Semester 1, 2026
Victorian Institute of Technology | www.vit.edu.au
Note: * denotes 'Hurdle Assessment Item' that students must achieve at least 40% in this item to pass the unit.
| Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When due | Weighting | ULO# | CLO# for BITS |
| 1 | Analysis Report (Individual) (1500 words) | Session 4 | 25% | 2 | 1,2,3 |
| 2 | Project Proposal (Group) (2000 Words) | Session 9 | 35% | 2, 3 | 1,2,3,4 |
| 3* | Project Report (Group) (2000 Words) | Session 12 | 30% | 1,2,3,4,5 | 1,2,3,4,5 |
| Presentation (Group) | Session 13 (Study Week) | 10% |
You must reference all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use the IEEE referencing style when referencing in your assessments in this unit. Refer to the library's referencing guides for more information.
VIT enforces that the integrity of its students' academic studies follows an acceptable level of excellence. VIT will adhere to its VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms where it explains the importance of staff and student honesty in relation to academic work. It outlines the kinds of behaviors that are 'academic misconduct', including plagiarism.
In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms, late submission of assessments will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be applied as soon as the deadline is reached.
Special Consideration is a request for:
Students wishing to request Special Consideration in relation to an assessment the due date of which has not yet passed must engage in written emails to the teaching team to Request for Special Consideration as early as possible and prior to start time of the assessment due date, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
For more information, visit VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms.
Reasonable adjustment in assessment methods will be made to accommodate students with a documented disability or impairment. Contact the unit teaching team for more information.
Contract cheating usually involves purchasing an assignment or piece of research from another party. This may be facilitated by a fellow student or friend or purchased on a website. The unauthorized use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is also considered cheating. Other forms of contract cheating include paying another person to sit an exam in the student's place.
We determine your grades to the following Grading Scheme:
| Grade | Percentage |
| A | 80% – 100% |
| B | 70% – 79% |
| C | 60% – 69% |
| D | 50% – 59% |
| F | 0% – 49% |
The objective of this assignment is for students to demonstrate their comprehensive understanding of Business Process Modeling (BPM) by analyzing and assessing a complex business situation, operations, and processes. The assignment focuses on identifying efficiency issues within an organization and proposing process improvements using modern approaches and technologies relevant to the situation.
You are a consultant hired by a large financial services company, FinTech Solutions Ltd. (FSL), which offers a wide range of banking and financial products. FSL has been experiencing challenges related to operational efficiency, customer service delays, and redundant processes. Your task is to conduct a thorough analysis of FSL's current business processes, identify areas for improvement, and propose solutions using BPM techniques and modern technologies.
1. Understanding the Current Business Processes:
2. Process Improvement Recommendations:
3. Application of Modern Approaches and Technologies:
Your report (1500 Words) should be structured as follows:
1. Introduction (3 marks):
2. Analysis of Current Business Processes (6 marks):
3. Process Improvement Recommendations (10 marks):
4. Application of Modern Approaches and Technologies (4 marks):
5. Conclusion (1 mark):
6. References (1 mark):
| Assessment Item | When due | Weighting | ULO# | CLO# for BITS |
| Analysis Report (Individual) (1500 words) | Session 5 | 25% | 2 | 1,2,3 |
| Task | Criteria | Marks | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement |
| Introduction | Overview of FSL and its challenges, and outline of the purpose and objectives of the report | 3 | Provides a comprehensive and clear overview of FSL and its challenges, and clearly outlines the purpose and objectives of the report | Provides a clear overview and outlines purpose and objectives, but lacks some detail | Provides a basic overview and states the purpose and objectives, but lacks clarity and detail | Fails to provide an overview or outline the purpose and objectives clearly |
| Analysis of Current Business Processes | Detailed analysis of FSL's existing business processes using BPM tools, highlighting inefficiencies and areas for improvement | 6 | Provides a thorough and detailed analysis, effectively using BPM tools to map out and analyze processes | Provides a good analysis using BPM tools, but misses some details | Provides a basic analysis with limited detail and effectiveness in using BPM tools | Analysis is superficial or missing, and BPM tools are not used effectively |
| Process Improvement Recommendations | Specific process improvements for FSL with justification considering feasibility, potential benefits, and alignment with FSL's strategic objectives | 10 | Proposes specific and detailed improvements with strong justification, considering feasibility, benefits, and strategic alignment | Proposes specific improvements with good justification, but lacks some depth | Proposes basic improvements with limited relevance and justification | Proposals are vague or irrelevant, with little to no justification |
| Application of Modern Approaches and Technologies | Discussion of modern approaches and technologies to enhance operational efficiency, and explanation of their contribution to process optimization and business outcomes | 4 | Thoroughly discusses relevant approaches and technologies, clearly explaining their contribution to optimization and outcomes | Discusses approaches and technologies, but lacks some depth in explaining their contribution | Mentions modern approaches with limited discussion and explanation | Fails to discuss relevant approaches or explain their contribution clearly |
| Conclusion | Summary of key findings and recommendations, emphasizing the potential impact of proposed improvements and technologies | 1 | Clearly summarizes key findings and recommendations, emphasizing the potential impact | Summarizes findings and recommendations but lacks some clarity or emphasis on impact | Provides a basic summary with limited emphasis on impact | Does not summarize findings and recommendations or emphasize impact clearly |
| References | Listing of all sources cited in the report, formatted according to academic or professional standards (not included in marks) | 1 | Lists all sources correctly formatted | Lists sources but with some formatting errors | Lists sources with significant formatting errors | Fails to list sources or has numerous formatting errors |
Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.
This assignment is designed to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios, enhancing your skills in business process analysis and improvement using BPMN. Your proposal should reflect a deep understanding of the selected business situation and provide practical solutions for enhancing process efficiency.
1.1. Business Situation and Context (2 marks)
Select one of the following detailed business situations and describe its context. Provide specific details about the process issues or challenges being faced:
1. E-commerce Customer Service Optimization
Context: An online retail company is experiencing significant delays in customer service response times. Customers report dissatisfaction due to long wait times and unresolved issues. The current process involves manual tracking of queries through email and phone, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistent service quality. The company aims to enhance response times and overall customer satisfaction.
2. Manufacturing Production Line Efficiency
Context: A mid-sized electronics manufacturer is facing delays and high defect rates on its production line for assembling smart phones. The process includes stages such as assembly, quality control, and packaging. Inefficiencies like machine breakdowns and workflow bottlenecks have led to increased downtime and defective products. The company seeks to streamline the production process and reduce defect rates.
3. Healthcare Patient Scheduling System
Context: A busy urban hospital is struggling with an outdated patient scheduling system, resulting in frequent appointment overlaps and long wait times. The system fails to account for changes in patient schedules or medical staff availability, leading to inefficiencies in patient flow. The hospital aims to modernize its scheduling system to improve patient experience and optimize resource utilization.
4. Retail Inventory Management
Context: A national retail chain is dealing with inventory management issues, including frequent stock outs and overstock situations. The company's inventory system is not effectively aligned with real-time demand, resulting in lost sales due to stock outs and excess inventory elsewhere. The goal is to enhance inventory accuracy and reduce discrepancies between inventory levels and actual demand.
5. Financial Services Fraud Detection
Context: A major financial institution is facing challenges with detecting fraudulent transactions across its network. The current system relies on outdated algorithms that are ineffective against sophisticated fraud techniques, leading to increased financial losses. The institution aims to upgrade its fraud detection system to better identify and prevent fraudulent activities in real-time.
1.2. Objectives (3 marks)
Clearly state the objectives of your project proposal:
Develop three BPMN-focused research questions that your proposal will address:
3.1. Overview of BPMN (3 marks)
Provide an overview of Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Explain how BPMN is used to visualize, analyze, and improve business processes. Include a brief description of BPMN's main elements such as processes, events, gateways, and tasks.
3.2. BPMN Application to Chosen Business Situation (5 marks)
Apply BPMN to your selected business situation. Create a BPMN diagram that models the current process related to the chosen scenario. The diagram should include:
3.3. Analysis Using BPMN (5 marks)
Analyze the BPMN diagram to identify inefficiencies or bottlenecks in the current process. Discuss:
3.4. Recommendations for Process Improvement (2 marks)
Based on your BPMN analysis, provide recommendations for improving the process. Suggest specific changes to address identified issues and enhance overall process performance.
4.1. Data Accessibility and Quality (2 marks)
Explain how you will ensure data accessibility and maintain data quality:
4.2. Implementation Feasibility (2 marks)
Discuss the feasibility of implementing your proposed solutions:
4.3. Evaluation and Measurement (1 mark)
Describe how you will evaluate the success of your recommendations:
Describe the expected outcomes of your project:
Summarize the importance of the project and how your recommendations will address the identified issues. Highlight how your BPMN analysis and proposed solutions will contribute to improving process efficiency and effectiveness.
| Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When due | Weighting | ULO# | CLO# for BITS |
| 2 | Project Proposal (Group) (2000 Words) | Session 9 | 35% | 2, 3 | 1,2,3,4 |
| Task Criteria | Beyond Expectations (5 marks) | Meets Requirements (3-4 marks) | Needs Improvement (1-2 marks) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0 marks) |
| 1. Introduction (5 marks) 1.1. Business Situation and Context | Thorough and detailed description with clear context. | Adequate description with some relevant details. | Partial description; lacks depth or clarity. | Incomplete or unclear description. |
| 1.2. Objectives | Clear, well-defined objectives fully aligned with the business situation. | Objectives are stated but may be somewhat unclear or partially aligned. | Objectives are vague or partially related to the business situation. | Objectives are missing or irrelevant. |
| 2. BPMN-Based Research Questions (5 marks) 2.1. Research Questions | Three insightful and well-formulated BPMN-based questions directly related to the business situation. | Three relevant questions with minor issues in formulation or relevance. | Two relevant questions or three questions with significant issues. | Questions are not clearly related to BPMN or the business situation. |
| 3. BPMN Diagram and Application (10 marks) 3.1. BPMN Overview | Comprehensive overview with clear explanation of BPMN elements and their application. | Basic overview with some details missing or unclear. | Minimal or unclear overview of BPMN. | No overview provided. |
| 3.2. BPMN Diagram | Detailed and accurate BPMN diagram effectively modeling the process. | Mostly accurate BPMN diagram with minor issues in detail. | Diagram is incomplete or has several inaccuracies. | Diagram is largely incorrect or missing. |
| 4. BPMN Analysis (10 marks) 4.1. Analysis of Inefficiencies | Thorough analysis identifying clear inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and improvement opportunities. | Good analysis with minor gaps or inaccuracies in identifying issues. | Adequate analysis with some gaps or inaccuracies. | Minimal or unclear analysis of BPMN diagram. |
| 4.2. Recommendations for Improvement | Clear, actionable recommendations well-supported by BPMN analysis. | Recommendations are somewhat clear but lack detailed support. | Recommendations are unclear or not well supported by BPMN analysis. | No actionable recommendations or not based on BPMN analysis. |
| 5. Practical Issues (5 marks) 5.1. Data Accessibility and Quality | Detailed explanation on ensuring data accessibility and maintaining quality. | Basic explanation with some issues in detail or clarity. | Inadequate or unclear explanation of data accessibility and quality. | No explanation provided. |
| 5.2. Implementation Feasibility | Comprehensive discussion including resources needed and stakeholder engagement. | Some discussion of feasibility but lacks detail or clarity. | Basic discussion with significant gaps or inaccuracies. | Inadequate or missing discussion on feasibility. |
| 6. Evaluation and Measurement (5 marks) 6.1. Evaluation and Measurement | Clear description of success evaluation, KPIs, and feedback mechanisms. | Adequate description with some gaps or lack of detail. | Minimal or unclear description of evaluation and measurement. | No description provided. |
| 7. Conclusion (5 marks) 7.1. Conclusion | Well-articulated conclusion summarizing project significance, BPMN analysis, and recommendations. | Good conclusion with minor issues in clarity or depth. | Adequate conclusion with some gaps or lack of depth. | Minimal or unclear conclusion. |
Note: * denotes 'Hurdle Assessment Item' that students must achieve at least 40% in this item to pass the unit.
To build on the achievements from Assessment 2, your group will deliver a final report and presentation that demonstrates your capability to achieve the project goals set out in your proposal. This report will present a suite of critical findings, strategic advice, and actionable measures for improving business processes. You will also address impacts on organizations and society where relevant. Each group member will complete a peer review report and a self-reflective report as individual submissions.
This assignment will culminate in a comprehensive final report and an oral presentation that encapsulate the findings and recommendations based on the previous assessments. Your work should reflect a practical application of business process analysis using BPMN, demonstrating your ability to enhance process efficiency and address broader organizational impacts.
| Assessment ID | Assessment Item | When due | Weighting | ULO# | CLO# for BITS |
| 3* | Project Report (Group) (2000 Words) | Session 12 | 30% | 1,2,3,4,5 | 1,2,3,4,5 |
| Presentation (Group) | Session 13 (Study Week) | 10% |
1.1. Executive Summary
Provide a brief overview of the project, including the selected business situation, main findings, and key recommendations. Ensure that the summary is concise and tailored for executive stakeholders.
1.2. Detailed Business Situation Analysis
1.3. BPMN-Based Analysis
1.4. Strategic Recommendations
1.5. Implementation and Evaluation Plan
1.6. References and Appendices
2.1. Presentation Content
2.2. Delivery and Engagement
Deliver the presentation confidently and professionally. Engage with the audience, handle questions effectively, and demonstrate teamwork in the presentation delivery.
3.1. Evaluation of Group Members
3.2. Reflection on Team Dynamics
4.1. Personal Contribution
4.2. Learning and Development
| Task Criteria | Beyond Expectations (4) | Meets Requirements (3) | Needs Improvement (2) | Does Not Meet Expectations (1) |
| 1.1 Executive Summary (5 marks) Conciseness and clarity | Provides a concise, comprehensive summary tailored for executive stakeholders. | Clear summary of findings and recommendations. | Summary is unclear or incomplete. | Missing, unclear, or ineffective summary. |
| 1.2 Detailed Business Situation Analysis (10 marks) Depth of analysis and integration | Thorough, insightful analysis with comprehensive integration of new data. | Detailed analysis with some integration of new data. | Analysis lacks depth or integration of new data. | Superficial analysis with missing key details. |
| 1.3 BPMN-Based Analysis (15 marks) Diagram detail and analysis | Highly detailed BPMN diagram with insightful analysis of inefficiencies. | Detailed BPMN diagram with clear analysis and recommendations. | Incomplete BPMN diagram or limited analysis. | Missing or unclear BPMN diagram with inadequate analysis. |
| 1.4 Strategic Recommendations (10 marks) Relevance and feasibility of recommendations | Comprehensive, actionable recommendations with clear strategic rationale. | Relevant recommendations with clear rationale. | Recommendations are somewhat relevant but lack detailed rationale. | Missing, irrelevant, or poorly justified recommendations. |
| 1.5 Implementation and Evaluation Plan (5 marks) Feasibility and planning | Detailed, feasible plan with clear resources, stakeholder strategies, and evaluation metrics. | Feasible plan with resource needs, stakeholder strategies, and evaluation metrics. | Incomplete plan with insufficient details on resources or evaluation. | Missing or inadequately addressed implementation plan. |
| 1.6 References and Appendices (5 marks) Completeness and organization | Comprehensive, well-organized references and appendices supporting the report. | Appropriate references and appendices supporting the report. | References and appendices are included but poorly organized. | Missing or inadequate references and appendices. |
| 2.1 Presentation Content (10 marks) Clarity and effectiveness | Highly engaging, well-organized presentation with excellent use of visuals and data. | Clear, organized presentation with effective use of visuals and data. | Somewhat organized but lacks clarity or effective use of visuals. | Disorganized, unclear, and ineffective use of visuals. |
| 2.2 Delivery and Engagement (10 marks) Confidence and audience engagement | Confident and professional delivery with strong audience engagement and excellent handling of questions. | Confident and professional delivery with good audience engagement. | Somewhat confident and professional but lacks effective engagement or handling of questions. | Unconfident or unprofessional delivery with poor engagement. |
| 3.1 Evaluation of Group Members (5 marks) Fairness and detail of evaluation | Detailed, fair, and constructive evaluation with clear justification. | Fair evaluation with adequate justification. | Lacks detail or justification; somewhat biased. | Missing, biased, or inadequate evaluation. |
| 3.2 Reflection on Team Dynamics (5 marks) Insight and discussion | Thorough reflection with detailed discussion of team dynamics, challenges, and solutions. | Clear reflection on team dynamics with discussion of challenges. | Superficial reflection lacking depth or detail. | Missing or inadequate reflection on team dynamics. |
| 4.1 Personal Contribution (5 marks) Detail and impact of personal contributions | Detailed description with significant examples and impact reflection. | Relevant description of contributions with examples. | Description is general or lacks detailed examples. | Missing or inadequately described personal contributions. |
| 4.2 Learning and Development (5 marks) Reflection on learning and future applications | Comprehensive reflection on learning with specific skills gained and future applications. | Clear reflection on learning and future applications. | General reflection on learning; lacks detail. | Missing or inadequate reflection on learning and development. |
Note: This report is provided as a sample for reference purposes only. For further guidance, detailed solutions, or personalized assignment support, please contact us directly.

Enhancing Operational Efficiency at FinTech Solutions Ltd. through Business Process Modeling and Intelligent Automation
FinTech Solutions Ltd. (FSL) is a large financial services organization offering banking, loan processing, digital payments, and customer support services. Despite its strong market presence, FSL is currently facing significant operational inefficiencies, including delays in customer service, redundant workflows, and ineffective data management practices.
These issues have resulted in reduced customer satisfaction, increased operational costs, and slower decision-making processes. In a highly competitive financial services environment, such inefficiencies can directly impact customer retention and organizational growth.
The purpose of this report is to analyze FSL’s existing business processes using Business Process Modeling (BPM) techniques, identify inefficiencies, and propose strategic improvements. Additionally, the report explores the application of modern technologies such as Robotic Process Automation (RPA), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and cloud computing to enhance operational efficiency and business performance.
FSL’s core processes include:
2.1 Process Mapping Overview
Using BPM techniques, the customer service process can be mapped as follows:
2.2 Identified Inefficiencies
1. Manual Data Entry
2. Lack of Process Integration
3. Bottlenecks in Approval Processes
4. Poor Customer Response Time
5. Redundant Processes
6. Inefficient Decision-Making
To address these inefficiencies, the following BPM-based improvements are proposed:
3.1 Process Automation
Introduce automated workflows for:
Justification:
3.2 Process Integration
Implement an integrated system connecting:
Benefits:
3.3 Process Redesign (Reengineering)
Redesign loan approval workflow:
Current:
Multiple manual approvals
Proposed:
Impact:
3.4 Customer Service Optimization
Benefits:
3.5 Data-Driven Decision Making
Impact:
4.1 Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
RPA can automate repetitive tasks such as:
Benefits:
4.2 Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning
AI can be used for:
Impact:
4.3 Cloud Computing
Migrating systems to the cloud enables:
Benefits:
4.4 Business Process Management Software (BPMS)
Using BPMS tools helps:
The analysis of FinTech Solutions Ltd. reveals several critical inefficiencies in its business processes, particularly in customer service, data handling, and decision-making workflows. These inefficiencies stem largely from manual operations, lack of system integration, and outdated technologies.
By implementing BPM-based improvements such as automation, process redesign, and system integration, FSL can significantly enhance operational efficiency. Furthermore, adopting modern technologies like RPA, AI, and cloud computing will enable the organization to reduce costs, improve service delivery, and gain a competitive advantage.
Overall, the proposed solutions will transform FSL into a more agile, efficient, and customer-centric organization.
[1] M. Dumas, M. La Rosa, J. Mendling, and H. A. Reijers, Fundamentals of Business Process Management, 2nd ed. Springer, 2018.
[2] Gartner, “Robotic Process Automation Market Guide,” 2023.
[3] IBM, “AI in Financial Services,” 2024.
[4] Oracle, “Cloud Computing Benefits,” 2023.
[5] Deloitte, “Digital Transformation in Banking,” 2024.
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.