lacks clarity in providing a conclusion.

 
Grammar and VocabularyDemonstrates exemplary grammar and vocabulary usage throughout the assignment.Shows proficient grammar and vocabulary usage with minor errors.Contains some grammatical errors and vocabulary inconsistencies.Contains noticeable grammatical errors and vocabulary  issues affecting clarity.Contains  pervasive grammatical errors and vocabulary problems hindering comprehension. 

 

Organization

Presents ideas logically and coherently, maintaining a clear and organized structure.Presents ideas logically, generally maintaining a clearstructure.

Presents ideas with some logical flow, thoughstructure

may be somewhat unclearat times.

Presents ideaswith limited logical flow, with structure oftenunclear or confusing.

 

Absent or lacks coherence and organization.

 

 

References

Uses a wide range of high- quality sources, correctly cited and referenced throughout the

assignment.

 

Uses relevant sources, mostly cited andreferenced correctly.

Uses some relevant sources, with occasional citation orreferencing errors.Relies on limited or outdated sources, withfrequent citation or referencing errors.

 

Absent or lacks propercitation and referencing.

 

 

 

            BUS5006 Organisational Behaviour

Example invalid form file feedback

Join our 150К of happy users

Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.