| Assessment Description | Formal written project proposal. |
| Individual/Group | Individual. |
| Length | 1,000 words |
| Subject Learning Outcomes | a, b & d. |
| Week Due | Week 7 |
| Weighting | 20% |
| Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) | Allowed |
This assessment builds on the work you have undertaken in Assessment 1.
You are expected to take into consideration the feedback you received from Assessment 1 and then write a formal project proposal.
A project proposal at the higher education level is used to assess the quality and originality of your ideas, your understanding of the purpose of your project, and the ultimate feasibility of the project.
This assessment is worth 20% of the overall marks available for this subject.
This assessment requires you to build on the work you have undertaken in Assessment 1.
Building on your research to date, and analysis of the identified business issues you have discovered, you are required to develop a formal project proposal.
The formal project proposal should be a 1,000-word document that addresses key questions related to the business issues identified in Assessment 1. It will typically describe something you intend to produce to address the identified issues – this might be a report, a web site, a film, a book, a computer game or an event – there are many possibilities.
While the actual elements of a project proposal differ depending on the project itself, there are several key elements of a project proposal. Building on your project proposal poster work you should, at a minimum, consider the following:
Your project proposal will be used to assess the quality and originality of your ideas, your understanding of the purpose of your project, and the ultimate feasibility of the project.
This assessment should incorporate APA 7th referencing style. For support on how to reference see the AIHE Learning Support Hub on canvas for further information.
Use of Gen AI is Allowed:
This assessment allows the responsible and ethical use of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools to assist with preparation. However, students must ensure that their final submission represents their own critical thinking, analysis, and synthesis of information. Any content generated by GenAI must be carefully evaluated for accuracy, appropriately acknowledged, and properly referenced. Students are required to declare the use of GenAI within the assignment. Any submission that includes content created by unauthorised use of artificial intelligence tools is a breach of academic integrity.
Please refer to the attached rubric for marking criteria and standards of performance. Constructive feedback will be provided within a timely manner in accordance with AIHE Assessment Procedure.
This assessment is not redeemable unless otherwise specified.
Written submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Time limits for in-person or video presentations that exceed the allocated time limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded, and Lecturers may ask students to cease their presentation.
Students may be eligible for a variation to assessment arrangements when unexpected or extenuating circumstances impact on their performance or their ability to complete their assessment tasks by or on the specified date. Students must complete the Application to Vary Assessment with evidence.
Students with identified special or specific needs may apply for variations to assessment in the subject. Students are required to contact the Student Support Officer or Student Learning Advisor to discuss their specific needs.
An assessment task is late for submission when it is not submitted by the due date and time as indicated on Canvas, or by an agreed extension date and time as confirmed by the subject lecturer.
Late assessment tasks will be penalised at the rate of 5% of maximum possible marks, per calendar day (i.e. 24 hours or part thereof). After seven (7) calendar days, assignments will attract zero (0) marks. Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty.
For further detail see: AIHE Assessment Procedure.
Academic integrity is an essential quality for higher education and is a fundamental part of learning and teaching. AIHE is committed to promoting academic integrity and ethical behaviour. The reputation of AIHE and its graduates, and the academic standing of its qualifications rests with its ability to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct fairly and consistently.
All students must become familiar with, and understand the meaning and consequences of plagiarism, cheating in exams and tests, unauthorised use of artificial intelligence, collusion, contract cheating and other academic offences under the AIHE Academic Integrity Policy.
| CRITERIA | High Distinction Level (HD) 85 - 100 | Distinction Level (D) 75 - 84 | Credit Level (C) 65 - 74 | Pass Level (P) 50 - 64 | Fail Level (F) 0 - 49 |
| An introduction to the project proposal. (10 Marks) | The project proposal introduction presents the topic of the project in context, identifies the elements of the inquiry and indicates the purpose and structure of the project. | The project proposal introduction presents the topic of the project in context, identifies the elements of the inquiry and indicates the purpose and structure of the project. | The project proposal introduction covers all requirements to an acceptable level. | The project proposal introduction covers most requirements to an acceptable level. | The project proposal has no / incomplete introduction. |
| Background of the project. (10 Marks) | Covers all background information, provides context for the inquiry and the key business issue to be addressed plus identifies key theoretical perspectives. | The project proposal covers all background information, provides context for the inquiry and the key business issue to be addressed. | The project proposal covers all background information to an acceptable level. | The project proposal covers most background information to an acceptable level. | The project proposal has no / incomplete background information. |
| Objectives of the project. (20 Marks) | The project proposal provides clear information regarding all project objectives. Objectives are aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. Theoretical basis for the objectives is identified. | The project proposal provides clear information regarding all project objectives. Objectives are aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. | The project proposal provides clear information regarding all project objectives. | The project proposal provides some information regarding project objectives. | The project proposal has no / incomplete information regarding project objectives. |
| Project scope. (20 Marks) | The project scope is identified, all the composite parts (as per the assessment brief) are evident, and they are aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. Theoretical basis for the scope parameters are identified. | The project scope is identified, all the composite parts (as per the assessment brief) are evident, and they are aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. | The project scope is identified, and all the composite parts (as per the assessment brief) are evident. | The project scope is identified, and the majority of the composite parts (as per the assessment brief) are evident. | The project proposal does not identify or has an incomplete project scope. |
| Timeline. (10 Marks) | The project proposal includes a timeline and identifies key deliverables. Information is presented in a form that is informed by project management principles, and aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. | The project proposal includes a timeline and identifies key deliverables. Information is presented in a form that is informed by project management principles, and aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. | The project proposal includes a timeline and identifies key deliverables. Information is presented in a form that is informed by project management principles. | The project proposal includes a timeline and identifies key deliverables. | The project proposal does not include a timeline and / or fails to identify key deliverables. |
| Outcomes. (10 Marks) | The project proposal proposed outcomes that are informative and achievable. Information is presented in a form that is informed by project management principles, and aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. | The project proposal includes proposed outcomes that are informative and achievable. Information is presented in a form that is informed by project management principles, and aligned to the identified topic, elements of the inquiry and the purpose / structure of the project. | The project proposal includes proposed outcomes that are informative and achievable. Information is presented in a form that is informed by project management principles. | The project proposal includes some proposed outcomes. | The project proposal does not include proposed outcomes. |
| Conclusion. (10 Marks) | The project proposal conclusion provides an overview of the topic of the project in context, identifies the elements of the inquiry and indicates the purpose and structure of the project. Theory perspective is noted. | The project proposal conclusion provides an overview of the topic of the project in context, identifies the elements of the inquiry and indicates the purpose and structure of the project. | The project proposal conclusion covers all requirements to an acceptable level. | The project proposal conclusion covers most requirements to an acceptable level. | The project proposal has no / incomplete conclusion. |
| Format – is in the required format and is of the correct length. Grammar, punctuation and spelling are correct. (5 Marks) | The project proposal is in the required poster form. It is clear and accurate with few, if any, errors. Expression is engaging. The project proposal expresses thoughts with flair and attention to detail which exceeds expectations. | The project proposal is in the required poster form. It is clear and accurate with few, if any, errors. Expression is engaging. | The project proposal is in the required poster form and in the most part clear and accurate with few errors. | The project proposal is in the required poster form but contains several errors (such as writing / structure / flow of ideas) affecting communication of meaning. | The project proposal is not in the required poster form. It is difficult to understand, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. |
| Citation of sources – intext and reference list adhere to APA conventions. (5 Marks) | The project proposal cites sources thoroughly and with complete attention to detail. | The project proposal cites sources clearly and accurately. | The project proposal cites sources clearly and accurately in the most part. | The project proposal cites sources with some accuracy. | The project proposal contains no citations, or inaccurately cites sources. Reference list is inaccurate. |
| APPROVAL | NAME | DATE |
| Subject Developer | Dr Karen Grogan | 08/04/2021 |
| Original Approval (HoS/Academic Board) | HoS/Academic Board | 21/04/2021 |
| Approval (HoS) | HoS (Change to template approved through Teaching & Learning Committee) | 21/10/2024 |
| Latest Version Approval (HoS) | HoS (Change to template approved through Teaching & Learning Committee) | 03/03/2025 |
| VERSION # | KEY CHANGES | DATE |
| 1.0 | Original Development | 08/04/2021 |
| 1.1 | Update to new template | 17/11/2024 |
| 1.2 | Updated late submission details | 7/03/2025 |
| 1.3 | Updated the due date | 16/07/2025 |
| CURRENT UPDATED DOCUMENT LOCATION | ||
Note: This report is provided as a sample for reference purposes only. For further guidance, detailed solutions, or personalized assignment support, please contact us directly.
In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, businesses are increasingly challenged to capture and retain customer attention. This project proposal explores the development of an AI-driven digital marketing strategy aimed at improving customer engagement and conversion rates for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs). The project investigates how artificial intelligence tools can personalize customer experiences, optimize marketing campaigns, and drive business growth. The purpose of this proposal is to outline the background, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes of the project while ensuring its feasibility and practical relevance.
With the rise of digital platforms, customer behavior has shifted significantly, requiring businesses to adopt more innovative marketing strategies. Traditional marketing approaches often fail to deliver personalized experiences, leading to reduced engagement and lower return on investment (ROI).
Recent studies indicate that AI-powered marketing tools, such as chatbots, predictive analytics, and recommendation systems, can significantly enhance customer interactions. According to contemporary marketing theories, personalization and customer-centric strategies are key drivers of engagement and loyalty.
However, many SMEs lack the knowledge, resources, or structured approach to implement AI effectively. This creates a gap between technological potential and practical application. The project addresses this gap by developing a structured AI-driven marketing framework tailored for SMEs.
The theoretical foundation of this project is based on:
These frameworks support the integration of AI into marketing strategies to improve efficiency and customer satisfaction.
The primary aim of this project is to design and evaluate an AI-driven digital marketing strategy for SMEs. The specific objectives include:
These objectives align with the overall goal of improving business performance through innovative and data-driven approaches.
This project focuses specifically on SMEs operating in the retail and service sectors. The scope includes:
The project will be conducted in clearly defined stages, ensuring it remains achievable within the given timeframe. By narrowing the scope, the project maintains focus and delivers practical outcomes.
This project adopts a mixed-method approach combining both qualitative and quantitative research.
The project will follow project management principles such as Agile methodology to ensure flexibility and continuous improvement.
The project will be completed over a 7-week period:
| Week | Activity |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Review feedback from Assessment 1 & finalize topic |
| Week 2 | Conduct literature review |
| Week 3 | Collect primary data (surveys/interviews) |
| Week 4 | Analyze data and identify key insights |
| Week 5 | Develop AI-driven marketing framework |
| Week 6 | Evaluate framework and refine strategy |
| Week 7 | Final report submission |
Key deliverables include research findings, framework design, and final recommendations.
The expected outcomes of this project are:
The project aims to deliver measurable improvements in customer interaction and business performance, making it highly relevant in today’s competitive environment.
This project proposal presents a structured plan to explore the integration of AI in digital marketing for SMEs. By addressing existing challenges and leveraging modern technologies, the project aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice. The proposed methodology, timeline, and scope ensure that the project is both feasible and impactful. Ultimately, this project contributes to the growing field of digital transformation and provides valuable insights for businesses seeking to enhance customer engagement.
Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital marketing (7th ed.). Pearson.
Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., & Setiawan, I. (2021). Marketing 5.0: Technology for humanity. Wiley.
Ngai, E. W. T., Xiu, L., & Chau, D. C. K. (2009). Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2592–2602.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Get original papers written according to your instructions and save time for what matters most.