Get Cheapest Assignment in Australia, UK, US, UAE, Canada and NZ Order Now

HI6006 Competitive strategy Group Assignment Holmes

0 Comments

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester T1 2019
Unit Code HI6006
Unit Title Competitive Strategy
Assessment Type Group Assignment
Assessment Title Report – Case Analysis and Application of Strategy Models
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) Students are required to explain in report format, with reference to a case of your choice (from the list below) how any one of the following would be applied: Business Strategy, Corporate Strategy, Acquisitions and Structure, International Strategy, Cooperative Strategy, Sustainability. Be sure to base your answer on the models studied in class and quote academic sources
Weight 30% of the total assessments
Total Marks 30
Word limit Not more than 2000 words
Due Date Week 10
Submission Guidelines All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.The assignment must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers.Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style.   Note: an in-class presentation may be required. This is at the lecturer’s discretion. Please check with the lecturer if you are required to make a presentation in-class.

Purpose:

Assignment 2 Specifications

This assignment aims at ensuring that students have familiarised themselves with at least one of the long case studies and are able to apply the relevant foundational strategy development models that are applicable to the case.

Holmes Assignment help

Details

Select any case from those listed from between weeks 1 and 9, select from the following aspects of competitive strategy and apply the theories of strategy development and implementation as relevant to the case you choose:

  • Business Strategy
  • Competitive Dynamics
  • Corporate Strategy
  • Acquisitions and Structure
  • International Strategy
  • Cooperative Strategy
  • Sustainability

In this report, sub-headings are essential. Be sure to use paragraphing.

Be sure to reference your sources in-text and provide a list of references at the end in Harvard style.

Your final submission is due Friday of week 10 at midnight.

Assignment Structure Report Format

Cover page

Executive Summary Table of Contents

Section Headings – brief summary of the case; identification of strategic issues; relevant theoretical concepts.

Sub-sections numbered Paragraphing

Page Numbers

Add a Reference List at the end.

Marking Rubric

  Excellent 4 Very Good 3.5 Good 3 Satisfactory 2 Unsatisfactory 1 or 0
Format and Professionalism of the Report [*this may include an in-class presentation] The report is exceptionally well-documented The report is very well- documented The report is well- documented The report is satisfactory The report is unsatisfactory
Referencing (in- text) Correct in all respects Correct in most respects Correct in general Some minor errors Largely incorrect or incomplete
Reference List (at end) Correct in all respects Correct in most respects Correct in general Some minor errors Largely incorrect or incomplete
Executive Summary Clear, concise and compelling   A good summary of the report   Missing
Summary of the Case Clear, concise and compelling Clear, concise and  compelling, but with some reservation A good summary of the case A satisfactory summary of the case Inaccurate or misconstrued content
Explanation of Strategic issues All key strategic Issues are identified and well-explained Most key strategic Issues are identified and explained Some key strategic Issues are identified and explained key strategic Issues are identified and explained, but with some reservation strategic Issues identified or explained incorrectly or poorly
Application of Relevant Theoretical Concepts The theoretical concepts have been matched to the issues in the case precisely and well applied The theoretical concepts match the issues in the case and are applied quite well A good attempt has been made to match and apply relevant theoretical concepts to the case A satisfactory attempt has been made to match and apply relevant theoretical concepts to the case The attempt made to match and apply relevant theoretical concepts to the case is unsatisfactory or negligible
Total 30 marks* Comments Mark Awarded

*if presentations were done, this mark out of 30 is an aggregated mark i.e. it includes both the report and the presentation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *