Get Cheapest Assignment in Australia, UK, US, UAE, Canada and NZ Order Now

PRJ5002 Enterprise and Resource Planning

0 Comments

Assessment Brief: PRJ5002 Enterprise and Resource Planning Trimester 1, 2021

Assessment Overview

Assessment TaskTypeWeightLengthDueULOs Assessed
Assessment 1: Online Quizzes Weekly online quiz of key content areasIndividual      30%20 mins eachWeek 2- Week 10ULO1 ULO3
Assessment 2: Applied Project and Presentation (Project Management Plan) This assessment requires students to work in groups and analyse a real-life project to develop and writer a report of HR, Communication and Stakeholders planGroup   Users              30% (20% report, 10% presentation)2000 words 15 mins verbal presentationWeek 9ULO2 ULO3 ULO4 ULO5
Assessment 3: Case Study A case study related to project human resources, communications, and stakeholders with related questions will be provided. This assessment requires students to work individually on provided project case and answer the related questions with supporting from the literature.Individual                40%2500 wordsWeek 12ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 ULO4 ULO5

Assessment 1: Quiz

Duedate:Weekly (Week 2 – Week 10)
Group/individual:Individual
Word count / Time provided:20 minutes
Weighting:30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO1, ULO2

Assessment 1 Detail

This quiz will assess your knowledge of key content areas (Week 1 to Week 10 contents) and to identify further support needs. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading  materials),  engage  in  the  unit’s  activities,  and  in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material. By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to identify key aspects of HR and Communication in Project Management.

Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. 10-20 Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) will be used for each quiz. Individual quiz question mark will be depended upon the total number of questions for each quiz. For an example, 10 marks will be allocated for each quiz question if 10 questions are used for a particular quiz. The Canvas System will instantly mark the answers of the quiz, but the results will be published later by the Unit Coordinator (UC). Average marks will be calculated based on the total number of quizzes (9) you must attempt. No Marking Criteria and Rubric will be used for this assessment task.

Assessment 2: Applied Project and Presentation

Duedate:Week 9
Group/individual:Group
Word count / Time provided:2000 words and 15 minutes verbal presentation
Weighting:30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4

Assessment 2 Detail

This assessment is designed to assess your individual and technical skills in planning and communicating a project effectively. You required to select a project case (either from the provided links to the real-life projects or a project case from an organisation of your selection). The project should be in final stage of initial process, with either a signed off project charter or in the stage of getting the approval of the project charter. You are required to write a report of Human Resource, Communications and Stakeholder Management Plan and pertinent subsidiary plans.

This report should include:

  1. An introduction to the organisation and project, program or portfolio case.
  2. Aa stakeholders’ register.
  3. A brief project charter.
  4. Project HR Management Plan that includes: Roles, Responsibilities, Authority and Competencies.
  5. Project Organisation Charts.
  6. Staffing Management Plan, Staff acquisition.
  7. Resource calendars.
  8. Staff releaseplan.
  9. Trainingneeds.
  10. Recognition and rewards,
  11. Compliance and Safety.

Project Communications Management Plan should include:

  1. Communications Matrix.
  2. Project Meeting Guideline (Schedules and Template for minutes of meetings (MoMs).
  3. Project Reporting Procedure (Schedule and Template for Reports).
  4. Project Management Information System (PMIS), and Glossary of Common Terminologies.

Finally, Project Stakeholder Management Plan should include:

  1. Stakeholder Analysis (Identification/Stakeholder Register).
  2. Stakeholder Analysis (Power/Interest    Matrix).
  3. Stakeholder Analysis (Engagement Analysis).
  4. Control Stakeholder Engagement.

For successful completion of this assessment, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in thediscussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material. You are expected to discuss your work with lecturer and to seek support.

Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric

The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.

Assessment 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking CriteriaNot Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark)Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark)Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark)Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark)
Organisation and integration: use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope and components (10 marks).Poor organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope and components.Satisfactory organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case scope and components.Has good organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope and components.Has very good organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope and components.Has excellent organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope and components.
HR management plan including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Staffing Management plan including Resource acquisition and release plan, HR calendar and histogram, Staff induction and training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity and inclusion (20 marks).Lacks evidence of knowledge to develop human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity and inclusion.Evidence of basic knowledge and skills of developing human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity and inclusion.Good knowledge and skills base in developing human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity and inclusion.Very good knowledge and skills of developing human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity and inclusion.Has excellent skills in developing human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity and inclusion.
Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report (20 marks).Poor knowledge relevant Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.Evidence of basic knowledge and skills of Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.Has good Project communications requirements, Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.Has very good Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.Has excellent skills in Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.
Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders (20 marks).Lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.Evidence of basic knowledge and skills of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.Good factual and/or conceptual knowledge and skills base in planning for methods of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.Has very good knowledge and skills of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.Has excellent knowledge and skills of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.
Referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English (10 marks).Poor referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.Satisfactory referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.Good referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.Very good referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.Excellent referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.
Presentation slides Visual Appeal (10 marks)There are too many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. The slides were difficult to read, and slides contained information copied onto them from another source. No visual appeal.There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information was contained on many slides. Minimal effort made to make slides appealing.There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information on more than three or more slides. Presentation has good visual appeal.There are few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information on two or more slides. Presentation has significant visual appeal.There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Presentation is visually appealing/engaging
Presentation topic knowledge/content (10 marks)Presenters didn’t understand topic. The presentation was a brief look at the topic, but many questions were left unanswered. Majority of information irrelevant and significant points left out.The presentation was informative, but several elements went unanswered. Much of the information irrelevant; coverage of some of major points.The presentation was a good summary of the topic. Major information covered; presentation contain some irrelevant information.The presentation was a very good summary of the topic. Almost all-important information covered; presentation contain little irrelevant information.Presentation was excellent and shows extensive knowledge of topic with comprehensive and complete coverage of information.
Presentation skills (10 marks)Unsatisfactory presentation with no clarity, appropriate pause, intonation and is not capable to engage listeners.Satisfactory presentation with some clarity and pauses.Good presentation with clarity and pause in majority of speech.Very good presentation with clarity and pause and able to engage listeners for most of the time.Excellent presentation with clarity, pause, intonation and is capable to engage listeners all the time.

Assessment 3: Case Study

Duedate:Week 12
Group/individual:Individual
Word count / Time provided:2500 words
Weighting:40%
Unit Learning Outcomes:ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4

Assessment 3 Detail

The pdf file of the case study is in Canvas Week 5. This case will enable the students to learn about:

  • Leadership styles, which are effective in adverse situations.
  • How to manage and engage multiple stakeholders who have conflicting interests.
  • Problem-solving and ethical decision-making models; and
  • The effectiveness of strategic decisions. Questions for the case study:

Question 1. What were the challenges faced by Suryakant Mishra? How did he exercise a

problem-solving approach?

Question 2. Why did he focus on a stakeholder engagement approach? Was the stakeholder management approach a game-changing strategy for UAIL or just a cost-escalation method?

Question 3. What type of leadership styles, do you think, were demonstrated by Suryakant Mishra? How would you like to define his negotiation style?

Question 4. What was the role of leadership communication in the case study?

Question 5. Did he exercise ethical decision-making processes?

Question 6. Were his decisions effective? How well did he achieve the stakeholder engagement goal?

Question 7. What approaches should his successor adopt?

Students need to support their answers with further references to comprehensively address the questions in a critical manner. In addition, summary of recently published articles relevant to project human resource, communications and stakeholder management need to be added to the discussion where appropriate and relevant.

Assessments 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric

The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40 of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.

Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking CriteriaNot Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark)Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark)Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark)Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark)
Identification and understanding of the case with justifications/rationale (15% marks).The report does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic or provide a rationale for why it was selected.The report demonstrates an understanding of the topic, and provides a rationale for why it was selected, however was unclear in places.The report demonstrates a good understanding of the topic, and provides a rationale for why it was selected, however was somewhat unclear in places.The report demonstrates a thorough knowledge of the topic and provides a rationale for why it was selected.The report demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic and provides a clear rationale for why it was selected.
Identify and analyse of resource management, stakeholder management and communication management issues, problems and failures as they apply to the case study and recommend appropriate course of action with emphasis on resource, communication and stakeholder management and lesson learnt (25% marks).Poor identification and analyses on resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and no/minimal recommendations of appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.Satisfactory identification and analyses on resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and recommendations of appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.Good identification and analyses on resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and good recommendations of appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.Very good identification and analyses on resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and recommendations appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.Excellent identification and analyses on resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and recommendations appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.
Evaluation of the literature (15% marks).The evaluation of the literature did not provide clear background information about the topic or cite relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay.The evaluation of the literature provides background information about the topic, but is limited, and a wider reading, citing more relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay was required.The evaluation of the literature provides background information about the topic, but a slightly wider reading, citing more relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay was required.The evaluation of the literature provides background information about the topic, citing relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay.The evaluation of the literature provides clear background information about the topic, citing highly relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay.
Explanation about the notable resource, stakeholder or communication management practices at the case organisation (15% marks).Poor identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder, or communication management practices at the case organisation. .Satisfactory identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder, or communication management practices at the case organisation.Good identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder and communication management practices at the case organisation.Very good identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder and communication management practices at the case organisation.Excellent identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder and communication management practices at the case organisation.
Quality of critical analysis (15% marks)Critical analysis is sophisticated and nuanced and is well supported by an impressive range of quality evidence, with convincing and justified arguments, clearly articulated points, and balanced opinions and future predictions to form conclusions.Critical analysis is thorough and is supported by a good range of quality evidence, with convincing arguments, clearly articulated points, and balanced opinions and future predictions to form conclusions.Critical analysis is good, and is supported by a range evidence, with some clear arguments, articulated points, and opinions and future predictions to form conclusions, however, was unclear in places, and a slightly wider range of evidence was required.Critical analysis is adequate, and is supported by some evidence, however the arguments, points, opinions and future predictions were unclear, and a wider range of evidence was required.The critical analysis, arguments, points, opinions and future predictions were poor or absent, and not supported by relevant evidence.
Writing, structure and presentation (10%)There are many structural, wording, spelling and grammatical issues.The ideas are written in a reasonably clear manner, however there are some structural, wording, spelling and grammatical issues.The ideas are written and structured in a clear manner, with only minor wording, spelling and grammatical issues.The ideas are written and structured in a very clear manner, with no wording, spelling or grammatical issues.The ideas are written and structured with excellent clarity and cohesion, with no wording, spelling or grammatical issues.
Referencing in Harvard Style (5%)There are many errors with the referencing in Harvard style with in-text citations and the reference list.Referencing is used, although there are some errors with in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.Referencing is used appropriately, and only minor errors with in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.Referencing is used appropriately, and no errors with in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.Referencing is excellently used, with correct in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.

PRJ5001 Project management profession

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *