ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Unit code and name | BC400–Communication and Media Management |
Assessment type | Case Study |
Assessment mode | Individual |
Length | 1,500 words +/-10% |
Due data | Due by 11:59 pm AEST Sunday of Week 9 |
Weighting | 30% |
Assessment Summary
For this assessment, you are required to critically analyse the communication strategies employed by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) during recent crises related to water management, drought, and stakeholder relations. The case study will examine how MDBA navigated issues such as water allocation for agribusiness, balancing environmental sustainability with agricultural needs, and managing public perception.
Your task is to evaluate how MDBA communicated with its stakeholders (agribusinesses, farmers, environmental groups, and government bodies) using digital, social media, and public relations strategies. You are expected to apply relevant communication theories to assess how effectively MDBA managed its reputation during these crises and offer insights for improvement.
Assessment Instructions
The first step is to read the case study and then follow the key focus areas given below.
Introduction:
The Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) is a key Australian government organisation responsible for managing the water resources of the Murray-Darling Basin, a crucial agricultural region for Australia. The Basin supports a range of agribusinesses, including farming, irrigation, and livestock production. However, the MDBA has faced significant criticism over its management of water resources, particularly in times of drought, leading to a series of crises related to water allocation, sustainability, and environmental impact.
This case study examines the challenges MDBA has encountered in managing its communications with agribusiness stakeholders, farmers, environmental groups, and government bodies. Students will explore how MDBA has utilised digital and social media communication to engage with these stakeholders and assess the effectiveness of its strategies during crises. The case study will also require an evaluation of how the organisation has managed its reputation amidst widespread criticism and public pressure.
Background of MDBA’s Issues:
MDBA has faced several key challenges in its management of water resources for agribusinesses, including:
MDBA has been criticized for its allocation of water resources, especially during periods of drought. Many farmers and agribusinesses have accused the organisation of mismanagement, leading to reduced water availability for agriculture while prioritising
Environmental flows. This has resulted in wide spread dissatisfaction among key stakeholders.
The Basin’s water resources are not only critical for agriculture but also for maintaining biodiversity and supporting Indigenous communities. Balancing the needs of agribusiness with environmental sustainability has been a major point of contention, with the MDBA often caught between opposing interests.
MDBA has faced significant backlash from both agribusinesses and environmental groups. Farmers have protested the reduction of water allocations, while environmentalists have criticisedtheMDBA’sfailuretoadequatelyprotecttheBasin’secosystems.Thistensionhas placed considerable pressure on the organisation’s communication and public relations efforts.
MDBA’s Crisis Communication Strategy:
MDBA has employed variouscommunicationstrategiestomanageitsreputationandengagewith stakeholders during these crises:
MDBA has issued official statements and media releases to address public concerns about water allocation and environmental management. These communications were aimed at clarifying the organisation’s decisions and reassuring stakeholders of its commitment to transparency.
Engagement via Social Media:
MDBA has utilised platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube to engage with farmers, agribusiness owners, environmentalists, and the broader public. These platforms have been used to provide updates on water availability, explain policy decisions, and respond to criticism in real-time.
MDBA has also held public consultations and stakeholder meetings to involve affected communitiesindecision-makingprocesses.Theseforumsallowstakeholderstovoicetheir concerns and ask questions directly to MDBA representatives.
Key Communication Challenges:
Despite the MDBA’s efforts, many stakeholders have accused the organisation of lacking transparency, particularly in its decision-making processes regarding water allocation. Delays in responding to stakeholder concerns have further damaged its reputation.
MDBA faces the difficult task of balancing the interests of agribusiness, environmental sustainability, and Indigenous rights. Communicating effectively with such diverse groups, each with competing priorities, has proven to be a significant challenge.
The perception that MDBA prioritises environmental flows over agricultural needs during drought has contributed to public frustration. Many farmers feel that their concerns have not been adequately addressed, leading to protests and public outcry.
Case Study Task:
Based on the information provided, address the following questions in your report:
Key Focus Areas:
Evaluate MDBA’s use of digital platforms (social media, website updates, etc.) to communicate with stakeholders during crises related to water management. How did MDBA use these platforms to engage with agribusinesses, farmers, and environmental groups?
Analyse how MDBA managed relationships with key stakeholders, particularly in balancing the interests of agribusiness, environmental sustainability, and Indigenous rights. How effective was their engagement with these groups, and what challenges did they face?
Assess MDBA’s public relations strategies during periods of drought and reduced water allocation. How did MDBA manage its reputation in the face of widespread criticism from both farmers and environmentalists? Were their responses adequate in addressing concerns?
Relate your analysis to key communication theories covered in this unit. How do these theories explain MDBA’s actions, and what improvements could have been made in their communication approach?
Research Report Requirements:
Your report should be a minimum of 1,500words+/-10%.
Research Report Structure:
Your report should be well-structured with clear headings and subheadings to address the following key points:
VII References
Grading Criteria:
Submission Instructions
Upon the completion of this assessment, you need to upload your MS World file (.docordocx.doc) in Moodle. Your tutor will provide feedback when marking your work in Moodle.
Referencing
For the references that you used, please make sure to use APA style for citing and referencing research
Academic Integrity
Please refer to the academic integrity policies in Leaders’ website
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.