Get Cheapest Assignment in Australia, UK, US, UAE, Canada and NZ Order Now

BUSI49102 Individual Report

0 Comments

Assessment – 2 Specifications

  Module Title:Maximising Project Success   Assignment Weight  70%
  Module Code:  BUSI49102  Assignment Title  Individual Report
 
  Submission Date and Time:15th January 2023 11pm   Module Leader  Jacqueline Jenkins
  Submission Place:  DropBox in NOW MPS Learning Room  Email:  Jacqueline.jenkins@ntu.ac.uk

Aim of the Assessment

The aim of this assessment is to work individually to critically evaluate the challenges faced by project managers for designing and delivering success.

Expected Module Learning Outcomes
a) Critically analyse the factors and variables influencing how to manage a project to success.
b) Systematically reflect on how to maximise the value of the project.
d) Critically analyse the complexity faced in effectively managing organisational change within a project in different contexts.
e) Appreciate the importance of managing knowledge in organisations and evaluate the processes by which knowledge is stored and shared within organizations.
f)     Critically reflect on undertaking project management in a more sophisticated, critical manner, appreciating the scope and problems of transferring models between environments.
g) Demonstrate criticality in evaluating the impact of a wide set of alternatives available for making recommendations in different cultural, organisational contexts.
h) Demonstrate understanding of the multiple objectives in projects and their relationship to project success.
Your Task

Case Study

You have a free choice to identity a project that has been completed in the ‘real world’. This can be either a business known to you, or a case study that you identify from your research. Using the APM and relevant PM literature, your task is to produce an individual report up to 3000 words critically analysing the factors which played a significant role in maximising success, or otherwise, of this project. In your report discuss the performance of your selected case study project critically evaluating how it has performed against the 12 APM success factors. The criteria of a project for this task is defined as, ‘A unique set of coordinated activities, with definite starting and finishing points, undertaken by an individual or organisation to meet specific performance objectives within defined schedule, cost and performance,’ (British Standard 6079, 2000). Ensure you include academic project management literature (including project management theories) and other example case studies to illustrate and critically evaluate your discussion.

Whilst you have a choice on which company and case study project you select for this task, you must complete the Pre-Screening Assessment Approval Form and have this approved by the module leader, or designate, before time 16:00 date Friday 16th December 2022. This is to ensure the markers can validate it as being a real-life example.

Below is a suggested structure for your report. You need to include all these elements, you have some flexibility over suggested word limit, provided your overall word count does not exceed the 3,000 words limit in your report.

  1. Introduce the case study you have selected and justify why you selected it.

(300-400 words)

  1. With regard APM success factors, to what extent was the project able to meet the desired organisational objectives and/or defined success parameters.

(800 – 900 words)

  1. Critically analyse the challenges encountered by the project and the actions undertaken to resolve those, utalising wider literature to support your analysis.

(800 – 900 words)

  1. Based on your analysis above, provide recommendations to guide future project managers in terms of what lesson were learned from this example.

(800 – 900 words)

Report Presentation Guidelines

  • Your Report should not exceed more than 3,000 words. The word count includes the Main Text, all figures and tables therein, which count as 250 words each.
  • The word count excludes the Title Page, Table of Contents, References and Appendices. The report will need to adhere to the Harvard Referencing style (see
  • The paper will need to be submitted as an electronic copy to the designated NOW Dropbox. Your assignment must be in MS Word or a standard pdf format.
      Evaluating success factors (25%)    The piece demonstrates weak knowledge about the project and there is very little or no evidence of research from the literature.The central theme is unclear, and the piece would benefit from redrafting. The piece demonstrates a very little knowledge and research about the factors that played key role in project success.  Some factors are identified in relation to the project. However, more details and elaboration are required together with evidence from the literature.Key concepts are relevant, clearly expressed, understood and evaluated. This work demonstrates a good understanding of the project together with evidence from the literature.Key concepts are well- identified, expressed and evaluated. Most recent research and relevant concepts are employed and assessed in a way which demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge of current problems/issues.  All the factors are identified, expressed and evaluated. Most recent research and relevant concepts are used in a way which demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of current issues.
 
        Identification of Challenges/Measures (15%)    The piece doesn’t demonstrate any challenges or issues and the strategies to overcome them. Lack of theoretical knowledge or very little evidence from the literature is shown.  The key challenges have not been highlighted clearly and the piece would benefit from redrafting. The piece demonstrates very little knowledge and research about the strategies implemented to overcome them.      Some key challenges are discussed together with the strategies. The piece demonstrates fair amount of research and knowledge of the literature.    Some key challenges are highlighted together with strategies to overcome them. This work demonstrates a good understanding of the aspects from the literature.    Most of the challenges are highlighted together with strategies to overcome them. This work demonstrates a comprehensive amount of understanding of various aspects from the literature      All the key challenges are discussed with strategies to overcome them. This work demonstrates a in- depth understanding of various aspects from the literature.
  Level of criticality used throughout the report. (20%)  Level of criticality is superficial and/or not clearly relevant.  Level of criticality lacks depth but have relevance and show some attempt at critical thinking.  Reflections are made on the theory and practice and some critical thinking is evidenced.  Reflections show solid understanding of both theory and practice. A good level of critical thinking is displayed.  Substantial reflections made on a range of theory and practice which displays a high level of analysis and critical thinking.  A range of innovative reflections are made, showing excellent understanding of both theory and practice. Sophisticated level of critical analysis shown.
 
      The work demonstrates      Some elements of the knowledge and information sharing process between the relevant stakeholders are shown, however, the work needs to show detailed evidence of PM knowledge from the literature.    The work demonstrates    The work demonstrates      A well-written report which demonstrates in- depth amount of knowledge about the case and information. The work demonstrates various quality sources with evidence of PM knowledge from the literature.
 The work demonstratesvery little knowledgegood knowledge aboutcomprehensive amount
 weak knowledge aboutabout the case andthe case and informationof knowledge about the
Knowledge/Informationthe case and information sharing process betweeninformation sharing process between thesharing process between the relevantcase and information sharing process between
Sharingthe relevantstakeholders and thestakeholders. Goodthe stakeholders in the
(15%)stakeholders. Lack of PM knowledge or very littlework would benefit from redrafting. Lack of PMamount of PM knowledge isproject. The work demonstrates most
 evidence from theknowledge or very littledemonstrated togethercurrent research and
 literature is shown.evidence from theusing quality sourcesevidence from the
  literature is shown.from the literature.literature.
 
            Recommendations for future practice (15%)            Recommendations with no clear evidence from the analysis conducted earlier in the report. No link found between the analysis and the suggestions provided.          Recommendations with very little evidence from the analysis conducted earlier in the report. The report would benefit from redrafting. No clear link found between the analysis and the suggestions provided.        Recommendations with some evidence from the analysis conducted earlier in the report. Some links are found between the analysis and the suggestions provided; however, the report needs to show in- depth knowledge of the theory.      Realistic Recommendations provided based on the analysis conducted earlier in the report. Clear links are found between the analysis and the suggestions provided. The report shows good amount of knowledge from the recent literature and practices.    Realistic Recommendations provided based on evidence from the analysis conducted earlier in the report. Clear links are found between the analysis and the suggestions provided. The report shows comprehensive amount of knowledge from the most recent literature and practices.      Exemplary Recommendations provided based on analysis conducted earlier in the report. Self- explanatory links are found between the analysis and the suggestions provided. The report shows exceptional knowledge from the most recent literature and practices.
 
          Presentation, Language, Referencing (10%)        Poor presentation and style of the report. Several grammatical and punctuation mistakes are found. There is no or very little evidence of intext citations and Harvard referencing style.    The work has been presented in a vague style with no structuring/styling of the report. Several grammatical and punctuation mistakes are found. There is very little evidence of intext citations and Harvard referencing style.        Fair presentation and style of the report. Some grammatical and punctuation mistakes are found. Intext citations and Harvard referencing style are applied with errors.        Good presentation and style of the report. Very less grammatical and punctuation mistakes are found. Intext citations and Harvard referencing style are used with minor errors.      A well-structured and well-presented report with very less grammatical and punctuation mistakes Intext citations and Harvard referencing style are applied without errors.        A well-structured and well-presented report with no grammatical and punctuation mistakes. Intext citations and Harvard referencing style are perfectly applied without errors.
 
What you did well in this coursework.
What you can do to improve your future coursework.
Below, if applicable, are highlighted some additional online resources that are maintained by the NTU Library, and that you can access via your NOW Student Help Learning Room. Engaging with these resources and the feedback provided above can also support you to enhance specific aspects of your work.
   Writing   Managing your time
  
ReferencingPresentation skills

Get BUSI49102 Individual Report Assignment Help with Punjab Assignment Help at an affordable price with 100% plagiarism-free content by experienced writers.